/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.11448129]

she's here bros

[Anonymous No.11448138]

>>11448129
who that

[Anonymous No.11448161]

>>11448129
Literally who?

[Anonymous No.11448166]

>>11448138
>>11448161
how new r u?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gIFqBdRsvE

[Anonymous No.11448170]

Try this thread again, but with the papers about 4chan, and I'll be actually interested.

[Anonymous No.11448172]

>>11448129

Ugly

[Anonymous No.11448189]

>>11448166
She's a qt. Nose ring plus an interest in abstraction? Lovely.

[Anonymous No.11448196]

>>11448166
tits or gtfo

[Anonymous No.11448204]

>>11448129
Her use of the word "bitches" is extremely problematic

[Anonymous No.11448209]

what do you think of her dress

[Anonymous No.11448212]

>>11448209
What a tryhard

[Anonymous No.11448213]

>>11448209
dogprojectilevomit.jpg

[Anonymous No.11448226]

Just sharing some deep thoughts

[Anonymous No.11448241]

Why are you guys so mean?

[Anonymous No.11448249]

>tfw no ontologicool gf to intellectually mog me
meh, she probably wouldn't even bully me into submission anyway, right bros?

[Anonymous No.11448250]

>>11448166
>who in normal life would probably be my friends

[Anonymous No.11448252]

>>11448129
Stop posting Ontys

[Anonymous No.11448253]

>>11448252
why?

[Anonymous No.11448254]

>>11448253
She's a pseud

[Anonymous No.11448261]

>>11448254
she literally got funding to present her ideas at a conference, could you be any more wrong?

[Anonymous No.11448263]

>>11448253
Because I chat with her a few times a week and you guys are going to spook her

[Anonymous No.11448267]

>>11448261
Her ideas about how she got harrassed by random incels on 4chan. Deep stuff, right?

[Anonymous No.11448269]

>>11448226
Wow, it's like I'm watching The Big Bang Theory 2: Philosophic Boogaloo

[Anonymous No.11448280]

>>11448263
she already has a boyfriend bro

[Anonymous No.11448282]

[Anonymous No.11448286]

>>11448129
Who cares

[Anonymous No.11448287]

@Ontologicool

why did you make all of your videos private?

[Anonymous No.11448289]

>>11448282
His name is probably Pierre

[Anonymous No.11448292]

>>11448241
I've never understood why /lit/, supposedly the most enlightened board on 4chan, harasses women so much.

[Anonymous No.11448294]

>>11448292
t. roastie or white knight

[Anonymous No.11448296]

>>11448292
crossposters from /b/, /r9k/, or /pol/

[Anonymous No.11448299]

>>11448294
Come on, it's basic decency. This shit has been going on for years

[Anonymous No.11448300]

>>11448166
>she gets bored intelectually
stopped right there

[Anonymous No.11448302]

>>11448292
as an experiment, to see how the test subject will react

[Anonymous No.11448303]

>>11448299
>This shit has been going on for years
>C'mon guys it is the current year, respect wahmen!

[Anonymous No.11448310]

>>11448280
And I already have a girlfriend. What do you think we talk about?

[Anonymous No.11448314]

>>11448310
I think your motives are impure.

[Anonymous No.11448320]

>>11448303
What I've said applies to men too

[Anonymous No.11448322]

>>11448296
I'm not sure, this board's obsession with youtube girls isn't the same as other boards

[Anonymous No.11448327]

>>11448292
>>11448294
>>11448296
>>11448299
I'm not an SJW, a roastie, or a white knight, but there's a difference between not giving a shit about offending someone's over-refined PC sensibilities and actively being a dick. I'm not even a huge fan of ontologicool (too much Deleuze and garbage).

On the other hand, such dickery has been 4chan's style since back before the Habbo raids, so I don't really expect it to change. Kind of would be nice if we left that shit to /b/ and whatever, though.

>>11448302
Most virginal answer possible.

[Anonymous No.11448329]

>>11448314
Why? She's a real bat and it's fun to have a quick convo with her because she's just go off in ways that I never could.

[Anonymous No.11448331]

>>11448292
It's not harassment, it's how the internet works. Online communication is meant to be anonymous, because it's all just a bunch of ones and zeros in the end. Girls like Ontologicool and that book review girl irresponsibly chose to upload their image for everybody to see and then expected the same laws from the outside to apply. But they don't. They were never supposed to.

