[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 27 KB, 775x387, science vs philosophy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10235193 No.10235193[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Is this true? Do we really need philosophy today?

>> No.10235206
File: 110 KB, 657x539, 1508687069162.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10235206

>>10235193
>all philosophers are skeptics

>> No.10235207

true

we need redpilled science, not postmodernism

>> No.10235213

>>10235207
If by "redpilled" you mean "right-wing", then beware that STEM offers exactly zero insight in social and political issues.

>>10235206
I obviously asked the question in a provocative way.

>> No.10235216

>>10235213
FACTS, and OBJECTIVE REALITY and RACE REALISM are right-wing by necessity. The left rejects objective TRUTH and OBJECTIVE REALITY.

>> No.10235234

>>10235216
>FACTS, and OBJECTIVE REALITY and RACE REALISM are right-wing by necessity

this is such an uneducated claim that i do not know where to start. the first thinkers of the enlightenment were anti-religious, anti-authoritarian revolutionaries. while the philosophers behind fascism were rosseau, heidegger and evola, all romantics and/or in favor of subjectivism.

>The left rejects objective TRUTH and OBJECTIVE REALITY.

the postmodernists, the "new left", often is. the marxists, on the other hand, were hegelian rationalists.

e. g., there is no clear "left" or "right" philosophical thinking. both the left and the right drew from enlightenment and counter-enlightenment thinking, from romanticism and rationalism.

>> No.10235235

>>10235193
Considering science creates philosophical problems, yes

Considering science as a whole is inconsistent with itself, yes

Considering science rests on unproven dogmas, yes

Considering science can't answer every question, yes

>> No.10235242

>>10235234
>Responding to bait
Go away

>> No.10235244
File: 357 KB, 775x502, 1446011066696.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10235244

>>10235216

>> No.10235249

>>10235242
There are countless people that truly think like that.

>> No.10235258

>>10235249
Shoo shoo

>> No.10235264
File: 58 KB, 1011x801, k4VcM5Y.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10235264

Know your place STEMlords.

>> No.10235271

>>10235264
This is somewhat true, but the later career prospects cancel this out somewhat

>> No.10235273

>>10235264
Liberal Arts students blow as well

higher education was a mistake

>> No.10235325

science is a form of philosophy and noble sciences are shaped by noble philosophy

>> No.10235355
File: 32 KB, 501x485, 1493343365565.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10235355

>>10235193

>> No.10235368

>>10235234
you're making us look like fools, just don't answer

>> No.10235377
File: 156 KB, 740x464, foucault-obscurantist.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10235377

>>10235193
No, I am drunk so I probably won't explain it properly but Foucault pretty definitively showed that science itself is ideologically driven, and can potentially destroy empirical progress in shifts of concern, hiding truth under the new layers and lenses of modernity.
The man was based as fuck.

>> No.10235390

>>10235377
>based as fuck

>whines about first world problems
>believes psychotics do not need help
>depressive syphilis ridden fag

Yeah no

>> No.10235401

>>10235390
t. asshurt nationalist brainlet

>> No.10235402

>>10235390
>first world problems
>believes psychotics require help
>doesn't anally dominate the weak
you have to go back

>> No.10235416

>>10235193
shitty bait image kill yourself OP

>> No.10235421

>>10235401
Neither assumption is true
>>10235402
He argued against psychiatry, when psychiatry is the only hope for the mentally ill for a better life.

>> No.10235424

>>10235416
Made you reply, so it fulfilled its purpose wonderfully

>> No.10235435

>>10235421
he said psychiatry is a power structure used by the state to regulate the nation, which is largely true; you can see it easily in the numerous revisions of the DSM. A lot of the more begin disorders are simply undesirable traits for a productive nation.

>> No.10235436

>>10235264
I hope by Liberal Arts you mean Pure Maths

>> No.10235441

>>10235377
that wasn't foucault, that was foucault piggy-backing off of nietzsche, who in turn was taking a position opposite kant. all kant wanted to do was find some form of philosophical stability after hume, so really really, it all comes down to hume. thank you hume.