[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 73 KB, 690x767, Screenshot_8.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14978628 No.14978628 [Reply] [Original]

Post your dichtonomy test and favorite philosopher:
Schopenhauer
https://dichotomytests.com/test.html?id=0

>> No.14978666

>>14978628
Have you even read Schopenhauer? He would cringe at you.

>> No.14978782
File: 116 KB, 548x940, philosophy results.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14978782

>>14978628
Gustavo Gutierrez

>> No.14978786
File: 40 KB, 515x801, this feel.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14978786

Haven't read any philosophy yet, any reccomendations based on my results?

>> No.14978789

>>14978628
I got monotheism.
Spinoza

>> No.14978869

>>14978786
Nagarjuna or Levinas maybe?

>> No.14978883

Phone posting, so I'll just summarize what I got
Montheist with heavy asceticism moralist leaning. Balanced rationalism-romanticism and skepticism-absolutism dichotomies
Marcus Aurelius
Intresting how hard the thread is leaning towards spritualism so far

>> No.14978893

>>14978883
because only spiritualists are stupid enough to think a test like this means anything

>> No.14978903
File: 201 KB, 750x1334, 946E27C5-7EED-4A04-9434-386480B1D8EE.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14978903

Some questions are dumb. I like Neeche

>> No.14978908
File: 392 KB, 1242x1951, FB287308-566B-4AFC-97FD-F97087F005BB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14978908

Camus

>> No.14978909

>>14978893
It's just a cute little quiz anon, no reason to get defensive.

>> No.14978917

It gave me monotheism but I am atheist. Kek.

>> No.14978940
File: 337 KB, 998x1680, IMG_20200330_010741.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14978940

Nietzsche maybe. I also like Foucault

>> No.14978952

>>14978917
Perhaps there are some things you're in denial about anon

>> No.14979111
File: 65 KB, 472x596, FC39zCO.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14979111

Aquinas

>> No.14979125
File: 40 KB, 326x455, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14979125

Kierkegaard

>> No.14979187
File: 310 KB, 1218x1324, Lit philosophy test.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14979187

Alan Watts

>> No.14979585
File: 115 KB, 551x726, Screen Shot 2020-03-18 at 11.32.57 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14979585

Kierkegaard

>> No.14979591

>>14978917
how Whiteheadian..

>> No.14979642
File: 66 KB, 550x751, dt.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14979642

Aristotle

>> No.14979656
File: 54 KB, 586x606, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14979656

>>14978628
I haven't read a lot of philosphy but i read some of Plato's dialogues and enjoyed them quite a lot

>> No.14979723
File: 56 KB, 455x573, aightbet.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14979723

>>14978628
what should i read?

>> No.14979726
File: 482 KB, 1080x1706, 20200330_040635.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14979726

Cioran

>> No.14979795

>>14979726
>>14979723
>>14978903
NPCs

>> No.14979912
File: 238 KB, 828x1588, D7197CF6-688A-42CB-902F-F9061877DC8B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14979912

>>14978628
Mary Wollstonecraft

>> No.14979941
File: 555 KB, 1080x2077, Screenshot_20200329-204607_Chrome.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14979941

>>14978628
Giovanni Papini

>> No.14979947
File: 394 KB, 807x1563, Screenshot_20200329-204415_Chrome.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14979947

Plato

>> No.14979958

>>14979795
And you conclude that how?

>> No.14980048
File: 73 KB, 613x905, Philosophy_Test.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14980048

Siddhārtha Gautama

>> No.14980098
File: 65 KB, 540x784, Meekssks.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14980098

Hitler

>> No.14980157
File: 311 KB, 1080x1730, Screenshot_20200329-202620__01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14980157

Samael Aun Weor

glad to see there's not many materialists on lit

>> No.14980164

>>14980048
of course the one materialist is a McBuddhist though lmao

>> No.14980191
File: 58 KB, 423x640, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14980191

I am my own favorite philosopher

>> No.14980192
File: 894 KB, 1440x3040, Screenshot_20200329-181020_Chrome.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14980192

>>14978666
what's my philosophy

>> No.14980211

>>14980192
high school libertarian

>> No.14980293
File: 86 KB, 666x849, orangeposting in 2020.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14980293

>>14978628
idk I don't read much philosophy

>> No.14980378
File: 51 KB, 528x679, res.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14980378

what's my philosophy?

>> No.14980383
File: 285 KB, 964x1214, results.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14980383

Schopenhauer

>> No.14980408

>>14980383
Surprised about my scepticism. I guess it comes from a belief that the Will as a thing-in-itself is inaccessible. Only the objectification thereof is apparent.

