/lit/ - Literature

[fag No.16205405]

I'm thinking about buying a bible and making my way through with a pack of highlighters, I think it would be a good way to truly assess how I feel about the book as a whole. I just don't know exactly what metrics to lay out in the colour code.
I'm thinking something along the lines of:
• Admirable moral(s)
• Objectionable moral(s)
• Relevant today/to me
• Commie gobbledygook
• God was being a cunt here
• Jesus was being a good cunt here
some shit like that. I'm not trying to create some overly anal cross-referencing clusterfuck but I also don't want it to be as simple as "durr red bad, green good". Which categories would you lot go for if you were to do this?

[Anonymous No.16205425]

Please be a troll

[Anonymous No.16205439]

>>16205405
>• Commie gobbledygook
It's simply not commie. The word you're looking for if you must compare it to modern stuff is 'hippie'. Communism is not associated with non-violent small scale voluntary communes these days.

[Anonymous No.16205446]

>>16205405
you might enjoy the skeptic's annotated bible (https://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/)) as it's written for and by the sort of person you are

[fag No.16205675]

>>16205439
I know that man, I'm just keeping it light because it's a very boring idea
>>16205446
thanks for the suggestion, it seems a good thing to rip off ideas from. They seem to have more of a debunking angle than I'm going for though

[Anonymous No.16205820]

I could mark it all in red and burn it. It's fucking bullshit for mindless cattle.

[Anonymous No.16205993]

>>16205405
Your a massive faggot and probably a redditor

[fag No.16206181]

>>16205993
I'm not massive

[Anonymous No.16206193]

>>16205820
Look how liberated this guy is

[fag No.16206446]

>>16206193
he doesn't afraid of anything

[Anonymous No.16206666]

>>16205820
Filtered

[Anonymous No.16206725]

>>16206666
Epic digits brethren
Satan's got you now