ITT we pretend to argue about an ideology and philosopher/s that don't exist.

[Anonymous No.17258375]

[Anonymous No.17258384]

>>17258375
you start

[Anonymous No.17258389]

>>17258375
i'll start.
hitler

[Anonymous No.17258401]

CCRU/Land/Moynihan do this about Prof. Barker as he relates to Spinal Catastrophism and the geotraumatics of vertebrates

[Anonymous No.17258413]

>>17258375
Joseph Planatinga's notion of insectesoid engrams as products of AVR (asserted veridical representation) is not based, but baseless

[Anonymous No.17258437]

>>17258375
Sick of all the Cieszkiewicz shilling on this board. We get it, you thought "Hermeneutics of the Subject" was le heckin most important work in 20th century philosophy. Wake up zoomers. I bet not a single Cieszk memer on /lit/ has read a single book by Arno Salter. Let alone Villem Bosch.

Where are my Bosch-chads at btw? "Intrinsic Topologies" is some interesting shit desu.

[Anonymous No.17258466]

>>17258413
You clearly don't understand Planatinga, the insectesoid engrams may be a function of AVR but he never once denied the contextualisation of the entire substructure upon the underlying somatolith which itself provides ample foundation for the crystallisation of such engrams from the intersecting nuclei.

[Anonymous No.17258469]

>>17258437

>Reading Bosch

>Not reading Bludret

ngmi

[Anonymous No.17258487]

Afabis is this homeless schizo with a PhD in bioinformatics lives in my town. every day 5 in the morning he stand on footpath and preach to sleeping stray dogs that they should help him to start a philosophy department in the in the old graveyard under the mountain for cripples. but dogs don't give a shit about the madman.

WHAT THE FUCK IS HIS ENDGAME?

[Anonymous No.17258518]

The "triadic" phenomenology of Petra Visconti outshines everything Husserl vomited on to paper, of course, but the only Tauredian philosophers lit talks about these days are some kind of marxoid or fascist, of course...

[Anonymous No.17258519]

Well no one's ever tried REAlLcommunism!

[Anonymous No.17258539]

Truly, the annihilation of the ancient mystery cult of Judah has been a terrible mistake for humanity, and we should’ve never let the Flavii destroy this ancient religion. The teachings of master Hillel, while obscure, could’ve revolutionized the world. Instead we got the mess we have today, Jupiterism and Lokiism, neither of which can stand up to the Hubal jihadis.

[Anonymous No.17258552]

>>17258437
I'm Afraid Arno Salter was pre-emptively mogged by Maximillian von Schwanz, who provided an irrefutable proof that unlived in societies can exist in principle, in his 'Meditations from a Bordello Bathroom'.
If it weren't for von Schwanz's involvement in the failed coup of Lenghezia in 1876, his work would not have remained so obscure and the entire dialectic infighting of the ensuing decades would have been rendered moot.
I admit Cieszk was neither the most elegant writer nor original thinker, but credit where credit is due in his reviving the concept of intraspeculation.
Salter and Bosch may be convincing to hacks, but it's only because they were afforded a solid 3 decades of uncontested pontification in which they managed to obscure the fact that their entire theses rest on fundamentally flawed implicit axiomatic principles.

[Anonymous No.17258553]

>OP hasn't read Pirral & Dunne's Bijectivity Theory on Forms

[Anonymous No.17258557]

>>17258437
> I bet not a single Cieszk memer on /lit/ has read a single book by Arno Salter. Let alone Villem Bosch.
Frankly I was not impressed with Bosch. The entire notion of disjunctive retrieval as the ground for subject-as-noumenon falls apart when you consider the consequences of this in extremis. If subjects really are not other than the refractions of objects as mediated by psychophysical neuropathologies, what is the source of the 'fraction' in the first place. How do we arrive at the original disjunctive? Salter thinks he corrects this by introducing the mnemogrammatics of mentation, but now the problem is merely transposed from the spatio-temporal to the unconsious. And at that point you might as well pick up where Freud and Lacan went because it's clear Salter and Bosch could not solve this any more than you can.

[Anonymous No.17258628]

>>17258466
oh no no no no
he did btfo'd his brainlet babble when he evaporated insectesoid sugar strands which organised into monolithic webs of entire decentralised substructure. insectesoid sugar strands are capable of making such complex substructures despite the influence of AVR.
that's what you get for not reading Yosophara's main thesis.

Planatingafags are worst than subhumans.

[Anonymous No.17258630]

>>17258518
>he doesn't realize how well the Tauredian trio fits into a dialectical materialist framework
Next you'll tell me you don't understand what Adriano Pugliesi meant by "the continuation of the spirit" in his greatest work, On The Anti-Form.

[Anonymous No.17258647]

>>17258553
You would have thought with social norms progressing as much as they have since the 70s, that exponents of Pirral & Dunne would drop the pretense that the accusations (that their work derived entirely from a series of psychosexual struggle sessions under the influence of LSD) are somehow false and libelous.
If anything is libelous, it is your own treatment of their protégé Cibulka, who proved through clinically replicating those conditions, their principal importance to Pirral & Dunne's work.
So you've got to ask yourself, what is the point in reading 'Bijectivity Theory on Forms'?
Either
a) You haven't had the experience of the sessions in which those ideas were formed and so can never grasp the significance of the book.
b) You HAVE had the experience of the sessions in which case you realise that the book's narrative is a pale facsimile of the experience itself.

The only reason for putting the book on a pedestal is because you can't get laid, you're too afraid to buy acid on the deep web, and pretending that the book alone is adequate is a massive cope.

[Anonymous No.17258674]

>>17258630
Is coom antiformatic?

