/lit/ - Literature

>>21040619
Mogs me

>>21040619
The growing of the moustache was merely the external ceremonial representing his essential and internal change from redditor to anon after reading more books.

>>21040619
I thought it was Jack London

>>21040619
I wonder how many people pretended to be friends with Nietzsche just so they could meet his sister.

I like to think, if I had lived back then, I would have cherished his friendship for its own sake. But probably, like any redblooded man, I would have forgotten him completely the moment she walked into the room.

>>21040658
she's cute but not that attractive

>>21040619
His fine, his haircut here is dumb tho

>>21040661
I guess it helps to know how based she was.

>>21040658
19th century fluoride stare (would)

>>21040704
The white under her pupils is slightly worrisome because it appears in another photograph of her too. Not sure if it's fixable.

>>21040619
Looks like Michael Pitt. (Who is also going insane, coincidentally)

>>21040619
>a man who would religiously browse Reddit
I'd sooner expect him to be spending most of his time griefing in survival crafting games.

>>21040619
This is how I visualize every poster here

>>21040619
I can't really take Nietzsche-haters seriously since they're just Chesterton posters themselves

>>21040658
shit, that's a 10/10 if I ever saw one

>>21040619
Your mother

nietzche was a nihilist atheist so he tried to turn ''nihilism'' into ''optimistic nihilism'' by doing 2 things
-first by being a deceitful bitch, like any atheist, by redefining nihilism to mean ''christianity''
nihilism according to women, atheists and NPCs like nietzche mean ''thinking long term''. So according to them, when christians think what will happen after death and focus on that, that's ''nihilism''. According to atheists, ''non-nihilism'' is ''living in the present moment like Dionysus''
-second, by saying that since there is no truth and only subjective values, people should fight for their personal values. So for instance, trannies, BLM, feminists are the ubermen according to nietzche because
--they fight for their own values
--they are subversive of the ''old values'', ie the values of the british judean dutch french bourgeois merchant rats who started liberalism 300 years ago, in order to kill kings and priests and make the bureaucrats and merchants the ruling caste in their ''nationalist democratic republics''

there that's all there is nietzche . Optimistic nihilism is retarded and a huge cope by atheists to justify hedonism lol. But bitches like nietzche dont call hedonism ''hedonism'', they call it 'vitalism''.
nietzche is an hedonism, like any atheist, but atheists are desperate to earn atheist karma points, after saying objective morality and truth doesnt exist lol, and they embark on a self-made self-aggrandizing narratives wherein they are cooming like Dionysus and at the same time ''fighting for values''.
The other cope by atheists is ''traditionalism'', ie ''everyday I want a bureaucratic daddy to tell me what do to in his fascist republic while I am pretending to be wicca witch doing magic in my sparetime like Evola''.

>>21040658
for me, it's nietzsche's mom

>>21041010
>redefining nihilism to mean ''christianity''
If god doesn't exist, and you use the concept of god to make all your evaluations or judgments in life, about life, and the conclusion is that dying lets you reunite with the thing that doesn't exist, then yeah Christianity is absolutely a species of nihilism, and what's worse, it is dishonestly so

So Nietzsche was a simp larping as a greek warrior-wine god while Kant was a "lame moralist" living life full of fun, pitching tents and drinking coffee? How do we UNPACK this?

>>21041010
>since there is no truth and only subjective values
"the more eyes, different eyes, we know how to train on the same thing, the more complete our “idea” of this thing, our “objectivity,” will be."

Or to put it in a modern parlance: since there is no truth, then you need a connectionist neural network for a robust enough approximation.

>people should fight for their personal values
"Fundamentally, humanity is reflected in all things, people find beauty in everything that throws their image back at them: the judgment 'beautiful' is the *vanity of their species* ... Of course a sceptic might hear a suspicious little whisper in his ear: does the world really become beautiful just because it is seen that way by human beings, of all creatures? People have *humanized* it: that is all. But nothing, absolutely nothing, guarantees that a *human being* is the standard of beauty. Who knows what a human being looks like in the eyes of a higher arbiter of taste? Daring, perhaps? Perhaps even funny? Perhaps a bit arbitrary?... 'O Dionysus, divine one, why do you pull on my ears?"

Or in other words: your perception of beauty, your evaluations are actually evolutionary heuristic hacks. You are not so much choosing your values, but rather you are "connecting" to Dionysus. I.e. the One True God (just not the Christian one)

>like any atheist
"What’s that? Doesn’t that mean in popular language that God is disproved, but the devil is not—?” To the contrary, to the contrary, my friends! And in the devil’s name, who is forcing you to speak such common language?"
"this anti-Christ and anti-nihilist, this conqueror of God and of nothingness—at some point he must come..."

i.e.: the One True God is the one you would call the Devil. And the one Nietzsche would call a true devil (or rather Spider-God: "god of the sick, God as spider, God as spirit", "the universal spider") is the christian god.

>nietzche is an hedonism, like any atheist
"Where is innocence? Where there is will to procreation. And he who seeketh to create beyond himself, hath for me the purest will
Where is beauty? Where I must will with my whole Will; where I will love and perish, that an image may not remain merely an image.
Loving and perishing: these have rhymed from eternity. Will to love: that is to be ready also for death. Thus do I speak unto you cowards!"

>>21040619
Klages was heavily influenced by Nietzsche, and he was better. I discuss his views here a bit:
>>21041494

I would argue Klages was truly life affirming whereas Nietzsche was not.

>>21040658
>>21041010
>>21041261
Epic and original