/lit/ - Literature

>>18660713
Gr8 b8/10
Take your (you) and kys.

>>18660713
Hopefully they won't read it and therefore miss out on all the useful information he provides

>>18660713
>99.9999999% of men in history before the years of 1960-1990 in a few regions in a few western nations have the same understanding of women
>this is somehow wrong

>>18660713
Why would anyone who isnt a woke leftist care.

im misogynist

>>18660813
same can be said about geocentrism

>>18661000
except that this is cultural and instinctual concepts that can't be proved or disproved with the scientific method

>>18660713
Daily reminder to read the Straussians.
Leo Strauss, Thoughts on Machiavelli
Leo Strauss, "Three Waves of Modernity"
Arthur Melzer, Philosophy Between the Lines
Harvey Mansfield, Machiavelli's Virtue
Harvey Mansfield, Machiavelli's New Modes and Orders
And also a reminder to read the Discourses on the First Ten Books of Titus Livius, and not just The Prince. The two go together.

>>18660713
>More like "The Princel."
Kek

>>18660713
Even in renaissance italy they understood that white (specifically) women cannot resist the lures and brutalities of BBC.... Anyone else get that from this passage?

>>18661810
t. coping buckcel

>>18661810
>Even in modern America they understood that black (specifically) bucks cannot resist the lures and brutalities of the breaker.... Anyone else get that from this post?
Spread your cheeks.

>>18660809
>DUDE
>Don't be like the fox all the time!
>Don't be like the lion all the time!
>Be a fox around traps, dude! And a lion around wolves, dude!
So cool, animal analogies, so useful, chicks don't know what they're missing...

>>18661810
>>18661830
>>18661851
Please post in either hm or lgbt, thank you.

>>18661851
>>18661810
Can you guys keep us out of your weird sexual neuroses?

>>18661871
wash yo ass

>>18661871
>>18661896
Buck breakers aren't gay, Snopes says so. I'm simply trying to assert dominance over this wild buck.

>>18661830
>>18661851
>>18661871
>>18661896
>Board moves slower than molasses
>Someone mentions BBC
>4 responses within 5 minutes
Chuds. You. NEED. help.

>>18661912
Chud who? I'm just a buck breaker.

>>18661912
Another chud-complainer-poster broken.

>>18661912
is yo ass itchy around whites?

>>18661011
>cultural and instinctual concepts that can't be proved or disproved with the scientific method
So this is what being uneducated sounds like

>>18660713
No, but I do think it is unfathomably cringe, and only read by men who are either milquetoast faggots with skinny wrists and strong glasses, who learned about masculinity by reading blogs, or 80 IQ criminal thugs. It is no better than 48 Laws of Power or whatever other gay self-help faggotry that tops check-out lists in prison libraries, and the same goes for Aurelius' Meditations, which is also an incredibly gay book, written by a confirmed opium addict (Galen's records of his time as Aurelius' personal physician are available through any reputable library).

>>18661000
Geocentrism and heliocentrism are both proven valid by Einstein's general relativity.

>>18661912
I only told them to leave, why lump me in with them?

>>18662011
His point is that you replied quickly to BBC posts on a board that goes slowly.

>>18660713
he was right, tho.

>>18660813
>men across all history, across all cultures, has had the same view of women
Imagine thinking this

>>18662779
Imagine not having read anything written before the 20th century

>>18662779
There are exceptions of course but for most of history women were treated as inferior.

>>18662779
I've talked to literal Injuns here in my country (Brazil) whose advice on women is literally identical to the advice my Polish grandpa gave
It's genuinely funny how consistent it is.

>>18661995
based

>>18661967
Prove it then, retard.