[Anonymous No.17258678]

>>17258469
Blurdret is just Aclesion's 'ruminations on virtue' for retards

[Anonymous No.17258700]

>>17258628
Imagine reducing Planatingian theory by merely adopting the sullen vocabulary of its van Thünen predecessor (and then confusing him for Yosophara). Brainlet.

[Anonymous No.17258713]

>>17258375
>bruised knees on that youthful girl
I'm imagining it and there is nothing you can do about it

[Anonymous No.17258714]

>>17258674
Coom isn't an empty form, at least as Pugliesi, but I think too many Pugliesi readers focus on empty forms without reading through his work on other kinds of antiformic thought or frameworks. Coom is more like a false idealism as Pugliesi's student Einar Gunnarsson describes it, a sort of idea perpetuated on anti-intellectualism, an anti-idea almost.

[Anonymous No.17258725]

Just as pointless as actual philosophy then.

[Anonymous No.17258871]

>>17258714
How coom isn't the "the continuation of the spirit" and an idea at the same time you fucking coping retard?
Consider this dissection of Einarian wankery by the Meta-Wittgensteinian Philochad Yamoor-al-Xssark

>A. Coom acts as a slim like cancer when inserted into coal mines.
>Aa. Slim in it's totality is zero as the Shunya.
>Aab. Shunya is a totality until Fluctuations.
>B. Fluctuations generate energy beams of code.
>Ba. Code carry charges in between synapsis.
>Bb. Randomness makes charge orgy.
>Bba. Charges orgies creates commands for objects.
>Bbb. Random commands could be called ideas.

[Anonymous No.17258907]

None of this matters because Gorkoniker BTFO'd all of you esoteric cowboys.

[Anonymous No.17258909]

What does /lit/ think about Gabas' pentacracy as a form of government?

[Anonymous No.17258921]

>>17258907
>Gorkoniker
a poor rip off of Cervellissimo minus the Cranaesthetics. seethe more

[Anonymous No.17258982]

>>17258921
>Cervellissimo
His theories of banticism were hopelessly flawed, Gorkoniker solved those issues in his discourses. Eliminating the cranaesthetics and roping in neo-babelic theology elevated Cervellissimo's philosophy to a new level.

[Anonymous No.17258991]

>>17258982
>neo-babelic
>listening to Najder
NGMI, my guy

[Anonymous No.17259000]

>>17258871
Once again, when you faggots just read Pugliesi's most famous work, Guilt and Civilization, you have a skewed vision of what he's talking about in regards to the continuation of the spirit, read On the Anti-Form. But to give you the quick version, "energy" as Pugliesi speaks about it in Guilt and Civilization isn't the entropy caused by fluctuations, his conception of energy isn't that of a vulgar determinist (which you would know if you read On The Anti-Form), energy as Pugliesi describes it is more so the absence of the process of self perpetuation. Pugliesi's model is that all things become whole again, he takes entropy to be the starting point not something things trends towards. Basically, read through the chart for Pugliesi on the /lit/ wiki. Sure the guy who made it was wrong in saying you should read On the Anti-form before reading On Cycles and Finales, as I find that to be the work that filters even the most dedicated Pugliesi readers.

[Anonymous No.17259015]

>>17258909
I hate to shill Pugliesi all the time but in his essay called "Mutilated Courts" he refutes pentacracy pretty succinctly. Gabas is a better mystery writer than he is a philosopher imo.

[Anonymous No.17259018]

>>17258909
Lottie Gimpson eloquently demonstrated the flaws in Gabas' thinking by showing that his framework allows esoteric Hitlerism to be reconciled with white genocide.

[Anonymous No.17259021]

Do you think Alfred Maryanne knew he would die before his book was published? The Oneiric Déjà Vu wouldn't have made any sense otherwise.

[Anonymous No.17259035]

>>17258991
>can't present an argument of more than three words
Go read more Gorkoniker instead of touring him, you might be surprised and may learn something useful.

[Anonymous No.17259041]

>>17258991
Not that guy but I haven't seen anyone refute Najder on anything other than his autistic essay on toys and performative cruelty, be he was 90 when he wrote that so I think he get's a pass for being barely conscious. His essay collection The Rats Outside, the Birds Inside is the best synthesis of Kantian methodology and an oddly mystical theology out there. Name a better modern Kant scholar you can't.

[Anonymous No.17259049]

>>17259021
Unironically he was a shaman of some sort, all of his rivals died from hypothermia and I can't fathom as to how that could be a coincidence.

[Anonymous No.17259053]

What the fuck was Kapelstanel's problem?

[Anonymous No.17259069]

>>17258437
>BTFO's Salter and Bosch
>>17258466
>BTFO's Planatinga
>>17258469
>BFTO's Bludret
>>17258552
>BTFO's Cieszkiewicz (and Schwanz)
>>17258909
>BTFO's Gabas
>>17258907
>BTFO's Gorkoniker
>>17258921
>BTFO's Cervellissimo

Can Roker be stopped?

[Anonymous No.17259071]

>>17258437
You fucking donkey, it's not a matter of hermeneutics but a matter of explaining, as hilfer pointed out, Fleischundkäseburrites.
>>17258921
>Cranaesthetics
>Being this fucking retarded

[Anonymous No.17259083]

>>17259053
Too based for this world, a too often misunderstood philosophical savant.

[Anonymous No.17259084]

>>17259041
>refute
>Najder's toy masterpiece
You must be more demented than he was.

>>17259053
Humanity would unironically been better of if he'd stuck to apiculture like his father did. Someone doing that much damage must have been damaged himself, and god knows from what.

[Anonymous No.17259094]

>>17259021
Some artists have foreseen their deaths and integrated that into their art, like David Bowie with Lazarus, or Dazai with No Longer Human. But I can't see how Maryanne could have possible foreseen being shot where he lay in his bed by fanaticists. If you ask me, I think there's some sort of conspiracy afoot.

