How could anyone like film?

[Anonymous No.15089356]

Like I'm serious, it's such a cope for no talent.

[Anonymous No.15089368]

>>15089356
isn't film just a portable version of theater?

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!oI3er5KKetj No.15089371]

How could anyone like Pepe frog posting?
It’s such a cope

[Anonymous No.15089384]

>tfw I enjoy both cinema and literature and also all kinds of arts
Feel good to not be an utter pleb like OP.

[Anonymous No.15089404]

>>15089384
Cinema is for plebs.

[Anonymous No.15089411]

>>15089356
>>>/tv/
>>15089371
Fuck off, you are even worse than OP

[Anonymous No.15089467]

>>15089411
>>15089356
Film is just a portable version of theater. If you criticize film as a medium then you are criticizing stage plays simultaneously.

[Anonymous No.15089513]

>>15089368
You, firstly, no. Even if the film were just a recording of a stage production it loses all ceremonial value and the cultural element thereof.

>>15089371
Hey woman, keep your mouth shut.

>>15089384
You can enjoy film, but you must understand that it can only ever be a lower art-form.

>>15089411
cope.

>>15089467
>Film is just a portable version of theater.
WRONG.

[Anonymous No.15089521]

>>15089513
>>15089411
>>15089356
>>15089404
>>>/tv/
Nobody cares

[Anonymous No.15089534]

>>15089356
Shut up, grandpa
I bet not even you can believe that shit

[Anonymous No.15089554]

>>15089521
I do, I care, do you remember carers? I remember carers.

>>15089534
Isn't it in the zoomer croud to rebel?

[Anonymous No.15089574]

>>15089554
I member
>croud
u and w aren’t even next to each other

[Anonymous No.15089593]

>>15089534
>grandpa
Older people unironically have more appreciation for cinema unless they’re like super old. If young people todsy really appreciate cinema as an art form and not cheap entertainment then you wouldn’t have such crap films out today. Even serious but mainstream movies up until the 80s/90s tended to be generally fairly good movies now mainstream movies are just another word for superhero or cgi extravagant crap

[Anonymous No.15089600]

>>15089574
>>croud
>u and w aren’t even next to each other
OHHHH TOO OLD FOR YE IS IT YA FISH SQUICKLE MUGPRUGIN?

[Anonymous No.15089606]

>>15089600

[Anonymous No.15089624]

>>15089356
t. doesn't understand the medium

Film is the closest medium to pure unconsious symbolism that is your thoughts or dreams that exists. If you don't like film you don't understand pure symbols and should stick to your lower form of writen language and perpetually being 3 forms removed from them.

[Anonymous No.15089636]

Each medium has some aspect that other mediums cannot express.

[Anonymous No.15089641]

>>15089606
Sorry, not a boomer. Don't know your sentimental reminisces.

>>15089624
>Film is the closest medium to pure unconsious symbolism that is your thoughts or dreams that exists. If you don't like film you don't understand pure symbols and should stick to your lower form of writen language and perpetually being 3 forms removed from them.
If you're going to base a MODERN aesthetic system on Plato, then at least do it correctly. However, you must know that you are wrong, and Plato would be ashamed.

[Anonymous No.15089647]

>>15089641
I'm basing it on freud and jung, not plato.

[Anonymous No.15089661]

>>15089636
Will durr, but one would not deny the immanence of Sight and sound, of which paired company would else be found? To the senses of touch and taste in which a matter to have and not!

[Anonymous No.15089677]

>>15089661
Get a load of willie wonka here

[Anonymous No.15089696]

>>15089624
this 2bh, once you start viewing every film, every charater and their role, every situation as symbolic from the story to the plot to the setting and the participants, film is much more deeper and i dare say sinister for it is used by the jews as a form of control and beyond control as a way of changing your consciousness
be wary of films my friend, it is much more potent than mindless consumerism, it is a weapon

[Anonymous No.15089710]

>>15089696
a weapon welded by jews that want to promote state enforced homosexuality ruin the greatness of the european races and put everyone into a totalist-global government of brown racemixed people
any denial of this is denying what is apparent; to deny it knwoing that is apparent makes you 1: a fuckingcuck 2: a jew
i have spoken thus, from here you can only obtain knowledge

[Anonymous No.15089770]

>>15089647
Well the simple fact is that film doesn't hold a candle to the the written word! It was Aristotle who said spectacle was but a farce, and a far greater experience from reading than seeing. Of course much of what he says in his Poetics cannot be taken as literally today, but taken to its natural conclusions from that unmovable vision, much remains right.

Also, you still nonetheless fail to live up to Freud, or Jung. In that your views on cinema are plainly wrong. Lets say we ignore the unnecessary perpetuating characteristics of cinema which make it so bad, of the instrinsic value there remains it is contradictory to the sound views of psychology. In an imaginative and that is imaged creative experience the ever-present moving of time in some will-fashioning scenario-esque of an "apparent" err's it so dramatically only a fool would think it could be taken-as. That is as fact or whatnot, and it parallels quite well with Heidegger's separation of the-work-of-art and the aesthetic. Now apply this to what tradition has bestowed with the term of the profoundest out of mundaneity, like the term was used in Greece.

>>15089677
You think I am funny?