/lit/ - Literature

>The Revolution Betrayed
Cringe!

>>16509152
>chud
Sage

>>16509161
>>chud
>Sage

>>16509152
>only books from the /lit/ Greek infographic, because I start from the beginning, then read from the top to understand their developments, and then I continue the loop forever.

>>16509160
It's not a bad book, it highlights a lot of great achievements of the USSR as well as its mistakes.

>>16509183
Still gets more puzzy than you

Evola, who unironically probably is the intellectual forerunner of /pol/.

>>16509152
>chud
Still no one has told me what this means. All I know is it comes from chapo redditors

>>16509152
Lefty/pol/ is just as cancerous and annoying as /pol/, they both have an insufferable hivemind mentality and they have severely degraded the quality of this site.

>>16509258
Guenon is also the modern forerunner of Pakistani/Iranian Islamism. Both the Iranian revolution and Zia's Islamisation were engineered by his followers. Read the wiki page on traditionalism for source

>>16509258
ah yes, of course

>>16509152
All that theory and your system still shits itself every time lel

>>16509152
The collected works from the siglo de oro

>>16509275
>feels>reals
this but unironically

Why can't leftism ever get to "Ought"

>>16509275
Feels are unironically the only thing that is real, read Descartes. Materalism cannot be valid because as far as we are concerned physical objects basically doesn't exist, but our feelings about it shape the way it exists to us

>>16509152
>chud they really are pushing this word huh? feel bad for the native good lefties here on /lit/, retards will think theyare these retards. sad.

probably the greeks, Cicero, schopenhaur, heidegger, also hegel (if not more), Hobbes, neitzche, schopenhaur, also won, that german economist guy, and depending on their strain (pagan, christian, agnostic/athiest, indic, etc) others like aquinus, different popes, guenon, etc.

but you dont actually want to discuss liturature here, do you op?

>>16509152
What if I’m a “chud” who likes Debord and Gramsci?

>>16509293
>>16509304
pure idealism
>History is not like some individual person, which uses men to achieve its ends. History is nothing but the actions of men in pursuit of their ends.
-Marx
>In the second place, however, history is made in such a way that the final result always arises from conflicts between many individual wills, of which each in turn has been made what it is by a host of particular conditions of life. Thus there are innumerable intersecting forces, an infinite series of parallelograms of forces which give rise to one resultant — the historical event. This may again itself be viewed as the product of a power which works as a whole unconsciously and without volition. For what each individual wills is obstructed by everyone else, and what emerges is something that no one willed. Thus history has proceeded hitherto in the manner of a natural process and is essentially subject to the same laws of motion. But from the fact that the wills of individuals — each of whom desires what he is impelled to by his physical constitution and external, in the last resort economic, circumstances (either his own personal circumstances or those of society in general) — do not attain what they want, but are merged into an aggregate mean, a common resultant, it must not be concluded that they are equal to zero. On the contrary, each contributes to the resultant and is to this extent included in it.
-Engels
>Philosophical idealism is only nonsense from the standpoint of crude, simple, metaphysical materialism. From the standpoint of dialectical materialism, on the other hand, philosophical idealism is a one-sided, exaggerated, development (inflation, distension) of one of the features, aspects, facets of knowledge, into an absolute, divorced from matter, from nature, apotheosised.
-lenin
>Let us not forget that revolutions are accomplished through people, although they be nameless. Materialism does not ignore the feeling, thinking, and acting man, but explains him.
-Trotsky

I find it kind of funny that /pol/fags blew out your board so hard you have to shill on /lit/ now.
Uncanny how close the chudjack looks to leftist newcasters too.

>>16509397
Yeah, /pol/ sure showed them by spamming gore, bestiality and cp. Fuck those degenerate faggots on /leftypol/

>>16509385
>Muh class
Far more people are willing to die for ideals and their group than for class interests explicitly which everyone knows. Marxists say that nationalist and religious conflicts are driven by materialism implicitly , but I'd argue differently . Even communist uprisings and ideological wars are more to do with race, religion and culture than materialism, which is just a cloak for those interests. Marxism takes different forms in different countries, but they are almost always cultural and ethnic groups which drive it rather than the proletariat at a whole. I like SJWs more than class reductionists because they are more honest, class reductionists are just lying. Very few people implicitly or explicitly give a shit about class.

>>16509385
The only thing you can be sure is real are your feels. Can leftoids do anything besides post memes and dogma or are you all this embarassing?

>>16509460
>being a solipsist in 2020

>>16509460
>The only thing you can be sure is real are your feels.
Based