[Anonymous No.17259101]

>tfw Adnil deniers don't know they will be devoured by the flesh MONAD at the end of time
>tfw they seethe when you point that out

The right course of action is always pursuing and living through serious suicide attempts bros

[Anonymous No.17259103]

>>17259084
>Got filtered by Kapelstanelian Copronomics
This board has gone to shit
>>17259083
Based

[Anonymous No.17259108]

>>17259084
>You must be more demented than he was.
Okay fucker sell me on how toys are actually the child's way of developing cruelty and how it's actually a war crime that they exist, fucking sell me.

[Anonymous No.17259109]

>>17259101
The flesh monad is heaven for vore fetishists.

[Anonymous No.17259121]

>>17259041
I am that guy and I agree completely, Najder is as close to untouchable as philosophers have gotten. 'Performative Cruelty and Playthings' even as unequal as it is to his backlog has some things to say at least, but it's no masterpiece as >>17259084 claims.

If you ask me, 'Neo-Babelic Reason' is his true magnum opus.

[Anonymous No.17259126]

>>17259101
>>17259103
>Adnilfags
>Kapelstanelianfags
>In the year of our Lord 2021
W-why? You realize crops aren't going to become the dominant species right? You can't seriously believe flesh is the spirit r-right?

[Anonymous No.17259136]

>>17259121
>Neo-Babelic Reason
a sad book written by a lonely, disturbed man. Cervelissimo would have beat him in both a debate and a fistfight

[Anonymous No.17259144]

>>17259126
Kapelstanel did win a (posthumous) Burbel, so he can't be completely incoherent.

[Anonymous No.17259149]

>>17259094
>But I can't see how Maryanne could have possible foreseen being shot where he lay in his bed by fanaticists.
I mean, that's probably what would have happened if anyone had read his book while he still lived anyway. It was powerful stuff, more so than I reckon he could have contained.

[Anonymous No.17259158]

>>17259144
My man he said corn was reaching sentience what the actual fuck could be defended here?

[Anonymous No.17259161]

>>17259136
I doubt it, it's well-known that Cervelissimo abandoned his post in the Battle of the Ganges. That's why he had to spend most of his writing days in Denmark in exile. Gorkoniker on the other hand, won the silver star.

[Anonymous No.17259173]

>>17259108
>>17259121
You both unironically need to read that newspaper shitpost Najder wrote on islam in Thailand. It explains absolutely everything he would later reshape into Performative Cruelty and Playthings.

[Anonymous No.17259177]

>>17259121
Can't say I agree on the toy murder essay but Neo-Babelic Reason is a great work. I prefer The Rats Outside, the Birds Inside and his lesser known work on Chaucer (when he mentioned that he sees the primary influence on both Kant and Marx to be Chaucer it fucking blew me away, it literally cannot be refuted).

[Anonymous No.17259182]

>>17259126
Stop posting here Bolgovin, and fight your straw men elsewhere. No one believes your drivel anyways. Imagine being a literate moroccan, let alone one attempting philosophy. Go home and fuck your camel of a wife instead of denying your nature. The monad welcomes you with open organs even if you do not welcome it.

[Anonymous No.17259183]

>>17259161
>abandoned his post
he was enlisted and didn't believe in the cause he was fighting for, there is nothing wrong with leaving
>Denmark in exile
self imposed exile, mainly just because he really liked Denmark
>Gorkoniker on the other hand, won the silver star.
pretty much a pity award

[Anonymous No.17259187]

Any good books on Shantirule Micronature? Please dont recommend the hack Hualheffal, thanks.

[Anonymous No.17259200]

>>17259173
Oh no please don't be one of those faggots that thinks Najder is secretly an ebin pseudo-Christian, he literally is one of the most influential Muslim scholars of all time this autism cannot continue. He makes SO many references to the Night Journey.

[Anonymous No.17259201]

>>17259182
>straw men
Kek. You win an Internet, my friend.

[Anonymous No.17259215]

>>17259187
>Shantirule Micronature
unnecessary, read Cervelissimo's On The Nature Of Javricism

[Anonymous No.17259221]

>>17259000
>he shills Anti-Form everywhere
>he doesn't even mentions Osmotic Rhythm Loopology
FILTERED KEEEEEK
Nature of energy might seem draining to retards you like after reading Anti-Form in which Pugliesi shilled IOIOIQ's empirical """evidence""" about the nature of entropy. Read ORL in which Pugliesi get really redpilled and made claim that there is no "Becoming Whole." See it as two glasses half filled with water. You pour one into another sometimes one get more water and sometimes other get more water(that was what Xssark talking about). Only retard see this as muh "starting point." It is a stasis not a "start." Yes this is determined randomness and even a brainless like you can predict but nothing is precise. Randomness is not a process but an Astrid posture of information itching on its balls.

Stop felling for IOIOIQ lies you autist.

[Anonymous No.17259231]

>>17259183
>pretty much a pity award
He had his leg blown off by a mortar while dragging his mates from a blown-out building during the Irkutsk Invasion. At least he showed some semblance of courage against the Chinese during the Third World War rather than running away from from Turks like Cervelissimo did. Sure Cervelissimmo could've probably got him in a fistfight, but not if Gorkoniker still had both legs.

[Anonymous No.17259253]

>>17259182
>"...and it cannot be denied, when sacrifice of men is made impressible by the law of the land, all men of God must defy that legal body."
>"Consider the figure of Christ as one eaten by his disciples, consider the widow ritually burning herself, all is sanctified in man's consumption of man>"
>"There will come a time when among my followers, there will be those of make mischief and say 'There is great wonder in the message of out lamb the master Adnil! Surely one cannot say his words are as they seem!' These demons seek only one thing, to damn men to the realm of starvation. Blessed and those of full stomach, blessed are those who dine on flesh."
THIS is your guy? There has been a thousand years of people refuting him and you mention some contemporary Moroccan guy?

