[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 600 KB, 779x491, Screenshot 2020-12-21 143058.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17088785 No.17088785 [Reply] [Original]

Who was in the wrong here?

>> No.17088792

>>17088785
Hegel, obviously

>> No.17088805
File: 321 KB, 1000x450, IMG_20201220_121416.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17088805

>>17088785
Schop Schop, obviously

>> No.17088806
File: 313 KB, 1024x1454, 314E8B07-B016-420F-8B60-DC8BB9296BF6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17088806

There’s been work on fusing them you know, like pic related https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Bahnsen

>> No.17088833

>>17088806
What is your opinion on Hegel? Was he more than an obscurantist historicist?

>> No.17088854

Hegel:William Stoner::Schoppykins:Charles Walker

>> No.17088873

>>17088833

I think hegel is great when read within his context, people ignore his science of logic and people ignore his sources and then dive into him and get surprised that they can’t understand his work. I don’t believe he was trying to be obscure at all.

>> No.17088900

>>17088873
Since you endorse him I might give him a try. But what is your take on his historicism? Doesn't it work like a backdoor to smuggle relativism into otherwise firm and foundational philosophies?

>> No.17089585

Hegel did literally, and I genuinely mean literally, nothing wrong.

>> No.17089645

When Nietzsche read Hegel later in his life,.after a lifetime of not touching him because of his exposure to Schops, even he realized that Schopenhauer was talking out of his ass about Hegel

>> No.17089672
File: 570 KB, 1199x798, 1608478948549.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17089672

>>17088785
Hackgel obviously.
STOP COMPARING THE GREATEST WESTERNER SAGE WITH A SUBHUMAN.

>> No.17089680

>>17088792
>>17089672
BASED

>> No.17089721
File: 67 KB, 850x400, schopenhauerhume.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17089721

>>17088785
>>17088805

>> No.17089777
File: 26 KB, 750x353, Pauli.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17089777

>>17089585
based

>> No.17089784
File: 706 KB, 601x605, 11223.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17089784

>>17088873
This is the dumbest post I have ever read please don't ever post here again retard

>> No.17089877

>>17089645
Source?

>> No.17089944

>>17089784
Sauce?

>> No.17089960

>>17089672
>Hey look everybody, I understand Hegel
>AND I'm a scum elitist

cringe

>> No.17089982

Hegel was a retard

>> No.17089985

>>17089877
if I remember correctly one key passage goes something like "we Germans are all Hegelians at heart, whether we know it or not".

Anyway, I don't think Hegel and Schoppy are incompatible at all. The world as Will is just a different philosophical horizon. It's a proto-phenomenological motif, and that's precisely where Hegel's philosophy ends. The owl of Minerva takes flight only at the end of the day, dialectical philosophy is purely retrospective. The miracle of the day goes unexplained.