/lit/ - Literature

Not /lit/

>>17717602
no there is not. Also women are not even capable of not being sluts. At best they can play the prude nest door girl in public, like they did before feminism, but they are always whores in private.

>>17717602
It's generally pretty antisocial since it causes a lot of undue grief and stress for the people around them.

It’s a made up thing

>>17717602
I usually think of having a daughter and I would definitely not like my daughter to be knob gobbling skank. Would you like your daughter to be a knob gobbling skank, anon?

By being a slut, they neglect the people who really do love them.

>>17717616

>>17717602
it decreases their reproductive value, puts them into potentially danger situations and they have to assume risks of having to raise a fatherless child.

it goes against natural law clearly

>>17717616
If I lived in a society where being a whore is accepted, and she is an adult with a healthy financial and social life, then yeah let her be a slut.

Typical fragile and controlling male pattern degeneracy

Not /lit/

social decay, hurts themselves, women are slutty because they are taught to be. it is a dance for attention and validation, not volitional but conditioned. some women are just hypersexual though.

>>17717635
What natural law that prohibits females from being promiscuous? I don't see any monkeys or lions moralise about this shit. It's free game for all as far as I know

>>17717602
Sure but it's mostly a matter of restricting male access to sex. If women use their sexuality beyond the negotiated limits to advance socially it could result in a collapse of the monopoly and decrease female capital broadly. It's a bad strategy and a wider consequence would be a loss of male creative energy.

>>17717614
>>17717641
wise words from the lonely 48 year old lesbian who relies on tripfagging on 4chan to support her ego. tell me again why anyone should take anything you say seriously?

>>17717648
>It's free game for all as far as I know
maybe just learning about the topic then, you utter retard. obviously things that are incapable of moralising don't moralise, that doesn't mean it is a freeforall. nothing is a freeforall in nature and it's not in our society either.

>>17717617
correct. it took me a while to overcome the thoughts that my wife had someone before and I don't think it will ever go away. my cope is the fact that I had someone before her too.

>>17717636
woman hands wrote this

>>17717648
the fact they are the fragile sex.

it has been ethologically proven women unconsciously think what i have said. unironically you can read this in a book about animal behavior such as the one by john alcock

>>17717648
>monkeys and dogs and niggers do it so should you!

>>17717655
>lonely
Hm?
> tell me again why
I’m here to help you sad sacks of shit.
I’m here to share the good news.

>>17717675
>I’m here to share the good news.
You're not Christ, begone you whore.

>>17717678
No mang, he ded.

>>17717675
>pee bottles
Nice touch there.

>>17717675
>I’m here to help you sad sacks of shit.
what could you possibly offer anyone?

>>17717648
>letting literal animals dictate morality for you
what the fuck is wrong with you
>>17717636
To give into this world is to hate yourself

>>17717695
Have you just arrived?

>>17717700
no?

Watch this lecture series. It isn't about women specifically, but our species in general. I disagree with some of it but he makes a compelling case.
https://youtu.be/nkbbk5HCCmU

>>17717602
It decreases vaginal tightness for everyone.

>>17717713
This. It reinforces BBC privilege.

I like being promiscuous so why should I care if someone else likes to be promiscuous too?

>>17717602
sex makes everything worse. it drives this shitty economy, it drives people to wear stupid shit and act out disgusting fantasies. it makes guys bring girls to d&d. it sucks!

I hate sexual promiscuity. I want to criminalize both condoms and birth control.

>>17717723
Society anon. Sometimes we have to suppress our desires for the greater good and often then we learn that it was for our individual good as well.

>>17717728
mein neger

>>17717675
No one needs your help, no one asked for your help, you are not helpful. It's all just cope you tell yourself to stomach looking in the mirror just one more day.

Aren't you tired of being so pathetic? Aren't you tired of living like this?

