[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 2.21 MB, 2320x3088, https___bucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com_public_images_9191638f-75c6-4d55-a943-d1c98355584c_2320x3088.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17159613 No.17159613 [Reply] [Original]

She's right you know.

>Houellebecq has captured the noncommittal, transactional and mutually recriminating nature of today’s sexual relations. In all fairness, it doesn’t take a genius to see this or write about it. Then again, most of the writers I respect, many of whom you mention here, are less interesting as theorists or philosophers in their own right than as hoarders of common sense. This is exactly the sort of stuff that’s worth paying attention to and taking stock of because the invisible contortions of ideology actively work to deny it.

>Feminists love to accuse Houellebecq of “objectifying women” by writing substance-less, one-dimensional female characters. This is supposed to be indicative of sexism or misogyny on his part. First of all, asking a French guy to not be a sexist pig is sort of like asking a French guy to not be a racist pig. The French are the only ones who can make chauvinism look charming. Personally, I’m endeared by his horny descriptions of the local trim. His sex scenes are great for airplanes. They bring a joie de vivre to his otherwise joyless view of global monoculture. In my mind, you can’t have one without the other. Or you could I guess, but then he really would be the miserable nihilist his critics imagine.

>Secondly, all of his characters are one-dimensional and lack substance. That’s the whole critique! The men have no more depth than the women; it’s just that as a male author who writes exclusively in a male voice, it would be weird and presumptuous if he suddenly tried to simulate female subjectivity. Who wants that anyway? Though frankly he could probably pull it off better than most. When it comes to storytelling, I’m a big fan of Aristotle’s idea that the convincingly implausible is always preferable to the unconvincingly plausible. That’s my beef with all these Staff Picks Table young women writers: for all of their claims to relatability, none of them could write a relatable character, dialogue or plotline to save their lives. They’re programmed to think exclusively in memes and Joan Didion pull quotes.

>The fact that so many of his critics, the feminists in particular, miss the point proves the point. In making it about themselves, they reveal the lack of perspective and generosity inherent in their approach to criticism and probably to life in general.

>> No.17159639

Why must women write in such a tedious, insufferable way?

>> No.17159669

>>17159613
I wonder what these kinda bitches look like once the klonopin runs out

>> No.17159684

>>17159613
>The French are the only ones who can make chauvinism look charming.
unironically take note, lads: this is the average female mentality right here
if it's charming, it's ok if it's sexist / racist / wrong in general

>> No.17159693

>>17159613
I don't read or listen to women

>> No.17159715

>>17159613
>The French are the only ones who can make chauvinism look charming

Correct.
It always struck me watching Mad Men, how you guys are glorifying the old days of chauvinism, but we French are still living 100% in that kind of dynamic all the time.

>> No.17159735

>>17159613
What race is this thing

>> No.17159750

>>17159639
>>17159684
>>17159693
I don't see how you can think that thing in the OP is a woman.
>>17159613
Not great analysis. Seems really interested in the political analysis at the expense of actual literary analysis (most extremely with the "hahaha, he's French, how funny, right?).
Sadly, these traits are common in literary criticism these days - it's tough to even think of a major literary critic who tries to stay away from the political discussion of literature and who has a clear understanding of literature that isn't just snarky or able to get clicks.

>> No.17159763

>>17159639
Why must academics?

>>17159735
Armenian
>>17159750
She is clearly a woman

>> No.17159765

>The fact that so many of his critics, the feminists in particular, miss the point proves the point. In making it about themselves, they reveal the lack of perspective and generosity inherent in their approach to criticism and probably to life in general.
holy BASED

>> No.17159770

>>17159639
To appear smart, coping mechanism

>> No.17159791

>>17159613
>They’re programmed to think exclusively in memes
That's what I hate about contemporary music.

>> No.17159803

>>17159613
Also that's a guy

>> No.17159807

>>17159763
her and dasha are both eunuchs

>> No.17159818

>>17159807

Fucking obsessed.

>> No.17159834

>>17159715
>It always struck me watching Mad Men, how you guys are glorifying the old days of chauvinism, but we French are still living 100% in that kind of dynamic all the time.
I think I gotta take the french-pill.

