[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 21 KB, 180x284, 180px-Debord_SocietyofSpectacle.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12724741 No.12724741[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

yeh but u not explaining what u mean

>> No.12724747
File: 35 KB, 500x376, 1546364212002.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12724747

Just watch they live

>> No.12724846

>>12724747
That's not even remotely comparable kys

>> No.12724874

the spectacle is the filter through which we perceive reality.
It may be controlled by the circulation of capital as in the west or by an omnipotent single state-organism like in the eastern bloc

>> No.12724883

>>12724874
He speaks in a vague and theoretical way that makes it almost impossible to understand without concrete examples, which he apparently avoided wilfully to make it applicable to any situation (basically bs).

>> No.12724889

Is this alex jones but for lefties?

>> No.12724909

>>12724883
Examples are the go cart of the judgment, which he who is naturally deficient in that faculty cannot afford to dispense with.

>> No.12724981

>>12724909
Cool, lets personalise every shit vague argument we see.. you'll learn so much that way..

>> No.12725068

>>12724883
If you're looking for concrete examples of the 'spectacle', you're misinterpreting what it actually means for man to substitute his idea of society for its superstructural model. Also what good is a theory of society if it isn't applicable to all situations within that society? It's like you're critiquing a banana for being yellow.

>> No.12725071

Uhhh we didn’t write this book buddy go complain to the author

>> No.12725088
File: 499 KB, 500x341, scully smokes.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12725088

>>12724747
I disagree but I also want an X-Files thread, please send aid.

>> No.12725138

>>12724883
chapter 4 is very clear and concrete, idk what you're talking about

>> No.12725139

Debord is a pretentious French cunt. Read Raoul Vaneigem instead. Same stream of thought, but fantastic and clear writing.

>> No.12725179

>>12725071
I wrote the book AMA

>> No.12725187

>>12725179
what u mean

>> No.12725219

>>12725187
Make situations and that, blow up buildings like the angry brigade or shit yourself on public transport in order to violently break people out of their ennui and dreary consumer fetishism

>> No.12725476
File: 71 KB, 540x544, peterCoffin.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12725476

>>12725179
Are you the guy with the fake girlfriend who keeps making the same point in every video ad nauseam?

>> No.12725721

>>12725068
People have idealisations regardless of capitalism. Even in capitalism where what was once genuine is being 'offered' by something synthetic can still have a subjective, practically illusory and distinct purpose to an individual. He's just applying a human habit to something that is far younger in the human experience.