/lit/ - Literature

>>1657887

touch her boobs

I think she's probably got an interesting story, one way or another.

I do nothing. I'm too scared to talk to girls. I'll fantasize about kissing her tonight as I fall asleep.

Congratulate her for having a vested interest in history.

It's illegal in France, so I'd blackmail her and therefore get pussy.

Afterwards, I'd denounce her just for lulz.

nazi punks fuck off

I'm Jewish, and I've read Mein Kamph.

There's nothing wrong with reading it. I'd probably ask her what she thought of it.

>>1657898
WHY is it illegal to read Mein Kampf in France? How ridiculous.

>>1657901
You think that excuses what Israel is doing to the Palestinians?

Pull out The Communist Manifesto and glare at her across the train.

>>1657909
I'd pull out the Little Red Book

>>1657905

It's illegal to have it, sell it, or buy it, and therefore read it.

French guilt = White guilt x 10000000

We feel guilty for everything that ever happened. More than so than the Germans for the Holocaust.

>>1657908
Do you think that excuses what the Palestinians are doing to the Israelis?

>>1657912
Cheese eating surrender monkeys...

>>1657912

yall don't seem to feel too guilty about fucking with the gypsies

>>1657913
You mean having their homeland taken away and being killed for manufacturing fireworks?

the book is funny . i do nothing unless i am drunk and have a circle of friends for retreat. otherwise i raise this evocative scene in the chapter on race and folk.
>>1657901
>I'm Jewish, and I've read Mein Kamph.
not creepy at all. we have fascists of our own. to me this book's a good measure of the human standing before me. if the person panics with some excuse on how hitler was stupid, there's something to hide. it is presumably an arisateur.

>>1657918
Holocaust went after the gypsies too.

>>1657919
haha! it would be lulzy to discuss it in terms of Hitler's Bodenpolitik.

>>1657919
That land that was given to them by the Romans, after the Romans crucified and kicked out the Jews from their homeland?

That piece of land? K.

>>1657918

Of course we do. 70% of the population would have them benefit from subsidies while shoplifting anything on their path until the end of time.

>>1657915

Most successful military nation in the history of mankind cheese eating surrender monkeys, I would prefer.

Mein Kampf is not banned in France.

>>1657928
Now lets universalize that land policy for everyone. Oh, wait, let's not do that cuz it's fucking stupid.

>>1657929
>Most successful military nation in the history of mankind
That's not what Napoleon said to Nelson...

>>1657932
You're right, lets just give it to the Palestinians because the hipsters and terrorists say so.

Much less stupid.

>>1657929
>Most successful military nation in the history of mankind
>France

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat

>>1657934

dumb old hipsters recognizing that israel is perpetrating a methodical ethnic cleansing

>>1657934
>You're right, lets just give it to the Palestinians because the hipsters and terrorists say so.
>lets just give it to the Palestinians
It was theirs in the first place!

>>1657919
There is this gif that shows the decreasing Muslim population compared to the increasing Jewish population in Israel over the 20th century, does anyone have it?

>>1657928
>That land that was given to them by the Romans, after the Romans crucified and kicked out the Jews from their homeland?
Or that land that was taken away from Kanaanites after killing them all. ^^

>>1657933
>>1657936

France is the biggest country in Europe. To do so, it won the most wars.

Also, England is a French colony.

>>1657938
You do realize that the land was called "Palestine", after the Romans took it?

If the Canadian government took my house and gave it to you, and then the US gov't came in and gave it back to me, would you scream and cry and tell me to give you your house back?

>>1657946
Normans were only French speaking, not French. Their territory was also never as big as the Celts', which spanned across all of Europe.

>>1657950

French speaking = French

France has always followed the jus soli doctrine, not jus sanguini like the Germans;

>>1657946
>France is the biggest country in Europe

>>1657954

Russia doesn't count. It's an empire on its own.

>>1657946
lol no.
remember agincourt, crecee, world war one, world war 2 and the napolionic wars. just a small number of frances numerous epic fails

>>1657958
>Russia
>In Europe
>Doesn't count

K.

