[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 195 KB, 1420x1080, _20200208_155019.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14719324 No.14719324 [Reply] [Original]

Psychology, psychoanalysis, whatever. I've always felt like it's the poor man's philosophy, but I still have the silly desire to read people. It would also probably be useful for Deleuze, and more wacky Reich.

>> No.14719335 [DELETED] 

>>14719324
Introduction to Psychology by Sigmund "Fuck your mother" Freud

>> No.14719364

brainlets don't know the difference between psychoanalysis and psychology and will blindly share quotes from either on facebook
midwits think freud was a sexist pervert who said everyone wants to fuck their mom
patricians understand the respectably self-consistent psychological models the movement consistently developed and refined, and acknowledging the number of psychoanalytic concepts that have been elevated to the level of psychological fact, while simultaneously understanding the harsh limitations on their methodologies and the seriously compelling critiques against their theories

>> No.14719468

>>14719324
look at that dead eyed idiot

>> No.14719482

Reich and Deleuze are both incoherent frauds, don't even bother reading psychoanalysis if that is your goal

>> No.14719501
File: 8 KB, 240x240, TsjuEUN-_400x400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14719501

>>14719324
hold on is that nick mullen from the podcast cumtown???

>> No.14719502

>>14719324
>Psychology, psychoanalysis, whatever
>poor man's philosophy
>I still have the silly desire to read people
>It would also probably be useful for Deleuze
You could just be the most retarded OP on /lit/, the board of retards

>> No.14719510

>>14719364
Freud never allowed himself to be psychoanalyzed. That speaks volumes to me.

>> No.14719517

>>14719324
>psychoanalysis
>the poor man's philosophy

I'm sorry man but seriously just no. I don't even need to argue here because if you read literally anything on that topic, you'll figure yourself that your statement is false.

>> No.14719529

>>14719517
as a proctologist, i've never been subject to a rectal exam
does my practice suffer for this?

>> No.14719541

>>14719510
he analyzed himself at the beginning. the requirement that all analysts be analyzed themselves did not significantly take hold until Freud had mostly lost interest in clinical work and was an old fucking man who'd rather write about religion.

>> No.14719546

>>14719529
>>14719517
meant for >>14719510

>> No.14719576

>>14719324
It's more like religion then philosophy. Talking to people who are into psychoanalysis is very similar to talking to people in a cult. None of it can be verified and any questioning of the methods is met with hostility. Members report greater psychological wellbeing in a way similar to people who get into a religion as well.

>> No.14719588
File: 65 KB, 922x652, IMG_20200126_174530.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14719588

you don't

>> No.14719616

>>14719576
>it's like a cult
Well, yeah.
Because most members are women just like cults.

>> No.14719626

>>14719364
>psychological fact
bro... holy yikes-ing cringeballs

>> No.14719944

>>14719626
No, elevated to the level thereof by psychologists themselves
There is of course no such thing as psychological fact

>> No.14720091

>>14719576
>people who are into psychoanalysis
retards on /lit/ and woke W&GS undergrads on twitter don't count for shit when it comes to psychoanalysis, you know this yes?

>> No.14720155

>>14719324
Read Peter Gay's Freud Reader and Freud Biography. Supplement with William James and Alfred Adler. Dive into Jung if new age or proceed to Lacan if postmodernist.

>> No.14720387

>>14719324
learn typology

>> No.14720395

>>14719324
what if there was a pokemon but it's just a set of keys

>> No.14720404
File: 26 KB, 300x423, md12066478402.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14720404

>>14719324

>> No.14720588
File: 70 KB, 700x466, lacan-cigar.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14720588

>>14719324
If you have a basic understanding of Freud I recommend getting into Lacan.
Looking Awry by Slavoj Zizek is the best way imo. He makes it very entertaining by referring to popular culture (like books and cinema) to explain many of Lacans main ideas.

>> No.14720604

>>14719364
> who said everyone wants to fuck their mom
but he did say so, and he is rightfully doing so. Negating the Oedipus Complex is negating a fundamental truth

>> No.14720833

>>14719324
https://discord.gg/hCjX58e

>> No.14720943

>>14720604
The Oedipus complex is a much more subtle notion than "you want to fuck your mom"

>> No.14721006

>>14720943
It is a desire that is very difficult to articulate in everyday life, because of social norms we have to repress it (basically in psychoanalysis this social norm pressure is the superego). I am not ashamed to admit that my mothers often appears with sexual connotations.
I really dont know how to explain this dreams, that I and many other people with healthy relationships with their mom have, without using the Psychoanalytical framework.
Anyway, the correct casual way to explain the Oedipus complex would be "Deep down, you want to fuck your mom"

>> No.14721878

>>14719364
Freud snorted coke read oedipus Rex, and masturbated some nonsense in between, a true Jewish snake

>> No.14722001
File: 18 KB, 500x390, images (47).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14722001

>>14720588
Yeah
>>14719588
Yea
>>14719324

>> No.14723090

>>14720604
Freud tried desperately to fit Hamlet into the complex, and failed miserably. Deleuze talks again about Freud’s continual failure to actually apply his ideas in One or Several Wolves.

>> No.14723280
File: 52 KB, 750x125, 1D18C278-F638-4C5C-A90B-204049E85A75.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14723280

>> No.14723287

>>14719529
It's different, they are using their brains to tackle other brains
Unless you are using your own ass to inspect your patients

>> No.14724468

>>14719364
Is it possible to learn this power?

>inb4 not from a conductist