>> No.17159842
File: 151 KB, 827x918, 20200909_174919.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17159842

>>17159834

The baguettes are really good too.

>> No.17159846

>>17159715
what kind of dynamic exactly?

>> No.17159856

>>17159613
> Armenian Jew
When will normies realise the Turks and Germans were the good guys

>> No.17159870

>>17159639
>>17159770
What do you disagree with here? Or do you just not understand what she said?

>> No.17159876

>>17159856
>Genocide good
Let me guess, you're a Nazi as well?

>> No.17159878

>>17159715
literally stop lying and immediately kill yourself one of the most embarrassing things I've ever read if you said this to me in real life I'd straight up break your fucking legs

>> No.17159911

>>17159876
> genocide
literally a made up term that's vague beyond belief and applies only when the political interests of a actor desire it to apply

>> No.17159916

>>17159870
Do you ever reflect on the fact that if the internet were to disappear tomorrow your entire reason d'être would disappear as well?

>> No.17159938

>>17159715
Lmao this isn't even remotely true

>> No.17159940
File: 3.60 MB, 580x435, UntimelySevereCopperhead-size_restricted.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17159940

>>17159878

Seething Anglos should know their place and be silent.

>> No.17159942

>>17159878
Are you ok?

>> No.17159963

>>17159613
who is the tranny?

>> No.17159964

>>17159911
No, it's a very clear term. You're just a postmodernist.

>> No.17159972

>>17159916
>reason d'être
pretentious faggot

>> No.17159975

>>17159940
Where is her ass?

>> No.17159978

>>17159972

Good band though.

>> No.17159980
File: 67 KB, 1200x675, 853786C8-B75F-4D97-86B2-DA5EA962C1F1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17159980

>>17159916
Au contraire

>> No.17159983

Really quite embarrassing when /lit/ attacks Anna for being a woman despite her sharing most of /lit/‘s opinions on things

>> No.17159996

>>17159983
/lit/ doesn't care about ideas and critiques anymore. it's all /pol/ and /r9k/ discourse disguised as book talk.

>> No.17160016

>>17159983

That everyone hates her is reason to love her. Why don't they understand?

>> No.17160019
File: 145 KB, 446x363, 769C1940-E52A-4D9F-BB59-8D8680AF9C53.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17160019

>>17159983
>>17159996
True and depressing

>> No.17160032

>>17159639

Women have a feeling of chronic weakness always stirring in the very back of their minds, so they fluctuate between apathy and bouts of overcompensation

>> No.17160051

>>17159975
Literally being fucked by an Arab.

>> No.17160056

>>17159715

France has mostly been even worse than America with regards to male sexual repression and these new sexual strictures. I say mostly because America is now probably the worst in the world, maybe for the past 10 years

>> No.17160060

>>17160032
>overcompensation
Read the OP already

>> No.17160064

>>17159763
>She is clearly a woman
why would you assume someone's gender based solely on their physical appearance?

>> No.17160071

>>17160019
She's a contrarian retard, dumber than the feminists she dunks on.

>> No.17160079

>>17160051
Nice

>> No.17160084

>>17159983
since when is misogyny not /lit/?

>> No.17160087

>>17160051

> Grégoire Lyonnais
> Arab

Doute.jpg

>> No.17160091
File: 115 KB, 682x900, 2muu2j.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17160091

>>17159916
>reason d'être

>> No.17160135

>>17159770
Preach girlfriend

>> No.17160152

>>17160056
>France has mostly been even worse than America with regards to male sexual repression and these new sexual strictures.
Correct. To the point where haha, sorry, to the point where HAHAHA to the point where IT'S ILLEGAL FOR A FRENCH HUSBAND TO ASK FOR AND DO A DNA TEST ON 'HIS OWN' CHILDREN HAHAHAHAHAHAAHA OHONONONO NOT EVEN BURGERLAND IS *THIS* KEKED

>> No.17160158

>>17159613
>most of the writers I respect, many of whom you mention here, are less interesting as theorists or philosophers in their own right than as hoarders of common sense
Ah yes, the Ben Shapiro approach.
Her commentary has been written hundred times over by countless hot-take twitterati like her and is too simplistic to warrant discussion.
She's also wrong. What's missing in literature is exactly some respect for philosophy but without denigrating it to common sense. Wellbeck does that, but she wouldn't know. Wait a minute… she namedropped Aristoteles (I hear it's in vogue with anglos nowadays), so she must be right. Yes. Good blog.