>>1657947
>If the Canadian government took my house and gave it to you
how would you react? how do you expect a disinherited refugee to react?

>>1657959

Agincourt ? Won the war.

World wars ? Won both.

Napoleonic wars ? Won half a dozen of them.

Creece ? Does not exist.

>>1657947
I think you'll find that the territory was Philistia, and that Palestine was merely the Roman name for it. The idea that it is/was Israel is a highly contentious point based on incredibly shakey propaganda.

>>1657960

Russia has a unique status bro.

>>1657963
>World wars ? Won both.
No, you changed to the losing side halfway through.

I think she's taking a course at any of the many universities in the area.

>>1657909
>>1657909
>>1657909

Lol'd

>>1657967

Sorry, but we won both, and got to occupy part of Germany. Don't be mad.

>>1657962
I would expect them to realise that two wrong don't make a right.

I.E- the situation is entirely fucked up. But completely reversing everything for the sake of a population half the size of the one being displaced is not a viable option.

>>1657973
Why did the allies have to invade France again?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normandy_landings

>>1657953
>France has always followed the jus soli doctrine, not jus sanguini like the Germans;
Everybody did in the middle ages.
Now no one does except perhaps the Islamic Republic of Iran.
by the sound of it you must be American. Along with Brazil and New Zeal your country kept the Jus Solis for the by far the longest time. Time to revert?

>>1657964
>is/was Israel is a highly contentious point based on incredibly shakey propaganda.

So I take it archeological evidence is propaganda now?

>>1657977

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Kursk

Because the third Reich was already defeated and the Marines could have vacations on the beach, unharmed.

>>1657982
The conclusions the Zionist government draw from the "archaeological evidence" is, yeah. That's a no-brainer.

>>1657953
I suppose you think that Mexicans are Spanish, and therefore European? or that Brazilians are Portuguese? or that Jamaicans are English? or for that matter, Chinese who have learned English and speak it are English themselves?

Your logic = full retard

>>1657978

Wat?

>>1657982

"surely this fragment of pottery gives me an absolute right to displace hundreds of thousands of people from their homeland" - an israeli

>>1657988

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Renan#Definition_of_nationhood

Take your insults to him, not me. He defined the nationality doctrine.

>>1657986

You are delusional. I mean that politely.

>>1657995
>You are delusional. I mean that politely.
You keep telling yourself that. I'll keep thinking displacing and killing people are bad things.

>>1657990
"surely this fragment of pottery gives me absolute right to destroy a country that constantly offers to accept us, and displace a population twice our size." - a Palestinian

>>1657974
>I would expect them to realise that two wrong don't make a right.
Write that to shimon peres perhaps the wrongs will cease.
>I.E- the situation is entirely fucked up. But completely reversing everything for the sake of a population half the size of the one being displaced is not a viable option.
If you are the squatter the rule of law is not "viable", of course. But I don't think you are actually israeli. You seem a lot more like an American Jew to me because bigotry and national prejudice is still rampant in the USA. What difference does it make to you if the brutal savages who throw stones at women they perceive as whores wear big black hats and kippot or the kuffiyeh?

>>1658001
And you keep you keep thinking in terms of black and white.

Please, don't vote.

>>1658003

Baaaaaaawwwwwww, Hitler was nasty. Mommy, can we genocide sandniggerz, I so persecuted and mad !

Baaaaaawwwww.

Sincerely, Israel.

>>1658003

>a country that constantly offers to accept us

on the condition that they stop all the terrorist-y stuff, which the pa doesn't really have the ability or resources to ensure

>>1658005
You have no argument, Good day.

>>1658006
And strapping a bomb to yourself and blowing up a crowd full of people who had nothing to do with anything isn't brutal or savage at all.

He who lives in glass houses...

reminder that the irgun pioneered car bombing :)

>>1658009
>ability or resources to ensure

It'd be real easy. Denounce them and stop supporting them when they take power.

