king stannis baratheon first of his name #4ry4nw4r

[Anonymous No.11849283]

This Man (a True Man) tried to bridge a pathway b/w the SOUL of the PIE/ARYAN peoples and their world and the "SOUL" of the modern "western" (because they live in EVROPA or AMERICA) man...a true hero. Thus Spoke Zarathustra is a masterpiece which shows YOU to be a lAST MAN. The only books one need read are the Dead Seas Crolls and Nietrzsche.

[king stannis baratheon first o(...) !9fB.6ikQAA No.11849289]

WOOPS that is not meant to be a SUBJECT it should have been my tripcode

[king stannis baratheon first o(...) !Uu1aZOi5pM No.11849307]

poo poo pee pee

[king stannis baratheon first o(...) !9fB.6ikQAA No.11849313]

>>11849307
I altered my tripcode when I realized my error...you cannot impersonate me

[Anonymous No.11849333]

>>11849283
Why do three quarters of the philosophy fanboys on /lit/ feel the need to make sweeping nonsensical claims about the philosophers purport to take seriously instead of starting an actually interesting conversation about such philosophers that is grounded in their texts and a clear understanding of their work?

What kind of ridiculous “thesis” are you trying to posit in the OP? What textual evidence do you have to back it up? And are you able to rationally expand upon it without confusing yourself with your own jargon?

[Anonymous No.11849343]

>>11849333
that Nietzsche was attempting to overcome the CATERSO-SPINOZAN tendency in modern thought and bridge a Way (Tao/Dao in the Eastern sense, Weg in the Heideggerian [he was also CARTESO-SPINOZAN] sense) between antiquity and the present, in terms of attitude toward the totality of BEING. this is apparent in the naming of his prophet of the philosophy of the future after one of the MOST ANCIENT PROPHETS.

[Anonymous No.11849359]

>>11849343
What is this carteso-spinozan tendency in modern thought? What does it have to do with Taoism beyond the fact that you see it as a “way” in the sense of a life orientation? And what is the Nietzschean approach to BEING?

[king stannis baratheon first o(...) !9fB.6ikQAA No.11849372]

>>11849359
heidegger himself devotes a large portion of his MAGNUM OPUS to dissecting the CARTESO-SPINOZAN tendency toward the application of PROMETHEAN mathematical technics to PHUSIS. Have you not read Heidegger? DESCARTES initiated the EN'LIGHT'ENMENT/'LIGHTBRINGING/LUCIFERIAN/SATANIC age in the world...a new phase of what the HINDU descendants of the PIE people refer to as KALI yUGA but which is known by other names around the world...in truth the ages of the world can be conceptualized in a combination of the PLATONIC POLITEIAN (gold men, iron men, bronze men, copper men, homo sapiens) INDIAN (KALI YUGA and its predecessors and antecedents) and BIBLICAL (the book of DANIEL foretold the end of the Babylonian Empire at the hands of the ZOROASTRIAN PERSIANS and the coming of the ROMAN empire with the spiritual metaphor of bronze, iron, and steel).
the nietzschean approach to BEING is specific to the world of the modern man in which it is possible to be a LAST MAN. he offers us an atheistic alternative to IESUS KRISTOS in the figure of the SUPERMAN. This figure would be blasphemous were it not for Nietzsche's secret CHRISTIAN roots.

[Anonymous No.11849395]

>>11849372
You need to spend more taking explicitly making the connections between this vast host of ostensibly discordant phenomena that you seem to presuppose. This reads like a combination between mystery-cult jargon and the ramblings of a schizophrenic on adderall. Why is Descartes and the enlightenment he helped usher in luciferian, aside from the asinine connection you draw between en-light-enment and luciferianism? How are all these disparate philosophical works and historical events connected, beyond the paranoid connections a child could draw between them based on superficial word-play? Is the ultimate meta-lens through which you view intellectual and historical progress gnostic or Christian or something?

Explain yourself from the ground up, because this looks conspicuously like deluded rambling of a mind that’s teetering off the tracks.