[Anonymous No.17259255]

>>17259187
>unironically reading shantirule
He was refuted by Küntröhl so hard he suffered a stroke and became a monk. 'On Samoan Mice' is still a good read though, so I'd probably start there.

[Anonymous No.17259266]

>>17259158
Just wait

[Anonymous No.17259279]

>>17259253
based and blessed, fuck illiterate edgy Adnilfags

[Anonymous No.17259282]

>>17258909
>get's retroactively btfo'd by zolimensky

[Anonymous No.17259310]

>>17259158
>>17259126
>taking his crop metaphor literally
You need to wire in to the atmospheric wave consciousness dude, because that is exactly what he was referring to. We become ONE with the grain.

[Anonymous No.17259317]

>>17259221
Osmotic Rhythm Loopology being authored by Pugliesi is highly suspect, Xssark still hasn't proven shit about that. I refuse to believe the guy undid all of his previous work because some fucking Tibetan monk responded to him with "why" whenever he would come to him to debate him on ontology. Fuck I wouldn't be surprised if Xssar's dad wrote Osmotic Rhythm Loopology, it reads more like his book The Deafening of the Disciples than anything Pugliesi wrote. Also, fuck off with this "there is no starting point" shit, read Anti-Form NOW. For that matter, read Petra Visconti's In Times Unrecorded for a great retroactive refutation of Xssark.

[Anonymous No.17259343]

>>17259253
Impermissible*
>>17259279
Based, these Adnilfags need to read their guy's book before they start arguing about he's actually not edgy lol.
>>17259310
My man he tried to prove corn was gaining rudimentary mental functions there is literally no metaphor here.
>>17259266
O-okay.

[Anonymous No.17259353]

>>17259310
>FAGGOT FUCKING SUBHUMAN RETARD IS STILL STUCK WITH DEBUNKED "MUH ONE DADDAY AT DEATH OF DEATH" BULLSHIT
READ EULNAEERAB FOR ONCE STUPID FAGGOT JUST FOR ONCE

[Anonymous No.17259368]

>>17258375
man the french really do know how to replicate the japanese talent to make sexually appealing characters don't they

[Anonymous No.17259374]

>>17259282
>Zolimensky
Holy based, have you read about his friendship with Pugliesi's son Angelo? They were neighbors and they apparently debated each other every Wednesday morning, Zolimensky even raised Angelo's kids after he died, what a guy.

[Anonymous No.17259385]

>>17259374
based people attract eachother

[Anonymous No.17259393]

>Osmotic Rhythm Loopology being authored by Pugliesi is highly suspect, Xssark still hasn't proven shit about that. I refuse to believe the guy undid all of his previous work because some fucking Tibetan monk responded to him with "why" whenever he would come to him to debate him on ontology. Fuck I wouldn't be surprised if Xssar's dad wrote Osmotic Rhythm Loopology, it reads more like his book The Deafening of the Disciples than anything Pugliesi wrote. Also, fuck off with this "there is no starting point" shit, read Anti-Form NOW. For that matter, read Petra Visconti's In Times Unrecorded for a great retroactive refutation of Xssark.

[Anonymous No.17259404]

>TO THIS DAY there are "men" defending Marquez' theory of pseudoaltruistic annihilationism
More like pseudointellectual annihilGAYtionism, am I right fellas?

[Anonymous No.17259412]

>>17259393
>doesn't even know if the person who he's claiming undid his whole philosophical system wrote the book he supposedly did so in
Why are Xssarkfags so retarded, Xssark is an interesting thinker and yet anyone that likes him on this board is a mouth breathing retard.

[Anonymous No.17259442]

>>17258375
>he hasn't taken the Insect Communism pill

[Anonymous No.17259448]

>>17259385
Zolimensky was a modern poet warrior who hated the idea of a warrior class, I've always wondered what people who have read him thoroughly (I've only read two of his essays, the one on cars and the one on symbolic reasoning) make of his take on war being "less expressive" during the times where there were strict military classes?

[Anonymous No.17259452]

>>17259177
>lesser known work on Chaucer
How have I not heard of this? Christ that sounds amazing.

[Anonymous No.17259460]

>>17259442
Eternal Virtual Phantasmagoria sounds pretty kino honestly.

[Anonymous No.17259468]

>>17259187
>Shantirule Micronature
Why do you want to read these evil asshole?
If see the applied theory from this pchool of philosophy then look into the Wusakian Brotherhood in northern Bangladesh. Is this you schizo always wanted? An army of rough bleeping and blooping metamorphic lichens?

GET THE FUCK OUT OF MY BOARD

[Anonymous No.17259489]

>>17259452
It's only available in some countries for some reason, I think it broke some old English law so it is ironically not legal to sell it in England (though I believe sharing it via a file is fine). Marx really is like Chaucer minus the satirical tone, Najder should be the the most prominent Chaucer scholar around but we can't have nice things it seems.

[Anonymous No.17259527]

>>17259412
>look the humanoid is still stuck in anthropomorphising
FORTYFUCKINGKEKSFORTYFUCKINGKEKS
Xssark is The Philosopher of this millennium. You can cope however the fuck you want. Eastern virtual alchemists applied Pugliesi's theories while you North Pole autists are still stuck in """analysis""", sucking each other off and IOIOIQ propaganda.