>>1658014
[citation needed]

>>1658008
No, I keep thinking in terms of ethics. Like a human being. Weirdo.

ITS LIKE IM REALLY IN /new/

>>1658018
>Ethics

I think you know what that word means, but you're not using it correctly.

It's not "ethical" because you say so, buddy. Welcome to the real world.

>>1658022
>I think you know what that word means, but you're not using it correctly.
I don't understand what is essentially a question of oughts?
>It's not "ethical" because you say so, buddy. Welcome to the real world.
Hmm, well I guess I am the only person in the world who think killing isn't wrong and that people have a right to return, ignoring nearly every other person who has ever lived, of course.

>>1658005
>Sincerely, Israel.
the Israelis are not responsible for the amount of prejudice they have amassed during all the years of sectarian warfare. If I'd have a word with someone it would be the nations responsible for the holocaust. Today they play gandhi and try to chide both sides. I say the pope must be moved from the Vatican to settle down both displaced Jews and Arabs.
The first state to recognize nazi Germany was the Holy See. The first Agreement ever met with Hitler was the Reichskonkordat and that is just one example. Why should the Arabs suffer? Here i agree with antizionists.
>>1658003
The Palestinians claim the property they still have owned before the first Arabo-Israeli war. The israelis just got dealt that rag of desert dealt to by the British and the other Western States to keep the Arabs from uniting.
Even as a zionist you cannot appeal to what supposedly happened 2000 years ago. If land claims could be made on basis of ancient maps we would indeed be in state of a perpetual warre.
The Israelis just do not have another dreg of land they could call home. It's not about the holiness at all or else why would we keep the cave of patriarchs to the PA? There is no other place they could go. They were used and abused but it's better than nothing.
Nothing is what the gyppos have today.

>>1658020
Well actually I've never been to /new/ but I suspect this is the kind of thread that popped up there all the time

>>1658031
>who think killing isn't wrong
You're right. Killing is wrong, which is why the Palestinians have never- oh wait.

>people have a right to return
They do, and they did.

Now, you're going to try to justify why the Palestinians are right and the Israeli's are wrong, because of your own opinions and fact proofing.

Or, we can just agree to disagree, and stop engaging in a stupid fucking argument that has no right answer if we're going to try and determine who's "Right" and "Wrong."

>>1658033
Gypsies suffered under the holocaust too. The big joke is that the Germans supported a homeland for the Jews, to get them out of Europe and protect Arian purity.

>>1658041
>They do, and they did.
Give me an example of a 2000 year old Israeli who returned to their homeland.

>>1658013
>And strapping a bomb to yourself and blowing up a crowd full of people who had nothing to do with anything isn't brutal or savage at all.
Now that we agree that killing people is wrong we must also find a compromise that would make both sides disarm.
I agree with Khaddafi and Ben Gurion - it must be a united secular state where the uniting enemy is prejudice, religious and national. Have all the fancy rockets hit both shas and hamas.

>>1658065
>it must be a united secular state where the uniting enemy is prejudice, religious and national.

I agree as well. For the record, I think the current Israeli gov't is fucking retarded for being such douche-bags.

But, just like I don't hate my own country for it's stupid gov't, I don't hate Israel. Or Palestine.

>>1658036
>I suspect this is the kind of thread that popped up there all the time
and it's not just the topic. lit, all of the sudden, lost all manners.

>>1658072
The problem with /new/ wasn't what was being discussed, it was the act that it was impossible to have a conversation without it turning into a white power thread.

>A young man is reading a book on the subway
>That book is Neuromancer

What do you think?
What do you do?

>>1658069
out of pure curiosity, your "country" is what? i can't understand a "country" is supposed to be. there is a government and you can be it's subject or it's citizen. I am for intance a citizen of austria. by nuremberg racial laws i am also a jew. would israel now be "my country"?

so tell me, is the "right to return" justifiable in any way shape or form?

