/lit/ - Literature

Chuds around here are scared of these.

the ego and its own

>>17111059
>all accessible books that aren't banned due to how "dangerous" they are
nice one leftoid

>>17111051

>>17111124
Show me their North Korean editions

>>17111051
"Buddha and His Dhamma" is the world's heaviest book and weighs 2,000 kg. You could easily kill someone with it if you tossed it at someone.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/agra/Worlds-heaviest-book-unveiled-in-Agra/articleshow/46613674.cms#:~:text='Buddha%20and%20His%20Dhamma'%2C,from%20all%20over%20the%20country.

>>17111135
Books like Siege are actually dangerous...

>>17111170
siege isnt even a book. its just a bunch of old neo nazi newsletters compiled together

>>17111170
What is that again, murder porn for rightwingoids?
Another manifesto for oath keepers?

>>17111205
Kys tranny

>>17111210
Scared to death

>>17111205
Based

>>17111205
begone, tranny

>>17111218
Absolutely based. Finished Debt: the First 5000 years from that man, didn't realize he was a fellow anarchist until an interview a few months later.

>>17111229
You forgot your trip

>>17111204
I know lol

>>17111229
fuckin retard. Go read fragments of an anarchist anthropology right the fuck now.

>>17111205
>>17111204
Learn to read you ugly, braindead cunt.

>>17111218
>Bougie professor
Yeah he was really scaring the establishment.
This is the one anarchist they REALLY fear.

>>17111205
>>17111218
>>17111229
you'll never be a women

>>17111239
Cross poster.
>>17111241
Spoil me, a bit. Cmon. What's it about? I'm a busy man.

>>17111252
Pretty much what’s in the title

>>17111245
What strategies does he go into, anon? Been meaning to get to it.

>>17111270
>>17111218
>>17111205
>>17111135
>>17111059
kys namefag

>>17111270
>What strategies does he go into, anon? Been meaning to get to it.
Read Anti-Tech Revolution where he goes into it.

>>17111280

>>17111283
So you haven’t read it either.
I see.

>>17111294
It's called "Anti-Tech Revolution" so obviously you start a revolution without technology and learn kung-fu.

>>17111294
>What strategies does he go into
>Tells you he wrote a whole book about it
He also wrote more articles, for example:
>6. Radicals Must Attack The System At The Decisive Points.
>To work effectively toward the elimination of the techno-industrial system, revolutionaries must attack the system at points at which it cannot afford to give ground. They must attack the vital organs of the system. Of course, when I use the word “attack,” I am not referring to physical attack but only to legal forms of protest and resistance.

>Some examples of vital organs of the system are:

>The electric-power industry. The system is utterly dependent on its electric-power grid.

>The communications industry. Without rapid communications, as by telephone, radio, television, e-mail, and so forth, the system could not survive.

>The computer industry. We all know that without computers the system would promptly collapse.

>The propaganda industry. The propaganda industry includes the entertainment industry, the educational system, journalism, advertising, public relations, and much of politics and of the mental-health industry. The system can’t function unless people are sufficiently docile and conforming and have the attitudes that the system needs them to have. It is the function of the propaganda industry to teach people that kind of thought and behavior.

>The biotechnology industry. The system is not yet (as far as I know) physically dependent on advanced biotechnology. Nevertheless, the system cannot afford to give way on the biotechnology issue, which is a critically important issue for the system, as I will argue in a moment.

>Again: When you attack these vital organs of the system, it is essential not to attack them in terms of the system’s own values but in terms of values inconsistent with those of the system. For example, if you attack the electric-power industry on the basis that it pollutes the environment, the system can defuse protest by developing cleaner methods of generating electricity. If worse came to worse, the system could even switch entirely to wind and solar power. This might do a great deal to reduce environmental damage, but it would not put an end to the techno-industrial system. Nor would it represent a defeat for the system’s fundamental values. To accomplish anything against the system you have to attack all electric-power generation as a matter of principle, on the ground that dependence on electricity makes people dependent on the system. This is a ground incompatible with the system’s values.

>>17111320
I thought Kaczynski was a meme, but reading this makes me interested.

>>17111059
based butterfly

>>17111051

>>17111356
Lol

>>17111134
this terrifies jannies like you would not believe

>>17111356
Have sex

>>17111320
Thank you for your effort posting
>mental-health industry
Heh

>>17111356
Identity(White) = White
I don’t know what deal is, it’s pretty obvious

Look up what kinds of books are being banned from amazon.com

Should give you a good sense of what the establishment considers 'dangerous' these days.

Anything by jones

>>17111384
See: >>17111367

The Story of B by Daniel Quinn

>>17111384
>>17111356
based

>>17111270
You've been here for how many years and you still haven't read Uncle Ted???

>>17111051

>>17111205
Dilate then kill yourself tranny

Don’t tell anyone I told you about these!!!

The works if anyone associated with the vichy regime
Seeing the most talented generation of french writers forcibly erased out of history (continues to this day) is enough to turn anyone into a fascist (don't mean facism doesn't suck balls)

>>17111059
Why? I don't think I've ever heard of those? I assume they're political in nature.

>>17111051
Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of "truth" and "memory"

>>17111051

>>17111144
underrated post

>>17111356
go back to twitter faggot

>>17111051

>>17111059
That's not dangerous, Butterfly. Try to think of a book that you'd be spooked to find your child reading.

>>17111356
All the seethe replies confirm

>>17111051

>>17111051
The bibble

>>17111270
lel haven't even read Ted, get off this board retard leftoid

>>17114891
Didn’t even read the text there? It’s short.

>>17115238
That’s not the measuring stick of a litizen
>leftoid
>he doesn’t know

The only actually dangerous book so far

>>17111384
They just deleted the white nationalism thread for some reason, I never understand whether the mods allow or don't allow political literature on this board. There are countless threads that reach bump limit on the subject, but they also delete them sometimes.

>>17111170
Dangerously fucking cringe and le edgelord katana meme

>>17115276
I dont care about you taking digs at the chuds, but they do not in any sense fear the works you posted. I think you know that. You arent a retard. You cant think of anything really dangerous?

>>17111384
>>>>/x/

>>17115312
I know! A whole thread on rape, completely off topic, of course it reaches 300+ posts. Always the worst moderation around here

>>17111051
Here OP.
>>17111085
Required A lit.

>>17115334
That was a really fun thread.

>>17111051
I think the only books banned in the US are stuff on how to make weapons, and that one book about tax fraud. In European countries there are some bans on Nazi and Communist stuff.

>>17115325
They react very strongly against the idea of power to the people.
What are you thinking of? Some serial killer memoir or some shit? More antisemitism? What’s dangerous about a book really? I say it’s books that inspire action, and there’s no greater action than a revolution

>>17115312
There was dangerous leftist mogging in that thread. Theres a particular anon who always debunks race realism and next thing you know the threads gone. Its odd

>>17115355
>no greater action that one spin of the wheel
heh

>>17115365
>who always debunks race realism
Don't be ridiculous, the racists win that argument every single time. It is trivial to point out the reality of genetically distinct populations who differ on psychological and behavioral averages no matter how you try to measure them.

>>17115370
When the “wheel” has yet to actually spin over once, yeah.

>>17115376
Listen cutie, I'm just telling what happened and what I've seen happening before. I'll try to screencap it next. They don't like it when anons shatter disunity propaganda.

