[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 23 KB, 673x106, Goodreads capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17218607 No.17218607 [Reply] [Original]

Guess the book by the Goodreads review.

>> No.17218654

Heart of Darkness?

>> No.17218665

>>17218654
Correct, that was easy.

>> No.17218682
File: 220 KB, 828x589, CD7A1592-7D44-489E-82AE-4BDFE4E7A5E8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17218682

>> No.17218710

>>17218682
The Sound and the Fury
That arab twink deserves to be curb stomped

>> No.17218789

>>17218710
Got it. The amount of seething over Faulkner’s books on GoodReads is hilarious.

>> No.17218792

>>17218710
How do you get that form that review without googling?

>> No.17218837
File: 100 KB, 775x436, D9Klfzm[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17218837

>> No.17218859
File: 489 KB, 2100x977, goodsneeds.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17218859

now here's a fine piece of seethe

>> No.17218883

>>17218607
great burger thread

>> No.17218886

>>17218837
Hobbes

>> No.17218903

>>17218792
Not him but:
1. It's obviously faulkner
2. Sound and the fury is the only Faulkner read in pop lit. circles

>> No.17218917

>>17218837
This has to be Leviathan.

>> No.17218919

>>17218859
Never read Bronze Age Mindset and yet it's painfully obvious, my sides

>> No.17218932

>>17218859
Now this could be pretty much any 'right-wing' book published after 1960.
But I agree, this is a marvellous piece of seethe, cope and dilate.

>> No.17218941

>>17218883
Cheery-o and right-o my good man, this is an absolutely fenidextrous thread hmm yes, yes indeed, my man, One wonders whether or not her Majestieyie's colonies do regret abandoning Her.

Right, right, absolutely pecker, absolutely pecker indeed I do say so.

Cheery-o! and long live the Queen!

>> No.17218957
File: 25 KB, 782x141, KBLj040[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17218957

>>17218886
>>17218917
It is. The seething ideological opponents rating books they disagree with badly are quite entertaining to read.

Here's something else.

>> No.17218964

>>17218919
>>17218932
The upshot picture of some sweaty white knight virgin just makes it too perfect

>> No.17218977

>>17218682
Faulkner. You fucked up the censoring, dork.

>> No.17218994
File: 31 KB, 760x153, jp1rlPE[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17218994

>> No.17218995

>>17218957
Journey?

>> No.17219002

>>17218994
>shelves: did not finish
heh
Also, that could really be everything

>> No.17219004

>>17218941
I wish you'd stop assuming such posters are bongs. Most of the world speaks English, why do you always assume its a bong, when we're so few compared to total english speakers?

>> No.17219020

>>17218994
My diary desu

>> No.17219021

>>17219002
I'll give you a hint, the author is German and /lit/ likes him.

>> No.17219059

>>17218995
Nope

>> No.17219077

>>17218837
Zizek

>> No.17219086

>>17218957
Stoner?

>> No.17219092

>>17218994
Zarathustra?

>> No.17219095
File: 63 KB, 817x356, goodreds.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17219095

>> No.17219103

>>17219021
Is it Goethe?

>> No.17219106

>>17219103
No, a Goethe fanboy.

>> No.17219110

>>17218710
>twink
I'm actually ticked off at how channers appropriated the term and misuse it constantly.
Twinks are young gay guys with slightly feminine/androgynous appearances and no facial or body hair.
Channers use the word 'twink' to refer to soiboys, none of which, as far as I've seen, are remotely attractive.
Stop using one word when you are referring to something else.

>> No.17219124
File: 119 KB, 900x900, 111222.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17219124

>>17219004
Indeed, 'tis a tragedy olde chap. Her majesty should've never let those bloody puritan gits onto those boats. It's a proper outrage, it is. I miss Zambia

>> No.17219126

>>17219095
Forgot to censor the name of the book.
>>17218994
One of Nietzsche's?

>> No.17219127

>>17219095
Gonna go out on a limb here: American Psycho?