>>17717728
Wife's friend slept with an Arab (she's a pure blue eyed blond), had taken injections for contraception and also already took morning-after pill. Now she's with some kid who clearly just wants to fuck her and is already making jokes about how she's been with an arab. She is astounded at the fact that he's making jokes about that! It doesn't enter the woman's mind that the only value they have is their innocence (after virginity is gone) and when that's gone then they morph into contraceptive-chugging, abortion-having semen demons.

>>17717729
How will society be affected if I stop being promiscuous? Could you explain how having safe, consensual sex with multiple people has any bearing on society?

>>17717728
>I want to destroy culture, intellect and cause massive poverty.

>>17717735
You’re wrong. You’re all very maladjusted fools reenforcing bad ideas. More of you need to listen to me

>>17717602
Technically there isn't.
The problem is that they think with emotions instead with reason. That's why they're sluts. Gays and trannies are like this too.
If they were able to think rationally and logically as men, they wouldn't have a problem in having relations with quality partners.
They can't tho, since it's hardwired in their gender to prioritize their beauty above all else, which becomes an obsession, and end up forgetting wtf that means in the process.
Some men who know this take advantage of it and don't mind hurting them. This is retarded since they're abusing their own yang energy, which can mentally lobotomize them in the long run.

>>17717757
how usury has an effect on the economy? how abortion has an effect on population? how promiscuous sex has an effect on family creation and finding/keeping a good husband in your case?

>>17717759
>>I want to destroy culture, intellect and cause massive poverty.

I'm a Christian, I hate everything about your "culture."

>>17717759
we already have destroyed culture, destroyed intellect and massive poverty. it's probably a good time for a change.

>>17717777
nice digits friend

>>17717768
>My culture is rich and god smiles on us in all our filth

>>17717759
>implying your form of culture and "intellect" have anything to offer anyone, even the people who lust after it
lmaoing at you

>>17717777
I have a program for that.

>>17717792
>lmaoing @ things I don’t get

>>17717602
If women are not sluts, men will like them more. Pretty simple reason.

>>17717602
It spreads disease (notice the huge pandemic going on), not to mention trillions spent on communized healthcare which enables the government to control the universities. Furthermore stable marriages are needed to raise families. And in addition, the immune system is actually passed from mother to the child, so their lifestyle has an impact on the childrens health

>>17717766
>finding/keeping a good husband in your case
I would argue that having multiple sexual partners would make me a better husband as I would have more exprience dealing and empathising with a multitude of people.
>how promiscuous sex has an effect on family creation
Probably none, I do think it is responsible for me to have/start a family in my early 20s.

>>17717798
ok, i'll bite. share your program.

>>17717800
>Pretty simple
Yes, you sure are

>>17717708
Hey good post, btw

>>17717805
anglo education everyone.
Is this how you justify shagging random whores? You'd be better at understanding them emotionally? I bet that's exactly why you shagged them in the first place, to get to know them better.

>>17717655

>>17717805
If you get HPV, a common virus, it causes throat cancer, very prohibitive

https://theconversation.com/michael-douglas-oral-sex-and-cancer-the-facts-about-hpv-14897

>>17717824
>!!oI3er5KKetj
thanks brother

>>17717798
what dont I get? I love how you can never actually post anything beyond some vapid platitude. I dont think ive ever seen you exercise a shred of intellect. andyou say you are here to supposedly help us by showering us with empty platiuded. yea as i said I am lmaoing at your arrogance

>>17717824
nah lol

>>17717812
We stop protesting, considering the ruling class as the parasites they are, turn away and seize the parts of the world we live in. Meet and organize, offer the functioning replacement to adjoining regions. Among them, a non accumulative currency. Replacing state and capital would change the behavior of people in all sorts of positive ways

>>17717822
>Is this how you justify shagging random whores
No, I don't need justification from you, I do it because it feels good and it's fun. I stand by my argument that someone that has multiple partners, would on average, be a more understanding and mature husband.

>>17717825
>it causes throat cancer
It CAN cause throat cancer. You could also get a multitude of other STI's from unsafe sex, what is your point?