>>1658081
>The problem with /new/ wasn't what was being discussed, it was the act that it was impossible to have a conversation without it turning into a white power thread.
israel has a mostly white flag. it would fit.
>>1658086
>so tell me, is the "right to return" justifiable in any way shape or form?
whose "right of return"? do you have the patience to listen? perhaps you are trolling?

the whole concept of 'nation' is no longer applicable. check out benedict anderson- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imagined_communities

>>1658090

the jewish right of return. that is the crux of the issue isn't it? whether or not these "people" (if they can be defined as a unified people) have the right to settle in a land generations removed from them.

>>1658090

>The problem with /new/ was the fact that it was impossible to have a conversation without it turning into a white power thread.

That's not a problem.

>>1658085
I'm an American. And Jewish.

I don't consider myself a "citizen" of Israel, but I do feel as if I have some connection to the country,

depends which version, orig or eng?

The thing is Israel isn't going anywhere, its existence needs to be acknowledged. Also by calling Israel apartheid you are only detracting credibility from your argument. Does Israel have some policies that need to be changed? Yes. Is it apartheid? No. The Palestinians and the Israelis need to recognize eachothers right to exist at this point or else it'll continue down the same path it has been. Hamas doesn't help because they made the issue a religious one and they don't want to make peace with Israel but rather see its annihilation. That is unproductive. Compromises need to be made on both sides.

>>1658101

well that's nice and all and probably because you grew up with the conception of israel already existing so naturally you would feel some connection if during your whole life you've been told you're part of some group and that group has a homebase somwhere.

but that doesn't answer my original question.

>>1658109
>Hamas...made the issue a religious one

ahem, israel was founded as a "jewish state" and still is one to this day.

EG: >>1657887
EG: > >>1657887
profile

>>1658114
True. But the issue was historic and not religious. They claimed their ancestral homeland as the reason. Which is true, not sure if right.

>>1658114
I'm well aware that Israel was founded as a Jewish state but the issue is about land, the Zionists make it as much of a religious issue as Hamas. It only adds fuel to the flames. Zionists aren't the voice of Israel whereas Hamas is trying to represent the Palestinians over the PA. Israel has offered to make peace but Hamas is committed to never making peace with Israel.

>>1658126

it's kind of lame to be both a religion and and ethnicity at the same time. you can play switch hitter and conveniently cover every argument with it.

>>1658092
to quote Stalin, how many divisions does this benedict have?
>>1658095
>the jewish right of return. that is the crux of the issue isn't it? whether or not these "people" (if they can be defined as a unified people) have the right to settle in a land generations removed from them.
the crux of the issue is much more complicated. israel is not their land because there once was a judea - there is no way you could proove the Chinese, Ethiopian and Polish Jews have more to do with folks involved in events described by Josephus than, say, the average citizen of modern Syria. - the original zionists, under herzl, just wanted to run away somewhere (africa, south america) before it is too late. after it already was too late the world suddenly turnt generous and allowed the zionists to build a nation if they did it in israel pissing off the arabs and keeping a republic of 300 millions from appearing on our oil.
Germany bought it's indulgence from Israel and everyone involved in Siemens, BMW or any other German corporation was now bound to support Jewish Zionist Nationalism in it's most radical forms
paying kikes and gyppos or even slavs would have driven germany bancrupt. since they paid a national abstraction they need the jewish nation state to exist as such; hence the right of return.
now, in soviet tradition western leftists tend to get pissy with this exact national state over all the other. they support arab nationalists and not, say, a universal jus solis or common property or whatnot. why?
nobody cares about the people who die trying to get into spain or into the usa. how is it different from the people who die trying to get israel go away?
by supporting palestinian nationalists we just support a different jus sanguis.

>>1658132

personally i am suspicious of this ethnicity argument. i don't think they're an ethnicity at all, just a religion. this ethnicity idea is a myth that has proven itself to be incredibly convenient.

>he original zionists, under herzl, just wanted to run away somewhere (africa, south america)

i'm sorry but i'm just not ok with this, no matter where it is. this is just colonialism. why would you think that's just fine?

