[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

File: 67 KB, 900x750, jacques-derrida-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Fri Apr 20 17:35:12 2018 No.11033268 [Reply] [Original]

>tried to read Derrida
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CS7j5I6aOc

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 17:36:08 2018 No.11033274 Derrida is unironically the endgame of philosophy

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 17:48:31 2018 No.11033320 >>11033274 Nah, Wittgenstein ended philosophy before Derrida got around to it

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 17:56:27 2018 No.11033349 >>11033320 he's a secret boss of philosophy

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 17:59:09 2018 No.11033360 >>>/his/

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 18:00:20 2018 No.11033368 >>11033360 History ended.

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 18:00:57 2018 No.11033371 >>11033349 Wittgenstein isn't take seriously anymore though

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 18:03:42 2018 No.11033381 >>11033371 Yes he is. Just because he isn't as fashionable among lefties as Derrida is doesn't mean that he isn't taken seriously in philosophy departments

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 18:07:05 2018 No.11033389 >>11033381 >fashionable among lefties >Derrida anon..

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 19:03:26 2018 No.11033569 >>11033389 He's right though. Derrida is fashionable among lefties, in France at least

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 19:05:11 2018 No.11033575 >>11033320 If you had read Derrida you would understand that is not true

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 19:08:50 2018 No.11033588 >>11033569 It's because he was fashionable in France no left movements outside France ever mention Derrida, fool

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 19:10:50 2018 No.11033594 >>11033389 Yes

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 19:11:40 2018 No.11033598 >>11033594 Ok, show me where he is fashionable exactly, and I know most Marxist circles well.

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 19:15:21 2018 No.11033609 >>11033598 Identity studies

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 19:16:46 2018 No.11033617 >>11033598 There are a ton of Marxist circles that focus on trying to deconstruct dialectic materialism. Its pretty much Derrida applied to Marx

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 19:18:39 2018 No.11033620 >>11033617 >a ton of circles sure

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 19:21:43 2018 No.11033634 >>11033609 >>11033617 Not Marxism. Next.

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 19:22:54 2018 No.11033638 >>11033620 Yes

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 19:23:42 2018 No.11033642 >>11033638 Ok, let's start examining it. Show us 1 (one).

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 19:26:22 2018 No.11033656 File: 32 KB, 500x611, derrida.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 19:30:29 2018 No.11033674 >>11033656 no, you're just a brainlet who never had a single thought in your life, therefore can't discern it

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 19:55:31 2018 No.11033763 >>11033642 I declare myself to be one.

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 19:56:47 2018 No.11033768 >>11033634 We are talking about leftism not just marxism.

Anonymous Fri Apr 20 20:13:01 2018 No.11033832
File: 249 KB, 1024x769, 32985323270_5ed4ca7bdb_b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

derrida is a pleb filter.

imagine a big nightclub and he's the bouncer, sitting there on a bench, just staring off into space. when you get to the front he gives you this look. the club is actually free to enter but first you have to pass this test.

if this triggers you, or if you ask what he is looking at, it means you don't get to be invited inside for what in this case is an infinite wake for karl marx (there is a rotation of dead authors to be mourned). if you are not triggered by his readings of specters of marx, he shrugs and the doors open.

as you pass through, he says, you do realize, mon ami, that you are - that we are - both already dead, no?

to which you respond, 'viola.' and then you are free to go in.

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 20:19:21 2018 No.11033854 Derrida was that stupid kid in school who would ask you to define something and then ask you to define one of those words you had to use to define the original.

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 20:20:53 2018 No.11033862 >>11033832 Derrida may be a pleb filter, but he isn't the first pleb filter. That's good ole' Plato or good ole' Nietzsche, depending on the person.

Anonymous Fri Apr 20 20:30:45 2018 No.11033902
File: 76 KB, 727x481, 2384233.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11033862
quite true. any number of philosophers can under the circumstances be the guy at the front door.

as you say, it depends on the person. i tend to pick on derrida because he developed such a classic Derrida Look and i do think he would be good at filtering out people who might be inclined to misbehave in the nightclub. but anyone could do it.

roland barthes would do just as well. it's like that scene in the movies where some CIA agent or whatever has to infiltrate the secret conspiracy of the bad guys, but first they have to meet with some agent to shit-test them so that they can see whether or not this will all be a waste of time. when derrida's sick barthes can fill in for this role.