>> No.17160161
File: 1.11 MB, 428x300, f51397fffa9b8a3695ca8701b4d5673e.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17160161

>>17159975

Here.

>> No.17160169
File: 1.39 MB, 3840x3205, 23432432.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17160169

>>17160087
is he algerian?

>> No.17160170

>>17160152
>ILLEGAL FOR A FRENCH HUSBAND TO ASK FOR AND DO A DNA TEST ON 'HIS OWN' CHILDREN
You're joking right? That can't be right.

>> No.17160179

>>17160158
First they say she’s too complex to read, now she’s a Ben Shapiro. Oh brother.

>> No.17160203

Should I begin with Serotonin or Whatever? Does it matter?

>> No.17160213

>>17160152
>>17160170

It's not right.
> articles 16-10 à 16-13 du code civil, L 1131-1 à L 1133-10 et R 1131-1 à R 1132-20 du code de la santé publique, 226-25 à 226-30 du code pénal et L 111-6 du code de l'entrée et du séjour des étrangers et du droit d'asile.

Genetic tests on someone else than yourself have to be ordered by a judge (in France), doesn't matter the relation, but they can 100% be used in a divorce case in order to cancel any obligations.

>> No.17160215

>>17160170
It's been illegal since 1994. You get a 15000 Euro fine and a year in prison.

>> No.17160227

>>17160169

Not even, his parents are both French, Christophe and Claudie.

>> No.17160247
File: 74 KB, 740x740, EpaLA-yWMAQmB4R.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17160247

>>17160179
>they
Not my pronoun and I didn't say that.

>> No.17160253

>>17160203
Not really. He basically writes the same book over and over. It's a good book.

>> No.17160258

>>17160227
>She

>> No.17160270

>>17160213
And the judges are all pozzed so they refuse most of the time and favor the woman instead. Just like in the US.

>> No.17160273
File: 637 KB, 1340x604, 1607154361420.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17160273

>>17160258

Fuck you and your meme-based intelligence.

>> No.17160280

>>17160270

Please provide jurisprudence as proof.
T. Avocat.

>> No.17160319

That's a good reading of Houellebecq, I like it. I also like the "hoarders of common sense" thing, and the characterisation of New York Times Boundary-Breaking Books of the Year (And Here's Why That's a Good Thing) readers getting Aristotle's verisimilitude backward is insightful.

I liked this, I will post one fewer misogyny today and try to force myself to reflect on whether certain women might have souls.

>> No.17160370

>>17159613
How do I write like this? I was never good at writing essays in school or expressing myself in general.

>> No.17160430

>>17159613
based

where did you get this? twitter account, or does she run a blog?

>> No.17160446
File: 2.88 MB, 600x600, The Weak should fear the Strong.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17160446

>>17160370
>Get a thesaurus.
>Google "Common french expressions".
>Shoehorn one in where it fits (or not, doesnt matter).
>Google "Famous Greek philosophers of antiqueety" (Google will auto-correct, dont worry).
>pick one, for example, Aristotl.
>Google "Quotes of Aristotle" and pick something that sounds profound
>Shove it in your essay
voila. Make sure to write as if you're just thinking in a stream of consciousness, as if there's no control, order or cohesion in your thoughts. You're writing as a woman, after all.

>> No.17160492

>>17160446
Based

>> No.17160527

>>17160446
I'm so conflicted, normally I love elephant woman beating misogyny poster and agree with him on everything, and normally I hate women, and normally I would say anyone who runs a "blog" or "podcast" or uses "social media" should be killed and specifically the faggots who shill this particular podcast here are obviously normie tourists but I also think the OP quote is pretty decent for a short review essay, and insightful in exploding the milquetoast presumptions of the social media normies likely to read the essay.