>>17717756
That's normal. The only purpose of men is to please women. The only purpose of women is to enjoy their easy life given to them by men.

>>17717853
>why yes, im going to recite meaningless platitudes about humanity uniting as if that is some sort of a functional system. of course i wont actually provide a complete and sound step by step guide as to how I will magically make trillions of variables fall into place perfectly

INTELLECTUAL
COPOUT

>>17717853
>Non-accumulating currency
Lol, like it self destructs when you stash too much of it under your mattress? You can never prevent people from accumulating resources, or hierarchy from forming. I agree, though, that the current ruling class needs to be punished and replaced

>>17717881
>You can never prevent people from (x)
youre about to learn a harsh lesson of what IRL leftism looks like

>>17717858
50% of Americans have herpes, and you can get it just from swapping spit. Your sex organs are not a hobby, and it would take too long to list all the problems caused by this attitude.

>>17717901
What do you mean?

>>17717879
It’s not meaningless just because you can’t understand it for its simple delivery.
Why take a swing at the air when you could ask for some clarifications

>>17717881
Yeah. Labor vouchers. Recourses are a wealth of the land, but it’s nothing without the laborers.
I know why you pulled hierarchies out of your ass, but this arrangement would leave only justifiable hierarchies.

>>17717729
based

>>17717912
>more meaningless platitudes! you just dont understand! of course i dont understand and cannot clarify how i intend on reaching thse seemingly impossible goals

>>17717912
>Recourses
Resources. Drrr spielchick

>>17717920
>intendon gaming system
It’s incredibly possible though.

>>17717910
I mean "a boot stomping on a face forever"

>>17717912
I didn't pull hierarchy out of my ass... Currency is a problem for you because some people have more of it than others. It always comes down to hierarchy with leftist ideologues. You can't accept that some people are more capable than others, and more worthy of leadership. You would rather force inefficiency in the system to elevate the polloi than admit some people are smarter than you.

>>17717912
>Posting "Labor vouchers" without explaining how exactly you define the value of labour in its countless forms

>>17717906
>50% of Americans have herpes
Anon HSV-1 and HSV-2 are different things.

>Your sex organs are not a hobby
Why not? Explain how having safe, responsible, consensual sex with my penis is different to playing videos games with my hands?

>>17717931
one again you cant simply give a straight answer on how you plan to magically unite a society behind your pipe dream that wont even band together to stop an apparent environmental apocalypse that will kill everyone

>>17717635
>decreases their reproductive value

>>17717946
I'll repeat: It would take to long to list all the problems this attitude causes.
>HSV 1 and HSV 2
I know that, I'm talking about oral herpes not genital herpes.

>>17717946
>explain how acting on primal instincts is the same as recreation
>explain how tending to the soul is the same as discarding it

>>17717942
It’s in a book

>>17717953
Through the magic of organizing. There is a Great Depression coming, and people will be quite receptive to a working alternative.
The neets will hide indoors till the power goes out. But they’d sooner hang themselves than till a small garden (this last was probably just vindictiveness. Nevermind)

>>17717946
Fuck it I'll list some. Besides diseases, studies show overall happiness is much lower in females ethno have had more than one sexual partner. There's obviously the tissue damage and cancers than come from abusing your organs for pleasure, and a whole slew of much more complex social problems that arise from the inevitable breakdown of trust that happens when people have multiple partners or serial monogamy

>>17717999
"ethno" should be "who". I'm on my phone rn

>>17717602
historically it was a dumb idea cause you'd get left with bairn or disease, good chance you'd die in birth and if not you're stuck with bastard son. it was a potentially life ruining move. that's why it's silly when libshits whine about people in the past "controlling wamens bodies" cause even the soiest of chapotrannies would've done the same thing to their own daughter. now we have the pill, condoms and abortion, there's literally no reason not to be a slut other than unconvincing moralfagging.

>>17717999
Sounds like you’re describing a pornstar or prostitute here.
Trust is a social construct. The more active sorts don’t associate with the lower sexed and “virginal” types because they don’t care to be judged.

