/lit/ - Literature

>>22247576
>benis
woah...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CS9aYQn3bM
>interviewer asks Heidegger about atomic bomb
>Heideggger answers that it is fine, that he is actually scared of trannies
What is wrong with chuds?

>>22247576
he LITERALLY said that

>>22247576
>>22248089
I refuse to believe he said that.

>>22248124
He looks like that AND says that...

>>22247576
>the self is the self's relationship to its own self's selfness

I hate philosophy so much bros

>>22248148
>>22247576
>retards on this board will defend this
daily reminder that we had perfectly good philosophy all throughout antiquity and the middle ages. modern philosophy was a mistake.

I bet the German original sounds better english lol kill anglos behead anglos roundhousekick....etc...

>>22248148
>dude is just defining something that is "actual" literally defining the "self-now"
NOOOO, I'M GOING INSANEEEE

>>22248148
Why would he relate the self to the self instead of the other?

>>22248148
>>22248248
>>22248309
>>22248342
Kierkegaard was parodying Hegel there.

>>22247576
Musashi and Heidegger are cut from the same cloth. Since ww2 though the warrior mentality has been purged from all culture.

>>22248436
>Kierkegaard
Biggest faggot there's ever been.

Shut up!

>>22248451
Fuck off jew boy

>>22247576
>>the essence of being, the being of being, is be-ness
There is absolutely nothing wrong with this sentence.

>>22248309
?
What?
Sir, you should take your nonsense words and get off my board

>>22248501
Got chatGPT to explain it to you.
It is true that Kierkegaard's definition of the self can be seen as an attempt to define the "self-now" or the self in the present moment.

Kierkegaard believed that the self is not a static or fixed entity, but rather a dynamic and constantly changing phenomenon that is constantly being defined and redefined in relation to its own essence and existence. In this sense, the self is something that is "actual" or real, but it is also something that is in a constant state of becoming.

Kierkegaard's emphasis on the present moment is also reflected in his philosophy of existentialism, which emphasizes the importance of individual experience and subjective interpretation in defining the self. For Kierkegaard, the self is not something that can be objectively defined or measured, but rather something that is subjectively experienced and lived.

Overall, Kierkegaard's definition of the self is a complex and multifaceted concept that reflects his broader philosophical concerns with faith, despair, and the individual search for meaning and purpose in life.

>>22248636
>faith, despair, and the individual search for meaning and purpose in life.
>emphasizes the importance of individual experience and subjective interpretation in defining the self

You don't see the irony?

>>22247582
I see the light.

>>22247582
boy penis!

>>22248636
>>22248934
>individual experience and subjective interpretation

And yet he's a Christian.

>>22248436
a literate guy on /lit/??!!

Just become youself bro

>>22247576
That's an odd interpretation of Heidegger. Here is mine, which I think is more parsimonious:
>the essence of being, the being of being, is ing-ness.

>>22247576
"Heidegger is impossible to translate, even into German."

>>22247576
>leads concept to complete abstraction without the ability to confirm anything because of transcendental nature of the pursuit for hundreds of pages
>refuses to elaborate

>>22249360
"To understand being, we must look at the word itself. 'Being' consists of two parts: 'BEI' and 'NG'. What do they mean? No-one knows, and that's why being will forever remain a mystery."

— Jack Handy, sort of

>>22248934
>existentialism
Yes, but still, it is just a definition.

>>22249389
Coffee also consists of two parts: 'CO' and 'FEE'.

>>22247576
This sounds like Aristotle, especially some syncopated sentences like το ην ειναι του ειναι etc.

Just dasein yourself bro

>>22249413
Thanks for reminding me of “covfefe”