[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 205 KB, 580x493, BerkeleyDean.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19847040 No.19847040 [Reply] [Original]

1. Naturalism: The view that all of reality can be explained in terms of natural processes, excludes belief in anything supernatural, but accepts the possibility that there may be a transcendental/dualistic aspects to reality, may even accept the possibility that the physical world doesn't exist as we know it through experience.

2. Materialism: The view that the only thing that exists is matter, that matter is definitely real and a part of the natural world and thus excludes belief in the supernatural, but accepts the possibility that aspects of matter, like the mind, may belong to separate domains of material reality that is only accessible through specific processes (i.e. our usual laws of physics may not be able to account for things like the mind, and a different approach may be needed).

3. Physicalism: The view that all of reality can only be explained in terms of natural, material, physical processes, including the mind, and rejects any and all explanations that say otherwise including religious, metaphysical, and spiritual views that contradict it.
>inb4 none
You have to pick one

>> No.19847055

No I don't. I pick none, and I put my red hot cigar out on your asshole.

>> No.19847056

The -ism that doesn't define the limits of explanation for that which it cannot explain.

>> No.19847145

>>19847040
>You have to pick one
all of them were refuted by Rene Guenon (pbuh)

>> No.19847167

>....false trichotomy....
...Dealing in trialities...
....trying to fit a tridecahedron in a triangle hole...

>> No.19847240

>>19847040
4. Anonism: retard making childish ultimatums on the internet with zero authority and small learning.

>> No.19847307

>>19847040
Well which do you think, anon

>> No.19847574

>>19847040
Your pic (immaterialism) is the right one

>> No.19847716
File: 124 KB, 750x1000, 65rjg6y8bh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19847716

>>19847040
nice spooks, nerd

>> No.19848134

>>19847040
The third, but it isn't necessarily a good thing. All these viewpoints can be used as a baseline to create litearture though. Literature does not need to be identical to reality.

>> No.19848224
File: 1.22 MB, 150x150, You believe this shit.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19848224

>>19847145

>> No.19848267

>>19847040
4. Faggotism: shut the fuck up fag

>> No.19848370
File: 36 KB, 180x264, 9780521761482.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19848370

>>19847040
Platonism, both natural (encosmic gods and fate) and supernatural (hypercosmic gods and providence) forces are real and active in the world.

>> No.19848448

Counter point, how can any of these systems prove reality exists?

>> No.19848452
File: 512 KB, 900x1380, Pyrrho_in_Thomas_Stanley_History_of_Philosophy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19848452

>>19847040
I choose Scepticism (I don't know and won't pretend to)

>> No.19848459

>>19848452
Dogmatic skepticism is taking a position of knowing that knowledge is impossible and therefore affirms the possibility and actuality of knowledge of the impossibility of knowledge.

>> No.19848559

>>19848459
Shut the fuck up, retard.

>> No.19848623

>>19848559
Back to >>>/v/ brainlet

>> No.19848662

>>19848459
Yes, and it's correct.

>> No.19848757

>>19848370
This. Otherwise we should all just devolve into apes or kys.

>> No.19848772

Physicalism and materialism are, essentially, the same. Between the three, I'd have to side with naturalism.

>> No.19848783

>>19848623
”I know that I don’t know” is a perfectly logical statement with no contradiction whatsoever, the fact that you think the bullshit you typed sounds smart would be hilarious if people weren’t spouting this platitude here everyday.