[Anonymous No.17259538]

Preudisky was a a fucking hack. His ontological dissertations on Freidrich Heinek's Origin of Evil was absolute pseud garbage. I can't imagine what kind of disease of the brain you would have to have to write 600 words and not make a single point that wasn't debunked Shroyd over a hundred years earlier. It's baffling, really.

[Anonymous No.17259545]

>>17259489
Well just one work hardly qualifies someone as a 'scholar.' Anyway, it seems everyone agrees he is the most influential and thorough Kant scholar, so we have that.

[Anonymous No.17259582]

>>17259527
>Eastern virtual alchemists
ohnonONONONONO DON'T TELL ME YOU FELL FOR THAT NEW AGE HACK PHIlLIP TREINER, YOU REALLY READ XSSARK'S ON TRADITION AND ALCHEMY AND CAME OUT THINKING "oh yeah there is no initial state that's anthropomorphic shit." HOW?

[Anonymous No.17259591]

>>17259545
It's pretty extensive and it's a collection of three works that typically don't work on there own, though the last one is unfinished as he swore off writing for the last seven years of his life.

[Anonymous No.17259600]

>>17259069
retroactively refuted by Bernard Proboscis (AKA Abdulhamid Krishna). Read Kingdom of Quality and Signs of the Kali Yuga

[Anonymous No.17259609]

>>17259591
on their own*
Ah fuck this is what sleep depravation does to ya

[Anonymous No.17259659]

What's the difference between this thread and any other philosophy thread? It's not like people read their works anyway.

[Anonymous No.17259678]

Does anyone get what Seaman was talking about regarding feudalism as sentient? I don't see how interconnected networks of fealty actually create the sovereign as some sort of immanence. The sovereign is pretty obviously a person and not a personality that feudalizes from the heavens. Maybe I am just getting filtered.

[Anonymous No.17259682]

>>17259659
This thread is unironically having more discussion than actual philosophy threads, except that it isn't real. This is peak /lit/.

[Anonymous No.17259698]

>>17259678
>Semen

[Anonymous No.17259705]

>>17259600
I would be careful about reading Proboscis if I were you. He is widely considered to have been a crypto-Prognathicist by scholars of the Schnausserian school of Adbiden Kamala

[Anonymous No.17259711]

>>17259442
>pirate sea-steading
I can’t believe people consider this an option after Jackdoff’s expedition to the caribe seasteaders of the Granadadines. Congenital deformities from the inability to digest seagrass and frequent siguaterra poisonings creates a frail population. Anybody serious enough about the subject has to read Jackdoff’s
>Seamen Inquiries

[Anonymous No.17259719]

>>17258375
iIf you believe in axtrufism you're out, you're cancelled sweaty, you're absolutely racist, genderfobic, alienfobic , you should be eliminated from this solar system. Please, go on the Andromeda system with axtrufists, criminals, extrobufists and fufukists , and stay here. You're not welcome in the Virgo constellation (which , actually it isn't, because we do methexaine on regulary base ;) ).
And if you try to answer back, you're corodot. I'll tell you.

[Anonymous No.17259724]

>>17259698
Yeah very funny. Next you're going to call me a joan of arc crossdresser for posting him. But people are reading Seaman whether you like it or not

[Anonymous No.17259744]

>>17259724
You beat me >>17259711
to it damnit

[Anonymous No.17259747]

>>17259682
It's hype/lit and it belongs in that stupid &amp magazine

[Anonymous No.17259760]

>>17259747
€amp was better ngl

[Anonymous No.17259777]

>>17259582
Philip Treiner is the problem of the South. Thankfully with deep internet propaganda by our good friends at Geo/(1)\ security society the book is now banned in the whole so called "totalitarian" continent.
Also stop larping as a Yamoor-al-Xssark scholar. You faggots don't even understand the language properly.
>"oh yeah there is no initial state that's anthropomorphic shit." HOW?
We have found the evidence of mountain goats eating rocks along other compound for processing immortality materials 1000 years ago. The evidence was found on the mountain peak of some Nepali mountain. Alchemic idea start from rocks which spread its tentacles into the cyber space for approaching reality with in hyperreality. H*maniods are nothing more than circuits to collaborate and inject sincere trends. Keeping petting the good dog until it's annihilation.

You don't know shit snowfaggot.

[Anonymous No.17259796]

>>17259760
It's very obvious that &amp and €amp are just soulless facsimiles of the now lost samizdat issues of ßamp, which ran from 1983-1985 in East Germany. I read through them once in Belgrade and was pretty blown away, but that was before the Balkan wars so I'm not sure copies even exist anymore.

[Anonymous No.17259797]

>Not one mention of Horia Belcea’s Synthesis of the Objective and the Subjective

[Anonymous No.17259824]

>>17258700
>reducing Planatingian theory by merely adopting the sullen vocabulary of Van Thunen

You know this is a mejor thesis of Yosopharas 'Benficiary method for cultural interpolation' right? Planatingian theory is rigid enough to withstand any kind of linguistic critique.

There's literally no confusion. Prove to me you've even read Yoso.

[Anonymous No.17259832]

>>17259719
>t. still denies the Klorbax-Mind
lmao filtered sjw. Read Hoberl

[Anonymous No.17259841]

>>17259797
This. Belcea BTFOs all of the pseuds mentioned earlier in this thread

[Anonymous No.17259852]

>>17258909
Too bad Gabas ripped the idea off from Saint Octostasius’s Divine Metropolitus (where political concept he not only theorized but prerefuted) How about you read the Church Fathers for once instead of their lousy modern imitators?

[Anonymous No.17259858]

>>17259777
Fuck it I'm not arguing with some faggot that rejects initial stages and somehow believes early Pugliesi is anthropocentric. I would tell you to read On the Anti-Form again but I'd prefer that you bash your empty skull in with it instead.

