[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 108 KB, 478x600, restricted.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15594004 No.15594004 [Reply] [Original]

I notice you condemn women for having a lot of sex. I agree it's reprehensible but a lot of the pictures I see here means you guys have porn habits suggesting you would be a lot worse if you could have sex easily. I'm not trying to defend it but it's weird you don't have empathy. Read some Willa Cather or Edith Wharton sometime

>> No.15594127

>>15594004
I don't condemn women for having tons of sex. Harlots existed since the dawn of time, I condemn the culture that celebrates it.

>> No.15594638

>>15594004
simp

>> No.15594700

>>15594004
>you guys have porn habits suggesting you would be a lot worse if you could have sex easily
assuming you're pointing to the frequency and not the fetish, this is a good OP

>> No.15594756

>>15594127
based.
>>15594004
If I had more access to sex, Id actually have less sex considering the scarcity of pussy would no longer be strong and driving libidinal force. That, and the ability to have lore sex means an equal correlation to the amount of girls I might filter through, better achieving a suitable made whom I would more than likely settle down with in lieu of the ability to copulate with strange whores.

>> No.15594760

>>15594004

>I notice
>I agree
>it's weird that

Fuck off hole

>> No.15594795

>>15594127
Well you're part of it! When you post these sorts of disgusting pictures and use porn you are celebrating it

>>15594700
Fetish?

>> No.15594811

>>15594004
Diseases, bro. That is the main problem.

>> No.15594919

>>15594004
Alright lads, stop me if you've heard this one.

Which would you rather have: a key that opens a lot of locks, or a lock that's opened by a lot of keys?

>> No.15595028

>>15594919
I understand the analogy but the women you complain about are not interested in a relationship with you, so, uh, how is that relevant? We're talking about your hatred of women, not rejecting their advances--which you probably wouldn't, but I think it's admirable if you would.

>> No.15595059

>>15594795
>Fetish?
As in the weirdness and horniness aren't the same thing. Men jacking off ten times a day would prove your point, men jacking off to something weird once a month would not. Not that I think having lots of sex is in principle reprehensible, but people can do more than they want to. It's an agreeable OP at least as it appeals to habitual addiction.

>> No.15595069

>>15594919
People aren't solely their dicks and pussies. There are other things attached to them, while pussy is important it is a secondary matter.

>> No.15595076

>>15594919
>and the dick is the key cause it's pointy

>> No.15595101

>>15594004
>you guys have porn habits suggesting you would be a lot worse
yeah sure

>> No.15595143

>>15595028
Hatred? Quite the contrary. To the human race, women are worth more than men. It takes a women 9 months of staying alive to contribute to the continuation of the human race. The same thing can take a man about 10 minutes. It only stands to reason that, if female sexual acts are "worth" more (and male sexual acts are thus "worth" less), that an uneven societal pressure towards sexes would result.

You're talking "hate" and shit. Bullcrap. It's pure supply and demand.

>> No.15595192

>>15595143
>To the human race, women are worth more than men. It takes a women 9 months of staying alive to contribute to the continuation of the human race. The same thing can take a man about 10 minutes.
You're saying a man can do what takes a woman nine months, in ten minutes? That doesn't sound right anon.

>> No.15595253

>>15595192
Sex lasts an average of about 10 minutes. A guy knocks a chick up, and he's done. He doesn't HAVE to do anything else. The lady, meanwhile, has to carry a child until birth.
9 months vs. 10 minutes.

Fuck's sake anon, didn't your parent's have "the talk" with you?

>> No.15595261

>>15595253
This was before birth control, anon. Nowadays people can enjoy it and whatever.

>> No.15595263

>>15595253
>can't take a ten minute pregnancy joke
But seriously, what you're describing in your post is not how female acts are worth more to society, but how they cost more of the woman. Which is a bit of an unfair societal pressure, right?

>> No.15595359

>>15595069
Your right, because people have assholes as well as dicks and pussies.

>> No.15595383

>>15595359
Seriously, anon. That is why there are so many people divorcing.

>> No.15595403

>>15595359
Pussies don't like dicks, because pussies get fucked by dicks. But dicks also fuck assholes — assholes who just want to shit on everything. Pussies may think they can deal with assholes their way. But the only thing that can fuck an asshole is a dick, with some balls. The problem with dicks is that sometimes they fuck too much or fuck when it isn't appropriate — and it takes a pussy to show them that. But sometimes, pussies get so full of shit that they become assholes themselves... because pussies are only an inch and a half away from assholes. I don't know much in this crazy, crazy world, but I do know that if you don't let us fuck this asshole, we're going to have our dicks and pussies all covered in shit!

>> No.15595428

>>15595263
The higher cost to the woman is exactly WHY the act is worth more to society. This should be painfully obvious.

