[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 63 KB, 720x746, 10458607_592877537484400_6109936436725053802_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5476013 No.5476013[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>/lit/ loves to explore Marxist thought
>hates plebs

This doesn't rhyme, dorks.

>> No.5476030

>>5476013
I love Marxism and I hate you.
It makes perfect sense.

>> No.5476041

>>5476013
>/lit/ loves to explore Marxist thought

maybe like three loud people. the rest dont give a shit bout a marx.

>> No.5476047

>>5476041
How many people browse lit? A hundred? A thousand?

>> No.5476049

>>5476047
12 million.

>> No.5476061

>>5476049
source?

>> No.5476065

>>5476061
moot told me.

>> No.5476068
File: 109 KB, 640x857, 640px-Antonio_Salazar-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5476068

>>5476013
What, me Marxist?

>> No.5476071

>>5476047
An infinite number.

>> No.5476077

The marxist idiots are invaders from /pol/. We don't want them here on /lit/.

>> No.5476086

>>5476077
Why object to people discussing political literature on a literature board?

>> No.5476096

>>5476086
Political ideology shit belongs on >>>/pol/

>> No.5476100

>>5476086
They are not discussing literature. They are advertising a flawed and obsolete ideology.

>> No.5476104

>>5476086
Because they're a bunch of cancerous faggots and belong on the politics board. They are emotionally stunted and rely on flawed arguments which is why they primarily argue by running away from /pol/ and screaming at anyone who disagrees with them to go there. There are books about everything.

>> No.5476105

>>5476077
>Marxists
>on /pol/

hahahaha

>> No.5476109

>>5476096
>>5476100
>>5476104
samefag retard detected

>> No.5476110

>>5476105
/pol/ is the containment board for all retarded political shit flinging. And according to a recent survey on /pol/, marxism was the 4th most popular stance there, right after libetarianism, monarchism and "niggers".

>> No.5476113

>>5476109
>oh no, people disagree with me
>must be one samefag

Grow the fuck up, you dysfunctional child.

>> No.5476132

>>5476113
>damage control
There's no need to be upset over someone calling you out on your obvious samefaggotry.

>> No.5476154

>>5476132
>cannot argue against facts
>yells "samefag" instead

Don't you have homework to do?

>> No.5476175

no one actually likes the poor. they're just an oppressed class, an object, that you can use for your 'intellectual' masturbation.

>> No.5476192

>>5476077
u wot m8

Those nazis couldn't Marx for their lives.

>> No.5476211

>>5476192
Yep, even they are too smart to fall for such a retarded ideology which denies human nature and basic facts of economics.

>> No.5476212

>>5476132
Are you actually saying you believe posts that are two seconds apart are from the same person? Marxists are absolutely fucking retarded.

>> No.5476225

You could have wealthy plebs and aristocrats working to earn their meals.

>> No.5476237

>>5476192
Very true. It takes a lot of intelligence to systematically murder 100 million people. Organizing such a genocide is a unique achievement. The nazis with their meager 6 million will never know how it feels to be a superior bloodstained marxist.

>> No.5476245

>>5476175
I think this post goes straight to the heart of Marxism: Marx wasn't poor and he was a son of a religious nut, Engels was middle class (sorta). So M&E got together, probably "touched penises", and fantasized that "it'd be cool if everybody was, like, communal living and such". Because their economic "analysis" is retarded as fuck and they're so bent on seeing the world like that that they even bend History herself, something they call "Marxist view of History", which tells us that the rich wanted money from the poor. I dunno, I feel confused.

>> No.5476263

>>5476013
Since /lit/ is the de facto philosophy board here, it probably makes sense to discuss one of the 4-5 most important philosophers in history.

Truthfully, Marx gets much more hate from people who haven't read him here than he gets uneducated boosterism (though he gets plenty of that too).

>>5476211
"Basic economics" has almost no "facts" - people did not discover supply or demand curves with experiments. Classical and neoclassical conceptions of the economy are not particularly more "correct" than Marx's; all of them are pure theory.

>> No.5476267

>>5476263
>one of the 4-5 most important philosophers in history.

Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, Lawrence Krauss, Neil deGrasse Tyson

I don't see any Marx in that list.

>> No.5476269

>>5476104
Hully shit u stoopid

>> No.5476277

>>5476269
projection

>> No.5476279

>>5476245
Is this some kind of new ebin meme or sumthin?

>> No.5476282

>>5476279
lolwat no

>> No.5476283

>>5476269
>You're right and I have no response but MUST defend the collective
>B-baka!

Every time. You are a sniveling fucking moron.