[Anonymous No.17259898]

>>17259852
>Saint Octostasius
I don't have a lot in this fight but I'm not going to lie Friar Thelinosoula of Serenai debunked most of his ideas, in On the Holy Custodian of the Court he even went so far as to say Octostasius contradicted his own theological position as a proponent of asceticism.

[Anonymous No.17259901]

>>17259841
>>17259797
Very funny, Belcea isn't real.

[Anonymous No.17259918]

>>17259215
>>17259187
Don't listen to this guy, Cervellissimo is a cranaesthetics hack, he's outdated, obsolete.

[Anonymous No.17259921]

>>17259841
>Belcea BTFOs all of the pseuds mentioned earlier in this thread

Oh look, the guy who's never read Yosopharas.
The Tetrahedral-icosahedral refutes both Belceas psychological models and his thesis on hyperbolic socio-economic vertex. try again.

[Anonymous No.17259925]

>>17259442
Tumorous Quasimodernity in the streets, Vengeful Singularity in the sheets ;)

[Anonymous No.17259955]

>>17259898
>>17259898
Yeah yeah I know modern old-age movements popularized orientalist sympathizers like Antisaint Thelinosoula...but hey maybe when you’re done with your yoga lessons you can read the documents of the lesser known Council of Serenai where, despite local favoritisms, Antisaint Thelinosoula was declared DAMNED AND HIS IDEAS ANATHAMA

[Anonymous No.17259957]

What do you bros think about Bisakh Tareeh's magnum opus "Shozahik-e-Kalamatoon"?
Is he the greatest Ontologist from Indian subcontinent since Culliputra?

[Anonymous No.17259976]

>>17259955
His students became bishops and one of them became a pope cry harder faggot.

[Anonymous No.17259989]

>>17259858
seethe harder IOIOIQ shill
You should learn a thing or two about applied Pugliesimatics from us.

[Anonymous No.17259994]

>>17259976
>not capitalizing the office of the Holy Father the Pope
Your orientalism is showing

[Anonymous No.17260007]

>>17259976
Is this supposed to be some kind of merit?
in the Divine Metropolitus SO himself states
>He who conforming to institutionalized merit; is without.

[Anonymous No.17260008]

>>17259957
Tareeh is utterly destroyed by the Shinda scholars of the 3rd Century. Their treatises on the Hermeto-numerics of the stars cannot be refuted.

[Anonymous No.17260018]

>>17259957
Nizah Gulm Ahmadundguleg's seminal work Ansar-e-Fahm, or The Root of Understanding is better in my opinion but they are both very thorough thinkers.

[Anonymous No.17260028]

>>17259994
I said I had jo lot in this as I am not a disciple of the Church.
>>17260007
Then why join a Church that stresses the sanctity of the clergy?

[Anonymous No.17260044]

>>17259955
That's not true that it only appears in "local favoritisms." That's loaded language which betrays your dishonesty. Thelinosoula's main works are classified as Tricameralian, which is one of the main orthodox schools of Cameralian Christianity, and Tricameralia neither is marginal nor heterodox within Cameralian Christianity. Important Heptacameralian theologians like Octostasius were important Tricameralian theorists themselves.

[Anonymous No.17260063]

>>17259957
India has seen only one good ontologist, and that was when St. Thomas himself brought the Summa to the Malabar Coast

[Anonymous No.17260071]

>>17260028
>Then why join a Church that stresses the sanctity of the clergy?
Saint Cloacacentus explains this thoroughly in his Commentary of the Hieratic Bodies, which is still used in Serenaine monasteries.

[Anonymous No.17260081]

what am I even Bozakodoinking at this point in my life

[Anonymous No.17260091]

>>17259901
He is more real than your imaginary monads midwit pseud.
>>17259921
>The Tetrahedral-icosahedral refutes both Belceas psychological models and his thesis on hyperbolic socio-economic vertex.
That's where you're wrong kiddo. If you actually read Belcea you will see how his view on paraphysical entities retroactively refutes your le meme polygeometric garbage.

[Anonymous No.17260095]

>>17260081
>t.

[Anonymous No.17260131]

>>17260008
>Hermeto-numerics of the stars cannot be refuted.
Based

Here a summary of Hermeto-numerics
>given position of stones in your surroundings determine the position of stars in the sky
>all sewerage pipes lead you to the edge of the earth
>therefore whole humanity should shit on streets so we can save universe from being a full of shit
>despite our efforts oneday whole universe will fill up with shit
>we can't do nothing but shit on streets
>after shiting wipe the shit with stone to magically dry your asshole with stardust so you too can gain immortality
How can anyone refute this?

[Anonymous No.17260146]

>>17260063
Tareeh is a Pakistani, bro.

[Anonymous No.17260148]

Best intro to brapology?

[Anonymous No.17260160]

>>17260148
As always, start with the Luxembourgish.

[Anonymous No.17260179]

>>17258375
How can /lit/ now reconcile with the Zhou Ping (pbuh) BTFO'ing the entire western canon??? His works exceed in length of great works in the Western and Eastern canon, such as the Mahabharata and Women and Men. His prose is far superior to western authors such as Nabokov, Faulkner, Flaubert, Pynchon, Tolstoy and even 21st century masters such as Zioni Elohimberg and Barron Trump. And he does not only surpass them in prose, but storytelling, plot, worldbuilding, philosophy, symbolism and just about every major aspect a novel. He has also done all of the translations himself, including the english version, german version, arabofrancais, nv-latin, Standard EU-UN Form Deutsch.

A few of his notable the "Romance of the The Three People's Republics", "Three Gorges Margin", "Odyssey to the West: 2060" and "The Philosophy", but he has 100 works in total. Also he is merely 22 years old.