[Anonymous No.11448334]

>>11448327
basic social awareness isn't edgy and contrarian enough for 4chan

[Anonymous No.11448337]

>>11448331
It's harassment when you're doing it with the intent of driving them from the forum or platform, dipshit

[Anonymous No.11448338]

>>11448327
>Most virginal answer possible.
why else would they do it? they want a reaction obviously, and that's exactly what she gave them; had she just continued doing what she was prior to the exposure she gained through 4chan, most wouldn't have continued trying to bait her into giving them attention.
fuck you

[Anonymous No.11448340]

>>11448327

[Anonymous No.11448343]

>>11448166
BETWEEN THE PLANES

[Anonymous No.11448349]

>>11448343
Between the towers WTC

[Anonymous No.11448354]

[Anonymous No.11448355]

>>11448337
Whatever you call it, the responsibility stands on their shoulders. It's as if they left their car with the doors open in a bad neighborhood and then complained that it's no longer there next day.

[Anonymous No.11448356]

>>11448331
So, your argument is that it is not harrassment because... the internet is filled with harrassers? Okay.

[Anonymous No.11448358]

she likes jordan peterson, tell-tale pseud.

[Anonymous No.11448359]

>>11448355
>It's as if they left their car with the doors open in a bad neighborhood and then complained that it's no longer there next day.

This is still theft, retard

[Anonymous No.11448361]

>>11448129
Dam gurl got da sexy eyes she finna boutta get BLACKED on

[Anonymous No.11448364]

>>11448129
I want to kiss those lips

[Anonymous No.11448366]

>>11448358
Source?

[Anonymous No.11448371]

>>11448292
aside from /pol/ /lit/ is the most racially obsessed board
aside from /r9k/ /lit/ is the most >tfw no gf board

[Anonymous No.11448372]

>>11448366

[Anonymous No.11448374]

>>11448364
Kissing girls is fucking gay dude. Just bang them and hang em up to dry

[Anonymous No.11448375]

Contra Lauren Bacall, it must suck to be a beautiful woman in a way exactly inverse to the way it sucks to be an ugly man. That must be the source of 4chan's ire against booktubers. It also goes some way towards explaining her pained sigh in the "hi 4chan" video: "These guys who would probably be my friends..." The severe loneliness of the popular and unpopular alike.

[Anonymous No.11448376]

>>11448359
It's not. At that point you're quite literally abandoning your property for anyone to take.
Same with the internet. If a girl posts a picture on a site and I'm free to download it, that picture is mine as much as it is hers.

[Anonymous No.11448377]

>>11448356
Holy shit imagine being this much of a beta orbiter

[Anonymous No.11448378]

>>11448372
look at dis dood

[Anonymous No.11448379]

>>11448372
Has she said anything about JP's ideas?

[Anonymous No.11448380]

>>11448361
Unironically this. Waiting for the cuck porn with her, her BF, and the bulls to drop any day now.

[Anonymous No.11448381]

She looks like Sasha Grey. Probably sucks dick like her too.

[Anonymous No.11448382]

>>11448376
I don't understand why you're disclaiming responsibility. It's a bad thing to harass someone. The odd thing is that you want to continue to harass women on the internet but also someone want to explain away or portray your action as somehow just. Why not have the courage just to admit that you like doing bad things? You make yourself look like a fool and a coward by bringing up these convoluted excuses.

[Anonymous No.11448385]

>>11448380
Thats her BF, he is too virile to fall for cuck meme

[Anonymous No.11448387]

[Anonymous No.11448389]

>>11448376
>It's not. At that point you're quite literally abandoning your property for anyone to take.
Is this what you're going to tell to the cops? As dumb as the person who leave their car open might be, the guy who takes it and run away is still a thief by definition, wether you like it or not: he took something that wasn't his, and run away from it.

[Anonymous No.11448390]

>>11448382
>it's bad therefore you shouldn't prevent people from doing the bad thing
lmaoing @ millennials who think this way

[Anonymous No.11448394]

post more cute pics please

[Anonymous No.11448396]

>>11448166
>"my boyfriend"
yeah i stopped reading there

[Anonymous No.11448397]

>>11448372
Lol based and redpilled

[Anonymous No.11448401]

>>11448286
Who cares? The people of /lit/. I think that the real question is "why do we care"? The answer to that is because she gave the trolls exactly the reaction they were begging for.