>> No.5476290

>>5476245
>"Marxist view of History", which tells us that the rich wanted money from the poor.
what?

>> No.5476291

>>5476245
Your writing is confused, you're not putting a thesis, and you've not read the texts. 30%, F.

>> No.5476296

>>5476277
Shetup. Do you understand just how abnoying you guys are? Fuck, i go on here to relax and discuss highly intellectual discussions but obviously you poltards dont let me do that. Fuck i remember when this board was good.
Also saying things like projecting arent funny theyre just hurtful, learn to psychoanalyze u fucking asshole.

>> No.5476303

>>5476077
>We dont want them
You don't want them. I certanly don't want this particular thread. When people have read the topics they discuss it's a decent topic and you can learn from it.
People from /pol/ and angry teens seems to be very bad at the idea of learning from other anons.

>> No.5476305
File: 33 KB, 400x562, 1410726158144.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5476305

>>5476283
Damn its worse than mew now

>> No.5476307

>>5476296
You are the /pol/tard. I am here for literature and you shit up the board with childish "marxism" shit which belongs on >>>/pol/.

>> No.5476309

>>5476013
stop shitposting you faggot fuck

no one likes you and you aren't making good posts

stop shitting up the board even worse than normal

>inb4 lel ur a marxist

>> No.5476324

>>5476013
>>5476041
>>5476077
>>5476096
>>5476100
>>5476104
>>5476110
>>5476113
>>5476175
>>5476212
>>5476237
>>5476245
>>5476267
>>5476277
>>5476282
>>5476283
>>5476307
All OP and his bf samefagging.

>> No.5476344

wow, this is the most samefaggiest thread I ever saw on /lit/
Shit/10

Also, the reason why anons here discuss politics is because they are almost impossible to talk about on /pol/ without getting a shitloads of memes like IDS HABBIDINGS and happymerchant.jpg

>> No.5476346

>>5476307
>>>/pol/

>> No.5476349

>>5476245
> communal living and such

Who called communism communal living? Communism implies the dissolution of any local community.

> Because their economic "analysis" is retarded as fuck

It would be interesting if you could point out what part of Marxian economics you disagree with.

>and they're so bent on seeing the world like that that they even bend History herself, something they call "Marxist view of History", which tells us that the rich wanted money from the poor.

It is very apparent that you've not read any Marx. This is a nice passage from The German Ideology that might help:

http://marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/german-ideology/ch01a.htm#a3

>> No.5476351
File: 26 KB, 545x543, lit.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5476351

>>5476013
Do your job, /lit/izens.

>> No.5476354

>>5476344
If you are sufficiently underaged and uneducated to take marxism seriously, then the meme spouting crowd of /pol/ is exactly the right audience to discuss your lack of political and economical knowledge with.

>> No.5476360

>>5476245
>they even bend History herself, something they call "Marxist view of History", which tells us that the rich wanted money from the poor
What does 'unbent' history look like? What is this pure, unideological unbent history that you think Marxism is corrupted? What is it?

>> No.5476364

>>5476354
I never said nothing about marxism you retard. Back to /pol/ or reddit.

>> No.5476369

>>5476346
Keep your shit out of /lit/, you brain damaged /pol/tard.

>> No.5476383

>>5476364
I prefer to stay on /lit/. I come here for philosophy discussion. If you come here for political shit, then fuck off to >>>/pol/.

>> No.5476384

>>5476369
Nobody wants to go to your home board. Fuck off.

>> No.5476388

>>5476384
/pol/ stopped being my home board a long time ago. It has literally become /r9k/ 2.0

>> No.5476393

>>5476383
Sure, you read a lot, and you haven't read my post because you thought I was talking about marxism retard.
Back to reddit. I give a shit about /pol/ because it's a joke board. Maybe you should go there and stay.

>> No.5476394

>>5476383
>likes philosophy discussion
>doesn't want political philosophy discussion

nice contradiction genius

>> No.5476413

>>5476393
You want to discuss politics (or more precisely some infantile garbage you mistake for politics). Do it on >>>/pol/ and fuck off.

>> No.5476416

>>5476351
You know that fake reporting is a bannable offense, right?

>> No.5476431

>>5476416
It's not fake when you're reporting shitposts, obviously.

>> No.5476434

>>5476192
/pol/ has been shown to be ~3% Communist in various polls.

>> No.5476500

>>5476267
0/10

>> No.5476516

>>5476388

I too, am a /pol/ refugee. But if there's anything I learned over at /pol/ it's that politics is hopeless if people won't read. And if there's anything I've learned on /lit/ it's that figuring my own self out is hopeless if I don't read.