>>17717991
"organizing" does not magically indoctrinate everyone to be on your side, and great depressions cause flare ups in every extreme ideology, not just yours, as well as all sorts of potential reactionary backlash from normies, not just yours.

try again. its really surprising that this is literally your entire world view here and we are just barely beginning to pierce the surface and you are already in over your head and haven't thought this far

>>17718021
From an individual perspective, you're right, there's no downside to chasing pleasure. From a society wide perspective, there is downside because it makes people dysfunctional and distracts them from things that are arguably more important.

>>17717969
>It would take to long
Well champion Im gonna assume you dont have any arguments so Im gonna continue champion promiscuity for all genders.

>>17717972
Define soul

>>17717999
>>17718008
I am not going to get diseases directly from practicing safe sex. I do not believe that sex would be the direct cause of sadness for women that have more than one sexual partner.
>the inevitable breakdown of trust that happens when people have multiple partners
What makes you assume that there would be a breach in trust? Anon I am not a teenager. I
can talk and communicate with other people in an adult and responsible manner.

>>17718029
Sink or swim, litli

>>17718047
Read The soul is not a smithy by DFW

>>17718048
>basing your entire world view on a pipe dream when you cant even explain step one
>"im here to help you"
once again, what can someone like you offer anyone besides a few platitudes?

>>17718025
We're talking about sluts, as per the OP. And calling trust a social construct is both retarded and a strawman fallacy.

>>17718047
Other people have written books about this, and besides I listed some shit here>>17717999 which you apparently read already.

>I do not believe sex to be the cause of sadness
Okay, you don't have to believe the world is round either. You're free you be wrong.

>What makes you assume that there would be a breach in trust?
You're one of those people who needs an in depth explanation for why it's bad to stuff your hand in a garbage disposal. You're the reason warning labels exist. Please rub some brain cells together before your next reply.

>>17718059
>Confusing the help for inceldom with the socialist freedom project
>refusing to acknowledge the sketch for step one makes it go away
>”your ENTIIIIIRE worldview...”
Is also something that take a bit more than a tweet to get across. Oh. You are that simple! I get it now.

>>17718062
No, your problem with trust issues is a social construct. There was a thread yesterday with anons openly advocating murder for infidelity. Unapologetically. You people have a problem and you’re not making yourselves anymore attractive for picking up bad mental blocks from each other.

>>17718100
Your concept of a social construct is a social construct. Check mate.

>>17718048
if you had milk in your breasts, why wouldn't you feed a starving baby?

>>17718107
Metaphorically I am.

>17718104
>said the spook

>>17717729
Sometimes you must suck my cock every day for the greater good of us all. You will develop great virtue and a dexterous tongue, and I will feel the bliss of excreting my seed into your mouth.

lib utopians can't help but emphasize the lamest aspects of their fantasies. gals like butters want to replace the gay nannystate we live in with a more primitive one where they somehow have more influence, nothing more. forced by militant dykes to do chores according to rota, in exchange for good boy labor points? wowie, that sounds amazing!

>>17718089
You claimed that studies show overall happiness is much lower in females who have had more than one sexual partner. I'm embarrassed that 4chan has to teach you that correlation does not imply causation.
>Please rub some brain cells together before your next reply.
I do not know why or how there would be a breakdown in trust if all parties involved partake in transparent and healthy communication with one another. We are both obviously coming at this from two very different head spaces so again, what makes you assume that there would be a breakdown in trust?

All the complexity of life results from competition between organisms to reproduce. Female sexual selection facilitates this competition and decides the winners. If the competition breaks down, then the entire system breaks down, including society which is nothing more than a framework for competition between males to reproduce.

>>17718146
We lived something like this several times before, pomo boy. I’m not a primitivist either.
> they somehow have more influence
Everyone thoroughly fed up with representative government gets into Direct Democracy consensus decision-making, and you think it’s just “somehow”?