>> No.15595456

>>15594004
the problem is not them having sex. problem is that in their safe space they have autistic view of life, and corrupted values. it is like house pet cats despise stray cats calling them losers, incels, etc. not understanding that they themselves are someones propery (parents), that their comfort is sponsored, and they gonna hit the wall hard. yet they act as attention whores. not power itself, attention is what corrupts heart and soul. celebrities end up very stupid, delusional, clowns.

>> No.15595470

>>15594004
>I notice you condemn women for having a lot of sex. I agree it's reprehensible
>having a lot of sex
>reprehensible
First premise is wrong, argument discarded. Heh, better luck next time kid.

>> No.15595476
File: 125 KB, 793x776, 1590992739373.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15595476

I'm currently writing a letter to Hiro insisting that every board on 4channel ban the posting of pictures of women in any capacity. I suggest you do the same.
Mashallah.

>> No.15595485

>>15595456
Women naturally want positive male attention and will behave in a way that attracts it. If you are watching porn or posting these pictures you prove my point. Attention is lavished on women for acting like that. Just show so, you know, discretion. Maybe a little modesty yourself? Women actually like modest guys too, you know

>> No.15595492

>>15595456
No the problem is that all conservative views on sex are false and based on superstitions. Even if most of them weren't losers they would still be wrong.

>> No.15595501

>>15595485
Not any more than males want positive female attention.

>> No.15595502

>>15595476
that would be nice. If I were hitler I would find all those who post models or girls on non porn/lgbt boards and gas them, turning their bodies into bioreactor fuel. I bet GDP/capita would grow.

>> No.15595510

>>15595492
tell that to muslims.

>> No.15595511

>>15595501
Yes, anon, much more. Women might not say it but however much attention you give they want 10x that much. Take whatever time you can to spend with your gf and care about what bothers her or what she might want, bother to think! Trust me, nothing is as valuable to a girl as attention

>> No.15595523
File: 887 KB, 910x587, B0C8EADF-E007-4197-A49E-59748D4FBDB2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15595523

>>15595485
>Women naturally want positive male attention
And most women tend to act like drunk baboons because the average male psyche has been prettified to a very small fragment of what it was once capable of being and their ability to separate behavior worth praising against shunning is stunted to the point that anything more than an eye-roll and a shrug is enough for the outer party to engage in an all out siege of flattering affects which all but renders the possibility of the female party
to relish in the idea that she deserves anything but a drooling, pandering fool as the basis of value.

>> No.15595526

>>15595492
Kinda, but they have their point. There are diseases and people are stupid enough to catch and spread them.

I seriously don't know if this is the rule or something, but what really scares me of having sex with other people is how they don't care about condoms. It is borderline ridiculous. I had a girl ask me to not use one, and it is so f hard to say no, if she just kept her mouth f shut, I would have put it on. Saw some of my sisters log history and she thought some similar bs, like why use a condom. And they were educated, it is not like that ex and my sisters were fucking illiterate.

Anyway, I don't trust myself near women when it comes to sex. They are retarded, men are stupid as fuck too. Slept with a guy once and he also wouldn't use.

>> No.15595533
File: 517 KB, 850x1183, Innocent and tasteful anime picture.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15595533

>>15594004
If I could have sex easily I wouldn't use porn retard

>> No.15595532

>>15595511
true. men play with reality, science, arts, sport, computer games, slot machines. women are also source of dopamine. but women cannot compete with men, for women children and kittens are "slot machines".

>> No.15595546

>>15595510
If you mean conservative Muslims, sure.

>> No.15595547

>>15594004
must read
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Manipulated_Man

>> No.15595552

>>15595511
Is this the famous redpill a priori anthropology I head so much about

>> No.15595564

I can have sex easily enough, what I want is a society which elevates relationships, courtship, intimacy, etc.
Dating in a world where every man can be replaced in ten minutes by a fitter wealthier guy with a bigger dick through tinder is not conductive to the flourishing of the soul or good relationships. In a world where one night stands are the norm, the normal rituals of dating feel almost insulting.
If I could ban pornography as well I would. People are social animals, and virtue is a group effort. Simply blaming the losers of society for their alienation is cruel

>> No.15595570

>>15595526
>Kinda, but they have their point. There are diseases and people are stupid enough to catch and spread them.
If that was true they would push for sex ed instead of being vehemently opposed to it. It's not about pragmatic concerns, they just buy into old fogy views about sex being teleologically predisposed for reproduction etc.

>> No.15595578

>>15595428
No anon, it's not. You're confusing supply and demand for eachother due to only ever using the words in tandem. These acts make the same thing. Society has the same demand for each, as in a demand curve. It's just the same line. Where this line intersects with women's willingness supply will be higher than where it intersects with men's, not because society's demand curve is different, but because women's supply curve is, because supplying costs them more. That is fundementally different from what you're saying, which instead suggests this is all just society "liking women more" and having a greater demand for them.