>> No.14980429

>>14980164
See poison arrow parable

>> No.14980815
File: 98 KB, 481x660, philosophy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14980815

I haven't read much philosophy. Any philosophers or philosophies I might enjoy?

>> No.14980825
File: 88 KB, 536x741, philotest.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14980825

Dostoevsky

>> No.14980834

>>14980815
Kant maybe?

>> No.14980848
File: 237 KB, 828x1412, 462A4C1F-94F1-440F-B569-0EEA56A591B3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14980848

Mainländer & Nietzsche

>> No.14980853

>>14980815
rousseau

>> No.14980866
File: 60 KB, 533x738, philosophy-dichotomy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14980866

Heidegger

>> No.14980956
File: 77 KB, 480x600, Untitled.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14980956

Who should I read?

>> No.14981013
File: 376 KB, 1124x1945, 7F57DA75-12AA-44A0-A944-5497BB7CC3F4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14981013

unironically marx

>> No.14981017

>>14981013
>favorite philosopher is marx
>materialism is in minority percent
Why do NPCs regurgitate marxian theory without understanding the founding principles?

>> No.14981022
File: 16 KB, 536x499, 223423423423.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14981022

Question #1 is already too hard for me bros. I could make a case for both.

>> No.14981026

>>14981022
that's one of the easier ones

>> No.14981041

>>14981017
>silly quiz reflects my beliefs with total accuracy
yeah, yes

>> No.14981042
File: 205 KB, 720x1178, IMG_20200330_092008.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14981042

guess i'm more or less in between on every axis because i have standards for myself, but believe freedom to choose to live in any way is essential.
rightneousness is only a virtue if it's voluntary. one must choose, actively, to be good. forced goodness has no value and isn't sincere.

>> No.14981057

My romanticism vers rationalism is a perfect 50/50. I find a cosmic beauty and harmony in this.

>> No.14981074
File: 58 KB, 435x625, 423433234234.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14981074

Plato is my favorite. What does it mean?

>> No.14981076
File: 32 KB, 511x580, I.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14981076

>>14978628
Recommend me philosophers please, my views shifted completely since the time I did Salvia and experienced ego death and other realities.

>> No.14981080
File: 313 KB, 1221x1582, Phil Scales.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14981080

Tough choice. Re-reading Nietzsche at the moment, but favorite is probably Plato or Aristotle

>> No.14981087
File: 254 KB, 974x1338, Captura de Pantalla 2020-03-30 a la(s) 12.34.40 a. m..png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14981087

>>14978628
derrida

>> No.14981091

>>14981074
As a quick explaination; you generally care more for the well-being of those around you more than yourself but aren't necessarily swayed entirely by emotion in your life choices

>> No.14981097
File: 145 KB, 723x873, Screenshot (202).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14981097

Got "Nietzschean humanism," and I do like Nietzsche a lot. I also like Plato. They may be the two best writers among the major western philosophers.

>>14980848
Based. Mainlaender intrigues me, hopefully I'll read him this summer.

>> No.14981103

>>14981097
>Nietzsche
>the second best philo along Plato
lmao the shit you pseuds say sometimes

>> No.14981105

>>14981017
Uh-oh, looks like someone's never read the economic-philosophical manuscripts!!!!!!!

>> No.14981115
File: 74 KB, 591x905, philosophy result.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14981115

some more data

>> No.14981120

>>14981103
I said second-best writer (granted I've only read a couple dialogues in the original, and less of Nietzsche in German). Nietzsche clearly had an entirely different kind of intellect from someone like Kant, and for someone who really prizes systematicity, Kant would be far the better philosopher. But I find that I get less out of reading him than I do Nietzsche.

>> No.14981137
File: 125 KB, 694x947, philosophy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14981137

Schopenhauer and Zapffe

>> No.14981144

>>14981137
bugman

>> No.14981168
File: 324 KB, 596x1125, 14E8BD55-608A-4E10-8C7E-46EFF219FBAF.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14981168

Aristotle

>> No.14981176

>>14981144
A self-aware bugman is not a bugman.

>> No.14981185
File: 283 KB, 954x1214, Screen Shot 2020-03-30 at 12.57.07 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14981185

Deleuze and Reza Negarestani

>> No.14981190

I love how /lit/ is fascinated with these shitty personality tests. Instead of reading more books to try to define what my beliefs are let's just answer 100 yes or no questions in under 15 minutes.