>>17115355
I actually think the antisemitic stuff is pretty dangerous because when people start reading it their worldview goes toxic very fast, they tend to alienate friends, they start thinking only in ethnocentric terms, they feel victimized and powerless, etc. So yeah for me something like a Kevin MacDonald book is more dangerous than like a paean to hypothetical systems of government. I guess maybe youre thinking more about danger to "the system" than danger to the reader.

>>17115344

>>17115386
There is literally no reason to think that eg. Japanese people and Australian Aboriginals have the same average intelligence. There isn't even a pretension of a reason, and there are obvious reasons to believe the opposite.

>>17115398
No one claims they have the same average intelligence. Race realists claim that race is the only or at least the most important factor in the distinction. Sane people and the majoritt of neuroscientists believe that environment and genetic structures affect intelligence. There's wide variation in intelligence by the same racial groups in different geographical locations. Intelligence is such a tangential and nuanced quality that it could never be boiled down to simple race. Probably why despite their best efforts race realists havent discovered a single gene or gene group attached to both race and intelligence.

>>17115425
Race realists(meme term but whatever) claim simply that there are significant average differences caused by genetics, they don't claim it's the only relevant factor.

And yes there are genes related to intelligence
https://www.cambridgebrainsciences.com/more/articles/22-genes-have-been-linked-to-intelligence

>>17115433
here is the actual paper
https://www.nature.com/articles/ng.3869.epdf

>>17115425
Everybody has mostly the same intelligence.

>>17111059
>using "Chuds" unironically
see and then you say you are not a tranny

>>17115377
You don't actually think that will ever happen, do you? Men are much too seduced by power and glory

>>17111051
Anything on how to make bombs/weapons, if someone saw you reading mein kampf they’d think your a psychopath so I’d add that

>local namefag derails thread

>>17115391
Yeah, I agree. And yes, that was what I was going for.
Anything that rewires a weak mind into doing something violent is most dangerous. And the invention of the printing press and the growing literacy of Europe afterwards sparked just that. So any religious texts, especially those that can be interpreted several different ways, are also quite dangerous.

>>17115445
I pick up these dumb slang terms from you. You dumb tranny.

>>17115448
Nothing would be more glorious than the Revolution, but I’m only hopeful they’ll try it. It’s our species last chance.

>>17115510
>So any religious texts, especially those that can be interpreted several different ways
*There was also a little booklet from that period about identifying witches. That too caused quite a bit of murder

Who gives a fuck about race, give me more books to download off libgen.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncle_Fester_(author)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ragnar_Benson

the manchester manual

>>17115312
Tranny janny strikes again!

>>17115365
Nice gaslight. It's exactly the opposite... In such threads the anti-whites invariably come across as unhinged, dishonest and pathetic.

>>17115312
It's easy to understand, just take note of which political themes disproportionately get the axe (hint: it's not leftist or equalist ones).

>>17115355
Why would you give power to the people?

>>17115312
jannies are trannies

>>17111059
>anarchist
>never mentions armed joy

>>17111320
Does he ever discuss the anti-roads movement or ELF?

>>17115853
Because that’s where it belongs. Why don’t you like freedom, anon? You a bootlicker?

>>17115365
>deboonks race realism
I shiggy diggy you don't think NAXALT is an effective deboonk of observations made on a societal scale.

>>17115883
Buttertranny, either you're in an insulated bubble of people just like you, and you consider them and yourself "the people," or you consider yourself "the people" IN SPITE OF all the people you encounter who are unlike you. I don't know which speaks worse of you.

>>17115883
No I just think power should not be given to stupid people
That can cause bad things

>>17115510
>>17115517
shut the fuck up you stupid mentally ill tranny

>>17115930
Schizo posting

>>17115986
Education is the key. Free and plentiful. Oh and with multiple hands in it, the more coordination is required, thus “stupidity” is avoided. Nice local controls for local shared economics. This avoids large scale warfare and ensures greater stability, social cohesion. So much good would come of it. Actual democracy and a shared economy would work wonders on the minds of man. Your “stupid” men are products of this system.

>>17116025
butterfly please give me a (you)

>>17116043
Hi. Be nice.

>>17116054
thank you my goddess

>>17116054
shut the fuck up you stupid mentally ill tranny

>>17115433
Then there's no difference and no justification for racism from a biological standpoint.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/posadas/1968/06/flyingsaucers.html

Bosting in butterfly thread

>>17116715
I mean why shouldn’t society work like the brain?
There’s no centrality to it either. Why the unnatural hierarchies? They chafe and restrain all that we could be!

>>17111059
Dilate

>>17116730
>hierarchies
>unnatural
lel holy fuck, this is probably the dumbest thing ive seen you say yet. imagine being this ignorant

>>17116730
consider suicide

Imagine being this ignorant >17116977 and thinking of yourself as intelligent.
No grace in ignorance

>>17116977
You fucking moron. Calling the term unnatural hierarchies means that some hierarchies are natural, but some of the ones we live by aren't.

>>17116977
>Muh lobsters duuuude.
Nooo. Don't talk about animals that have foregone hierarchies and do better with greater egalitarianism. Noooooooooo.

>>17111135
Most books don't have NK editions.

>>17117548
>but some of the ones we live by aren't.
and this is wrong, thus my statement
>>17117554
the fact that more egalitarian animals exist is irrelevant to the conversation, why would you even post this?
>>17117088
lol how desperate you are, notice how I never claimed to be notably intelligent because im not a full on narcissist pseud with an ego the size of the sun like you are

its amazing that you try so hard to LARP as something more then a brain dead hole with no critical thinking skills lmao, you spend every day here shilling your comically nonsensical philosophy that you cant even back up with arguments when put under the slightest bit of scrutiny (spoiler alert: you have no arguments because there are no arguments to be made because your beliefs are completely and utterly unjustifiable and nonsensical)

The Most Dangerous Book in the World: 9/11 as Mass Ritual
Programmed to Kill
Court documents from the Dutroux Affair

>>17117710
Some hierarchies are, at the very least, questionable. That you find it impossible to do this, we know you to be an insufferable shoe polish addict.
> I never claimed to be notably intelligent
Admitting one’s shortcomings is the first step to recovery. Good luck in your journey to learn more. Would you like a book recommendation?

>>17117806
>Some hierarchies are, at the very least, questionable
by all means, im waiting for you to back up this statement. it makes sense that you didn't bother though, you've never successfully backed up any statement you've made, thats basically just a part of who you are at this point along with your obsession with getting validation and recognition do your extreme narcissism

>Admitting one’s shortcomings is the first step to recovery
does this mean you're finally going to engage in some honest self reflection? it must be getting pretty cold in hell

>>17117844
What’s a “back up” on that even mean? You now sound like you agree with it. That’s a flip flop from you.

>>17117894
it means to provide information that cements the validity of your statement. not the least bit surprising that you are unfamiliar with this concept concerting you've literally never successfully practiced it.

no i never even remotely implied that agree with it, i simply asked you to back up your statement with an actual argument, are you autistic?

>>17117919
Bby, let’s take it from the top. At its base anarchism is a questioning of all unjustifiable hierarchies.
Above you said that this was wrong. But later agreed and said “by all means”. You don’t seem sure about this. It is a point of view. Many of us believe this is a good policy, while others will kill fellow human beings for questioning their “masters”.
What do I need to “back up”, I then asked. You follow up with this little post trying to sound smug and sophisticated. “No! I never implied I agree with you”. False. It’s the first thing you typed here >>17117844
What do you want?