[Anonymous No.11448408]

>>11448387
poor girl can only afford half a shirt

[Anonymous No.11448409]

>>11448387
I want to suck on this boob

[Anonymous No.11448411]

>>11448387
>5 minutes into intellectual discussion and she gives you this look
wat do?

[Anonymous No.11448418]

>>11448387
I want to sit on her face and make her rim my ass.

[Anonymous No.11448419]

>>11448411
Stay your lust you dreadful thot, I'm trying to explain something!

[Anonymous No.11448421]

>>11448226
Shes not wrong though. Everything is driven by irrational forces, what we call feelings, emotions or will.

[Anonymous No.11448424]

>>11448385
He is virile and I'm the Queen of England

[Anonymous No.11448430]

>>11448382
Let's try another example: you find an expensive watch on a random bench in the middle of the city. For all you know, the possessor didn't want it there and just abandoned it there for someone to take it. Sure it's bad to steal someone's watch, but it only becomes "stealing" if they actively oppose you.
Same goes online. I have no idea whether a girl that posts videos and pics of herself for everybody to see doesn't actually want to be "harassed", or what her limits are. If she did porn, wouldn't I have been entitled to call her a whore?

>>11448389
There are no cops on the internet and leaving comments is not illegal.

[Anonymous No.11448433]

[Anonymous No.11448438]

She's a child, I don't think there's any hope for her.

[Anonymous No.11448439]

>>11448430
You're still doing it. Just admit that you're a dick, whether you're entitled to it or not. Just admit it.

[Anonymous No.11448442]

>>11448430
>There are no cops on the internet and leaving comments is not illegal.
You made the analogy, dumbass. Regardless, the point here is guilt. A crime (or an immoral action, if you want to leave the legal framework) does not magically stop being criminal (or immoral) only because it is easy to commit. You can criticize the victim for having been stupid, but this does erase the agent's responsability.

[Anonymous No.11448447]

>>11448418
thats a bit gay

[Anonymous No.11448453]

>>11448433
she has a bit more breasts than expected

[Anonymous No.11448456]

>>11448442

For it being bad in the first place, you have to give us a reason as to why it's bad.

Also, how do you determine responsability?

[Anonymous No.11448460]

>>11448433
do you think she would have bigger milkers if she went thru pregnancy?

[Anonymous No.11448462]

>>11448282
His haircut makes him look worse than he actually is

[Anonymous No.11448463]

[Anonymous No.11448465]

>>11448430
>Sure it's bad to steal someone's watch, but it only becomes "stealing" if they actively oppose you.
That's an arbitrary criteria, you should justify it. You're taking something that is not yours, and in your example you've made no effort to find the owner. It's stealing by definition

>Same goes online. I have no idea whether a girl that posts videos and pics of herself for everybody to see doesn't actually want to be "harassed", or what her limits are.
But that's a lie, you know she does not want to get harrassed, since she has begged the board multiple times to stop doing this shit. There's even a video of her in this very thread in which she say what I've just said.

[Anonymous No.11448467]

>>11448442
you don't feel less guilty having known that someone, instead of limiting their attack surface, took a risk because it was convenient for them, which you then exploited?
it's almost like they deserve it for insulting the ability of their attackers

[Anonymous No.11448470]

>>11448465

What needs justification is your criteria for determining continuous ownership.

[Anonymous No.11448472]

>>11448465
Online harassment? Just turn off your fucking computer ontobitch. Ignore it. Block people. Etc., etc.

[Anonymous No.11448477]

>>11448456
>For it being bad in the first place, you have to give us a reason as to why it's bad.
It harms the well-being of another person for no reason other than entertainment.
>Also, how do you determine responsability?
In this case it is self-evidrnt. If you steal a car you're not eesponsible for having stolen a car? Is this your objection? If you harrass ontologicool you're not responsible for having harrassed ontologicool?

[Anonymous No.11448478]

>>11448292
>the most enlightened board on 4chan
It's for that very reason.

[Anonymous No.11448484]

>>11448470
It is already contained in the definition of ownership.
>>11448472
I've not said it is the end of the world. The debate was on wether this is harrassment, not about how bad harrassment is in general. Nice reading comprehension, stupid.
>>11448467
Not a moral or legal argument.

