[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

File: 511 KB, 1364x1600, David-Hume-oil-canvas-Allan-Ramsay-Scottish-1766.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

18193270

Anonymous Fri May 7 04:30:33 2021 No.18193270 [Reply] [Original]

Happy birthday Hume, thank you for being refuted

>>	Anonymous Fri May 7 04:32:36 2021 No.18193274 Kant here, eat a dick Hume

>>	Anonymous Fri May 7 05:01:52 2021 No.18193370 >>18193270 >refuted never sufficiently

>>	Anonymous Fri May 7 05:57:04 2021 No.18193519 >>18193270 >refuted By who(m)?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 7 06:02:15 2021 No.18193535 File: 1.57 MB, 750x1000, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>18193519 "Causality this!" fires

>>	Anonymous Fri May 7 06:04:57 2021 No.18193547 File: 382 KB, 360x450, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>18193535 dying "You c-can't prove the missile killed me." dies and so hundreds of millions of lives are saved

>>	Anonymous Fri May 7 06:18:54 2021 No.18193593 >>18193519 Me

>>	Anonymous Fri May 7 06:28:08 2021 No.18193632 >>18193519 Immanuel Kant, and in a big way

>>	Anonymous Fri May 7 06:30:30 2021 No.18193641 >>18193632 That hack was BTFO harder than anyone in the history of philosophy except perhaps Russell

>>	Anonymous Fri May 7 06:33:31 2021 No.18193656 >>18193632 Nah. Kant showed that causality is a transcendental category thus it is only applicable to phenomena. Hume stated that we impute causality between things which is basically the same thing Kant was arguing for in more detailed terms.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 7 06:38:10 2021 No.18193668 >>18193632 Kant explicitly said he's not refuting Hume but you never read the first critique