/lit/ - Literature

>>14343908
The coomer utopia.

You are a slave to your base desires.

>>14343908
>Don't necessarily have any qualms about being somewhat subordinate to a strong, male virtue oriented female in a relationship
>Women are exclusively hypergamous
Back to lifting.

>>14343908
Unless you are Chad/Tyrone, you would be put to demeaning, tiresome menial work just like women and immigrants are today.

>>14343908
I don't believe it. I just straight up do not believe that there is a society where half the damn population (the stronger half) don't work. That makes no sense. Why would the women even want that? They want to do all the damn work? Why? Are the men small and weak or something?
This shit is retarded and sounds like some sociologist made some shit up to push "women are strong" and that "Matriarchal societies exist where the women have the western traditional masculine role and the men are the traditional feminine role!"
I just do not believe given our species' dimorphism and hormones and such that this is real.

>>14343928
Matriarchies exist, it's just that the male essentially allow themselves to be slaves and they're incredibly weak societies.
Any society that didn't treat men like meat-grinder cloggers and it's women as breeding stock were destroyed by societies that did.

>>14343941
Why would males allow themselves to be slaves?
I honestly dont see any way for matriarchies to exist in the modern world unless we become a bonobo like free sex everyone gets laid shit. The incels, and to be honest men in general, will simply never allow it to happen otherwise.

>>14343953
Conditioning.

>>14343928
>>14343941
>>14343953
Men still work in matriarchies, the enforcers are still men it's just that the enforcers voluntarily enforce the will of visionless old women. The West as it stands is hurtling towards this. The police will always be overwhelmingly male but they'll go about enforcing whatever it is they're told to even if they don't agree with it.

>>14343953
Sounds like its time for a genocide.

>>14343962
I couldn't believe that the US have a law that in a domestic dispute the police always have to arrest the guy. I get that the woman is in more danger usually, but a)we have weapons and b)the potential for abuse of such a law is absurd.

>>14344033
Women aren't moral agents so this makes sense.

>>14344019
what?

>>14344033
Handcuffing is not arresting, but it is bullshit. The even more bullshit bit is how if the cop doesn't know who to believe, policy is to remove the man and let the detectives/courts get to the bottom of it. What makes this bullshit is that being arrested for domestic violence (not convicted, arrested on the suspicion of) abrogates your legal rights in many instances.

That's why the most common domestic violence is women slapping men trying to bait them into fighting back, they know all they have to do to fuck him over is get him to respond.

>>14343908
*blocks your path*

>>14343908
Matriarchs don't exist and never existed. it's just egalitarianism.

>>14343908
Matriarchies aren't like that at all. Men still do everything like always.

>>14343908
>zero data provided
Most CEOs are men
Men still make more money
Men work in the most dangerous jobs
Go away with your strawman argument

>>14343908
Recently had a conversation with a female friend of mine. I realized the futility of trying to actually argue with her and instead began goading her to see how pissed off she could get. I thought she'd slap me (to my benefit unbeknownst to her) when I finally peaked at:
>We allow you to work, give you busywork to keep you quiet in jobs that men could easily do. In the end, if all women quit their jobs tomorrow, there would be no collapse, no downfall of the economy, yet if men would quit their jobs tomorrow everything would collapse.