>> No.14981193

>>14981190
and yet but so here you're are

>> No.14981195
File: 12 KB, 560x666, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14981195

>>14978628
What the fuck?

>> No.14981202

>>14981195
You are enlightened.

>> No.14981211

>>14981144
slave
>>14981190
there's as much value in reading as in taking shitty tests

>> No.14981225
File: 72 KB, 563x821, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14981225

>>14978628
Plato.

>> No.14981276
File: 89 KB, 604x879, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14981276

Nietzsche
How can I be Nietzschean and Rousseauian simultaneously? Are there any points they would agree on? Asking because N seemed to strongly dislike Rousseau.

>> No.14981320

>>14978628
What's with the sudden influx of pseudoscientific personality tests?

>> No.14981325

>>14981320
I don't think this purports to be in any way scientific.

>> No.14981331

>>14981325
>it's supposed to be retarded
Not an excuse.

>> No.14981335
File: 17 KB, 398x560, 0EA61772-B9AE-43B7-B6C6-E9D410B9A6CA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14981335

>>14981097
Unless you can read German I recommend getting this book. It has in depth analysis of all types German pessimism from Schopenhauer to Mainländer and his philosophy of redemption

>> No.14981351
File: 98 KB, 497x795, test.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14981351

My result, please recommend me a philosopher. I like Plato, but looking for more

>> No.14981354

>>14981335
Thanks man, I'll look into it. I can sort of read German but it would be torturous.

>> No.14981376

>>14981320
The 2016 United States Presidential Election

>> No.14981381

>>14981351
Try Whitehead, Leibniz, and Husserl.

>> No.14981413

>>14981381
I need to read Leibniz, I really like his thought I found on wikipedia:
"The only way to rectify our reasonings is to make them as tangible as those of the Mathematicians, so that we can find our error at a glance, and when there are disputes among persons, we can simply say: Let us calculate [calculemus], without further ado, to see who is right."

>> No.14981432
File: 66 KB, 525x749, sssss.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14981432

>>14978628
Nietzsche

>> No.14981438
File: 13 KB, 350x350, absolutism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14981438

Hegel

>> No.14981444

>>14978628
Fuck off

>> No.14981480
File: 882 KB, 1125x2436, 67E2D94C-C184-48DA-B0E8-5218299CDF4F.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14981480

Who am I

>> No.14981516

>>14981320
>>14981331
>>14981444
I bet these type of comments must come from murrika. Or wtf is with this weird scientism? by that standard statistics and engineering are also retarded.

>> No.14982143
File: 76 KB, 733x929, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14982143

jealous of the people that got given a religion, I want that type of typecast reassurance

>> No.14982171

>>14982143
>got given a religion
what a cringe way of phrasing “choose to be religious”, get out of here pseud

>> No.14982182
File: 58 KB, 484x622, 1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14982182

>>14978628

>> No.14982192

>>14982171
they didnt choose though they got labelled by the test

>> No.14982345
File: 204 KB, 720x1520, Screenshot_20200317-144029.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14982345

Uncle Ted

>> No.14982362
File: 614 KB, 1080x2244, Screenshot_20200330_145147_com.android.chrome.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14982362

Don't know anything about philosophy. Who would I like to read?

>> No.14982385
File: 78 KB, 589x796, v.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14982385

not a philosopher but im engrossed by Goethe right now

>> No.14982397

>>14981516
Your precious autistic horoscopes are bullshit, Nigel.

>> No.14982413
File: 63 KB, 375x468, unknown[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14982413

schopenhauer
stirner
buddha

>> No.14982416
File: 87 KB, 816x894, 1584804295754.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14982416

>haha yea dude I am totally ascetic and I do charity work every day its the christan thing to do
stop larping

>> No.14982417

I'm waiting for the all post reply calling other people's view of life stupid.

>> No.14982430

>>14981354
it would be even if you were fluent. He was a shit writer and his books is tedious as hell

>> No.14982434

>>14978869
levinas is a good recommendation

>> No.14982467
File: 65 KB, 573x678, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14982467

Evola

>> No.14982539
File: 3.43 MB, 360x640, tk.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14982539

>cross
>cross
>cross
>cross
>cross
>cross

>> No.14982581

>>14980157
Based!
Aun Weor is the ultimate redpill, /lit/ is not ready yet

>> No.14982585
File: 110 KB, 884x898, egoss.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14982585

>>14978628
Fucking spooks.

