/lit/ - Literature

>noooo I need to break my back farming wheat or hunting bison
>is that a stoplight? you're doing me a heckin oversocialization I hate stoplights!
>leftists are insecure haha they hate strong and successful things, what no my hate for civilization is nothing like that!
>im abandoning civilization by living right next to a town with modern amenities instead of the actual country, noooooo you can't cut down these trees this is the deep wilds where I went to escape
>the technological system's propaganda means I have to bomb people so they listen to me, it has nothing to do with my manifesto being otherwise boring and gay
>people are unfulfilled because they can't achieve meaningful things with struggle, this is what causes all of civilizational discontent, all jobs and pursuits are just cope. no of course this belief has nothing to do with the fact that I dropped out of academia and went and lived in a hut
>it's eat your cake and have it not have it and eat it, Im not a professional quotemaker or anything though

>>17853438
Technophile? Yikes.

>>17853438
A reaction picture and mocking isn't a argument.

Last man.

Jacques Ellul is even more based

>>17853438
Different stokes for different folks, my man.

>>17853667
Im actually a big fan of Uncle Ted, especially Anti-Tech Revolution. I just wanted to post that frog so I thought of ways to mock him

>>17853679
Seems so since your mocks seem so logical and correct. It's almost a joke.

>>17853679
Its cool. Its good to have other viewpoints on things such as Ted's thoughts, its pretty much an echo chamber when it comes to Ted in here.

>>17853438
Absolutely based

>>17853438
Never read ted.

Fuck that cunt of a sister-in-law am I right I bet she wanted Ted's fat throbbing dick and he wasn't going for that industrialized pussy so she got with his brother to get back at him

>>17853876
His sister-in-law hated him for some reason, even before his spree.

>>17853590
Junger is more based.

>>17853438
Get with the times.

>people assume that ridiculous sounding claim is stupid and dumb without actually doing research
>most people that actually bother doing the research agree with the claim at least in part
Pottery

>>17853438
Posting a pepe and making strawmen isn't an argument

Cuckchinsky thread again

>>17853579
>>17854814

An argument could be that he is a violent psychopath that killed innocent people, and his book encourages further acts of terror. Technology has the improved the lives of 99% of people, instead of killing innocent people we should look for new solutions to the problems outlined in his book.

>>17853957
>wasn't a nazi even in nazi germany
fuck that faggot

>>17854933
counter-sage

>>17855049
Killing nerds isn't killing innocent people. I would pay big money to see Ted beat up Sergey Brin and Larry Page.

>>17853358
Blackpilled again.....

>>17856362
Didn't that game actually name-drop him?

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x36ny22

>17857178
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxWlJ_muK0I
Also here's more

>>17855251
Cringe. There were no good nazis.

>>17853438
Its painfully obvious that you only watched that gay ass tv show instead of reading the man himself

>>17853438

>>17857204
>