>>17117968
>At its base anarchism is a questioning of all unjustifiable hierarchies. Above you said that this was wrong
I never made a single statement regarding the definition of anarchism
>But later agreed
no I didn't, I asked you you to continue your your train of thought so it could be properly assessed, nothing more or less
> False. It’s the first thing you typed here
what the fuck are you talking about, nothing i typed there implied anything of the sort

>What do you want?
I want you to back up your statement, which is literally all i said aside from a few jabs obviously

>>17118008
>I never made a single statement regarding the definition of anarchism
About questioning hierarchies
>no I didn’t
I showed you where you did
>wtf
Indeed. You want a book rec to help with that confusion of yours or not? If not signal by not responding

>>17118024
Hope you had a nice christmas buddy, it's never too late to seek help.

>>17118024
i pointed out that unnatural hierarchies in society dont exist
>I showed you where you did
no you didnt, you showed me where i asked you to back up your statement regarding the existence of unnatural unnatural hierarchies in society, nothing about that implies i that I agree with your statement

Any religious book like the Bible is dangerous enough to put all humanity in war for more than a millenium

>>17118035
Solidifying just any hierarchy someone(s) wants to place over anything.

Certifiably.

>>17118050
ok, now in English please

>>17118060
Already in English.
Here it is another way.
(Do I have to ask you to switch the devil with hierarchies?)

>>17118072
what the fuck are you talking about? I never said anything about hierarchies not existing, are you retarded? i said that there's no such thing as unnatural hierarchies specifically, and you seem to be doing literally everything you can to avoid backing up your opposing claim (likely because its incorrect and you cant back it up)

Ugh..Another thread with a namefag tranny.

Are you really this dumb?
5/10

>>17118093
answer the question, ill spell it out for you again, what are these supposed unnatural hierarchies you claim exist in society, and what makes them unnatural?

>>17118102
Read Thomas Paine.
Go read it. Very accessible and lovely prose. He’ll explain it very well.

>>17118113
no, you explain it

>>17116128
Is it racism to want your genetic cluster to surive and not be overrun by divergent populations?

>>17118084
Wealth shouldn't = political power. The hierarchy of wealth is a damaging social hierarchy. The hierarchy of race, of gender. None of these hold to serious scrutiny. We have selected democratic hierarchies and those that do hold to serious Cartesian doubt, such as the hierarchy of expertise, a father to his children. Not all hierarchys are unnatural, not all hierarchy is natural either. In the natural world, with the types and level of social inequality as today, we would call a species Despotic for living ad we do. This is hardly natural. Though, Ive found that many on the right feel paralyzed by freedom and choice, they believe the poor peasants like themselves should obey the wealthy. I disagree, wealth is no virtue.

>>17118123
No on the former, yes on the latter. You imagine being “overrun”, but it is the same as finding yourself walking next to any other people. They’re related to you for being of your same species. But have some solidarity with your earthlings too. Be thankful for the meat you eat even.

>>17118116
I’m gonna need you to expand your mind on your own terms. Here.
https://dl101.zlibcdn.com/dtoken/f4f8b1247e41a81968aade04f3017a81

>>17118123
no

>>17118141
kill yourself you dirty tranny

>>17118129
>This is hardly natural
yes it is, people with power lording over those with less/no power is precisely how natural hierarchies work

>>17118141
looks like you have no argument then, another debate lost by butterfly. when will you learn?

>>17118123
Lmao. Yes, white people are going the way of the green people before them. You type confuse me though, don't you share genetics and ancestry with whites from over 2000 years ago? Those genes seem to still be present within the code of very many humans. I suspect even your shitty genes will continue repeating within the minds of the extremely stupid for ages to come.

No, it isn't racist to care about your race. It's racist to claim yours superior and lord it over others.

>>17118149
And it’s unnatural and precisely why we ought to club the bully to death

>>17118153
Loser. Non-reading loser.

>>17118149
Lmao, money shouldn't equal power. Espescially not in any justifyable way. Maybe to serfs like yourself, but since you're powerless, it hardly matters what you think. You think leaders are to "lord their power over others" I think the wide majority of people disagree with your idea of "natural" for good reason too.

>>17118175
>And it’s unnatural
how are natural hierarchies unnatural?
calling me a loser wont change your failure to back up your claim

>>17118184
>money shouldn't equal power
why? money means resources, having more resources is inherently a form of power

>>17118190
Hasta la vista, gordito.

>>17118207
lol you lost the debate, then instantly started another debate just to lose that one within a single post too, that has to be some kind of record failure

>>17111051

>>17118202
For one because it creates an involuntary relationship between the wealthy and the poor. The poor have done nothing to be born poor, neither does it signify a failure on their part. The wealthy have done nothing to be born so, and should not be treated ad if they have an inherent superior. They do not.

Do you think unelected corporate power should be writing laws for our government then using their leverage to pass legislation that harms the working class. Like inmigration for one, work visa laws are something written as a model bill by major corporations and copied by legislators after succesful lobbying.

Are you ok with that? In a so called democracy? I'm not, many think it should change.

Don't you think billionaires being an absolute minority actually make them quite weaker? Aren't the working class and the poor by far the majority of citiznes? Power in numbers is inherently a form of power. It would be perfectly natural for them to revolt.

>>17118190
What hierarchies are natural?

>>17118167
Kek lmao. Good point.

>>17118224
aah youre starting a completely different conversation, the morality of it has nothing to do with what I was discussing

>Don't you think billionaires being an absolute minority actually make them quite weaker? Aren't the working class and the poor by far the majority of citiznes? Power in numbers is inherently a form of power. It would be perfectly natural for them to revolt.
if the aforementioned people cant exercise enough power to change their place in the hierarchy then they are exactly where they belong within it and there's nothing unnatural about it. on the other hand, if they CAN do so, then they will change things, and there's nothing unnatural about that either

>>17118231
He’s baiting or an extremely stupid might-makes-right sort

>>17118231
any hierarchy where ones place is decided by any combination of the physical/economic/social capital they are able to wield

>>17118278
actually sorry" able to wield" is not the best way to describe it, its more like that which they are either actively wielding, or which passively effects others as if it was being actively wielded"

>>17118278
Hence, all hierarchies are questionable. But you’re going to pretend to not understand

>>17118265
Oh, I get it it. Everything is how it should be. Cool. I disagree. I'm not making a moral claim at all, only that money shouldn't equal power in a democracy, not only for moral purposes, but merely pravtical ones too. People who support democracy and freedom don't like it when they learn that nepotism is rampant and makes decisions for them. It leads to poor social cohesion and ineqaulity and despotism which generally destroys society. It isn't a mutually beneficial relationship like that of a mentor to a student or a father to a child. It's a parasitic relationship with the wealthy using their power to remain wealthy as well as create policy that allows them to better extract thd wealth of the worker. It simply makes no sense to allow such a disparity for peaceful society.

Of course, if you think everything that's ever happening is natural only due it's existence them, we don't have much reason to debate. I tend to think we should analyze what seems to be working poorly and attempt to imagine how we could improve things for the most people. You apparently lack that ability. Which is ok. I think stupid people deserve an equal chance as intelligent ones.

>>17118286
hence all hierarchies within society are natural, and that is NOT questionable.

>>17118278
Lmao. Sounds unnatural. Some pasty faggot with

>>17118278
Sounds dumb desu. I like the other guys. Noooo don't queation the megacorp, it's totally natural that he supports China

>>17118293
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/hence
Your authenticity is questionable

>>17118293
Sounds like shit lmao. Is there some corporate handbook I can read about this in? Or is it some lobsters approach?