>> No.15595591

>>15595578
>supplying costs them more
If this where true, why does marriage usually kill a woman's sex drive?

>> No.15595600

>>15595570
Yes, but those are traditions. They helped us not get all f sick and thrive as a society throughout time. They are not government policies that you can just change. And there are scriptures too, religion is dogmatic. What I'm telling you is that even in modern times that dogma makes sense. People are still uneducated about those things.

>> No.15595613

>>15595591
Because it often leads to pregnancy? Because they're more likely to be old by then? What is your point?

>> No.15595615

>>15595578
Seriously, anon. I thought that this was possible, but considering what I saw out there. It seems madness.

>> No.15595627

>>15595600
No it doesn't make any sense, if people are uneducated about sex what we need to do is educate them, not hearing to priests tell stories about the sanctity of sex. There are actual dangers about sex, demonic corruption isn't one of them.

>> No.15595636

>>15595591
>if women are less inclined to supply sex, then why do they have lower sex drives?
what did he mean by this

>> No.15595637

This thread is a part of the devilish plan to convert /lit/ into /pol/, /b/ or /r9k/.

Here is the tactics the devotees use: write the kind of a post that belongs to the boards named above, add slightly relevant notion of a book, congratulations! you've created a useless post.

>> No.15595641

>>15595637
I wonder if a blueboard equivalent of any one of those would solve the issue

>> No.15595651

ITT a load of economically immature anons and femanons

>> No.15595660

>>15595627
>There are actual dangers about sex, demonic corruption isn't one of them.
Wrong

>> No.15595661

>>15595660
right on dude

>> No.15595666

>>15595660
check these trips

>> No.15595677

>>15595627
This doesn't work as well as some kind of psychological distress, my ex and my sister had this kind of thing at school, anon. Bear in mind that this isn't the natural way of doing things, we didn't evolved to stop mid preliminaries put a condom and continue. It is hard, I had sex before and if someone asks you to just skip it hardly one would say no. Specially, if you are a men. Maybe telling people that can be a good start, but the way it is currently being done definitely isn't working.

>> No.15595678

>>15595578
>willingness supply
willingness to supply

>> No.15595688

>>15595637
plenty of other useless threads.

>> No.15595690

>>15595533
This is the most wild myth out there. Most people that consume porn have sex, and you will continue consuming porn after having sex. Because sex is incomparably worse to porn. Even if you hired a prostitute and painstakingly instructed her for days on how to make your fantasy come true, it won't compare to your imagination.

>> No.15595708

>>15594004
Promiscuity is a behavior rooted in genetics. No use blaming r selected promiscuous women, they tend to outbreed their human counterparts. We just need to use eugenics to reverse the gradual displacement of k selected brought on by modernity. Essentially, you shouldn’t be mad at promiscuous women, but you must exterminate them.

>> No.15595712

>>15595690
It is not, who have you been having sex with? There is no touch, no feeling, no care. Porn work mainly as stimulation, but doesn't replace sex.

>> No.15595763

>>15595666
The power of Christ compels you!

>> No.15595768

>>15595690
From my experience, sex feels better and is more fun than porn. Sure, you can get things out of porn that sex has a harder time providing, especially if you have certain fetishes, but it's not the same

>> No.15595803

>>15595690
sex and porn>sex>porn

>>15595708
go talk to some real people, it'd do you good

>> No.15595881

>>15595803
I have a full time job and have to interact with people every day. Stop your projecting, neet. I think it’s very obvious that the industrial revolution and ensuing population explosion that created nine billion extra people for the planet to sustain by the beginning of the twenty first century has primarily benefited those with r selected behaviors. Hence why people are so sexually unsanitary these days.

>> No.15595946

>>15595677
We didn't evolve for using computers either, it's just a matter of education. I don't know why you feel the need to do this odd ad hoc justification of conservatism.

>> No.15596002

>>15595946
Not saying that, just that the way it is currently definitely isn't enough. I don't know about the SOTA situation because I finished school quite some time ago. But I definitely don't trust anyone of my generation, most of them are fucking stupid.

>> No.15596052

>>15595690
The one time in my life I was having consistent sex my porn consumption and fapping dropped dramatically. Like to once or twice a month.

>> No.15596222

>>15594127
Based pragmatic Cato

>> No.15596234

>>15594004
Have you considered that since it's an anonymous board, you have no idea who is posting which pictures? Maybe lit isn't monolithic in its beliefs.
Also
>A thread died for this shit

>> No.15597055

>>15594004
>you would be a lot worse
projecting