/lit/ - Literature

>>22865379
I will read a book solely based on the opposite of what /lit/ says of it.

That's me with Hyperion

>>22865379
You can't really. People do this shit with VNs too and it's painfully easy to identify the secondaries.

>read audiobook of finnegans wake
>go on /lit/ and call someone retarded for not getting it
Life is good

>>22865379
Ah, audiobooks. That does do something to explain the uptick in pseudery around here.

>>22865571
Thats genre fiction so who cares?

>>22865627
Genre fiction is such a female meme nonsense term used exclusively by mid-wits.

>>22865637
How is it "nonsense"?

>>22865590
>evoking the phantom of pseudism
classic pseud.

>>22866370
>phantom of pseudery
HAHAHAHAHA!!!! MOTHER OF COPE!!!!!

I don't read books

>>22865379
It's still more than what most posters do. You're okay.

>>22865379
At least you’ll have read more than half the posters here

>>22866356
It's a term that literally does not make sense and makes a sentence have less meaning when used.
It's anti-sense.
It is non-sense.

>>22865379
full cast audio dramas >>>> audiobooks narrated by one guy

>>22865379
Better than simply flat out pretending you read the book and acting as though you did

>>22867769
Which is 90% of the posters here
>Verification not required

>>22867615
Okay sure buddy... In that sense words like "Kafkaesque" are also non-sense even though people are familliar with what it means?

>>22865379
>reading is hard and people listening to books are cheaters!
A pretty reasonable opinion to have if you are 8 years old.

>>22865379
The most well-read /lit/ poster

>>22865379
and we all see through your facade

>>22868613
No, apples and organs comparison.
For get I said mid-wit, you are full on nitwit.

>>22865384
Don't read Finnegan's Wake

It's terrible

>>22868932
>orangs
>for get

>>22869150
Organs was intentional.
For get was a typo.

>>22865379
based, same