>>17160430
Now I see this post and I'm angry. Why would you WANT to read a twitter or "blog?" why would you seek out faggotry? Why is she writing primarily for people like this if they have rocks for brains?

>> No.17160562
File: 3.12 MB, 500x280, 1589777285532.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17160562

>>17160527
Yeah i have to say, those are the only two things i can fault her for.
The thing is, Houellebecq is a lite version of Céline, and the girl in question is trying to write like Céline as well. There's no shame in that, he changed French literature with his style, after all, but that's simply the way it is.
I like how she calls him a hoarder of common sense; i think Houellebecq himself would agree with that. He said that the point of his writing is to find the wounds in a society, and then press deep.
I still think she could've ditched the Aristotle namedrop, but the French terms are fitting in this case.

>> No.17160706

>>17160562
Anna has never read Celine. She read Huysmans and I think said he was just ok.

>> No.17160774

>>17160430
>where did you get this?

I took it from here:

https://niccolo.substack.com/p/the-zrich-interviews-anna-khachiyan

>> No.17160808

>>17159964
>look up UN definition of genocide
>basically all the points apply to what is being done to whites in their countries
>"no no non, white genocide is a schizoid antisemitic conspiracy theory!"

>> No.17160831
File: 126 KB, 402x398, 1608573004697.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17160831

>>17159613
>First of all, asking a French guy to not be a sexist pig is sort of like asking a French guy to not be a racist pig. The French are the only ones who can make chauvinism look charming

>> No.17160857

https://www.wikifeet.com/Anna_Khachiyan

>> No.17160870

>>17160831
Racism is always charming

>> No.17160885

>>17159983
For me is Dasha

>> No.17160899

>>17160870
Yeah. And also I just hate that she's trying to be cutesy or whatever. The way she phrases it. Obnoxious stuff. W*men write that way a lot.

>> No.17160915

>>17160831
>>17160870
>>17160899

Seething Angloids.

>> No.17160917

>>17160857

Thank you for your service.

>> No.17160924

>>17160915
I'm black.

>> No.17160941

why did this person use a racist remark to complain about others being racist

>> No.17160943

>>17160924

... so?

>> No.17160945
File: 24 KB, 385x385, 1608876160135.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17160945

>>17160943

>> No.17160958

Is she a Pawg?

>> No.17160959

>>17160943
anglos cannot be black

do you even fucking know your esoteric race science? anglos are a subset of the germanic root race that made a faustian pact with ahriman, blacks would never have anything to do with ahriman

>> No.17160964
File: 652 KB, 1258x1052, 1578157042624.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17160964

>> No.17160970

>>17160958
She is a TTLG (tall thin lurch gurl)

>> No.17160999

>>17159842
good shit. moar fren moar

>> No.17161005
File: 14 KB, 485x586, 1355245148741.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17161005

>>17160970
>>17160970


So why are you guys wasting time on a random thin dishwater?

>> No.17161009

>>17159613
Bitch looks transgenda

>> No.17161027

>>17161009
In what way?

>> No.17161053

>>17160527
What re you such a faggot? Blogs are a perfectly fine medium for expression, shut the fuck up you insolent gay child

>> No.17161063

>>17160945

Wait, do you actually think "Anglos" mean Brits?
It comes from "Anglophone", you absolute moron.

>> No.17161073

i thought this was a very good review, full of character and wit. not saying i agree with it all but i enjoyed it.

>> No.17161074

>>17161063
Look at this guy trying to twist out of his error. Just take the L and move on. Not the end of the world

>> No.17161084

>>17161053
He probably pretends to read Aristotle for trad cred

>> No.17161088
File: 1.32 MB, 379x400, 1608967459216.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17161088

>>17161053
>Blogs are a perfectly fine medium for expression, shut the fuck up you insolent gay child

>> No.17161116

>>17161074

> Confirmed the Bell Curve's argument one post at a time.

weird flex ngl, but it is going to be appreciated here.

