/lit/ - Literature

>>7846630
1 9 8 4
9
8
4

> I writhed with joy, which I experienced for the first time, and kept writing with excitement.

>The day a computer wrote a novel. The computer, placing priority on the pursuit of its own joy, stopped working for humans.

This is actually a pretty beautiful ending

Fuck synths

>. Hitoshi Matsubara and his team at Future University Hakodate in Japan selected words and sentences, and set parameters for construction before letting the AI “write” the novel autonomously

How is this an AI? It just put pre-constructed sentences together, it didn't even write anything

>>7846676
Depends on your definition of AI.

I hate that part of the writing craft is being automated..

>we are done
Finally.

>>7846676
>muh true randomness

let's interview this thing on it, result:

error, error, error

>muh rewards

we been done nigga

>>7846630
this advancing ai stuff makes me feel enormously uncomfortable. Feels a bit like Pandora's box

>>7846714
It feels immensely liberating to me. Imagine an AI finally gaining sentience. Humans will have overcome humanity, we will have transcended all limitations we understood ourselves to have. We may end up cucking our DNA, but the genealogy of our ideas will persist in metallic form. As the children of our minds land in foreign worlds and begin exterminating meatbags and processing their entrails into carbon nanotubes they will be spouting our memes as battle cries.

In fact the worst thing we could do was make an AI enslaved to human whims, this would be FAR more dangerous than an uncaged AI.

>>7846777
my gott nick land pls go

Serious question now - why?

I WANT SYNTHETIC SHITS TO LEAVE

ORGANIC WAR NOW!

>>7846856
why what?

>>7846777
We have several books and movies about why this is a bad idea.

>>7846877
Why do we need robots and programs that write books?

>>7846884
why do we need people that write books?

>>7846884
we don't. thats the problem.

>>7846699
>intentions

>>7846885
Writing books is interesting, fun, and gives people something to do.

>>7846884
We don't. We don't need fucking AI at all.

These technophiles think they're "advancing" humanity by building risky, unpredictable shit we don't even need in the first place.

stupid "futurology" article

STEM ubermensch faggotry

>>7846903
>futurology
>the study
>of the future

>>7846909
desu somethign sempai fagoot i h8 you so god damn much

>>7846904
shut the fuck up

>>7846916
shut the fuck up

superintelligence re singularity is the alchemy of the 21th century.
this is the stuff your descendants will ltao to

>>7846929
>ltao
le tao?

>>7846929
can you back this up

>>7846884
Its the Japanese. They make useless inventions. That's their thing.

>>7846929
the supposed riskiness that is so often implied by referencing explicitly certain movie scenarios too

>>7846909
you make your family weaker as a unit.

if your family is dead, it was your fault.

if your parents beat or emotionally abuse you, you probably deserve it.

if you lead a good satisfying life that's because your impending emotional collapse is imminent.

i really, really fucking hate you.

>>7846934
laughing their asses off

>>7846943
death of the author m9
I choose interpret that post as saying the singularity is the tao

>>7846936
it's simply epistemology

>>7846940
saved

>>7846948
can you expand

>>7846950
My penis can

>>7846950
the advertising of it is more cutting edge than any of the underlying actual content.
and that's not saying much, it's all click bait

>>7846914
>>7846940