>> No.14982607
File: 242 KB, 988x1850, IMG_20200330_155710.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14982607

Guru Gobind Singh

>> No.14982652
File: 115 KB, 566x952, r341.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14982652

Guess my favorite philosopher
Recommend me one

>> No.14982657

You’d have to be schizophrenic to not be materialist.

>> No.14982664

>>14982362
ישוע

>> No.14982689

>>14978628
fuck these loaded leading questions

>> No.14982693
File: 539 KB, 1080x1691, Screenshot_20200303-201700_Ecosia.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14982693

Heidegger

>> No.14982744
File: 87 KB, 628x914, 1585032225110.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14982744

>>14978628
Kirkegaard

>> No.14982764

>>14982693
>heidegger
>absolutism
wat

>> No.14982831

>>14982192
>the test is God
ok.

>> No.14982838

>>14981516
Tests on philosophy are retarded you retard

>> No.14982886
File: 353 KB, 959x1950, Screenshot_20200330_180713.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14982886

Spengler

>> No.14982916

>>14981105
1844 Marx always soothes my heart :^(

>> No.14982998
File: 81 KB, 532x723, test.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14982998

Berkeley

>> No.14983013

>>14982652
Read Berkeley. The dialogues are a great starting place and then read the principles and really focus in on the idea of harmony on the later part of the principles and how a theodicy would have to be performed for Berkeley's God. If you like that then give Siris by him a read

>> No.14983369

>>14979125
>>14979585
twins

>> No.14984395

>>14978786
Augustine of Hippo

>> No.14984588
File: 231 KB, 720x1112, Screenshot_20200330-182417~2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14984588

>>14978786
Based

>> No.14984602
File: 63 KB, 472x648, 26190246810.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14984602

Nietzsche.

>> No.14984676
File: 509 KB, 1080x1920, Screenshot_20181201-140226_Chrome.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14984676

Hegel

>> No.14984717

>>14982689
This.

>> No.14984739

>>14982831
are you always this serious

>> No.14984747

same questions over and over again

>> No.14984769

>>14984739
Not him but there is a question that says do you believe in God. If you say no, you don't get the label

>> No.14984820

>>14984769

oh right, fair. i thought it was using your percentages to match you up with a like-religion.
cheers

>> No.14984883
File: 283 KB, 1046x1378, chart.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14984883

>>14978628

>> No.14984939
File: 102 KB, 410x573, Screenshot 2020-03-30 at 23.20.40.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14984939

Fun quiz. Not sure what to take from it.

>> No.14984944

>>14980192
degenerate

>> No.14984962
File: 62 KB, 464x650, 463847343.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14984962

Currently in a Schmitt phase
Previously Plato/Leibniz/Hegel/Derrida

>> No.14984966
File: 308 KB, 1062x1496, Screen Shot 2020-03-30 at 6.26.51 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14984966

Heidegger

Garbage questions btw

>> No.14984968

>>14984966
What would you do differently?

>> No.14985051
File: 520 KB, 1080x1860, Screenshot_20200330-184308_Free Adblocker Browser.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14985051

St Augustine or St Aquinas

>> No.14985160
File: 186 KB, 1021x1154, Screenshot_20200331_000137.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14985160

>>14978628
Deleuze

>> No.14985367
File: 92 KB, 617x822, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14985367

>>14978628
The Entire Trancedentalist movement (Emerson, Theoreau, Fuller etc.).

Any book recommendations based on this? Also, I got monotheism, which is strange because I believe in God, but don't call myself religious. What would I even define myself as in that case?

>>14978940
Foucault is pretty based in my view.
>>14979111
What are your thoughts on Buddhism?
>>14980825
Dosto wasn't a philosopher, although I recommend Tolstoy's philosophical writings.
>>14982416
I literally work for a registered charity.

>> No.14985393
File: 356 KB, 1011x1911, Capture+_2020-03-30-18-55-28.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14985393

>>14978628
I really don't know shit about philosophers, so can I get a recommendation based on my results?

>> No.14985437

>>14985393
Miguel de Unamuno. Start with "The Tragic Sense of Life".

>> No.14985605

>>14985437
Thank you, anon

>> No.14985632

>>14985605
Most welcome, friend.

>> No.14986153

>>14979187
tryhard lsd pleb

>> No.14986477
File: 224 KB, 720x1205, 20200330_224433.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14986477

Rousseau
Open to reccomendations though.