>>1658132
it's kind of lame to be both a religion and and ethnicity at the same time. you can play switch hitter and conveniently cover every argument with it.

The muslims are doing the same thing in Europe, if anyone criticizes Islam they are called racist. Which is meant to silence criticism and doesn't make sense as it's an ideology. Muslims in Europe pledge loyalty to Islam over their host countries and more than a third in the U.K. call for shariah law and they believe the flag with the shahadah will wave across the world including the White House.

>>1658142
>The muslims are doing the same thing in Europe, if anyone criticizes Islam they are called racist.

they're a minority group with a definite regional ancestry...the middle east/arabic peninsula. i personally don't believe in "race" as a biological construct, however there is a general regional and cultural similarity there.

jews on the other hand are from...everywhere. literally. and they all look completely different and speak completely different languages.

>>1658139

seriously. i feel like this just gets glossed over. like "they felt this need to colonize someplace..anyplace, and we were just OK with that"

it was already the 20th century. the rest of the world had just begun to give up on the whole "colonialism" idea. i can't give jews a pass on this, sorry. i don't care where they set up shop.

>>1658150

Muslims are from all over the world too. A French speaking Muslim from Algeria is different from the Arabic speaking Muslim from Qatar or from the Indonesian Muslim or the Russian speaking Muslim from Chechnya.

>>1658135
again, how many divisions do you have?
nobody questions your noble notions. it's just that ideologies that are depend on powers that be.
>>1658109
What's wrong about the Apartheid? or: how is it any more wrong that all the other extant borders?

>>1658168
Apartheid consists of depriving a given group of their rights and separating them from society. 20% of Israelis are Arab and they have all the same rights as the Israeli Jews. Not to mention they can vote and as already done can be judges and politicians. An apartheid policy

>>1658163

you make a very good point and it's true that these sweeping generalizations are silly. i don't know the ethnic makeup of the muslims in france. is it really that varied?

but muslims identity is in no way tied in to any concept of blood relation or singular ethnicity. in fact anyone can be a muslims, and that's their whole doctrine.

jews on the otherhand have the idea that they are a distinct race. one can only marry and procreate within this race. it has to be proven biologically and everything before you get married. it is not enough to simply practice the religion.

>>1658181
>20% of Israelis are Arab and they have all the same rights as the Israeli Jews. Not to mention they can vote and as already done can be judges and politicians.

yep, you're right about arab-israelis on paper having the same rights as jewish israeli citizens. however, as it is with blacks in america, when it comes to day-to-day living, they are completely second-class citizens and treated as such. ask an arab-israeli if he feels like he has the same rights as his jewish neighbor and he will most certainly tell you a different story.

>>1658157
nobody asked the jews. there were a few crazies like the stern gang in israel and when the brits saw how their empire is crumbling they used the jewish refugees as cannon fodder between the arabs. germany, on the other hand, needed israel to buy an indulgence. america needed germany to buy one so it could rearm to fend the commies away.

A plenty of people weren't fine with that. ben gurion, for instance. some other person even sent a bomb to konrad adenauer.

>>1658201

doesn't mean we have to be fine with it today. i oppose colonialism in all forms all throughout history. and you?

>>1658185
>jews on the otherhand have the idea that they are a distinct race.
yes, tell us more about ourselves. ideas appear and go whenever they're needed. during the bartholomy night pogroms in paris even protestantism was claimed to spoil the blood for generations.

>>1658201
>nobody asked the jews. there were a few crazies like the stern gang in israel and when the brits saw how their empire is crumbling they used the jewish refugees as cannon fodder between the arabs. germany, on the other hand, needed israel to buy an indulgence. america needed germany to buy one so it could rearm to fend the commies away.

you're still trying to defend the colonization as this thing that just kind of accidentally happened as this perfect storm, with many other nations having a hand in it because it was in some way advantageous for them--which might be true.

but it still doesn't change the fact that it was fucked. i still can't defend that it happened.

