/lit/ - Literature

>>18803289
Yes.

>I can't formulate an answer to a rejection of all the things I take for granted and use to justify my actions, so i'll just list them under an insulting picture so i can disregard them
you really got the nihilists there bud

>>18803289
Yes
>>18803297
Based

Were trannies an instance of the demonic powers overplaying their hand, or is there some secret long term strategy I don't know about? Nobody likes trannies, not even trannies. Trannies can't even play good victims, because they are essentially aggressive perverted rapist men.

They can't really have thought they would be accepted, right?

>>18803289
trannie is just a NWO communism

>>18803315
They're God's solution to the mouse utopia issue.

>>18803315
>>18803335
Think about why people dressing different, going by different names, and using different words to describe themselves makes you so angry and disgusted :^) I think it would help you become happier people.

>>18803353
>why does it make me disgusted
Because I've seen neo-vaginas.

>>18803345
Interesting.

>>18803353
Shut the fuck up tranny.

>>18803289
Yes. Everything that inhibits my license to view internet pornography is bad.

>>18803361
>I've seen neovaginas
Why did you see all of those plural neovaginas, friend? Was it because trannies ran up to you on the street to flash you, or was it because you intentionally looked them up? Is it really such a problem in your day-to-day to know that people near you might have plastic surgery that you consider gross? Are you similarly opposed to colostomy bags, on the basis of being gross? I think you should really work out why you're so angry about people getting surgery to change around their junk.

>>18803383
You seem very upset :) Are you feeling hormonal tonight? It's really interesting how you fail to address any of my points. Is it because you're just going along with the dominant cultural trend, instead of thinking for yourself and really analyzing your own reactions to your experiences?

>>18803353
Found the tranny

>>18803353
trannyism is the basically great reset socialism; a punishment from our woke neo-liberal masters to degrade us. Its some demonic shit bro

>>18803394
Funny that you have to assume I'm a tranny with zero evidence :^) Seeing patterns on white noise can be a useful psychological tool--is there anything you'd like to share about yourself, anon?

>>18803393
>Why did you see all of those plural neovaginas, friend?
Morbid curiosity. People who go to freak shows do not wish to be or fuck freaks themselves. If you're trans, that's fine. I just think it's gross and weird and I'm entitled to those feelings.

>>18803393
>Um, why do you have such an issue with ideologues brainwashing children to chemically castrate and surgically mutilate themselves? I think you have some growing up to do
Shut the fuck up tranny.

>>18803289
Bad is good.

>>18803416
>"refuted by the law of the excluded middle"

>>18803430
The only excluded middle here is your 5/10 ass getting zero bitches

Ah yes, another great thread for discussing literature.

>>18803405
Wow, that's a lot of words! Not a lot of meaning in there though :) If you can't be specific about what you mean, maybe you could try poetry as a form of self-expression! I hope that would be helpful for you!

>>18803289
>>18803297
>>18803313
Buddhists don't believe in this.
The Lord Buddha (lord for a reason) never criticized hierarchy, nor did He say that the self doesn't exist. He simply trascended those petty things.
You have a modern, westernized travesty of Buddhism, not real Buddhism.

>>18803442
Wokeism reduced meaningful discussion to mere commodities - the only thing that matters now is big money to Israel and Bezos, with the woke bureaucrats being paid their salaries by them. Liberal malaise, communism lite, is a slow cook to burn everyone’s soul.

>>18803430
11. In what way the Phenomenology of the Spirit is negative or contains what is false
Φ 38. Now, because the systematic statement of the mind’s experience embraces merely its ways of appearing, it may well seem that the advance from that to the science of ultimate truth in the form of truth is merely negative; and we might readily be content to dispense with the negative process as something altogether false, and might ask to be taken straight to the truth at once: why meddle with what is false at all? The point formerly raised, that we should have begun with science at once, may be answered here by considering the character of negativity in general regarded as something false. The usual ideas on this subject particularly obstruct the approach to the truth. The consideration of this point will give us an opportunity to speak about mathematical knowledge, which non-philosophical knowledge looks upon as the ideal which philosophy ought to try to attain, but has so far striven in vain to reach.