[Anonymous No.11448486]

>>11448166
>anonymous image board
>has to slut your pseud ass for attention

[Anonymous No.11448487]

Philosothots are disgusting.

[Anonymous No.11448489]

>>11448372
You know he fucked her. Her reaction says it all.

[Anonymous No.11448491]

>>11448484
>Not a moral or legal argument.
not an argument

[Anonymous No.11448492]

>>11448282
Imagine what a hunk he'd be with a straightened ponytail.

[Anonymous No.11448493]

>>11448484
I never said it was the end of the world? Nice reading comp yourself faggot. Anyways, you are just arguing over bullshit in the hopes your Queen is reading this and is moved by how much her beta bitch bois are coming to her defense.

[Anonymous No.11448494]

>>11448439
The internet is full of dicks. The point I'm trying to make is that people don't realize how much power they themselves give them by being oblivious to the nature of this place.

>>11448442
Fine, I'm guilty in a moral system that people babble about but doesn't objectively exist. But the victim holds more responsibility for the action than I do.

>>11448465
>she has begged the board multiple times to stop doing this shit
That is hypocrisy. The reason you upload something on the internet and make it available for everyone is attention, every single time. So what she is begging for is that all attention given to her must be positive, without having earned it or fought for it in the slightest.

[Anonymous No.11448510]

>>11448129
This bitch is crazy wouldn't touch her with a 30ft pole.

[Anonymous No.11448515]

[Anonymous No.11448517]

>>11448477

I'm playing devil's advocate. I'm not the other guy, and I have better things to do than ''harrassing'' some pseud thot, one of which is making sure that your shitty logic does not go unchecked.

1. There has probably never been a single case of ''harassment'' in the history of mankind that was perpetrated with the sole purpose of entertaining oneself. ''Harassment'' can serve many purposes, like maintaining hierarchical structures or social order, working to one's benefits or to the benefits of many. Also, I affirm that human beings are not of equal moral value, so the ''badness'' or ''goodness'' of ''harassment'' is case dependant.

2.

This is circular reasoning, or you're dodging the question. By which criterias do we determine who or what is responsible if X is to happen?

>>11448484

It probably is ; too bad you have not provided a definition of ''ownership''. If I tell you that this thing X is mine, what allows me to say that, and what does it mean for a thing to be ''mine''?

By the way, the internet is a public place. It would be idiotic to get upset by someone taking a picture with his cellphone of a missing dog poster you put on a utility pole somewhere in town.

[Anonymous No.11448519]

>>11448491
It is, given the subject at hand.
>>11448493
I think she is a pseud, I don't respect her intellectually in the slightest.

>>11448494

> But the victim holds more responsibility for the action than I do.
I don't see how this could be true, since without the thief there would have been no theft.
>That is hypocrisy. The reason you upload something on the internet and make it available for everyone is attention, every single time. So what she is begging for is that all attention given to her must be positive, without having earned it or fought for it in the slightest.
The only video left on her channel is about her ranting about 4chan harrassment. If what you said was to be the case, she would have interacted with the board through new videos. To reach your conclusions you have to discount virtually everything we know about this case.

[Anonymous No.11448527]

>>11448421
we get it, you browse here.

[Anonymous No.11448529]

There is only one thing Onto can do:
>Hypatia remained a lifelong virgin, when one of the men who came to her lectures tried to court her, she tried to sooth his lust by playing the lyre. When he refused to abandon his pursuit, she rejected him outright, displaying her bloody menstrual rags and declaring "This is what you really love, my young man, but you do not love beauty for its own sake."

[Anonymous No.11448530]

>>11448517
>There has probably never been a single case of ''harassment'' in the history of mankind that was perpetrated with the sole purpose of entertaining oneself.

[Anonymous No.11448535]

>>11448519
my post is completely relevant to the subject, which is that she brought the trolls upon herself.