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 20:55:52 2018 No.11034027 >>11033588 Sad but true

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 21:01:21 2018 No.11034064 >>11033768 >leftism not just marxism There is no "leftism" without Marx.

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 21:10:57 2018 No.11034111 >>11033268 >Le copy Heidegger but is okay because he was a nazi and I am a french jew and a pseud face

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 21:12:12 2018 No.11034115 >>11034111 pseud: the post

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 21:13:21 2018 No.11034117 >>11034064 Bait post

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 21:14:42 2018 No.11034124 >>11034111 >Every 20th century thinker who I don't understand is copying Heidegger I have to deal with so many of you people it hurts

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 21:17:45 2018 No.11034132 >>11034115 >My french ass is on fire

>>	Anonymous Fri Apr 20 21:20:51 2018 No.11034146 >>11034117 Bait post

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 21 05:14:48 2018 No.11035778 >>11033274 If by endgame you mean reason to take out of school and put in a museum, post-moderns are so shit.

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 21 07:05:19 2018 No.11036040 >>11033598 >I know most Marxist circles well

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 21 07:24:27 2018 No.11036093 >>11033320 I used to believe this. In some ways I wish I still wish I did because he had the potential to go further than Heidegger and Derrida combined.

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 21 07:28:53 2018 No.11036104 >>11033832 >tfw the door was always open, just for me, but im autistic and asked for permission to step in

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 21 08:02:44 2018 No.11036161 >>11033656 That's a surprisingly fine meme

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 21 14:33:55 2018 No.11037612 >>11036104 true

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 21 14:36:50 2018 No.11037629 >>11036040 I do, what's the mystery? Perhaps there are different special micro-cliques in universities, but I don't care about universities that much, and neither do the Marxist circles.

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 21 14:43:26 2018 No.11037657 >>11034027 >>11033588 Derrida had more success in the United States than in europe, at least do a little research before spouting random factoids

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 21 14:47:14 2018 No.11037669 >>11033588 Then why did I spend 30 minutes having a group discussion over derrida at a DSA meeting

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 21 15:14:06 2018 No.11037816 >>11033575 exactly what I was thinking I know Foucault does not call himself a philosopher, but I think he and Derrida pretty much make philosophy obsolete

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 21 15:19:10 2018 No.11037841 File: 10 KB, 80x100, 1523152571265.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11034146 ROOOOOOOOOOOOOO STOP TROLLING ON ME

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 21 16:53:07 2018 No.11038328 >>11035778 >derrida >postmodernism pick three and only three

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 21 17:11:00 2018 No.11038412 >>11034111 you realize heidegger endorsed derrida's project right?

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 21 17:13:45 2018 No.11038423 >>11037669 >having a group discussion over derrida Do you deconstruct? Do you understand what deconstruction is and practice it? Every second philosophy department also has lectures on Derrida, it doesn't make it Derridean.

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 21 17:17:31 2018 No.11038443 >>11038423 I suppose that is a fair point. Tell me, why are there so few derridean philsophy departments/academics? Why so few leftists touting Derrida?

Anonymous Sat Apr 21 17:44:01 2018 No.11038581

>>11034111
Heidegger (among others; Nietzsche, Saussure, etc.) opened the possibility of the question of the sign but it is Derrida who followed this line of inquiry himself to its fullest extent i.e. affecting the construction of the inquiry as a written work.

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 21 18:03:26 2018 No.11038672 >>11038443 It's not easy, and it wasn't supposed to be accessible in the first place.

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 21 20:03:27 2018 No.11039208 >>11033854 So, he was Aristotle?

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 21 20:07:20 2018 No.11039225 >>11033320 >Wittgenstein How fucking so

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 21 21:42:56 2018 No.11039603 >>11039225 limits of thought bro language dude fuck off he was le genius

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]