[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 41 KB, 500x500, question.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3437882 No.3437882 [Reply] [Original]

Is there a difference between soul and spirit?

>> No.3437887

>>3437882
Cheerleaders have spirit.

Black people have soul.

>> No.3437889

>>3437882
Symantically, yes, depending on what theological or linguistic framework you are using. Realistically, no. They are both concepts that don't exist.

>> No.3437892

>>3437887
What about black cheerleaders?

>> No.3437895

>>3437892
That's what we can call masterrace.

>> No.3437913
File: 787 KB, 480x360, 1330465035043.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3437913

>>3437887
>>3437892
>>3437895

>> No.3437973

>>3437889
Concepts exist.

>> No.3437990

>>3437973
Nope.

>> No.3438036

Neither exists, but they have different names.

>> No.3438071

>>3437889
>Symantically
>Symantic
>Sym
>y

>> No.3438106

>>3437990
>implying social reality is no a significant part of your experience of reality

>> No.3438147

>>3437889
The concepts exist. You said so yourself in the very same line, bro. "Realistically" is not a good term either and not much of the point.

>Symantically
lel

>> No.3440688
File: 137 KB, 600x400, Girls.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3440688

The third one off the Holy Tripod is obviously different Frere:

If you're English: you have a Soul and listen to Niglets, At least occasionally.
If you're English, but you claim Rome or at least Middle French: you have a Spirit and fuck Cheerleaders

However, if you aren't English in any sense of the Word: you'll find that Souls and Spirits do exist in Another concept.

Play make-believe with your reason Grandma; girl of Reason, we're playing make believe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3DdO5Op4

>> No.3441724

Soul is imortal spirit is a state that is changeable according with what you are experiencing/ your determination.

>> No.3441876

>>3437889
>They are both concepts that don't exist.

get a load of this guy who has died and reincarnated himself.

>> No.3442062

Spirit has multiple fuzzy meanings.

Soul can be used as a sort of short hand for the hypothesis that we're all precious snowflakes that will go on to some sort of afterlife. It's complete nonsense.

>> No.3442080

>>3442062
Oh, and I mean that both the 'precious snowflake' and the afterlife parts are both nonsense.

>> No.3442091

Yes. Spirit is that "lifespark" that comes from beyond. Something we can only look at from the side and never truly understand.

The soul is "you" underneath your personality.

>> No.3442131

>>3442091
>The soul is "you" underneath your personality.

This makes no sense. How is the 'you' any different from anyone else? It's a total fairy tale.

>> No.3442144

Spirit is what I drink, and soul is what I dance to.

>> No.3442148

geist = spirit
cognito = soul

geist is the feel of an epoch or a way of life

cognito = mind = emergent self irreducible to body

>> No.3442163

>>3442144
It's spirits if you drink it.

>> No.3442165

>>3442148
>latin makes me right

>> No.3442170

>>3442148
You have no idea what you're talking about.

>> No.3442190
File: 18 KB, 301x354, 1256143831189.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3442190

>>3442131
>I don't understand the concept so it's stupid

The soul is the indispensable self. The true self, the irreducible self, the core being.

According to certain religious beliefs, the soul is the spiritual half of the human person. It's the part of the human consciousness that survives death and exists in eternity.

>> No.3442461

>>3442190
>According to certain religious beliefs, the soul is the spiritual half of the human person. It's the part of the human consciousness that survives death and exists in eternity.
So am I allowed to call this stupid, or are we simply debating whether or not some people believe this?

>The soul is the indispensable self. The true self, the irreducible self, the core being.
This is gobbledygook. Can you elaborate? Are you ignoring nature/nurture and suggesting that people are born good or evil? Are you using the word 'soul' as a synonym for consciousness (which it isn't, according to mirriam-webster).

I'm not trying to fuck with you, but it's not like you went into a lot of detail...

>> No.3442468

>>3442163
>It's spirits if you drink it.
Really? Even the singular? "I only like one spirit, vodka."

>> No.3442490

>>3442461
You can cut off someone's arm and they haven't lost their "self." A person's personality can change and they still haven't lost their self. The soul is the fundamental self that can't be removed, no matter how much the body or mind may change over time.

That's the idea anyway.

>> No.3442526

>>3442490
It sounds like you're just using 'soul' as a synonym for consciousness, which it isn't.

And I still can't tell, are you advocating for religious beliefs, or not? And if not then why take umbrage with me when I call them retarded?

>> No.3442531

animals don't have souls but can be spirits