>> No.17161149

>>17160084

It genuinely wasn't like this from 2013-2015. When Jordan Peterson got popular, the quality of discussion on this board rapidly disintegrated. Anyone who claims otherwise is lying or a newfag.

>> No.17161151

>>17161116
Now you're referencing a book that goes out of its way to mention that IQ is a distribution in which some whites are far below the average even of blacks. Do you think it might be smart to stop digging the hole you're in?

>> No.17161169

>>17161063

>It comes from "Anglophone", you absolute moron.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angles

>> No.17161182
File: 454 KB, 1303x859, how_distributions_work.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17161182

>>17161116
It occurs to me you probably won't understand the post I just made so here's a helpful visual.

>> No.17161197

>>17161149
I didn't even hear about Jordan Peterson until the beginning of 2018 and I was browsing this board the entire time.

>> No.17161207

>>17161149
You are the newfag. I was here well before that and the only thing that was different before 2013 was that there was an openly leftist mod/janny who deleted anything "problematic" like it was a normie subreddit. And about a dozen tripfags who used the board as their personal chatroom. If you're pining for those good old days, you're in luck, because they still exist at reddit (where you belong).

>> No.17161238

>>17161182
kek

>> No.17161275
File: 55 KB, 640x480, 1609184890701.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17161275

>>17159613
>35
>single
>no kids
>writing this stupid dweebish nonsense about writers that are half dead anyways
Everything she thinks is important matters less than she'll ever know.

>> No.17161289

>>17160273
>7/12 top threads are frogposts
Based

>> No.17161292

>>17159613
>asking a French guy to not be a sexist pig is sort of like asking a French guy to not be a racist pig
wow, what a racist

>> No.17161307
File: 18 KB, 300x300, sad pepe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17161307

>>17161182
>>17161149

> tfw you are in the 97th percentile of one of the highest IQ population in the world.
> But black burgers aren't apparently Anglos because Poles are dumber than rocks.

>> No.17161317

>>17159613
>see this face
>hide thread
posting from the front page, just thought you should know. hae a nice day!

>> No.17161365

>>17161149
>When Jordan Peterson got popular, the quality of discussion on this board rapidly disintegrated. Anyone who claims otherwise is lying or a newfag.
i confirm

>> No.17161398

>>17161275
Do you honestly believe she would make a good spouse and mother? There's some people that know their role.

>> No.17161682
File: 37 KB, 540x601, 1601775616698.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17161682

>>17159613
Literally one of the hottest women on the North American continent right now.

>> No.17161694

>>17160924
Blacks, are in fact, an Anglo-Saxon people.

>> No.17161755

>>17161694
"Out of Africa" is on the edge of refutation - this anon is close to the truth

>> No.17161798

>>17160527
I like reading people's opinions and not everyone publishes them as essays, fuck off

>> No.17161833

>>17159613
I want her to sit on me and babble on about her literary criticisms while she plays with my dick, desu

>> No.17162037
File: 223 KB, 1080x1352, 20201105_190942.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17162037

>>17160774

Based source-man.

>> No.17162073

>>17161833
>wanting her to play with your dick
inconsistent femdom is the most pleb thing ever, why would she be preoccupied with your dick if she has dominated you. men are stupid, they ruin every fantasy by reducing it to MUH DICK MUH DICK, if a man says he's into feet it never means he wants to kiss your feet it only means he wants to RUB MUH DICK ON YOUR SHOES MUH DICK MUH DICK CAN I CUM IN YOUR SHOES AND SOCKS MUH DICK PUT YOUR FEET ON MUH DICK, if a man says he's into being your slave it means he wants you to to make an L-shape with your fingers and go YUH DICK YUH DICK JERK YUH DICK FOR ME YOU'RE SOOOO PATHETIC LET ME JUST TALK ABOUT YUH DICK FOR 20 MINUTES

pick a fucking lane and stick with it, at least cringe basic dom men are consistent with their corny napoleon complex bdsm bullshit

>> No.17162125
File: 121 KB, 1024x768, EiI0fuvXcAc3Cgq.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17162125

>> No.17162160

>>17162073
yo chill bruh lmao

>> No.17162181
File: 350 KB, 1024x683, gettyimages-1157057512-1024x1024.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17162181

>> No.17162198

>>17162073
Lmao what the fuck

>> No.17162312

>>17162181
Vile creatures.

