/lit/ - Literature

>>21567800
This is literature board

>>21567829
No shit.

>>21567829
If you read the Anon Mod post, I haven't broken any rules since I am looking for Philosophical conversation.
So the question turns to you, why are you here?

Do you think that fish, assuming it is alive, has lived a more fulfilling life than all the other fishes in the sea because it could see the sky emblazoned by a thousand fiery flowers while being carried around like a king on the arms of a human being?

>>21567860
If you want to think of it that way instead of it being dead and praised as food instead of a king.
Then yes, it in fact has, even if it only lived for maybe a few minutes because of it being out of water.

>>21567847
>discussions of philosophy that take place on /lit/ should be based around specific philosophical works
Please, read carefully

>>21567868
Yes, and I'm asking for a discussion based on philosophical works, you're trying to be technical and instead came out contradicting.
I'm asking for a discussion on philosophical works and yet here you are doing the opposite.
Again, i've broken no rule.

>>21567866
No it hasn't you stupid cunt it has been denied its freedom and forced to die painfully while facing things it cannot possibly comprehend. What kind of sadistic philosophy would teach the opposite?

Never said i thought that way, you only assumed.
The question was asked, and i answered with "If you want to think of it that way".

it is precisely that sort of answer that makes you a coward
do not deny me my (you)s i've shitposted in generals experiencing such recession that not a sinlge non-ironic (you) was given for weeks at a time

>>21567925
Refusing to answer the question would make me the sort of coward you're referring to.
I'm no such thing if I'm speaking to you head-on, well, not much courage or bravery is needed to reply or post here, just don't be a snowflake.
You can think however you want, that's your own opinion and perspective.