Φ 39. Truth and falsehood as commonly understood belong to those sharply defined ideas which claim a completely fixed nature of their own, one standing in solid isolation on this side, the other on that, without any community between them. Against that view it must be pointed out, that truth is not like stamped coin that is issued ready from the mint and so can be taken up and used. Nor, again, is there something false, any more than there is something evil. Evil and falsehood are indeed not so bad as the devil, for in the form of the devil they get the length of being particular subjects; qua false and evil they are merely universals, though they have a nature of their own with reference to one another.

>>18803442
What does a real woman do on a Saturday night?

Hint: Not what you're doing.

>>18803459
Falsity (that is what we are dealing with here) would be otherness, the negative aspect of the substance, which [substance], qua content of knowledge, is truth. But the substance is itself essentially the negative element, partly as involving distinction and determination of content, partly as being a process of distinguishing pure and simple, i.e. as being self and knowledge in general. Doubtless we can know in a way that is false. To know something falsely means that knowledge is not adequate to, is not on equal terms with, its substance. Yet this very dissimilarity is the process of distinction in general, the essential moment in knowing. It is, in fact, out of this active distinction that its harmonious unity arises, and this identity, when arrived at, is truth. But it is not truth in a sense which would involve the rejection of the discordance, the diversity, like dross from pure metal; nor, again, does truth remain detached from diversity, like a finished article from the instrument that shapes it. Difference itself continues to be an immediate element within truth as such, in the form of the principle of negation, in the form of the activity of Self. All the same, we cannot for that reason say that falsehood is a moment or forms even a constituent part of truth. That “in every case of falsity there is something true” is an expression in which they are taken to be like oil and water, which do not mix and are merely united externally. Just in the interest of their real meaning, precisely because we want to designate the aspect or moment of complete otherness, the terms true and false must no longer be used where their otherness has been cancelled and superseded. Just as the expressions “unity of subject and object”, of “finite and infinite”, of “being and thought”, etc., are clumsy when subject and object, etc., are taken to mean what they are outside their unity, and are thus in that unity not meant to be what its very expression conveys; in the same way falsehood is not, qua false, any longer a moment of truth.

>>18803452
He criticized the caste system

>>18803459
>>18803469
So this is the power of a 230 IQ mixed with schizophrenia...

>>18803475
You didn't understand what he said

>>18803289
Appearance is essence.

>>18803452
not exactly but I get what you mean. The no self obsession is a bad modern take, people end up identifying with the idea of no self and thus are fabricating an ego or self around the no self in a way.
The self is empty. Do not identify with self, do not identify with no self.

>>18803452
>The Lord Buddha (lord for a reason) never criticized hierarchy, nor did He say that the self doesn't exist. He simply trascended those petty things.
....meanwhile 95% of all influential Buddhist metaphysics, philosophy, logic etc at any point in history all interprets him that way

>>18803630
>reading interpreters when Buddha teaches to interpret yourself
The only good interpreter I have found is nagarjuna

>>18803630
there's no buddhist metaphysics philosophy, logic etc it's not buddhism

Why would any faggot ever willingly want to exist for all of eternity? You niggers are insane.

>>18803345
>if there are parallels in human society

There aren't. dafuq. some Japanese neat thinks showering is bad, big shock

these critiques were supposed to overturn christian slave morality, all that happened was a new more insidious slave morality, this time without even the semblance of an appeal to 'higher' values

>>18803345
The anti-Stacey meme omits the fact that Stacey is the vehicle for a postively eugenic natural selection. Herhealthy instinct of standards sorts the chaff from the male wheat and in doing so serves the highest purpose of fitness selection. The anti-Stacey meme is ressentiment from those who failed her test and have been consigned by her to evolutions reject pile.