>> No.14986731
File: 621 KB, 1080x2220, Screenshot_20200330-230735_Firefox Klar.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14986731

I don't like a lot of philosophers, I like cioran, Velikovsky (not really a philosopher) and linguists like eco, pierce, and saussure. More interested in theology and linguistics than philosophy desu.

>> No.14987219
File: 330 KB, 720x1280, Screenshot_20200331-011602_Samsung Internet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14987219

Kierkegaard. But I'd appreciate some suggestions. I'm in between books rn.

>> No.14987232

>>14986477
If you've read Rousseau, you gotta read Hobbes and Locke at some point. Pretty sure it's the law.

>> No.14987240

>>14985393
Read "The abolition of man" By C.S. lewis.

Shits on point.

>> No.14987259

>>14981276
For good reason, Rousseau is shit.

>> No.14987276
File: 290 KB, 1080x1717, Screenshot_20200331-003145~2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14987276

>>14978628
Stirner.

>> No.14987342

>>14985367
>registered charity
>charity
fucking christcucks

>> No.14987367
File: 234 KB, 720x1136, Screenshot_2020-03-30-07-56-18-1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14987367

I don't have a favorite philosopher
Imagine having a favorite philosopher

>> No.14987385

>>14985367
>Dosto wasn't a philosopher
In practice he was, have to have low IQ not to understand that, and that is precisely the reason why I picked him.

>> No.14987407
File: 118 KB, 663x931, Screenshot (2).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14987407

Jesus, although he was more than a philosopher

>> No.14987474
File: 62 KB, 488x602, phil.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14987474

>> No.14987478

>>14987474
My result, recommend me a phil

>> No.14988062
File: 561 KB, 1080x1920, Screenshot_20200331-045722_Chrome.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14988062

What does this mean for me. I feel cautious to philosophy in literature because it seems to be rabbit hole which you cant escape from if you go to deep in it. I feel a difficultly with my self because I feel like I think too much in a grey area where it seems some others think more radically black or white in a sense. Even thought thinking in a grey area only seems to bring a extra special sort of pain.

>> No.14988700
File: 266 KB, 1902x1499, Results Dichotomy Tests.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14988700

>>14978628
Any simple beginner friendly philosophy material recommendations that align with my results?

>> No.14988803

>>14979656
Hah 69

>> No.14988816
File: 162 KB, 1080x2340, received_809776819469770.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14988816

What's my philosophy?

>> No.14988824

>>14984968

Subjective questions like 'I would save a loved one over myself' that can't actually be answered honestly

'The ends usually justify the means' - No nuance and basically disregards any progress around the language of ethics made since Kant

Lots of false choices, like choosing between being happy or successful, between individual and societal progress, which say more about the philosophy of the one asking than answering

'Durr is free will real' - this one infuriates me as a compatibilist, its a question posed by 12 year olds

>> No.14988874

>>14978628
Can someone please explain to me what the fuck does "a world without colour is far darker than a world without order" mean? Not only do I not understand the question, I also don't think colour can be conceptualized without order either so that makes it kinda moot

>> No.14989227
File: 110 KB, 702x851, Philosophy Dichotomy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14989227

Nietzsche

>> No.14989387
File: 298 KB, 1132x1486, results.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14989387

Someone recommend me something to read. Fuck off christcucks

>> No.14989417
File: 83 KB, 496x628, asdasdasd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14989417

Philosophy is for cucks.

>> No.14989647
File: 81 KB, 541x720, Annotation 2020-03-31 124133.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14989647

From what I've read so far, Camus. Although I haven't read much philosophy.

Any suggestions?

>> No.14989675
File: 305 KB, 720x1280, Screenshot_20200331-094832_Chrome.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14989675

>>14978628
Nietzsche

>> No.14989722
File: 88 KB, 854x928, PhilosophyResult.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14989722

Aristotle

>> No.14989778

>>14978786
Just anything on skepticism and egoism in general to balance your viewpoint a little. I for example realize that what we perceive is not true, rather that which is analyzed through physics is a close approximation of truth. Also I'm guessing you believe that altruism is a thing, which I don't. I think that altruism is just egoism in disguise.

>> No.14989786

>>14979585
Belief fag

>> No.14989850
File: 225 KB, 720x1520, Screenshot_20200331-192121.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14989850

Nietzsche maboiiiiii

Naaah just kidding, Spinoza

>> No.14989853
File: 58 KB, 499x633, aseaease.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14989853

Deleuze

>> No.14989881
File: 323 KB, 720x1280, Screenshot_20200331-192353_Samsung Internet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14989881

>>14978628
Be the observer, not the participant