/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.14312874]

What were the best /lit/ posts of the decade?

[Anonymous No.14312993]

[Anonymous No.14313004]

[Anonymous No.14313020]

[Anonymous No.14313033]

[Anonymous No.14313039]

>>14312993
>>14313004
>>14313020
>>14313033
Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaased gang.

[Anonymous No.14313062]

[Anonymous No.14313070]

[Anonymous No.14313085]

[Anonymous No.14313094]

>>14312993
hey that's my post
i still stand by it desu

[Anonymous No.14313104]

[Anonymous No.14313119]

>>14312874
The Katie thread. For content the eternal /his/ threads where the oxfordbibliography link and libgen dl link were posted.

The worst was the original post of the /lit/ top 100 to imgur, the quality of posting completely collapsed and never recovered.

[Anonymous No.14313120]

[Anonymous No.14313136]

[Anonymous No.14313152]

[Anonymous No.14313156]

[Anonymous No.14313166]

>>14312874
Bell Hooks-pilled and based

[Anonymous No.14313168]

[Anonymous No.14313183]

[Anonymous No.14313191]

[Anonymous No.14313213]

>>14313152
Based

[Anonymous No.14313303]

sad fregg
sleazy gas station guy (?)
"this is water" tattoo thot
Bloom letters/art

[Anonymous No.14313334]

>What is Grmm's endgame?

Dying before he has to finish his story, because as a liberal atheist childkiller, he cannot actually conclude it in a satisfactory way without betraying his own ideology.

The absolute state of GRRM is that, looked at objectively, the series actually came to the only conclusion that his stupid nihilistic series actually could without being nakedly trite bullshit--and it was STILL trite bullshit, just not naked.

Think about it. How does this retard actually end the book, what can he possibly do that doesn't either:
-Point to bloodline aristocracy being moral
-Point to a certain class of people being qualified to rule
-Point to status-quo ideas of sex and rulership being correct
-Suck

He can't. He can't do a big final battle between good and evil because he is on record as saying that good and evil don't exist. He can't have a chosen savior swoop in and save everything because he is a dispicable atheist dogfucker and what would Jesus's tax policy be? He can't give any of the characters happy endings because literally every single one of them solves their problems through violence and he is supposedly a pacifist.

The only option is to just not finish the story, or to finish it in the way the show finished it. With some crippled wizard on the throne. I called this years ago. Martin cannot finish the story, because he is IDEOLOGICALLY unequipped to do so. As a weak, stupid, cowardly lazy left-wing sack of cum-eating degenerate faggot enabling shit, he has boxed himself in to a set of no-win options. By trying to subvert fantasy tropes he accidentally subverted basic story structure.

It isn't about plotlines or character bloat or any of that shit, even that hack Brandon Sanderson can overcome that. It's that the only way to end a story satisfyingly is to end it Right Wing as fuck, because the Right is the only side of political and philosophic thought that believes in happy endings.

Enjoy whatever slop this kike pours into your trough you fucking pigs. You deserve it.

[Anonymous No.14313352]

>I think I'm going to have non-consensual sex with Neil Gayman.

Yes, in fact right this moment I have resolved to rape this man. All of my faculties and resources are now going to be put into achieving this end. The way this man controls the contortions of his face elicits a deep, ape-ish urge within me to do extremely violent and sexual damage to him.

If you think about it, how is Neil Gayman different from a woman? They are equally timid. Equally frivolous. Equally acquiescent. Equally narcissistic. Equally upset by a combination of words or ideas that do not conform to the status-quo. And no doubt Mr. Gayman has sucked a penis too--maybe just a silicon one (for now), but nevertheless he has tried it; has been struck with the same sort of 'oh-i'm-so-so-naughty' inclination that seizes all women at some point in their life and with the frenzied tom-tom of feminine sexuality blaring in their head which is only ever empty and only ever filled when the image or implication of a Penis can be grasped in external reality, and just like such a woman has Neil Gayman greedily taken hold of the dildo that he secretly keeps in his top drawer (why disguise it further? why, wouldn't he be happy if someone were to discover his little perversion? oh think of how oh so so naughty that would be!) and after taking the full 7.5" of rubber down his throat he is filled with such a thrill such that no expression of his "masculine" sexuality has ever come close to attaining.

Hmm, indeed, the lines between Woman and Neil Gayman continue to blur, and my dick continues to rise. Raping him could be ethically and epistemologically justified, both through Utilitarian ethics and Platonic Teleology, but I will not go into that here. Suffice to say that raping Neil Gayman would be a net benefit for the world as such, as material entity and conceptual ideal. It would be a rape that would satisfy so many hearts, so many minds, and most importantly my own penis.

I am decided: Neil Gayman will be raped within the month. I will devote myself to finding out his residency, his routines, and I will plot and plan my moment of violation meticulously. This is a very real goal I have set, and I shall know neither rest nor mortal satisfaction until it has been attained.

[Anonymous No.14313366]

>>14312993
Do you save every post with "nigger" in it?