[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 118 KB, 220x241, hegel.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16746564 No.16746564 [Reply] [Original]

Did Aristotle retroactively refute Hegel?

>> No.16746667
File: 63 KB, 544x715, proclus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16746667

>>16746564
yup now read Elements of Theology

>> No.16746681

>>16746564
I think his teleology laid the ground for him.

>> No.16746690

>>16746564
Didn't Gadamer write about the difference between Plato's and Hegel's dialectic in favour of Plato? Apparently it was very interesting.

>> No.16746694

>>16746564
Hegel was too obsessed with dialectics and not nearly enough on revelation and individual discovery. Nobody has ever been bettered by Hegel's dreck, it is at best a weapon to be used in politics and is total poison to any sort of self-improvement, which is the entire fucking point of philosophy.

>> No.16746966

>>16746694
>self-improvement, which is the entire fucking point of philosophy.
No, the point is social order.

>> No.16747194

>>16746966
>modernists believe this crap
Sure, make a macro idealism based on the state

>> No.16747562

>>16746694
And here I thought the point of philosophy was understanding and wisdom, divorced from base practical concerns like self-improvement

>> No.16747575

>>16747562
They're all the same thing. If your wisdom isn't good for yourself then it's too particular

>> No.16748211
File: 433 KB, 619x474, LeNNi VI B.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16748211

>>16746564


«RETROACTIVELY»: IN ACTIVE, BACKWARD MANNER —ACCORDING TO YOU, HOW COULD ARISTOTLE RETROACTIVELY HAVE DONE ANYTHING TO GEORG WILHELM FRIEDRICH HEGEL WHO LIVED TWENTYONE CENTURIES AFTER ARISTOTLE?

DO NOT USE WORDS, AND TERMS, THE MEANING OF WHICH YOU IGNORE.

>> No.16748217

>>16748211
Lol this it's proactive op

>> No.16748912

>>16748217
You wouldn’t normally use proactive in that sense. Proactive would be taken to mean that Aristotle was gung-ho about it. OP should have used preemptively.

>> No.16748981

>>16748211
>>16748217
>>16748912
you’re all faggots.

>> No.16749013

>>16748981
I'm crying