>> No.17162319

>>17162125
>Get in loser, we're taking a precautionary approach to risk

>> No.17162346

>>17162073
I appreciate the disproportionate emotion but he didn't say anything about domination or slavery he just said "sit on me"

>> No.17162448

>>17162073
based

>> No.17162467

>>17159763
I love you Butters

>> No.17162485

>>17159715
lmao isnt france the only country where its illegal to take a paternity test?

>> No.17162588

>>17159669
Have to remember this

>> No.17162617
File: 120 KB, 746x997, d5SedSI.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17162617

>>17159613
based and annapilled

>> No.17162657

>>17160808
not the anon, just wanna say you're right

>> No.17162745

>>17162073
If you weren't a woman you would know what its like to have your dick stimulated and you never would have made this autistic post

>> No.17162970

>>17159613
link https://niccolo.substack.com/p/the-zrich-interviews-anna-khachiyan

>> No.17162975

>>17160016
>>17159983
hi annna please shit on my chest i am in rural iowa i am so lonely

>> No.17162982

>>17159639
It seems pretty normal to me.

>> No.17163001

>>17161275
word on the street is shes got a bun in the oven

a jew-bun. a challah.

>> No.17163012

>>17162181
the part in the interview about Wellabecq being a modern day sin-eater and taking all of society's evils into himself and letting them disfigure his face was pretty good i gotta admit. that interviewer is funny and also there is a 100% chance he browses 4chan, there's a good chance either he or Anna posted this interview here desu

>> No.17163236

>>17162975
Ahh, Mr. Nathan Fungus himself appears

>> No.17163240

>>17162617
i dont like that style of undergarment. make the whole lower body look bizarre

>> No.17163422

>>17159715
French """"men"""" are effeminate as fuck, paternity tests are illegal in Fronce, they are coming all africain (the country is already over 20% foreign) how exactly is that based and redpilled and masculine?

>> No.17163465

>>17163422
>coming all africain

>> No.17163484

>>17160071
It’s true

>> No.17163505

As someone who knows Anna personally these threads are so strange.

>> No.17163522

>>17163505
Why so anon?

>> No.17163566

>>17163522
Well Anna is a pretty cool and laidback person, so it's weird to read threads where she is talked about as if she's the second coming of Camille Paglia.

>> No.17163575

>>17163505
Anon you can't "know" Frankenstein in real life.

>> No.17163623

>>17160158
Hello Umeh Divad, how is your day? How has deriving is claims from ought claims been? Your strict, clear lines of causality as good as always?

>> No.17163631

>>17159613
AOC has always been amazing

>> No.17163696

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KvHX0QOF-bc

She is Zizekpilled

>> No.17163722

>>17159715
Based Algerian.

>> No.17163738

I listen to cumtown

>> No.17163745

>>17163566
nigga its 4:30am in NYC you dont know anyone

>> No.17163754

>>17163745

> What are prime cocaine posting hours?

Mate you've done made a fool of yourself.

>> No.17163773
File: 175 KB, 1000x2088, dial8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17163773

>>17159763

>> No.17163786

>>17163738
it's way past its prime

>> No.17163788

>>17163754
fair point

>> No.17163802

>>17163505
>people who don't know some say things about them that aren't true
>4chan
>he I will use this to opportunity for something that is not only NOT of the ordinary but is in fact the norm to namedrop for internet from anonymous strangers
Anon I don't even know who this bitch is and am not impressed in the slightest that you do. I do however feel sorry for you that you felt the need to namedrop the way you did. I can only imagine it stems from loneliness

>> No.17163808

>>17159613
anna should talk to keith woods

>> No.17163846

>>17163802
Epic projection my dude. I am just making conversation in a thread about something I have knowledge about, you're clearly the one with some serious personal deficits here.