>>17118278
>Social capital.

Jessica has 45thousand followers on Insta, she deserves to make policy for us peasants beneath her.

>>17118291
>I'm not making a moral claim at all,only that money shouldn't equal power in a democracy

the problem is this IS a moral claim whether you mean it to be or not, money=resources and resources=power, that's a stone cold unchangeable fact whether you live in a democracy or a dictatorship or whatever. saying money shouldn't effect your power in a democracy is completely down to morality, you dont have to explain why its an immoral thing, i get that and agree even, but from a purely logical standpoint, there's no actual hard non-moral scientific reason that resources would magically stop being a tool of influencing just because you life in a democratic republic

>>17118329
Money is paper, the resources aren't military ones. It doesn't equate to virtue or power in my opinion. I understand that as of right now, money equals greater resources, which can be leveraged into political power. I'm argueing that that's unjustified. His life, his vote, and his decision should not outweigh that of any other man. Now, his opinion could still be respected, he would certainly still have expertise in some area. Political power however is hard to justify for the wealthy.

>>17118322
its not a matter of "deserving" anything, its a matter of measuring raw power of various forms. in some bird species the dominant birds are decided by who has the most colorful feathers, the feathers give him social capital he can wield to get the prime mates and procreate. nothing unnatural about any of it

>>17118344
Yet Willow Tits have forgone hierarchy as have troops of Baboons. Many other animals have different forms of social hierarchy and order. Some have none. If an animal was hoarding massive resources, he would quickly be ruined by the rest. When they forego despotic hierarchy for egalitarian ones it seems there chances of survival increase. We humans have or at least seem to have and excercise choice. Therefore we could choose to abolish hierarchies that don't increase the happiness or survival of the whole.

>>17118342
>Money is paper
come on now, you know money isn't just paper, it has value that we bestow upon it and it can be exchanged for goods, thus it can be used to influence people who will take certain actions in exchange for compensation with money because they can use money to obtain goods or do some influencing of their own, whether they are part of a democracy or not

once again, i fully agree that it is immoral but its also a cold hard fact

>>17118359
sure whatever you say, none of this makes hierarchies unnatural though

>>17111051
steal this book - abbie hoffman

>>17118376
True, it's hardly natural or justified IMO. When it begins affecting the government of a representative democracy, it has overstepped it's justifyable and natural limitations to me.

>>17118387
I suppose not by a strict interpretation of the word such as everything exists as part of the natural world and that these hierarchies exist in the world. That seems a very weak reason ti cling to them however.

>>17118410
eeh, its completely natural for human beings to be influenced by the promise of some sort of compensation

>>17118417
I suppose the question is "Is this justified for representatives of the public in a democracy?" Should this be allowed? Humans and indeed animals have the ability to forego these desires for the benefit of the whole.

>>17111059
these are the type of books that make people try to negotiate with the genocidal multicultural murder machine that the united states has become, instead of trying to destroy it. so yeah, i would say they are pretty dangerous

>>17118459
indeed, im just here to shit on the attention seeking pseud tripfag for saying stupid shit, not to imply that corruption is good or whatever this conversation has turned into

>>17118564
Most debate is endless questioning until reaching a totally different question.
That said, when I see people shitting on butters I just assume they're simping in a contrarian manner.

>>17118041
Repent, heretic.

>>17111320
>The system is not yet (as far as I know) physically dependent on advanced biotechnology.
Over 50% of Americans are reliant on prescription drugs and advanced pesticides and fertilizers are probably necessary to worldwide food security. I think Teddy's wrong here.

>>17118342
You don't understand what is at issue. You're arguing from how to make things work from preconceived notions about moral rectitude predicated on the assumptions that "freedom" or "democracy" are both real and desirable. Your opponent is trying to discuss things without those assumptions.
Said another way, he is discussing what is, you are discussing what you think should be. These are entirely different conversations and it's fucking painful to watch.
Holy fuck, what happened to this board's reading comprehension and abstract reasoning?

>>17118496
Directly acting. Not asking/negotiating

>>17112582
Could you elaborate? This sounds interesting.

>>17111205
Yes, which is why it's actually banned, unlike AWFL rose Twatter Anarchism for Dummies.

>>17111135
I feel like this post didn't receive enough attention for how stupid it was

>>17111059
>>17111135
>>17111205
>>17111218
>>17111270
>>17111285
>>17111294
>>17111369
>>17115276
>>17115334
>>17115355
>>17115377
>>17115510
>>17115517
>>17115883
>>17116025
>>17116054
>>17116730
>>17117088
>>17117806
>>17117894
>>17117968
>>17118024
>>17118050
>>17118072
>>17118093
>>17118113
>>17118141
>>17118175
>>17118207
>>17118268
>>17118286
>>17118305
>>17119130
faggot

>>17111051
>t. people post a bunch of angsty neo nazi shit

>>17119159

>>17119126
Lol. Filtered pleb

Another thread ruined by that retarded tranny. Books for this feel?

>>17119482

>>17118141
I don't 'imagine' it, I see it... Western cities rapidly turning non-white, most children being born in Western nations are non-white, a brazen campaign of anti-white double standards and cultural destruction.

I could understand you still being blinded by the kool-aid, say, 15-20 years ago... But to pretend it ain't happening in (current year) requires either spiteful dishonesty or mental illness. Your scatter-brained, tangential reply suggests that you're probably on psychoactives, which might be exacerbating the latter.

>>17119901
I live in a 95% white area. It changes nothing. We still have crime, poverty, and wiggers.

>>17119901
race isnt real, its a social construct. whiteness is an american invention to justify colonialism

imagine dropping on your toe...

>>17111059
you are the biggest pseud on this entire website. You are so simple you couldn't even process truly "dangerous" literature. It would short circuit your mind like reading latin because truth is as foreign to you as hieroglyphs

>>17118072
ironic you would post that quote while using the term "antisemitism" unironically in this thread and claiming to be against hierarchies. You are a lolcow
It was (is) the instinctive policy with the mass of the Jewish nation, a deliberate policy with most of its leaders, not only to use ridicule against anti-Semitism but to label as ‘anti-Semitic’ any discussion of the Jewish problem at all, or, for that matter, any information even on the Jewish problem…If a man alluded to the presence of a Jewish financial power in any region, for instance, in India, he was an anti-Semite. If he interested himself in the peculiar character of Jewish philosophical discussions, especially in matters concerning religion, he was an anti-Semite. If the emigrations of the Jewish masses from country to country, the vast modern invasion of the United States, for instance (which has been organized and controlled like an army on the march), interested him as an historian, he could not speak of it under pain of being called an anti-Semite. If he exposed a financial swindler who happened to be a Jew, he was an anti-Semite. If he exposed a group of Parliamentarians taking money from the Jews, he was called an anti-Semite. If he did no more than call a Jew a Jew, he was an anti-Semite. You cannot long confuse interest with hatred, the statement of plain and important truths with mania, the discussion of fundamental questions with silly enthusiasm, for the same reason that you cannot long confuse truth with falsehood. Sooner or later people are bound to remark that the defendant seems curiously anxious to avoid all investigation of his case…I say it was a fatal policy; but it was deliberately undertaken by the Jews.” (Hilaire Belloc, The Jews, pp. 160-161).

“In 1848 the word “anti-Semitic” was invented by the Jews to prevent the use of the word “Jew.” The right word for them is “Jew” . . . “I implore all of you to be accurate — call them Jews. There is no need to be delicate on this Jewish question. You must face them in this country. The Jew should be satisfied here. I was here forty-seven years ago; your doors were thrown open to the Jews and they were free. Now he has got you absolutely by the throat — that is your reward.” (H.H. Beamish, in a New York address, October 30 – November 1, 1937).

>>17111051
The entire New Testament of the Holy Bible, particularly the Gospels, Acts Romans, and Revelation.

>>17120005
christianity is bullshit

>200+ replies
>no mention of isis propaganda

>>17118141
God fucking damn it butter fag,everything you posted in this thread is fucking ridiculous again
Also you are clearly left wing you faggot,read Ted Kackzynski,I know it was mentioned before.

Ted unironically made me realise how stupid and contradictory being ''left'' in general was,democracy always was the biggest meme ever,I don't love Spengler but his idea on democracy,media,and money is completely right,democracy is a meme,and I feel like Ted might have taken a little inspiration from him in this case.

I always knew communism was a meme since I was a real Democrat not a meme one but Ted shits on communism aswell,conservatism too
>oh you want to return to monke
No,I think that is unrealistic,you don't need to agree with that to know that the points Ted makes are real

>>17119912
Not a race supremacist,but race isn't a social construct and your bait is extremely weak,you didn't even atempt to debate the lad

>>17119908
That's not the point for me atleast,and that wasn't the guys point.
The point is that white people are not making children,and that they would rather get imigrants from other countries rather than bother increasing the natality rate.
White european countries have changed demographically a lot in the past decade,slowly turning from homogenous to multicultural.
>why care about race?
Why not,I would rather increase the birthrates than bring people to colonise me
I would rather keep every country homogenous and pretty rather than have the entire world be the same race.

Diversity isn't actually diverse as with time humanity will become one race thanks to it,everyone will look the same,no actual diversity.

>multiculturalism and diversity brings understanding between peoples and greater technological advancements
Wrong,Japan is largely homogenous,and they didn't need to invade other countries with low birtrates to spread their culture and trends,this arguments is completely idiotic.
I want every country to be homogenous but things like international universities can stay.


>>17119901
Based

>>17119174
He is right you know,you spend too much time here and are probably autistic.

Read Ted Kackzynki faggots
Here are some entertaining links to start
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmKj6xj0ams
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmdb2v3QCaI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWYDpidVgLI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C37iDf2krJE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxiTkuhH3tk

>>17111059
anarkiddies aren't dangerous butters

>>17120036
theres no reason to debate with fascists. your worldview is rooted in delusion and hate for the other.

>>17119912
imagine being so brainwashed by Jew media you are this retarded. How many fingers am I holding up Winston?

Fabia the Goddess

>>17120085
Weak bait
The pegans were like this too,might is right and all that,and they lost
(I don't want this to turn into a religious debate lads.)

I used to be like you,assuming you ain't baiting,will use your reply for memes

>>17120085

>>17120097
>numbers are a social construct

>>17120085
H

>>17119912
>its a social construct
Sure, I can agree with that. Are Arabs white? Are Ethiopians black? What the hell are Central Asians? This doesn't mean phenotypes don't exist and influence society.
>whiteness is an american invention to justify colonialism
At this point I assume you're baiting, but where does this brainlet meme even come from? If it's not this then it's Europe altogether. Some of the most ancient civilisations (Egypt, China, Greece) recognised different "races" and declared their own superior, especially the Greeks since they were politically divided but ethno-culturally united against light-skinned barbarians from across the border.

>>17120139
>Sure, I can agree with that.
Of course because you are an idiot. Set aside your argument for smooth brained dipshits was already addressed here >>17120097
>Are Arabs white?
White is not a race, it is a political designation for record keeping (census and other legal uses and some medical) in a multiracial society. Light skinned races are Aryan. Putting that aside for a moment, no Arabs are not "white", they are Arabs.

>Are Ethiopians black?
Same argument as a above as far as using "black." Black is not a race. Are Ethiopians sub Saharan Africans? No they aren't they are from middle west africa are likely an Arab/African mix. North Africa was never nigs, it was always aryans and arabs before motorized vehicles allowed people to be able to travel long distances, namely across 1000's of miles desert.

>What the hell are Central Asians
There are 4 main races. Caucasoid, Mongoloid, Australoid and Negroid. Central Asians are a sub race of Mongoloid who either evolved over time to develop different and unique features or a mix of some kind or both.

>phenotypes don't exist and influence society.
A phenotype us how someone looks. Do you mean genotypes? Phenotypes have little effect on society, genotypes have a large effect on societies.

I know we are kind of arguing the same point so I am not trying to "attack" you but don't give ground to someone when they are wrong especially if you aren't sure of something because these types prey on your ignorance to brainwash the "audience" ie the people reading the conversation. They know they likely can't trick or brainwash you but they know they can raise doubts and maybe do these things to other people if they can get you to give ground to their sophistry or they can strawman you.

>>17120010
Anti-semitic Christianity is the only true Christianity.
As for pegans,equally based,I don't have the mental sanity to engage in a religios debate on a mongolian basket weaving forum
Both of you should read Carl Jung and develop a more esoteric but also practical way to use religion.
Delve deeper into western esotericism even if it's influenced by Judaism.

The talmud says Christ is boiling in humans shit in hell,Mary was a whore,Christ his bastard idolater son
They hate Christianity.
Christ in NT calls jews the sinagogue of Satan too.


>>17120139
Not that anon but I don't like the term white either,I think white should only apply to americans.
''White'' should have no meaning in Europe,are italians,greeks,or the spanish white?
Are the south slavs white?
They are however indo-europeans,they deserve their own borders and lands just like the northern euros and eastern euros do.

Your argument regarding greeks I disagree with,greeks weren't subsaharan africans,but they were pretty mixed,and they did interract with ''ethiopians'' at some point.
Achilles had blonde hair for example.

Greek however did discriminate againts barbarians,and hellenic egypt was basically a greek colony.

Unironically the meme that whites did everything has a little truth to it,the egyptian pharaons appareantly had blonde hair and caucasian genes(recent studies),the babylonians should have come from the caucasus at about the same time as the indo euros,and the buddha himself was blonde blue eyed.
Mohhamed himself was a redhead too and his closest ancestors today are pale skinned and have red hair.

>>17120182
*middle east africa

sorry typing on my phone and proofreading a post this large is a real bitch on one

>>17120185
now this anon actually knows a little something. You ever been to my website esotericawakening?

>>17120182
Not that anon but I think phenotypes do have influence on society just as much as architecture and symbolism.

I also think we are not really conflicting as you did not specify this and I can't be sure how exactly big the impact phenotypes have on society are,too many variables.

>don't give ground to someone when they are wrong especially if you aren't sure of something because these types prey on your ignorance to brainwash the "audience" ie the people reading the conversation. They know they likely can't trick or brainwash you but they know they can raise doubts and maybe do these things to other people if they can get you to give ground to their sophistry or they can strawman you.

Nice

>>17120208
No

I think it's very much more worth it to keep occult shit in childrens stories(worth investigating) and un-interesting books.
The site seems to be too moral faggy for me,and sites are generally inflexible like that,an example of a site like this failing is JOS.
JOS was either a amazing normie filter or completely batshit retarded,maybe also a psyop.

Take goetic practices for example,''summoning'' and ''making deals'' with ''demons''.

The demons themselves aren't actually the monsters they are described to be(it still matters how they look),rather they are archetypes from the collective conscious,and they don't make you invisible or whatever stupid shit the goetia sometimes says,and Crowley pretends to be true.
The goetic demons are by far the weirdest thing,as they are barely known but somehow powerfull,it's like the writer of the key of solomon perfectly identified these archetypes,understood all the symbolism,and gave it to us.
It's like he became one with the collective conscious of humanity for long enough to write it,a true anonymous autist.

They testament of solomon is either a late translation or completely made up,Solomon himself might be a symbol,making the entire matter of wether it's a forgery or not pointless.

Occult esoteric shit should also be kept with as many filters,like retards(Crowley,hides a lot of truth in his works) and crackhead youtubers,these guys filter the normies and hylics really nicely.
Wiccans are also good since they are idiots and moral fags who care about muhh spirits,they look like idiots and don't reproduce,perfect cover up.

>>17111059
kek butters is a walking caricature

>>17118093
Have you reached menopause yet, Miss Butterfly?

>>17111059
"Democratic autonomous neighbourhoods" sounds like something a libertarian white supremacist would say.

>>17118265
Lolbertarian detected

>>17111051
Management of savagery

>>17120455
it also sounds like something out of the khmer rouge

>>17119920
RIP pinky

>>17120016
Right here bud: >>17111441

>>17120085
No, not hate. Just love for my own ethnos (which is totally natural and is the expected state of affairs in the rest of the world). If I end up hating anti-whites, it is only because they've necessarily made themselves my enemy by participating in the attempted destruction of my people.

>>17120182
White is more than just a political designation, it is taxonomy referring to the European genetic cluster; what your eyes tell you about who is White aligns very well with that cluster. It's more specific than Caucasoid, with a genetic 'bridge' of swarthy but not quite brown people leading over to MENA & South/Asian Caucasoids.

>>17120185
See above. 'White' describes an actual genetic cluster, and is a simple & intuitive term for referring to it. It doesn't insinuate that Europeans are somehow interchangeable, but it does indicate a relatedness and mutual interest specific to us.

>>17121150
You missed my point. I didn't say you couldn't call Aryans white, I said white is not a race

>>17111205
Kys tranniesnigger

>>17111384
surprised this is even dangerous considering history

>>17120342
what's moral faggot my website? I don't moral fag there, in fact I try to keep my personal opinions mostly out of everything as much as possible. In case you haven't noticed we are in a bit of a pickle arm politically and I try to put material we need normies to be aware so we don't end up in the gulag for being too smart for own good and anti-revolutionary as they say

>>17120036
What contradiction of the left, and what the fuck about Ted are you hiding? What’s that magical phrase that turned you into a single issue profa chud ?

>>17122002
Kill yourself you tranny freak

kill all tripfags
the day of the rope will come soon niggers

It's amazing that leftoids think any of their freely available books are dangerous, or that they're part of some kind of fringe. You can find Capital in every bookshop.

>>17120208
dcrd . gg/ atXSQFB6

>>17122075
to be leftoid means to adopt an alternate reality. You have to remember they have been trained and brainwashed by Jews, so above all they must see themselves as oppressed outsiders to complete the illusion to themselves. The cognitive dissonance that ensues when you tell them they are useful idiots for the very corporations and (((banks))) they claim to be against is to much to bare for their feeble mindd

>>17122002
also butters will never reply to me, I imagine she knows my syntax style and I expose her for the fraud she is and embarrass her so badly every time she tries to verbally joust with me she won't engage with me anymore like this >>17119989
>>17119954

>>17122075
>t. person who would accept his wife being fucked by a rich CEO, as long as he shares his worldview

>>17122075
>You can find Capital in every bookshop.
And you can find Mein Kampf as well, so what does that tell you about right cuckolding?

>>17122176
MK is SOLELY in bookshops because of the war. If he wasn’t the leader of Germany during the war, he wouldn’t be in the shops. Also, those versions of MK are altered by Jew revisionists.

>>17122152
Dimwitted antisemites that spread disinfo graphs from pol are brainwashed. What’s to discuss?

>>17122222
the upvote button seems to be broken or something
can't seem to gift any awards also :(
are the servers down ?

>>17122222
>I am a communist down with the banks and corporations
>Those banks and corporations are run by Jews
>DIMWITTED ANTISEMITE
You are such an imbecile it is hardly fathomable how you even feed yourself.

https://thezog.wordpress.com/

You are a pseud and a fraud. You probably only have read about 5% of the books you actually post and you wouldnt get off your fat tranny, western ass to revolt anything if it meant you had to miss a starbucks frappacino or a single meal. Dying your hair purple and tweeting hashtags is about as "revolutionary" as you will ever get you trash tier hack retard

>>17114916
Probably dangerous if someone took it seriously

I’m not an advocate for USSR style capitalism or banks of any kind. I’m not an Israel apologist, I am anti-state and antitheist. Nothing fraudulent about it

>>17122316
you are funded by the very organizations you claim to be against to suppress the real revolutionaries. You are a delusional useful idiot who has defrauded yourself into thinking you are fighting the establishment when you are the very apparatus that keeps the establishment in power. You are indeed most certainly a fraud, you are just too stupid and delusional to see it

>>17111356
What a meme book.

>>17111356
It's always this fucking painting.

>>17122316
>am anti-state and antitheist
ok, that' the bleakest position you could take. I don't know what this has to do with dangerous literature.

The Myth Of The 20th Century - Alfred Rosenberg’s Magnum Opus
https://ugetube.com/watch/the-myth-alfred-rosenberg-s-magnum-opus_SRX2VHsRj8ylGfx.html

>>17111051
The poem Invictus was linked to 200+ dead. It's a petty good read. Draws out the tough in you.

>>17115280
Great recommendation i've never heard of this. Apparently good 'ol paladin press translated a bit of it.

>>17122267
Oh no. He Zogposted. All of that information is totally substantiated.

Fuck oof qoomer scum. Your shitty disinfo is powerless here. Tell headquarters that shit only works on boomes and sub 100 IQ Apes.

>>17122344
Lol he believed the memes. Every worker right was won by leftism. If you hear abiut a strike or a boycott, if it's effective at all its leftist in nature, this is why they feel the need to allign themselves with the left. As an insurance policy you meme parotting imbecile. Think fo yourself if possible.

>>17114873
kek

>>17123011
>acting this retarded with projection
You can only be a jew. You shouldn't be this obvious, it defeats the purpose of why you are Moshe

>>17122002
Hey Butterfag,I will explain,piss your pants,my first reply is more than enough
Chud is a compliment
>creating an association of democratic autonomous neighborhoods
Holy shit the meme
>>17122222
This is one of the reasons,you are againts anti-semitism,this is insane,especially if you believe in democracy and are a lefty(you are).
I unironically got into anti-semitism like this,I came to the conclusion as a leftist that jews might not be my friends.
Jewish people are amongs the most powerfull in the world,you are blind not to see this,no,delusional,you don't need to believe anything /pol/ says,just look at things individually and figure it yourself.
Jews should certainly not be used as a scapegoat,but that doesn't mean they can't be behind something,or that getting rid of them won't solve problems.
>>17122316
>anti-state
>anti-theist
It's fine to be a secularist,or a atheist,however.
You are a walking caricature,yes it was said again but it's right,you are the woman nobody will love.

Jews are the most alt-right people out there,and the most powerfull,but you would rather debate le nazis to get your anarchist utopia.
These nazis are not even in power.
This might seem funny since fellow rightoids here accused you of the same thing,but you are quite literally serving the System you anarchist,how the fuck will you get rid of the System?
By reforming it until it's anarchist/anti-state?
By armed revolution?
How the fuck will you revolt againt the System when half the shit you do(debate nazi,racists,incels) is extremely beneficial to the System that you want to destroy.
It literally gives the System power.
You vote candidates that take guns away,literally no way to create your anarchist utopia you dolt,reform is never an option.
Even your liberal candidates are almost always religious and theists.
With what will you revolt?Literally
And againts whom excatly?
Are you fucking delusional?
Your anti-state utopia is impossible to achieve you fucking fraud.

The Modern Left is quite literally the biggest scam ever.

If you want an anarchist utopia go shoot someone in minecraft butterfag.
>>17120036
The videos in this reply are perfect and I love them,don't know about the whole channel since I didn't watch every video.
The System is not fucking desirable.
I recommend them to every commie/anarkiddie here,communism was and will always be the weakest ideology.

>>17123020
Read Ted Kaczynski faggot,or kill yourself.

>>17122172
I am a fascist, so no.
>>17122176
No, you definitely cannot.

>>17122222
Based as fuck. I usually dislike butters but /pol/fags are even worse

>>17123020
>Think fo yourself if possible.
The irony, coming from a crayon eater. You are a dining-kruger buffoon personified.

>>17123366
>scapegoat
>he doesn't know

pic related

>>17123416
I dont go to /pol/, you are both morons and belong together. The fact that you would hitch yourself to some who got so thoroughly rekt and exposed as the pseud she is can only mean you are a Jew shill so you can also eat shit

These books.

>>17123366
>Some jews are nazis,but you’d rather debate nazis
Jew or not, yes.
>nazis are not in power
Authoritarians are in power and using deceptive techniques to make people believe they have democracy, which is rather popular with the masses.
>you serve the system
As a low level wage slave. Looking to get out out of course. And no, espousing ways to subvert the system is not supporting the system. Staging a a coup, IE replacing one authoritarian with another authoritarian, isn’t going to help shit.
>it literally gives the system power
It literally does nothing but spread a different perspective as the system goes about its business. I know it’s inaction. Pff.
>you vote
I don’t.
>your liberal
Not my liberals.
>revolt?Literally
Supplanting the old crumbling order with a working new one with sheer numbers. The only way it works. As little violence as possible, I prefer.
>delusional?
No.
>You cannot escape states!
I think we can. I’ve read some books on it recently. Sounds doable.

> The videos in this reply are perfect and I love them,don't
That’s your post.

You you write like that to become more recognizable or something?

>>17123037
>>17123366
>>17123718
>A-anon I s-swear our ideology doesnt come from memes and infographs that are fake once researched. WE'RE SERIOUS and BASED.

kek. The state. Fucking hilarious children.

>>17123772
>i dO rEsEaRcH aNd sTuPp
you are a joke and no amount of mockery and attempts to be dismissive about facts is going to change those facts. You are as transparent as glass. I can spot you fucking clowns in an instant, your tactics are so obvious you may as well glow in the dark.

>>17123037
Lol if they tried to curb anti-semitism on 4chan it sure as fuck didn't work. On Wikipedia, however, they definitely ruined that site.

>>17123772
butters is just a moron and annoying but ultimately harmless but you are very clearly a shill. you stink of matza balls and severed foreskins

>>17123814
they have ruined the entire internet. the ADL is a foreign advocacy group operating within our nation as a blackmail and strongarm racket to virtual free speech with threats of economic and physical violence

>>17123907
*curtail not virtual

fucking phone

>>17123907
True, but they'll get gassed again sooner or later, so I understand their schizophrenia.

>>17123927
>schizophrenia
speaking of ....

The Hitchhikers Guide To Clown World
https://esotericawakening.com/clown-world

>>17123745
>the crumbling system
You are very much helping enforce the System trough spreading your leftist values
And the System will never serve you anarkiddie,you will always serve the System.
>No.
Yes,delusional

>sheer numbers
This is a big meme,Ted deals with this,
>espousing ways to subvert the system,replacing one authoritharian with another isn't going to help
Your suggestions are childish,Ted deals with this.
This is not how the System works.
Staging a coup would also create instability,which would be great too.

>I work,but looking for a way out
Everyone is looking for a way out

>spread a different perspective of the system
>creating an association of democratic autonomous neigborhoods
Your opinions are specifically retarded,even more so if these neighborhoods are meme communes,you seem easily impressionable,even I don't agree with Ted fullly.

You also deny Aristotel when he says democracy works best in homogenous society,in another thread,just because he might have had other opinions that don't conform to modernity.
Opinions unrelated to this argument.
Yes greeks did hate women so much they fucked boys,this doesn't disprove it.
Aristotel is right here,especially when considering that at the time,all the big authoritharian empires were multicultural.

>that's your post
Did I pretend it wasn't?
I literally started with
>my first reply is more than enough
How can you fuck up like this when I clearly admitted at the beggining it was my post.
Holy fuck you are retarded.

You also deny Aristotel when he says democracy works best in homogenous society,just because he might have had other oppinions that don't conform to modernity

>>17124079
>big meme,Ted deals with this,
In what way?
> This is not how the System works.
That was not a description of how the system is working. That was describing coups that have never supplanted the system.
> meme communes
Getting enough people to supplant the failing old system would be a successful meme, in the traditional sense of the word.
> homogenous society
A non issue. Only an issue with racists. But who’s to stop them from trying to carve out Blankoland? They’re a minority in the US and to survive they’re going to have to learn how to behave around their neighbors. No one will stand for a race war.
It’s undeniable that Aristotle cannot preach to the modern world on this.

>>17124209
You know why everyone hates you butters? Aside from your name fagging for attention of course. It is because you never fucking learn. I have seen you here for years get pwned on the daily. Completely fucking rekt on every point yet the next day you just pretend like it never happened, like it is Groundhog day and spew the same exact simplistic retardation which shows you are either too stupid to understand why you are such a simple plebeian or you suffer from some sort of personality or mental disorder that prevents you from learning from your mistakes and evolving. Since when you get pwned you generally scurry away from the discussion quietly with your tail between your legs it signals you must not be too stupid to understand you got pwned so what it that keeps you from being able to evolve and admit you were and are wrong.

You got played by master magicians. There is nearly nothing you think you know that is true as these people have been cooking the history books and "news" for millennia. Every single framework you operate from and use for reference in your ideological worldview, is the exact opposite of reality in most cases. They play with your mind like a cat plays with a mouse, you are a fish in a bowl that doesn't even know you are in the bowl with absolute no clue there is an entire world outside of it. This is why you are a joke and no one takes you seriously. You are like a child clamoring for attention in a College level physics class. People humor you a bit but ultimately just want you out of the way as soon as possible so the adults can have an adult conversation yet you always come back and start the cycle all over again.

I don't even have anything personally against you, I dont even give a shit about the name fagging but you are a like an abusive relationship where one partner knows it is going to end it is just a matter of when because they know that person will never change, they likely arent capable of changing no matter what you show them, tell them or help them try to understand. They are too narcissistic and lazy to listen or care so you just write them off as hopeless and move on with your life. Is this really what you thought you were going to be when you grew up?

>>17123883
Lol literal fake Rabbi.
Kek.
The state.

>>17124442
nah butterfly seems pretty cool and learned. You come across as a bully though.

>>17123907
Muh conspiracy meme. This is modern fascism and it's hilarious

>>17123963
WWG1WGA

>>17124442
Look at this effort post. This season of undercover SIMP is lame

anti semitism and racism are dead ends. not productive. will change nothing in your life other than redirecting the scapegoat towards something else. get a job or get money you nazi bums

>>17124560
your new tactic is to try to call what you morons used to call "stormfags", then "poltards" is now to try and label them Qtards? The mossad psyop? I highly doubt this will catch on it just makes you look like a moron, not that a Jew ever cared about looking like a moron though am I right? It is pretty much your whole schtick

>>17124574
>effort post
This is what a triple digit IQ level of conversation is called on this board? I wasn't aware of this tks jew.

>>17124599
You just look like a lost /pol/tard who needs to go back to his containment board.

>>17121150
>dude its just about love for our people
>yeah remove the jews from our country blacks are subhuman deport the mexicans

>>17124634
>>>/lgbt/ you first rabbi xer

>>17124442
>Failing to turn one i to another antisemite = pwned+can’t learn
Stupid chuds.

>>17124521
Thanks.

>>17124442
>Failing to turn one into another antisemite = pwned+can’t learn
Stupid chuds.

>>17124521
Thanks.

>>17124655
Hitler lost the war and his ideology discredited and shunned, exposed for the rabid irrational death cult it is. Hitler was an embarrassment to civilization and devolved humanity into naked barbarism. Demagogue who preyed on the irrational. Wretched creature as are his modern day followers who champion genocide.

Ok.

>>17124696

Kek at this Nazinigger poster. I always find it funny when they read a bunch of fake infographs and recite them in effortposts then think they're actually learned or smart.

>>17124701

>>17124711

>>17124599
>REEE infographs are amazing and infallible! Question nothing!!!

>>17116025
>Your “stupid” men are products of this system.

Man is not a blank piece of paper that can be sketched upon to create any image. The piece of paper comes into existence with an image already imprinted upon it. Man is immovable. Man is born the way he is because of his genetics. Man is different to all others around him. By denying this and pursuing your anti-essentialist beliefs that all men can be created the same and pushed to believe the same things, what you are actually doing is pushing to erase individuality. And the reason you do that, is because your own individuality is sickening to you, probably because you're a disgusting tranny.

>>17114873
Truly hazardous

>>17118113
Weird. When somebody told you to read uncle ted in response to your post, you said that was a sign they hadn't actually read the books themselves. Are we to conclude from this that you haven't read Paine?

>>17111294

>>17125120
We are more malleable than you give us credit for.
>created the same
Never implied, so not really trying to erase individuality. There is a need for balance in our thinking regarding individualism and the communal. The current system has muddied the waters on this. Keeping us bickering about it when there isn’t really a problem. At worst, I just haven’t gone into it. No, though. The individual would have plenty of room to roam. A lot more than they do today.
> your own individuality is sickening to you
Hahahah. I don’t know where you get this from... I am an actual woman.

>>17125146
That anon was trolling me and refused to get what I had already explained a dozen times. I will read Ted eventually. Lasch sounds just as interesting.

>>17124647
We were never asked if we wanted mass non-white immigration. To the contrary, assurances were made that the new policies wouldn't significantly alter the demographic landscape. Of course those were lies, and then the anti-white indoctrination began in earnest.

So here we are, with nearly all White countries under siege, and somehow I'm a villain for resisting the destruction of my entire genetic cluster? I don't think so.

>>17127285
>I'm a villain
yes
youre a genocidal maniac

>>17127295
>implying there is anything wrong with genocide
If you cant see beyond meaningless social constructs like good and bad you shouldnt be here. Humanist faggot.

>>17127459
Hold still

>>17127466
>info graphic memes
You dont actually care about people. Most of your arguments rest upon concern trolling. We know you dont care about the vast majority of people so just stop pretending you care about genocide.

>>17111051
This is literally dangerous. I live in Japan, a zone prone to earthquakes, and I read among these books. One of them could knock me out.

>>17127538
Wrong.

>>17127538
>>17127459
doesnt take much for nazis to go mask off does it

>>17127593
>>17127595
>values human life over all other forms of life
>pretends they arent selfish
You're both likely psychopaths, which would explain why butters is a tranny as they do not experience a gender identity.

>>17127612
you dont value life at all. you dont even value "muh people" like you claim you do, because if they dont fit your idealized vision youd have them executed. or if they do send them to die in a war for some vague cause.

>>17127612
Oh, hi Rei.

>>17127618
>you dont value life at all
Bullshit. I am able to remove my emotions from my morality like most adults. If you're over 18 and you are still unable to control your emotions you should kill yourself for the better of humanity.

So again, your whole argument relies on genocide = bad but we all know you're lying and dont actually care about anyone besides humans and this is caused by self preservation. At your core you feel nothing for anyone besides yourself.

>>17127619
>Rei
Uh oh hit a nerve. Spend more time outside.

>>17119133
Lucien Rebatet - Les Deux étendards
Louis-Ferdinand Céline - Journey to the End of the Night

That's what I could find on wikipedia as being the better lit of the regime (unless you want political theory)

>>17111051
Does bitchature count?

>>17127637
>neo nazi genocide apologist
>telling people to go outside
take your own advice

>>17115391
>they start thinking only in ethnocentric terms, they feel victimized
So only the self proclaimed chosen people are allowed to feel this way, amirite? And they’ve never done anything to cause MASSIVE death and destruction, it’s all just jealousy anti Semites, amirite amirite?

>>17127619
tranny

>>17115444
>Europeans invented and created everything by harnessing their innate racism and misogyny and homophobia and anti Semitism
Ok lol

>>17127690
Nope
All woman

>>17121885
It’s sad and disturbing that no one else seems to have noticed your post or probably has any ideas what you are referring to.

so dangerous that the ruling class has spent trillions of dollars to fight, distort, slander and suppress its ideas. no other book comes close.

>>17111144
Checked and Kek’d

>>17127785
Nigger, the ruling class are literally printing and distributing it through their retailers. If you want to look for banned books, perhaps the other end of the spectrum is more to your liking.

>>17122176
LMAO no, and I own both

>>17122674
Bingo, these get buried the most because they have the most truth to reveal and expose

>>17111051
The Abrahamic screeds. Tanakh, Bible, Koran.

>>17127466

>>17127966
Niggers and poles are the lesser evil

>>17123374
fascist/nazi books arent that hard to find because of their use as historical scholarship. you can get mein kampf and books about nazism or fascism that quote hitler, mussolini, etc from libraries at least in america

Imagine thinking that 'reading' something could be dangerous to anyone in 2020, when being addicted to consuming media is the norm. Anything that could get posted in this thread is inane.

>>17127923
>the ruling class are literally printing and distributing it through their retailers.

and Marx foresaw that as well when he said, "The Capitalists Will Sell Us the Rope with Which We Will Hang Them"

checkmate bootlicker

>>17128023
Marx was paid in gold to write the communist manifesto and capital

>>17128019
Based everybody has infinite distractions, no book will memetically spread through the population as they used to 100 years ago.

>>17128023
Marx was paid in gold to write the communist manifesto and capital

>>17128019
Based everybody has infinite distractions, no book will memetically spread through the population as they used to 100 years ago.

read de sade if youre ready for the realest shit

lenin

>>17111051
Anything written by Ayn Rand. Her immature faggot republican acolytes have done more damage based on her fake meme philosophy than any other group I can think of.