[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 11 KB, 220x329, 220px-Ayn_Rand_by_Talbot_1943[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13396078 No.13396078 [Reply] [Original]

Redpill me on her and her work

>> No.13396127

read it and find out

>> No.13396165

>>13396078
it's bad
see for example: http://www.franzkiekeben.com/rand.html

>> No.13396174

>>13396165
This guy is wrong in that they are contradictory: its just a bleak view

>> No.13396184

>>13396078
Hates commies and gives you reasons why you should too

>> No.13396339

>>13396078
The Scientology of money. Wait, that was redundant. I meant the Scientology.

>> No.13396345

>>13396078
Fountainhead good, Atlas Shrugged bad.

>> No.13396376

>>13396184
fpbp

>> No.13396387
File: 120 KB, 1000x624, Nick Gaetano - Ayn Rand_04a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13396387

>>13396078
Objectivism untangles the cthulhu tier morass that Kant, Hegel, and co unleashed and gave Aristotlean reason teeth again.

>> No.13396399

>>13396376
That wasn't the first post retard.

>> No.13396409
File: 32 KB, 220x220, weeb grill keks.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13396409

>>13396399
But it was the fourth

>> No.13396623
File: 17 KB, 640x443, muRCtUr_d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13396623

>>13396409

>> No.13396632

>champion of capitalism and objectivism is a woman
tells you EVERYTHING you need to know about Rand and her dumb fuck followers

>> No.13396646

>>13396078
How about I show you what being bluepilled on Rand looks like instead?
This is a truly pathetic smear job from a site called "Rationalwiki" (who are anything but). The actual article is trite and immature, what I want to direct you to is it's [Talk] page, specifically the archives of the talk page which are all different. This probably is so immature as to be a complete waste of your time but let's see what you get out of it.
They've since ~slightly lessened the immaturity of the article so first I'd like to direct you to a comment "CP level of quality"
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Ayn_Rand/Archive2#CP_level_of_quality
and an old version of the article it refers to:
https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Ayn_Rand&oldid=586099
Here is the modern version:
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ayn_Rand
and it's Talk page:
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Ayn_Rand
of which there are 5 archive pages https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Ayn_Rand/Archive1 (through 5)

>> No.13396649

>>13396632
What kind of person makes a post like this?

>> No.13396653

>>13396632
Her clit was bigger than your dick though anon fucking look at her

>> No.13396685

I've heard her prose is among the very best. Is that true?

>> No.13396701

>>13396078
Read Nietzsche and Stirner instead. She doesn’t go far enough in her individualism.

>> No.13396738

>>13396685
No, she tries so hard to instill theme everywhere it comes off completely hamfisted.

>> No.13396758

>>13396685
Oist here no, her prose is very literalist and mechanical though awkwardly romantic. I get annoyed with other objectivists who feel the need to defend Atlas by saying it has some grand prose. Her prose is merely sufficient to the task. She's no Tolstoy. Atlas is great because of it's integration and ideas.
Her prose is not terrible but it isn't noteworthy either.
also yes I knew you were being sarcastic this whole time.

>> No.13396762

>>13396685
It's really good but the drama is lacking in parts

Still, excellent for sure

>> No.13396868

>>13396078
One of our old guard has resurfaced, so this may be of some value. This guy is an Objectivist specialist in homeschool education. Fantastic series of phil this guy used to do, now he's adopted this "Rand's pitbull" style of video and is proceeding to gleefully attack lolbertarians, anarchists, subjectivists, and other sundry irrationalists. Do recommend.
Btfos some trite Kantian TED talk pseud
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdy5zolvvR4
And some others:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNEaXuvqz3s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVyoxTtCe-E

>> No.13397277

>>13396078
Tell me about your angle OP, what prompted this thread? What did you have in mind about Rand when you made it?

>> No.13397459
File: 928 KB, 1417x2370, Screenshot_20190702-023719.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13397459

>>13396409