>> No.17163864
File: 24 KB, 474x368, rope.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17163864

>>17163802
> I can only imagine it stems from loneliness

> That post also stems from loneliness
> So does this one

>> No.17163870

>>17163802
Creep

>> No.17163880
File: 111 KB, 1024x665, 1605775323651.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17163880

>>17163864
>Loneliness is key to all frontiers including the internet frontier and America is the land of frontiers above all: America is the land of the lonely

>> No.17163895

i tell you what friends, i read atomised and by the end it had force me into recognising its points and its poignancy. i felt hollowed out after reading it, and its edginess subsided into very real feelings and critiques. but alas, i read serotonin and it seems the edginess is multiplied by 100 and it's just not good at all. i don't get podcast woman saying all his characters are one dimensional, the brothers in atomised aren't. in fact her whole spiel is rather overwrought and annoying, she is dumb

>> No.17163915
File: 124 KB, 750x1000, Pépé.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17163915

>>17163880
>America is the land of the lonely

Kek.
My dad used to call Leafland "the Great Loneliness", after MacLennan's Two Solitudes ("the two loneliness).

>> No.17163947

>>17159613
Who is she?

>> No.17163956

>>17163947
Anna Khait

>> No.17163964

>>17162073
Woah, anon, no need to sperg out like that on the internet...

>> No.17163967

>>17163947

The perfect wife.

> You and two female friends are stuck in the men's washroom at a bar on a Friday night. He has the coke, but he's a bit creepy. How do you and your friends extricate yourselves from this predicament?

> "While I wouldn’t welcome this predicament I can’t say I’d resist it either. I haven’t set foot in a bar in almost a year because of the lockdown. I haven’t had a drink or smoke for over half of a year for reasons unrelated to the lockdown. My skin looks great but I’d sacrifice it for a martini."

>> No.17163972

>>17163947
A devout shitposter

>> No.17163999

>>17163802
the butthurt responses this post got prove you were onto it

>>17163846 clearly butthurt, thou doth protest too much response

>>17163870 either so mad he's replying again, or he's posting it to his fucking twitter (lol) or otherwise podcast-listening faggot e-friends, and some stupid broad thought she would "support him" by calling you a creep

tldr kill yourself touristniggers, he had your number

>> No.17164001

>>17159639
There are women, and there are half-women closer to being dickless fags. Throw in IQ distribution of the sexes, and there’s just going to be a lot more cognitive Plain Janes on top of the yaas kween social pressures driving its expression in the arts/academia

>> No.17164398

>>17163999
Or I just thought you were a creep for being so het up over a dude making a simple comment about Anna. Get your head checked you fucking weird cunt.

>> No.17164409
File: 2.95 MB, 600x338, 1608876722316.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17164409

>>17164398

>> No.17164415

>>17164409
dont run this fabulous gif into the ground by using it where it doesnt make sense

>> No.17164432

>>17164409
I don't even know what you're implying. Get off the internet and take your meds, tranny.

>> No.17164455

>>17161149
>the quality of discussion on this board rapidly disintegrated
Yeah, all those ”x is a spook”-threads really were highly qualitative.

>> No.17164627

>>17164415
I like it so much, but you are probably right. I didn't want to reply too seriously to that poster because I sensed a troll. In hindsight, I just wanted to post the gif.

>> No.17164658

>>17159613
>she

>> No.17164760

>>17159878
based

>> No.17164768

>>17164415
>>17164627
He's right. 'Creep' is a 99% indicator of a woman/someone pretending to be one.

>> No.17164806

>>17159613
Who gives a shit about one privileged liberal taking calling out other privileged liberals?
But at least she is smart for making her name through good old contrarian methods and her bodily beauty.

>> No.17165196

>>17159996
You should see the state of /mu/ these days, it's enough to make a man weep

>> No.17165269

>>17165196
I thought /mu/ was mostly a quarantine zone for teenage girls who want to be cool for browsing 4chan but don't actually have enough of a hobby to post on any real boards?

>> No.17165279

>>17160213
How often do people want a genetic test for someone other than selves on a non-family member?

>> No.17165469

>>17159763
>>17159870
So defensive, Butterfly... Has it really come down to white knighting for ecelebrities?

>> No.17165838

>>17159613
Correct