[Anonymous No.11448539]

>>11448282
wow that guy is punching above his weight

[Anonymous No.11448540]

>>11448517
>There has probably never been a single case of ''harassment'' in the history of mankind that was perpetrated with the sole purpose of entertaining oneself. ''Harassment'' can serve many purposes, like maintaining hierarchical structures or social order, working to one's benefits or to the benefits of many. Also, I affirm that human beings are not of equal moral value, so the ''badness'' or ''goodness'' of ''harassment'' is case dependant.
Most of what we can see in this thread can be explained through entertainment.
>This is circular reasoning, or you're dodging the question. By which criterias do we determine who or what is responsible if X is to happen?
Those questions made it obvious: the agent who commit the action (we could talk about coercion, but it did not pop up in the previously mentioned scenarios) is responsible for it.
>it probably is ; too bad you have not provided a definition of ''ownership''. If I tell you that this thing X is mine, what allows me to say that, and what does it mean for a thing to be ''mine''?
You should ask the guy who made the analogy. The point was about culpability, not apologias for private property.


>By the way, the internet is a public place. It would be idiotic to get upset by someone taking a picture with his cellphone of a missing dog poster you put on a utility pole somewhere in town
No one is upset here, chill out

[Anonymous No.11448554]

>>11448331
>Online communication is meant to be anonymous
this was never the case
and since the originator of a piece of information can always be identified, albeit with some difficulty, it never will

[Anonymous No.11448557]

dumb thot
wouldn't/10

[Anonymous No.11448559]

>>11448519
>without the thief there would have been no theft
No, in our case without me being the thief there would have been some other thief. Because the opportunity for the "thievery" arose by itself in front of me, without my having searched or planed it beforehand, it would have arose to someone else as well. Do you see how I'm not as responsible as a thief who actively tries to steal something from someone who defends himself?

>To reach your conclusions you have to discount virtually everything we know about this case
But I'm not talking about this particular case. This girl learned her lesson and moved on. But in the general case, people have to understand that they can't be upset when they receive attention after they themselves sought it by putting themselves on the internet. Positive or negative, it's irrelevant.

[Anonymous No.11448560]

>>11448535
Are you going to ignore everything I have said so far?

[Anonymous No.11448562]

DUDE IDEAS LMAO
she was a good example of what happens when you watch TED talks

[Anonymous No.11448563]

>>11448433
wow what a coincidence that that butterfly came along just at that very moment

[Anonymous No.11448566]

smart & beautiful

https://my.mixtape.moe/atsckl.mp4

[Anonymous No.11448569]

test

[Anonymous No.11448570]

>>11448433
>can still see bottom nip
nice

[Anonymous No.11448571]

They have locked the thread but couldn't be bothered to delete it!

[Anonymous No.11448573]

>>11448540

Suppose I leave the door to my house completely open for no reason, and some burglar ends up stealing my stuff. By some of the people in this thread, the burglar would be 100% responsible for the act, which is not a viewpoint that I can accept.

If a man walks outside during a lightning storm, nobody would think to ''blame'' the lightning bolt for frying his ass off. But if we suddenly decide to add intent to the lightning bolt, there's a shift in responsability and suddenly it's all on the lightning bolt. I don't see what justifies this.

And personally, whenever I mock some pseud thot, it's for the sacred purpose of maintaining the sanctity of whatever she is corrupting.

[Anonymous No.11448574]

>>11448571
They can do that? What does it mean? Only we can talk here?

[Anonymous No.11448575]

>>11448282
>Both leaning away from each other
>hand on the shoulder
>hand in pocket
>over enthusiastic smile

[Anonymous No.11448579]

>>11448574
They basically just made it so they thread doesn't get bumped back up to the first page.

[Anonymous No.11448587]

>>11448566
https://my.mixtape.moe/uhkupt.mp4

https://my.mixtape.moe/lesdst.mp4

[Anonymous No.11448591]

>>11448282
What is up with the jap glasses?

[Anonymous No.11448597]

>>11448587
what a hottie, how weird would it be to spread her pusy lips and lick them

[Anonymous No.11448599]

>>11448372
JP has some really manly hands. Imagine those fingers spreading your cheeks.

[Anonymous No.11448604]

>>11448573
based and redpilled

[Anonymous No.11448609]

Why does /lit/ sperg out each time one of these thots comes along? Have you guys learnt nothing? Women are a meme, do NOT take them seriously

[Anonymous No.11448611]

>>11448587
Looks fine without the shit in her nose.

[Anonymous No.11448618]

>>11448609
We're lonely and want affection, that's all

[Anonymous No.11448626]

>>11448587
Would lie in bed holding hands together hearing the rain hit the window for hours/10

[Anonymous No.11448638]

>>11448626
Do it. I'm sure her beta-boyfriend would let you join them in bed.