[Anonymous No.17260218]

>>17260179
Read Malthuk.

[Anonymous No.17260221]

>>17260148
Prolegomena to Future Fannologies by Florian Tushweil

[Anonymous No.17260243]

>2021
>still discussing this

Just fucking read the Chilean existentialists, Contreras and Alarcon solved the postmodern question already in the 80s.

[Anonymous No.17260261]

You can't really have a meaningful conversation on postmodern literature today without an understanding of Dean Fartman's analysis.

[Anonymous No.17260273]

>>17260179
Ping is a hack. But I'm not surprised. Ever since they annexed Russia, the Chinese obsession with emulating Russian literature has bordered on self-parodying. Are we really supposed to believe Ping's retelling of the Taiping Rebellion as set in American Hong Kong during backdrop of international and religious tensions caused by the French-Israeli War ends with redemption? There are entire cities in West Africa that are gone from the map and Ping treats exile to PRC-controlled Africa like it is some kind of yellow savior story.

[Anonymous No.17260287]

>>17260261
Fartman is a monolith of the 21st century

[Anonymous No.17260366]

>>17260287
>Fartman fanboy
>phoneposter
checks out

[Anonymous No.17260400]

This thread is retarded. I'll just go back to reading my bookshelf full of great woman philosophers.

[Anonymous No.17260484]

Bros....mBanti’s Metaphysical Manateeology...I can’t possibly be filtered this early into “start with the Congolese”. At this rate, how am I ever going to move to the Greeks?

[Anonymous No.17260486]

This thread was good distraction from the horror of by bio-robotic organs.

Now I am gonna go back to reading Tohoori Canon and then I am gonna meet Lurdubal(one the pioneer thinkers of T=Two=225 Illumination Lukers School of philosophy) at Sahara Desert in my lucid dreams.

[Anonymous No.17260498]

>>17260400
The cunt is Plato's proverbial cave. The more time you spend balls deep in women, the more time you are spending willfully ignorant of reality.

[Anonymous No.17260597]

>>17260484
>start with the Congolese
This meme again. Sirenology begins with the Inuit, so it's no wonder you feel lost when you lack a fundemental perspective.

[Anonymous No.17260641]

>>17258909
completely refuted by Juwig shape based theology

[Anonymous No.17260663]

>>17259069
>Implying Roker's trialectic isn't the logical conclusion Gorkoniger's dismissal of peta-materialism
read slower

[Anonymous No.17260721]

>Humanity sole chance at redemption is to advance to a point where they have the means to the point where exoplanet can be terraformed into pre-anthropocene earth like paradise
how can one man be so based

[Anonymous No.17260988]

>>17258375
>asks a question
>mfw hasn't read Schilden
>probably hasn't read Ulfsvardsen
>doesn't quote Reinhard Rheindracht when talking about modern cosmopathology.
>>probably a Frankist or Rueist

I'm calling it right here. He's trolling us with the un petit critique du reason. literally no one would ask such a stupid question otherwise. He's probably a Proctophilology graduate bwaha

[Anonymous No.17261149]

>>17260721
Jewig is the typical anglo bugman. Read Fred Gorshemflap.

[Anonymous No.17261283]

>>17259724
>swallowing Seamen lies
ngmi

[Anonymous No.17261409]

>>17258375
Sauce? Probably a French cartoon.
Only French would draw such a lewd loli for a kids show.

[Anonymous No.17261424]

>>17259000
What is Guilt and Civilization about anyways, I've seen it shilled a bunch of times around here but I don't know what it's about.

[Anonymous No.17261428]

>>17260663
As a transcendentalism-revivalist, it only makes sense that Gorkoniker would immediately dismiss peta-materialism. Roker himself is the largest figure in materialism currently living.

[Anonymous No.17261456]

>>17260273
The Chinese Ideology is already set, suspend your disbelief and observe the chinese mastery and ruthless efficiency at play here. Ping is more akin to an engineer than the regular author, elevating the brute uncalculated art and spontaneity of literature, into a science of aesthetics. Perhaps as you mentioned you find him to be partially derivative of Russian literature, and its been the movement since the fall in New Heilongjiang (or Moscow as we called it), but Russian Literature is a formula that works! Ping elevated the art and perfected it in its ideal form, and replaced outdated things like "the russian mindset" and "the russian identity", with the Han identity, though the form is still there and fully perfected.
>There are entire cities in West Africa that are gone from the map and Ping treats exile to PRC-controlled Africa like it is some kind of yellow savior story.
I'm not exactly a PRC apologist but, isn't that what whinos said about Conrad's Heart of Darkness? A "white saviour story". Plus what where those negrins going to do with that land anyway? They are better off desu.

[Anonymous No.17261463]

>>17259021
>>17259049
>>17259149
>>17259094
Sad to see that the discussion of Maryanne died out so quickly. Oneiric Deja Vu was the most captivating philosophical work of it's time.

[Anonymous No.17261511]

>>17261424
A work in which Pugliesi tries to prove that the basis for all civilizational megamyths is the collective guilt of society building. He posits that, whereas unsettled humans would incorporate tribes they beat in combat, once permanent settlements became prominent, the previous extension of the family gave way to destruction of many outside tribes. He believes many a civilizational origin story to really be an attempt at describing this guilt, Romulus killing Remus being the example he brings up the most. Many take his work's to mean that guilt has an anti-civilizational effect on societies, and thus it should be combated to protect civilization itself (this is where you get many Fascists that like Pugliesi). Personally though, as someone who has read his other works, I believe his point to be that this civilizational guilt is only a result of settlement as it has existed until this point, and not necessarily a feature of civilization, nor does it have anti-civilizational effects on society. Rather he posits that we should come to terms with the guilt settlement generates, as it goes beyond moral judgments, it was an integral part of pre-modern history, as family extension was an integral part of pre-historical human relations.