>>17718100
how are you going to help men better themselves when you can barely function on an intellectual level and have literally nothing to offer but meaningless platitudes
>Is also something that take a bit more than a tweet to get across
good thing this isnt twitter. we all know you wont explain anything because you cant, there is literally no other reason, you avoid it every time you are pressured but still manage to spend hours here every day and will probably spend quite a bit of time in this very thread (unless you feel spiteful enough to leave after reading this)

>>17718169
>meaningless platitudes meaningless platitudes
> meaningless platitudes meaningless platitudes
>nyaa nana nananuuuh

>>17718178
yes, thats what I thought. run away little girl, the men are talking

>>17718178
He does have a point. You do tend to throw out one liners and not engage in arguments. You assume this position of having all the solutions but seemingly cannot be bothered to illuminate the rest of us.

>>17718168
that's what i mean, your revolution brings us what exactly? more democracy, yippee! who decides what and how much gets taken to a vote? does that too get taken to a vote? do we spend our lives in endless council meetings bickering over trivial matters. even if your system can be implemented soundly, it's not exactly inspiring to anyone other than busy body women.

>>17718149
Multiple partners causes jealousy, infringes boundaries, and creates the potential for a man to be cuckoo'd and raise a child unrelated to him genetically. I guess it depends on your personal values whether you consider these to be problems, but personally I see no upside and many downsides. And there may be some historical evidence that societies with loose sexual morals were less efficient than ones with strict morals. But you're right that correlation =/= causation, my example was poor and showed confirmation bias.

>>17717853
Only a woman would have such a dog shit grasp of power dynamics. I finally understand why my great grandfathers would swap their daughters for a few heads of cattle, what a dumb, useless fucking gender.

>>17717611
Bruh babushka chopping firewood in subzero temp ain't thinking about getting donged by the town
It's cultural and maybe more

Women aren't a monolith blah blah

All things come at a trade off. You have to define a standard of good and bad.
When there's no loyalty then debauchery is much more prevalent

>>17718178
>spam every thread with bold claims and smug insults, then sperg out when anyone pressures you to elaborate
Yea, I wonder why that phrase would come up a lot when engaging you.

>>17718149
Also, sorry for the obnoxious bullshit here>>17718089 I really make myself cringe sometimes

>>17717675
I know where you live, California "girl"! You WILL help me. Yes you will.

>>17718181
>run away and take your overdue shower
Thank you.
But really. You aren’t receptive in the least. Why engage with a troll?
>men are talking
Ywnbam

>>17718195
I have been researching solutions, and I have been honest with what has to be done. It is very possible, it’s just a lot of effort [AND TRUST IN OTHERS] and I am under no illusions that it’s a sure thing. Do YOU have any questions?

>>17718204
More close knit community. More responsible, charismatic people. Plenty of time to learn much, tinker, develop. We would be resilient and far safer this way. A nation, an empire, they’re like a glass window. Rigid and seemingly strong. But they break into dangerous shards. I prescribe the beach. Cant break the beach.

>>17718233
No one’s pressured me to elaborate anything. They want the book in a single post. They’re not serious. They’re dismissive

>>17718290
Hahahahah.

>>17718208
>>17718272
So I think what you mean is that having multiple partner CAN cause those things you've listed. Most of which can be mitigated with proper communication. You can talk and be transparent about your boundaries and what makes you jealous. If you and the other person is respectful, you can negotiate what shape your relationship will take. For example, if you just want sex out of the relationship and you both agree on it, then the other party would not expect you to raise a child.

>here may be some historical evidence that societies with loose sexual morals were less efficient than ones with strict morals
>But you're right that correlation =/= causation, my example was poor and showed confirmation bias

>I really make myself cringe sometimes
First step to getting better is admitting you have a problem.

>>17717602
Sure. Sleeping around undermines your ability to pair bond, i.e. form stable, long term relationships. Humans need to be able to form these in order to survive, thrive and reproduce.
>>17717614
Lies.