[Anonymous No.11448642]

>>11448559
>No, in our case without me being the thief there would have been some other thief.
Which would have led to a different istance of thievery, so my claim stands. Also you're making an inference you can't possibly justify, it might have happened that, regardless of the opportunity, the car still went unstolen. Lastly, that hypothetical thief would still be a thief, and therefore responsible for their IWN actions.
>
Do you see how I'm not as responsible as a thief who actively tries to steal something from someone who defends himself?
You've backpedaled here. Sure, there are much worse cases of thievery, but this wasn't the point: the question sas wether that was theft in the first place.
>But in the general case, people have to understand that they can't be upset when they receive attention after they themselves sought it by putting themselves on the internet. Positive or negative, it's irrelevant.
This wasn't your point at all! You argued that it was not harrassment, and that the harrassers had no responsability.

>>11448573

>If a man walks outside during a lightning storm, nobody would think to ''blame'' the lightning bolt for frying his ass off.
The lightning bolt has no moral agency.
But if we suddenly decide to add intent to the lightning bolt, there's a shift in responsability and suddenly it's all on the lightning bolt. I don't see what justifies this.
If you put moral agency on the bolt, which means that the bolt deliberately killed the man, and if it could have avoided doing so, then I don't see how it is not guilty of murder. If the bolt has no moral agency, the whole question does not arise.

[Anonymous No.11448662]

>>11448433
best pic, I will fap to this

[Anonymous No.11448681]

>>11448642
Not him, but what if you freeze frame while the lightning bolt is half way down to earth, then walk directly into the path of the lightning bolt.
Are you still removed from any personal responsibility?
You knew what would happen once you walk into the path of the lightning, yet you still did it.
She knew what would happen had she fed the trolls, she gave them all the attention they desired, instead of simply removing their posts.
Yes, they are personally responsible for trolling her, but she is personally responsible for buying into the "victim can do no wrong" meme.
Had she taken personal responsibility, the trolls would have evaporated, and she could continue making her stupid videos.

[Anonymous No.11448691]

Everyone in this thread is a fucking idiot but none moreso than me who knows it but is still here

[Anonymous No.11448693]

>this whole thread

Yikes!

[Anonymous No.11448700]

>>11448693
fuck you

[Anonymous No.11448714]

>>11448700
Get help, bro.

[Anonymous No.11448715]

>>11448642
Whatever man, call the thief guilty if it makes you feel better, but in the real world nobody cares. If a friend came to you and told you that he lost his car after being utterly careless with it, wouldn't you try to educate him on how to behave next time?
But I guess that simply pointing fingers and calling others morally inferior is exactly the thing that someone who leaves their car with the doors open would do.

>This wasn't your point at all!
Yes it was. I am arguing that as a matter of fact there can't be harassment on the internet because nobody is ever obligated to go on the internet.

[Anonymous No.11448718]

>>11448714
for what?

[Anonymous No.11448796]

[Anonymous No.11448807]

>>11448396
all women have boyfriends

[Anonymous No.11448815]

>>11448715
>Whatever man, call the thief guilty if it makes you feel better, but in the real world nobody cares.
Spoken like a true pleb.
>If a friend came to you and told you that he lost his car after being utterly careless with it, wouldn't you try to educate him on how to behave next time?
I would mock him for his stupidity. If later I'll see someone else in his car, I'll see him as a thief, and so will the rest of the world, police included.
>Yes it was. I am arguing that as a matter of fact there can't be harassment on the internet because nobody is ever obligated to go on the internet.
Your point was that this is not harrassment. Do I have to quote your previous posts?

[Anonymous No.11448831]

>>11448204
>2018
>white feminism
really?????????????

[Anonymous No.11448959]

>>11448796
she is so thin, I wonder what her parents tell her about that

[Anonymous No.11449084]

>>11448166
I remember this video. It made me sad, desu.

[Anonymous No.11449267]

>>11448292
ye really maek you think lol

[Anonymous No.11449281]

she games the 'harrased women on internet' shtick, smarter than the average twittard she knows it would happen, she knew it would get her fame. too bad random internet dudes dont treat her like those irl asking for her number. this is enough to drive any decent woman mad. its not enough that she has attention. most likely shes some kind of samefagging psycho trying to shill herself. leave before dusk o sweet faced pixel maiden, or suffer the price of a cyber contract you wrought in your sleep. dun dun aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa