[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 21 KB, 474x528, 1611566764066.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17436553 No.17436553 [Reply] [Original]

"God", "immortality of the soul", "redemption", "beyond" -- Without exception, concepts to which I have never devoted any attention, or time; not even as a child. Perhaps I have never been childlike enough for them?
I do not by any means know atheism as a result; even less as an event: It is a matter of course with me, from instinct. I am too inquisitive, too questionable, too exuberant to stand for any gross answer. God is a gross answer, an indelicacy against us thinkers - at bottom merely a gross prohibition for us: you shall not think!
I am much more interested in another question,—a question upon which the "salvation of humanity" depends to a far greater degree than it does upon any piece of theological curiosity: I refer to nutrition. "How precisely must thou feed thyself in order to attain to thy maximum of power."

>> No.17436614

>In former times, one sought to prove that there is no God -- today one indicates how the belief that there is a God arose and how this belief acquired its weight and importance: a counter-proof that there is no God thereby becomes superfluous. -- When in former times one had refuted the "proofs of the existence of God" put forward, there always remained the doubt whether better proofs might not be adduced than those just refuted: in those days atheists did not know how to make a clean sweep.

>> No.17436656

>One kind of honesty has been unknown to all founders of religions and their likes -- they have never made of their experiences a matter of conscience and knowledge. "What did I really experience? What happened in me and around me then? Was my mind sufficiently alert? Was my will bent against fantasy?" -- none of them has asked such questions, none of our dear religious people asks such questions even now: they feel, rather, a thirst for things which are contrary to reason and do not put too many difficulties in the way of satisfying it -- thus they experience "miracles" and "rebirths" and hear the voices of angels!

>> No.17436714
File: 42 KB, 500x666, 9DFE9643D5964C6980589AEC48475CB1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17436714

>"How precisely must thou feed thyself in order to attain to thy maximum of power."
based /fitlit/ rising again

>> No.17436762
File: 1.22 MB, 1200x1200, 1557510431901.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17436762

if you have to "disprove" an argument with the implication that the person who made it is ugly at least post body to prove that you are right

>> No.17436832

>A casual stroll through a lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything.

>> No.17436984

>>17436762
Post face

>> No.17437087

>>17436714
Cope

>> No.17437339

>another anti-nietzsche psyop thread

>> No.17437738

>>17436553
This can't be real.

>> No.17438337

>>17437339
Nietzsche is a psyop tho

>> No.17438460

>>17436553
>I do not by any means know God as a result; even less as an event: It is a matter of course with me, from instinct.
Just replace a single word in the quote and Nietzscheanism is exposed for what it really is, atheist fundamentalism

>> No.17438745

>>17438460
There's a lot of those. He's basically a hard-core christian.

>> No.17438995

>>17437087
post genitals pls

>> No.17439101

>>17438995
Post shelf

>> No.17440230

>>17436553
Based

>> No.17440908

wasnt he a really pious little lutheran as a boy though? hes larping here

>> No.17440949

>>17440908
He killed God christcuck.

>> No.17440959

>>17438460
>atheist fundamentalism
I like to call it religious practicalism

>> No.17440964

>>17440949
lol seethe

>> No.17441004

>>17436553
someone should ban all religion and antireligion threads
you are all retards

>> No.17441026

>>17436762
He wasn't disproving the argument that way you moron, he was comically anecdotally making a fair point by comparing it with the fedoras.

>> No.17441041

>>17441004
Ban dfw

>> No.17441710

>>17441026
Post body.

>> No.17442220

>>17436614
What is this?

>> No.17443063

>Christianity was from the beginning, essentially and fundamentally, life's nausea and disgust with life, merely concealed behind, masked by, dressed up as, faith in "another" or "better" life.

>> No.17443147

>paradigma vs paradigma

Wowa wiwa

>> No.17443280

>>17436614
>today one indicates how the belief that there is a God arose and how this belief acquired its weight and importance: a counter-proof that there is no God thereby becomes superfluous
All the religious need to do is refute your opinion on how this arose. Amazing how such a philosopher could convince so many people through style alone.

>> No.17443983

>>17443280
Try it. You can't because Nietzsche was right.

>> No.17444840

>>17443147
Wowa

>> No.17446231
File: 618 KB, 708x547, tumblr_n346r1s9yh1toa0nco1_1280.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17446231

>>17436553

>> No.17446529

>>17436553
I've never bothered reading Nietzsche.
Is this really from him?

>> No.17446664

>>17436714
Imagine how tight that pussy is? It's prolly so tight it would suck the sperm right out of your balls.

>> No.17446776

>>17441710
Your first, I have no fears about it.

>> No.17447924

>>17446776
I didn't ask

>> No.17448008
File: 84 KB, 904x864, pepe tired.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17448008

>>17436553
Are you going to keep posting this every day? We get it

>> No.17448456

>>17436553
>people who believe in santa claus keep posting this quote thinking it shames him
kek, keep digging that hole

>> No.17449523

>>17447924
You asked me to post my body.

>> No.17449535

>>17443063
Here Nietzsche shows his own character, modern nausea (but of course these great men are always larger than any single typing), where the traditional Christian accepts life, and embraces it with healthiness.

>> No.17449548
File: 196 KB, 406x375, 1573256026137.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17449548

>>17449535
He shows his character as someone immune to feeling disgust with any aspect of life. That's why his philosophy of tragedy is the greatest and why his accusations against Christianity make you seethe.

>> No.17449559

>>17449548
Lol okay retard, the Grecian-tragic conception of life is ontological.

>just do whatever you want bro
No. What I want must never be what I want.

>> No.17449590

>>17449559
>the Grecian-tragic conception of life is ontological.
Nietzsche sees it that way too, but your ontology is inferior to his.

>just do whatever you want bro
straw man

>> No.17450278

>>17448008
Do you?

>> No.17450294

>>17449548
Cringe