[king stannis baratheon first o(...) !9fB.6ikQAA No.11849407]

>>11849395
An enlightened study of the relevant material by way of appropriate methodology will lead you to these conclusions.

[Anonymous No.11849410]

>>11849407
How does one become enlightened in your eyes (does that mean a satanist?!) and what is your methodology?

[king stannis baratheon first o(...) !9fB.6ikQAA No.11849413]

>>11849410
You can only truly know enlightenment if you have experienced it for yourself--one cannot prove enlightenment to other's. nor can one have it proven to oneself on behalf of another. My methodology is meditation and reflection.

[Anonymous No.11849428]

>>11849413
So your grand theory of everything in which Heidegger, Nietzsche, Plato, Taoism, Descartes, Spinoza, lucifer, India and Rome all play parts is true, but not something anyone who hasn’t reached your particular level of enlightenment can possibly grasp or have explained to them? Have I got that right?

[king stannis baratheon first o(...) !9fB.6ikQAA No.11849434]

>>11849428
there is only one level of enlightenment

[Anonymous No.11849440]

>>11849434
How cryptic and mystical! You should write a book! I’m sure it would sell out rapidly, no matter how many copies your first printing included! You really do have it all figured out!

[king stannis baratheon first o(...) !9fB.6ikQAA No.11849445]

>>11849440
unlike modern authors of pulp academia I am not "in it for the money." I am on a spiritual journey into the heart of Westerndom and the roots of the ARYAN civilizations of our world. publishing would be counterproductive as any time I could spend appealing to "AGENTS" (it is no coincidence that this is an alchemical term) to sell my work to publishers I could spend acquiring SOPHIA.

[Anonymous No.11849453]

>>11849445
Why so many words in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS?

[king stannis baratheon first o(...) !9fB.6ikQAA No.11849457]

>>11849453
for emphasis.

[Anonymous No.11849460]

>>11849457
It’s an affront to the eye that makes what might otherwise be interesting content easy to reject out of hand. If you did it once every five sentences it would work to provide emphasis, but doing it for every second important word is, in my opinion, overkill.

[king stannis baratheon first o(...) !9fB.6ikQAA No.11849465]

>>11849460
do you say this to a GERMAN who capitalizes every noun in his sentences?

[Anonymous No.11849475]

>>11849465
No, because I don’t read German, and even I did I would recognize that different languages have different governing norms. Also Germans don’t capitalize whole words.

Do what you want obviously. I’m just saying that prima facia seeing every third word capitalized will make your credibility drop by 50% immediately for most people

[king stannis baratheon first o(...) !9fB.6ikQAA No.11849480]

>>11849475
being "credible" is also not one of my concerns. I know for a FACT that many posters here confur with my notions.

[Anonymous No.11849512]

>>11849480
What notions? Can you literally explain just ONE piece of your master vision to me in clear, concise language?

[king stannis baratheon first o(...) !9fB.6ikQAA No.11849516]

>>11849512
Read the Dead Sea Scrolls

[Anonymous No.11849546]

>>11849283
aaaaaghhhh...

[Anonymous No.11849746]

Just a friendly reminder that Americans aren't European and have no place on this earth to call home.

[Anonymous No.11850389]

>>11849333
If you think this is bad then you should take a philosophy class at your local college. I guarantee you that there will be at least one idiot who thinks that asserting that scientific data has been collected about the Big Bang disproves the existence of God and all that sort of thing.

[Anonymous No.11850856]

>>11849746
This

[Anonymous No.11850877]

>>11849395
>mystery-cult jargon
>ramblings of a schizophrenic on [drug]
>paranoid connections
>superficial word-play
>deluded rambling

>all this bugman algorithms

you're a pseud god stop embarrassing yourself

[Anonymous No.11850891]

>>11849512
his language is clear and concise as it can be and I agree with virtually everything he's saying, though our areas of emphasis vary

you're a pseud completely unfamiliar with the material, and I call you a pseud because you don't have the humility to recognize it

[Anonymous No.11851144]

[Anonymous No.11851839]

>>11851144
Gay

[Anonymous No.11851888]

pls keep posting mister u are v good