>> No.17219128

>>17219106
Schopenhauer or Nietzsche

>> No.17219129

>>17218607
The Holy Bible
>>17218682
The Holy Bible
>>17218837
The Holy Bible
>>17218859
The Holy Bible
>>17218957
The Holy Bible
>>17218994
The Holy Bible

>> No.17219130

>>17219128
>>17219126
Spengler and his most favourite work is being reviewed

>> No.17219138
File: 17 KB, 320x320, 1559721883473.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17219138

>channers

>> No.17219140

>>17219126
>>17219127
I didnt I thought I saved a retarded review in my meme folder but it turns out it was just this. Like they say if you don't shoot you always miss

>> No.17219142

>>17219129
Dangerously keyed and sneed

>> No.17219148

>>17218957
In search of lost time?

>> No.17219149

>>17219130
You said the author was someone /lit/ likes. Spengler never gets talked about on here.

>> No.17219152
File: 205 KB, 459x827, reviews.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17219152

>> No.17219161

>>17219095
I mean, that's fair. She's not wrong.

>> No.17219166

>>17219149
not him but Spengler used to be talked about here a lot

>> No.17219170

>>17219152
Les Mis?

>> No.17219174

>>17219170
les no

>> No.17219182

>>17219152
Plato's Republic.

>> No.17219183

>>17219152
Zarathustra? Although two years is too much

>> No.17219185

>>17219161
Well, she's wrong about the book, but she's also wrong by default because she's a f*male

>> No.17219188

>>17219182
yes, very good

>> No.17219193
File: 34 KB, 552x260, snap.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17219193

Better game -- which of the famous kvetchers wrote this?

>> No.17219194

>>17219149
I still see one or two threads up on him here regularly.

>> No.17219220

>>17219185
based
>>17219188
The whole forced to read at school threw me off a bit, but that 'criticism' of the Republic I've seen before.
I'd love to have gone to a school which had it as part of the curriculum.
2 years though, 2 years...
>>17219193
It sends with a man, berg, or stein?

>> No.17219232

>>17219220
>>17219170
I discounted The Republic because I couldn't believe anyone would take 2 years on it.

>> No.17219251
File: 97 KB, 464x642, reviews2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17219251

>> No.17219254

>>17219148
>>17218995
>>17219086
The magic mountain

>> No.17219272

>>17219193
>Hitler
>bid for world power
Goddamn I hate living in a miasma of lies

>> No.17219273
File: 44 KB, 650x224, reviews3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17219273

this one is probably too easy

>> No.17219279

>>17219251
Can't guess the book, but I'm gonna guess Palahniuk?

>> No.17219284

>>17219149
u wot

>> No.17219290

>>17219279
nay

>> No.17219296

>>17219290
Gah, shoulda known since a woman was a fan and the review didn't include the obligatory WHACKY NAME HOW DO I SPELL shit

>> No.17219299

>>17219279
leave Palahniuk alone

>> No.17219300

>>17219273
Notes From Underground.

>> No.17219329
File: 66 KB, 463x601, reviews 4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17219329

>>17219300
nay

>> No.17219346
File: 164 KB, 640x610, Capture d’écran 2021-01-06 à 20.40.47.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17219346

>> No.17219371

>>17219124
What?

>> No.17219380

>>17219124
The puritans should have been loaded on ships and then promptly sunk.

>> No.17219387

>>17219346
Fanged noumena

>> No.17219396
File: 334 KB, 454x996, 531CE389-BF99-4B01-BC33-059E30EB6B7C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17219396

This was one of my favourite books growing up.

>> No.17219414
File: 120 KB, 1125x419, 1595052447459.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17219414

>> No.17219427

Funny how most reviews come from women or men with notably low test features.

>> No.17219429

>>17219414
Why would she read it 4 times then? the most boring thing I've ever read was Wuthering Heights, so I'm going to have to go with that. Maybe she's been part of a few book clubs so it seems like a safe pick

>> No.17219430

>>17219427
most normal people don't think "willikers, I'd better post to strangers what I think about this book!"

>> No.17219438

>>17219429
Think, anon, there is a method to her madness (I think)
It's not Wuthering Heights

>> No.17219445

>>17219387
nope

>> No.17219452

>>17219346
À rebours ?

>> No.17219462

>>17219430
It's the sort of thing I'd tell people whilst drunk at a party.
Insult their literary/ music/ philosophical/ political tastes, call someone a whore, do something embarrassing, leave for the next party, repeat.
But taking time to type it out online?
I couldn't be bothered.
More often then not I see a post that annoys me, start to type out a response, only to delete it and go read/ hike instead.

>> No.17219478

>>17219438
The only reason why she'd read it that many times despite hating it is if she were compelled to in some way. She either has to teach it or, like I already said, joins book clubs and has it prescribed to her. Portrait of the Artist is also another boring one, but I doubt it ever gets taught on a highschool level (where she would probably be teaching) nor would female centric book clubs touch it. Catcher in the Rye? To Kill a Mockingbird? 50 shades? Girl With the Dragon Tattoo? Something by Isabelle Allende?

>> No.17219495

>>17219452
Nope

>> No.17219498

>>17219478
You're kind of on the right track
It's not fiction though

>> No.17219535

>>17219166
As soon as Arktos pull their fingers out their arse and publish their unabridged two-volume translation of 'Decline', you'll see an uptick in Spengler spergs on /lit/ again.

>> No.17219539

>>17219498
12 rules, Michelle Obama's biography, Wild

if it's not any of those I give up

>> No.17219545

>>17218995
lol ww1 is on the third page of journey and the war sequence ends on like pg. 60

>> No.17219579

>>17219346
Might makes Right

>> No.17219581

>>17218957
War Horse?

>> No.17219600

>>17219254
oh no. I was going to say that. too sad.

>> No.17219606

>>17219579
neither

>> No.17219636
File: 25 KB, 615x134, Screenshot 2021-01-06 202935.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17219636

>> No.17219649

>>17219346
>>17219606
Mein Kampf then

>> No.17219662

>>17218994
Decline of the West

>> No.17219667
File: 43 KB, 650x135, Capture d’écran 2021-01-06 à 21.34.20.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17219667

>>17219649
Nope. Maybe this will help.

>> No.17219720

>>17219636
>Religious zealots (to the point of the murder)
Doesn't seem like a sound adjective to me

>> No.17219727

>>17219396
Heart of darkness?

>> No.17219744

>>17219346
>>17219667
L'etranger

>> No.17219787

>>17219273
Milk and Honey

>> No.17219825
File: 849 KB, 1242x1778, 7AAD0E74-E272-4DF5-93F0-BAAB551B3F76.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17219825

Looking at the reviews for this convinced me that teaching women to read was a huge mistake

>> No.17219832

>>17219346
Lolita?

>> No.17219843

>>17219727
close, I wouldn’t leave the author’s name in the review though

>> No.17219849

>>17218837
painfully obvious that this is Kant, how has no one guessed this, the name is clearly too short to be Neech/Schop, and Kant makes the most jarring dogmatic assumptions based in christcuck belief

>> No.17219860
File: 138 KB, 1236x424, Skærmbillede 2021-01-06 kl. 22.17.20.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17219860

>> No.17219864

>>17219849
brainlet, see >>17218957

>> No.17219875

>>17219273
Mein Kampf

>> No.17219902

>>17219860
machismo = Hemingway

>> No.17219952

>>17219396
Kipling?

>> No.17220242

>>17219952
no

>> No.17220381

sorry, had to go wrench on a car
>>17219787
yes
>>17219875
no

>>17219251
this one was Looking For Alaska
>>17219329
this one keyhote

>> No.17220385

>>17219832
>>17219744
Nope. Think well-known proto-surrealist poetic prose.

>> No.17220413
File: 58 KB, 575x213, goodreads review 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17220413

Nobody on /lit/ has ever read this book but I will find the responses amusing anyway.

>> No.17220435

>>17220413
Learned Disguise

>> No.17220607

>>17220413
>female protagonist
Well I've never read books with any of those.
Uhhhhh, hunger games?
Thats a book with a woman right.

>> No.17220849

>>17220607
how did you figure that the protagonist is a female?

>> No.17221040

>>17219825
Diary of a Wimpy Kid

>> No.17221072
File: 35 KB, 440x234, gr1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17221072

>> No.17221083
File: 139 KB, 974x834, 534762467345.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17221083

Can never resist posting this masterpiece of a goodreads review every time I see a thread

>> No.17221093

>>17220849
I half-watched, half-slept through the first movie with my family.
Wasn't the annoying girl, whoever the actor is called, the protagonist?

>> No.17221127
File: 15 KB, 414x85, filtered.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17221127

>> No.17221157
File: 44 KB, 509x131, chrome_2021-01-07_01-58-13.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17221157

>>17218607

>> No.17221168

>>17221157
Hmmm, this is a tough one. Could it be "Black Future: An Interracial Sissy Story"?

>> No.17221185

>>17220849
>How quirky and earnest she is

>> No.17221228

>>17221168
>>17221168
I was hoping that the subtlety wouldn't be lost, and I'm lucky someone with an eye for nuance found the title of the book.

>> No.17221367

>>17219346
120 days?

>> No.17221383

>>17218607
B-B-BASED DESTROYED BY BURGERS

>> No.17221594

>>17221185
>How edgy and hipster he is
in the previous sentence though

>> No.17221604

>>17219720
You don't understand, it was very religious zealots to the point of murder

>> No.17221606

>>17220385
joyce

>> No.17221609
File: 14 KB, 610x116, gr3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17221609

>> No.17221620

>>17219110
Shut the fuck up twink

>> No.17221633

>>17221127
Kinda based

>> No.17221637

>>17219251
>btw my book is great it has emotional depth too just like the book I'm reviewing plz read my book and tell me it's great

>> No.17221648

>>17221609
Young ducks are the best

>> No.17221696
File: 42 KB, 610x177, gr4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17221696

>> No.17221704
File: 150 KB, 879x767, 2021-01-06-183948.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17221704

the virgin self-inserter vs the chad reads for the memes

>> No.17221713

>>17221696
murakami

>> No.17221715

>>17219129
Wait, can we review the Bible on goodreads? Oh man, please excuse me, I've some trolling to accomplish.
Not that I've read it, but neither have the "faithful"

>> No.17221716

>>17221696
50 shades?

>> No.17221722

>>17221715
is this copied from a reddit post?

>> No.17221753

>>17221713
>>17221716
no, think gayer and blacker

>> No.17221789

>>17221753
sorry, I'm not familiar with those kinds of works, let alone read them

>> No.17221795

>>17218837
Kant

>> No.17221856
File: 82 KB, 1080x428, Screenshot_20210106-210152_Chrome.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17221856

lel

>> No.17221888

>>17219095
>when women can't just outright say they liked something that they liked
>"strong stomached feminist scholars"

oh right, she has to keep up appearances.

>> No.17221889

>>17221789
thats ok, it's hogg by Samuel R. Delany

>> No.17221905

>>17221753
Lmao let me guess. Black Future?
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/41461786-black-future#bookDetails

>> No.17221920

>>17221722
>reddit
rent free by a website, lol

>> No.17221934

>>17221905
>>17221889
Oh shit. Well it was the only thing that seems to fit that description lol.

>> No.17221936

>>17218941
I just busted a fat nut to a zoomer tiktoker (strong feminist) and I feel bad b/c I literally didn't fap to a strong black woman.

>> No.17221961

>>17219396
>Sean Barrs.
I hate that nigger. I have seen him in several reviews.

>> No.17222022

>>17219021
Heidegger or Hegel?

>> No.17222057

>>17219251
Dostojewski?

>> No.17222067

>>17222057
gross transliteration. It's Dostoevsky. We're not in Poland.

>> No.17222114

>>17221127
>this person will never experience the glory of Beowulf
:(

>> No.17222118

>>17222067
Its not translated, i just enjoy calling him a jew

>> No.17222131

>>17222118
transliterated, not translated, you illiterate fuck. Even ignoring the "jew" part, you ending it with "i" instead of "y". kys.

>> No.17222139

>>17220385
>>17219346
Comte de Lautréamont?

>> No.17222170
File: 12 KB, 615x97, gr5.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17222170

>> No.17222185
File: 74 KB, 446x516, gr2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17222185

>> No.17222198
File: 41 KB, 614x208, gr6.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17222198

>> No.17222244

>>17222170
tolstoy

>> No.17222338

>>17222244
nope

>> No.17222347

>>17221704
Ayn Rand?

>> No.17222375

>>17222185
One of the shorter works of Calvino?

>> No.17222377

>>17219396
King Solomon's Mines?

>> No.17222431

>>17222347
haha good guess but no

>> No.17222456

>>17218682
I'd break this philistine's nose if he was spouting this publicly.

>> No.17222465

>>17222139
Shit, I was right
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/9719801-the-songs-of-maldoror
Fucking plebs got filtered by based comte

>> No.17222500

>>17219188
Two fucking years?
It's not even 400 pages, and it's extremely easy to follow. This guy is just an irredeemable dimwit.

>> No.17222563

>>17219396
Things Fall Apart?

>> No.17222662

>>17222375
nope

>> No.17222670

>>17221715
lmao embarrassing

>> No.17222681
File: 182 KB, 918x627, 1431269179185.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17222681

>>17219152
He's kind of right though

>> No.17222703

>>17218957
The Magic Mountain?

>> No.17222719

>>17222131
Do you have downs by any chance lad, or did your mother drop you on your head when you were a baby

>> No.17222786

>>17218837
>that last sentence
????????
Do women really?

>> No.17222793

>>17219825
The Great Gatsby?

>> No.17222813
File: 51 KB, 630x333, goodreads1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17222813

>>17218607

>> No.17222827

>>17221936
Kek

>> No.17222855

>>17222813
satire

>> No.17222907

>>17222198
Vineland?

>> No.17222928

>>17222907
nope,think south of the American border

>> No.17222929

>>17222377
well done.

>> No.17222958

>>17219251
at first I was gonna guess Neechee. but this has to be Dosto
>>17219414
bertrand russell probably
>>17219636
more dosto

>> No.17223175

>>17221715
*nods approvingly*

>> No.17223241

>>17218607
The bell curve

>> No.17223273

>>17218994
The Book Of Mormon

>> No.17223391
File: 64 KB, 747x236, screen.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17223391

pretty easy one

>> No.17223395

>>17218837
The last sentence would make her guilty of sexual harassment and physical assault. I wish prisons were coed so that feminists could get the real equality treatment. Gender segregation in prisons is SEXIST!

>> No.17223408
File: 216 KB, 521x937, 5f0.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17223408

>>17221620

>> No.17223416

>>17223391
Schopenhauer?

>> No.17223423

>>17221696
american psycho

>> No.17223430

>>17220413
Legend

>> No.17223443

>>17220381
>this one was Looking For Alaska
Kek. I was thinking Hemingway or Dosto but I couldn't imagine a woman being a fan of either of them. Should have thought of Hank Green, my gf loves his stuff.

>> No.17223450
File: 77 KB, 821x464, cbccb84dc0017773042747a86626e3c1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17223450

Easy but I always found it funny.

>> No.17223451

>>17219185
>>17219296
>>17221888
Why the sexism?

>> No.17223458

>>17223450
Nietzsche?

>> No.17223462

>>17219860
Is it hemingway? Searching the review text gives no results.

>> No.17223475

>>17223450
sun and steel?

>> No.17223478

>>17223416
yes

>> No.17223481
File: 135 KB, 1312x564, cluepoo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17223481

>>17223462
nah.. more clues

>> No.17223486
File: 510 KB, 846x1200, 1449699284495.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17223486

>>17223481
>Catch 22
>overblown
>slog
What the fuck, that was one of the fastest books I've ever read. Shit now I'm mad

>> No.17223490
File: 40 KB, 540x394, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17223490

Why are all the 1 star reviews women...

>> No.17223492
File: 2.20 MB, 1565x987, 1504064254210.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17223492

Why is there so much Marxism bullshit nowadays? Like when will this fade away? Like we get it we live in an unfair world could they stop fucking whinning about it.
Just yesterday I heard the last name on the tele of a qt girl I used to hangout with in college and I decided to go check out her facebook to see what is happening to her and Geez ooh Geez. She was such qt sweety cuty girl; now she has those weird front-diagonal short feminist hair with piercing and dreadlocks and around her picture is a message in an other language (probably some Indian non-sense) about something. Like what in the actual fuck is going on?

>> No.17223493

>>17223486
the true crime is the casual brush-off of Beckett, sorry Beckette..

>> No.17223494

>>17223492
*whining

>> No.17223502

>>17223492
I don't remember the chapter of Capital about haircuts

>> No.17223508

>>17223502
but the dreadlocks, piercings and indian-fetishism definitely hit it off..

seriously, read some adorno for some proper marxism that hates on all these fads

>> No.17223511
File: 148 KB, 633x1170, shame.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17223511

Quite easy but what an awful review.

>> No.17223516

>>17218994
>dnf
>write a review about it

why do people do this

>> No.17223525

>>17218682
It' not BAP?

>> No.17223526

>>17223511
hugo - les mis

jesus what does this guy like?

>> No.17223534

>>17223526
Nope.
His own books apparently.
>highly excellent fiction like my own books (which I can't mark on Goodreads, causing me no end of grief)

>> No.17223536

>>17219300
kek

>> No.17223547

>>17223450
evola?

>> No.17223550

>>17223481
>Beckette

>> No.17223556

>>17223511
Monte Cristo, has to be.

>> No.17223616

>>17221367
>>17221606
no
>>17222139
Yes!

>> No.17223624
File: 179 KB, 828x781, 4FDCB602-3435-4A00-89CD-22B214143CFC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17223624

Goodreads is a trash site and the people that leave reviews are all garbage people.
t. Upset after reading poor reviews of my favorites

>> No.17223916

>>17218682
How the fuck do you dislike the Sound and the Fury though, /lit/? Not even with legitimate criticism, with such horseshit floundering? ???

>> No.17223931

>>17223451
My post isn't sexist. Palahniuk's work just isn't made for and doesn't appeal to women. It's like saying men not liking airport romance novels is sexist.

>> No.17224346

>>17219251

This guy gives me sociopath vibes.

>> No.17224349
File: 63 KB, 629x263, Screenshot 2021-01-07 135636.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17224349

>>17223481
I believe it's the same book this reviewer is talking about.
An excellent book btw

>> No.17224374 [SPOILER] 
File: 424 KB, 865x1600, 1610028187918.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17224374

>>17224349
I believe so.
and yes it is.

>> No.17224425

>>17219825
Crime and punishment

>> No.17224518

>>17221704
Dostoevsky?

>> No.17224556

>>17218957
Memoirs of a foxhunting man by Sassoon.

>> No.17224558

>>17223490
because a man generally accepts that a classic, even one he hated, is probably worthy of at least 2 stars if it's still being read 100 years later. eg I abhor Tolstoy but he still gets 2-3 star reviews from me.

>> No.17224574

>>17219273
John Green?

>> No.17224580
File: 100 KB, 750x380, F3EB80DD-DAF4-4BDA-980A-11B18F11BD63.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17224580

>> No.17224706

>>17224349
I don't get the whole
"Muh Celine is a nihilist take"
He's only a nihilist in the sense that Schops was a pessimist

>> No.17224853

>>17224580
American psycho

>> No.17224862

>>17224853
Nope.

>> No.17224898

>>17223916
I thought it was garbage. I understood the surface, and understood the themes, but I could not get into it.
All the characters are just William Faulkner. The women are William Faulkner in a wig, the men are William Faulkner in an array of suits, Benjie is William Faulkner with a couple extra duh's and doy's

>> No.17224906

>>17224580
Factotum by Bukowski

>> No.17224909

>>17224906
No

>> No.17224970

>>17221609
Rabelais, obviously

>> No.17225529

>>17223624
Anybody want to take a guess? Here’s a hint: it’s by a 20th century Russian author.

>> No.17225921

>>17223624
One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich

>> No.17225945

>>17222928
Something from Juan Rulfo?

>> No.17226269

>>17225921
No, it's similar in length, but it is satirical. It was self published/samizdat.

>> No.17226277

>>17219272
Danzig=the world

>> No.17226488
File: 7 KB, 221x249, 1568237464370s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17226488

>>17218607
Funny how the profile picture looks very much in element with the comment attached to it, it's ridiculously cliché and predictable. There will always be that one tumblr/twitter girl, studying sociology and listing all her political views in her bio as if anyfuckingbody gives a rats rotting arsehole.

>> No.17226504

>>17225529
Master and Margarita / Moscow-Petushki

>> No.17226643

>>17219183
The reality is even worse.
Fucking midwitts.

>> No.17226666

>>17218859
4chan, the book

>> No.17226673

>>17218665
>>17218654
>>17218607
how can Heart of Darkness even be racist?
It's the fucking opposite

>> No.17226758

>>17221127
Iliad?

>> No.17226912

>>17224349
One has to despise these bugmen uncapable of appreciating the sublimity of Céline.

>> No.17226924

>>17224706
I'd say he's a bit cynical, but overall just able to see the world for what it is.

>> No.17226926

My gf got the first two in this thread on first try. Damn she's more /lit/ than i am.

>> No.17227000
File: 48 KB, 309x475, Moscow-Petushki.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17227000

>>17226504
Correct. I really like this little book. I'm working on reading it in the original Russian, which is incredibly slow going, I find the language really difficult. The concept of the holy fool seems to be lost on a lot of the reviewers, and I think that is one of the most important aspects.

>> No.17227191

>>17226926
Marry her

>> No.17227960
File: 108 KB, 685x606, reddit pleb.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17227960

Not GoodReads, but was amused by this Reddit brainlet

>> No.17228057

>>17218682
>utilizing

>> No.17228071

>>17224970
yep

>> No.17228079

>>17219273
Turner Diaries

>> No.17228088

>>17225945
in Argentina, not Borges

>> No.17228117

>>17223556
Yes

>> No.17228233

>>17227960
I hate women who write like this

>> No.17228306
File: 24 KB, 620x157, rebecca, you ignorant slut.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17228306

>>17218607

>> No.17228828
File: 113 KB, 350x193, we are the real monsters.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17228828

>>17219396
>Victorians are the uncivilized savages

>> No.17228830

>>17223450
Conan the Barbarian?

>> No.17228958

>>17224425
Correct
Lol

>> No.17228988

>>17221072
coronameron

>> No.17229000

>>17222185
wittgenstein

>> No.17229101
File: 170 KB, 480x888, missing second half.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17229101

>>17228988
nope,but was published in the same year
>>17229000
nope
>>17222185
this is the rest of the review to better get what the book is

>> No.17230357

>>17223458
>>17223475
>>17223547
>>17228830
Nope, but if you combine the first anon and last anon's answer you'll get it.

>> No.17230363

>>17218607
Heart of Darkness obviously.

>> No.17230802

>>17226673
I forget who but someone wrote some essay about it loosely tied together based on the fact that Conrad said nigger in the book. Also chinua achebe legit wrote things fall apart as a response to HoD. All the arguments and literature against it are trash but people think the book is racist.

>> No.17231276

>>17222131
Since the russian is cкий, it should be -skij anyways. Y is ы.

>> No.17231279

>>17228306
Paradise Lost?

>> No.17231282

>>17228988
based! oobfag here, might start oobposting again soon

>> No.17231293

>>17222786
Unfortunately yes. For men like me it's almost a daily occurrence :(

>> No.17231305

>>17221127
Cantos?

>> No.17231319

>>17222185
Idk really, but this reviewer's style makes me want to club him to death and piss in his now-concave skull

>> No.17231334

>>17223450
harassment architecture

>> No.17231340

>>17219273
I know Egoism when I see it. Max Stirner

>> No.17231368

>>17221704
Totalitarianism in a tundra?

>> No.17231378

>>17223391
Hitler?

>> No.17231389

>>17221704
>substance had to be censored
brave new world? only fictitious drug i could think of.

>> No.17231395

>>17224580
Pale Fire

>> No.17231397

>>17227960
I don't recognize this book but from this description I must read it

>> No.17231494

>>17221704
>>17231389
The drug is the obvious hint.
Must be brave new world or dune. I guess Novel with Cocaine could fit the review but unlikely to be known by such plebs.