>>1658213

you're telling us about yourselves.

and notice you used "we." it's so internalized.

>>1658213
>ideas appear and go whenever they're needed.

so you're admitting that you follow a religion and are not an ethnicity. you're admitting that it's a construct put forth for the purpose of convenience.

>>1658203
>I oppose colonialism in all forms all throughout history
very noble. good luck purging the anglosaxons from britain.

Nothing. Random people don't like to be fucking accosted by some creep.

>>1658226
Thanks for informing us that you're a creep, Anonymous.

>>1658220

please. no one said anything about reversing colonialism. we can't very well kick everyone out of north america, can we?

but we can stop it from ever happening again. we can stem it when we see it now that we have the luxury of learning from history. israel is colonialism in action.

we can't tell the jews to go home. that's impossible. but we can't let them continue to oppress the native inhabitants either.

>>1658227
Hey, if you have any other view of yourself and you like walking up to random strangers and bugging them then you're probably pic related.

>>1658235
I'm sorry you hate talking to people?

shit, in an ideal situation both israel and palestine would be gone and in their place a unified, religiously neutral third state with both an immigrant and arabic population. but hey, that's just a pipe dream.

and don't worry, the true nastiness of colonialism will rear it's ugly head when that demographic bomb finally goes off in israel in about 50 years, when arab-israelis will outnumber jewish-israelis 2 to 1. we'll all watch in horror as they start systematically busing arabs OUT of the country, stripping them of their citizenship. israel is a land for jews, first and foremost and to maintain that power they need to make sure they're still the demographic majority.

and i'm not kidding about that expulsion thing, it's already been talk about by the high-level politicians over there. they're really worried about being outnumbered.

>>1658240
I don't hate talking to people, you just literally have to be autistic to believe it is not weird and stilted to bug some random person about a book on the subway.

>>1658229
>please. no one said anything about reversing colonialism. we can't very well kick everyone out of north america, can we?
take a tripcode. i could have sworn that you claimed to "oppose" something that you understand under "colonialism".
so it includes the us americans? what about the romance speakers in romania? also "colonialism in action"? do you oppose their existence as well? what about mohammed's "imperialism"? by the sound of it, it is still fun to you to wallow in semantics. have you just discovered schopenhauer's eristics? or maybe other silly little manual on rhetoric?

>>1658266
Sorry man, but You have to be autistic to think it's weird to make conversation with someone (anyone) about a book they're reading that you think is important/interesting

>>1658243
are you some kind of a hippie that you have pipe dreams? either you are into politics or you smoke your peace pipes and whatnot.

even as a small anon you can do agitation and propaganda against religious and national prejudice in your immediate friend circle. it does wonders. raise the right issues. it's little-to-nothing but is still better than apathy.

but first, of course, you will have to understand the quid pro quo a little better than what was already told in paul mccarthy lyrics.

An apartheid policy is not allowing people to become citizens such as Jordan did with the Jews in 1967. Or if apartheid is such a problem why don't I ever hear anything of the gender apartheid in Saudi Arabia.

>>1658282
Maybe if you're at school or something. If you were trying to read something, would you enjoy it if someone started bugging you about it? Or are you the kind of person who sits openly reading something in the hopes that someone WILL point it out?

>>1658218
>and notice you used "we." it's so internalized.
of course. And you should internalise it as well. There are the Jews - a group singled out in nazi, tsarist and israeli law - and there are the Israelis, citizens of Israel. Unless your aim is to annoy strangers on the internets you, too, should internalise the difference.

so...are jews a race or not a race but one that wants to front like it's a race? i can't read this whole thread to find out the answer.

>>1658289
>An apartheid policy is not allowing people to become citizens
hence 100% of all legal systems should be seen as an apartheid?

>>1658306
no, you are thinking about nascar.

>>1658292
Sorry buddy, but I don't see a problem with trying to start a conversation with someone who's just sitting there next to you when you have nothing better to do. If the person looks bugged by you or too consumed by reading to respond then you stop bugging the person. Again, sorry you hate talking to people?

>>1658203
He says he "opposes" colonialism. What he means is he is a COMMUNIST CRIMINAL who opposes the existance of the white race.

>>1658306
The Hebrews are a race and the Palestinians are a bunch of Arabs who believe they are a race and are basically a tool for the rest of the Middle East to use to say Israel should be wiped off the map.

>>1658314
But I don't hate talking to people, I just almost always have something better to do than bug someone. But I also have no need to take public transportation so I don't know how that is. I certainly wouldn't talk to anyone on a bus around here, though.

>>1658317

yeah but the hebrews don't exist anymore. that's some ancient shit. like saying the carthaginians are a race

who said palestinians were a race?

>>1658329
Hebrews, Jews, whatever. They're still a race and the Palestinians still are not and because of that, basically every middle eastern ruler who hates Israel is only using them to front their own beliefs.

I would immediately strike up conversation with the woman. Ask her why she is reading Mein Kampf in a non threatening manner. Discuss Nazi germany, recommend that she watch the Triumph of Will documentry made for the 1934 Nazi party meeting, and suggest we watch it sometime. I have hopefully met my dream girl.

>>1657887

have beautiful all white children with her

>>1658321
Understandable, and if they're reading Mein Kampf they're probably not very friendly anyway

>>1658340
*reading it in public especially

>>1658340
JIDF spotted.

>>1658315
he also talks to himself a lot which means he is a rather lonely and sad person. And with a vague definition of colonialism that he employs he could just as well be battering the negroes of zimbabwe in his missionary fervour - "stop bantu colonialism!" this could be a wonderful white power slogan. do you support anticolonialism or are you a negro-loving communist pig?
spoken seriously now, one of the things the historical decolonisation had acchieved was keeping all the subjugated peoples from gaining voting rights in england, portugal or france. compare Reunion, which is still French, with Madagascar and tell me again how anticolonialism is supposed to be noble.

>>1658317
Formula 1 is a race. The Hebrews are ancient east-mediterranean people

>>1658331
JEWS ARE NOT A RACE
FUCK
Please, everyone, get it through your indescribably thick skulls, jews are not a race. There are some isolated jewish ethnicities (i.e. Ashkenazi of the pale), but other than those few ethnic exceptions jews are nothing more than a people with a common religion.

I think she's a moron.
I move on with my life.

>>1658382
my indescribably thick skull won't understand how any group of people can be called a race. where is the racing track?

>>1658386
>implying you have a life

>>1658352
>this could be a wonderful white power slogan. do you support anticolonialism or are you a negro-loving communist pig?

are you seriously trying to accuse me of racism?

>>1658309
yes.

>>1658753

Why are you against colonialism? Serious question; not trolling.

Recommend Evola.

>>1658885
>Why are you against colonialism?

am i really being asked this question?

because colonialism exploits, manipulates and subjugates native populations to the advantage of the invading colonists. every land that has been colonized was either crushed beneath the heels of the colonizers (america springs to mind) or has endured a bloody and sustained revolt against it (and usually later, a complete destabilization of their society).

>>1658924

Okay, but why should we care about the native population? This is a secular morality question at its core, really.

Wonder why she's reading such a boring book if not to examine the history or extrapolate the philosophy of the Fuhrer for a history class or something.

It's not pretentious to be interested in history but the book reads very slow. It's the sort of thing you need to force yourself through to get anything from it.

I have a friend that recently read the Kuran (Qu'ran) just to say he did so he'd have some moral superiority when it came to the religion debate. He knows less than me about the religion because I retained information from Religious Studies class better than he. You don't need to smell the pig to know it stinks.

>>1658932

because they're human beings and as such do not deserved to be trampled on by forces beyond their control.

Good god, what happened to this thread?
>>1657887
I'd ask her if she really approved of fascism, and why. You know, try to incite discussion. I'd pull out my copy of Capital/Communist Manifesto first, though.