>> No.17231590

>>17231282
<3

>> No.17231632

>>17228958
lamo wtf

>> No.17231681

>>17230357
might is right ?

>> No.17231792
File: 111 KB, 1200x1200, 1606241323976.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17231792

>>17231681
You got it, nice.

>> No.17231910

>>17221072
either ducks newberryport or the learned disguise

>> No.17231955

>>17219149
Wrong

>> No.17231956
File: 113 KB, 398x877, gr1-full.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17231956

>>17231910
nope
>>17221072
here is the full review

>> No.17231976

>>17222813
Canterbury tales

>> No.17231998

>>17227960
Houllebecq?

>> No.17232008

>>17231956
Empress Theresa?

>> No.17232103

>>17232008
nope, was released around 2019-2020

>> No.17232126

>>17231395
No

>> No.17232149

>>17219152
Infinite Jest

>> No.17232263

>>17227960
Kafka on the shore

>> No.17232425
File: 191 KB, 1631x701, Screenshot (188).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17232425

this is gold considering the dumb fucking book its reviewing

>> No.17232452

>>17222198
Fucking gross whoever wrote that should neck themselves

>> No.17232526

>>17219152
The Organon? but that wouldnt be a school book

>> No.17232565

>>17219380
idk, they were productive. i think labor camps on someiland would be a lot more economically viable.

>> No.17232670

>>17219095
>tfw you effing hate it

>> No.17232694

>>17232425
word salad

>> No.17232737
File: 125 KB, 1440x608, Screenshot_20210108-150427.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17232737

>> No.17232859

>>17226673
>>17230802
Achebe himself called it racist in An Image of Africa: Racism in Conrad's Heart of Darkness, but it's not because of the word (after all, nobody claims Nigger of Narcissus is racist – although it is very good), but because Conrad employs Africa as this distant place, 'the other', and the locals don't really seem to have any jobs or occupations; they aren't really people, they just appear out of nowhere, do something and vanish.

>Students of Heart of Darkness will often tell you that Conrad is concerned not so much with Africa as with the deterioration of one European mind caused by solitude and sickness. They will point out to you that Conrad is, if anything, less charitable to the Europeans in the story than he is to the natives, that the point of the story is to ridicule Europe's civilizing mission in Africa. A Conrad student informed me in Scotland that Africa is merely a setting for the disintegration of the mind of Mr. Kurtz.
>Which is partly the point. Africa as setting and backdrop which eliminates the African as human factor. Africa as a metaphysical battlefield devoid of all recognizable humanity, into which the wandering European enters at his peril. Can nobody see the preposterous and perverse arrogance inthus reducing Africa to the role of props for the break-up of one petty European mind? But that is not even the point. The real question is the dehumanization of Africa and Africans which this age-long attitude has fostered and continues to foster in the world. And the question is whether a novel which celebrates this dehumanization, which depersonalizes a portion of the human race, can be called agreat work of art. My answer is: No, it cannot.

>> No.17232909

>>17232859
>Africa as setting and backdrop which eliminates the African as human factor.
There is nothing wrong or racist with this .
>. And the question is whether a novel which celebrates this dehumanization, which depersonalizes a portion of the human race, can be called agreat work of art. My answer is: No, it cannot.
yes,it can

>> No.17232936

>>17232909
Yeah, I don't agree with him either, but at least he did something about it by writing a book with Africans as human characters.
To be honest, I don't think humanism is the best rubrick for judging literature in the first place. Many great works are humanistic, but that's not what makes them great.

>> No.17232947

>>17232936
>I don't think humanism is the best rubrick for judging literature in the first place.
yeah, I would definitely agree

>> No.17233001
File: 65 KB, 627x356, Screenshot 2021-01-08 155249.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17233001

Thought this one was pretty funny. Love how most of these are by white women

>> No.17233330
File: 986 KB, 2048x1942, Screenshot_20210108-114055.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17233330

This one's not from Goodreads, but I thought it was funny and wanted to share it anyway.

>> No.17233776

>>17233330
No idea. According to her is in "old timey english" and I thought about Shakespeare. However, I think the author is not that old. Probably Wilde?