[Anonymous No.17261631]

>>17258909
never worked and never will. Gondresco-era Nendistan was the closest thing to a true Gabassian pentacracy, and we all know how that turned out.

[Anonymous No.17261686]

>>17258487
Afabis still maintains that his project is more than a crypto-reactionary form of Denstar’s philosophy of emergence as the hyper functionality of human behavior within a technologically mediated socius. He’s so based lads.

[Anonymous No.17261694]

>>17261511
You do realize this was plagiarism right?

[Anonymous No.17261730]

>>17261456
>I'm not exactly a PRC apologist but, isn't that what whinos said about Conrad's Heart of Darkness? A "white saviour story". Plus what where those negrins going to do with that land anyway? They are better off desu.
I mean now that I think about it, I have to wonder if this is the very attitude Ping wanted to provoke in his critique of New Sinocolonialism. I don't think he carries it far enough. Even his depiction of Col. Chen as going pseudochthonous, and attacking maglev trains using cyber-Kenyan tactics to convince the government that the Mao Mau Mao Mau Uprising is still ongoing, merely for him to still be able to submit his report to the military arm of the Sino-African Industrial Development Bank, almost seems to justify militarism as a valid expediture of Sinasian capital which would otherwise be turned against, say, the Kalmyk neosoviets, who are granted a paternalism that the Africans are not.

[Anonymous No.17261735]

>>17261694
Oh fuck off with this shit I'm not going down this road for the 5000th time. He explains his influences and expands their small observations into a whole historical framework.

[Anonymous No.17261901]

>>17261686
Right? Give the man his department already

[Anonymous No.17261993]

When are you anon's going to wake up and take the mauve-pill - that is, realise that reformed internationalist Hutuism will be the defining ideology of the coming decades? Mb'itane'ges Gokä VI says it all in his pamphlet "On the Tutsi Question". I have even prepared a Reformed Hutu Party of Northern Ireland flag for the eventual day of reckoning.

[Anonymous No.17262205]

How can a man who suffered this much be so happy, /lit/? It's absurd to the point of parody. Take "The Breathless Form" for example
>Chapter 28 talks about how the worst moment of his life was the vacation he and his pregnant wife took to Laos
>A homeless guy caves his wife's head in with a brick on her due date
>She dies and gives birth then and there
>He rushes the baby to the hospital
>Cancer
>It dies
>He has to wait 6 months to take the corpses home to bury them
>Says that he wishes daily he could murder the guy that killed his wife as slowly and horribly as possible
>Very next chapter he interrupts everything because he has to spend 33 pages talking about how great it is that pudding can be shelf stable for years and not even require refrigeration
Is he fucking with us or just autistic?

[Anonymous No.17262259]

>>17258375
sauce?

[Anonymous No.17262291]

>>17262259
gonna go out on a limb and say its french

[Anonymous No.17262312]

>>17262205
I think you have to be autistic to survive that kind of life and not eat your hand or something.

[Anonymous No.17262400]

>>17258375
On warm colors, it looks she's wearing no clothes. A pedo drew this.

[Anonymous No.17262420]

>>17262400
I think it’s obvious what kind of degenerate drew this—and your analysis was most unnecessary

[Anonymous No.17262444]

Someone’s going to come across this thread on Warosu and end up citing Pugliesi in some serious academic work

[Anonymous No.17262554]

finally a borgesian thread

[Anonymous No.17262821]

>>17262444
I would be ecstatic if my shitpost reached that level, I'm sorta tempted to shitpost about Pugliesi around the board but I guess I shouldn't shit up the board that much lol.

[Anonymous No.17262859]

I think we should have hyper/lit/ generals. They are pretty kino.

[Anonymous No.17262888]

we should start a reading group thread on the antiform

[Anonymous No.17262911]

>>17262554
Are you referring to the Latin American writer Borges, or the Armenian neo-thalassophist Borgesian?

[Anonymous No.17262919]

>>17262911
both

[Anonymous No.17262936]

>>17262205
>had to kill the rat he befriended to survive another month in the cave
>finally found his spelunking buddy from the start of chapter 9 but he was dead of oxygen deprivation

[Anonymous No.17262946]

>>17262291
based french pedos

[Anonymous No.17262962]

>>17262919
That's basically Borgesian's take on the theoretic geography of Wilsonian Armenia, that it was a kind of map that overcomes the territory. People became so focused on the idea of Black Sea access that their conception of Armenia became hypernaval. In the historical record it was not the Black Sea which was open to Armenia but the Mediterranean, via Cilicia. As the medieval map rots away, it falls on top of newer maps, leading to imcreasingly reterritorializing flows.

[Anonymous No.17262970]

>>17262859
If these meme philosophers keep on getting mentioned I think people might genuinely start to fall for it if we posted them outside of the general once we create enough material to make it sound believable. The possible shitposting potential is immense.

[Anonymous No.17262980]

>>17262962
This was refuted by Brannon

[Anonymous No.17263002]

what would you like to know about schismatic gespegewagianism?

[Anonymous No.17263073]

>>17263002
>schismatic gespegewagianism
Refuted by Ksimnerll Ünart, read “Fools and Folds”

[Anonymous No.17263288]

>>17262821
I thought my Gorkoniker shitpost was well-made, but your Pugliesi is a true work of art?

[Anonymous No.17263335]

>>17263288
I thought your shitpost started offnlow effort but it ended up pretty good, I respect it. Not that some /lit/fag's respect means much lol. I was the autist talking at length about Najder though so I think it ended well. Wasn't saying my shitpost was good, just might be funny to post it elsewhere.

[Anonymous No.17263366]

>>17262821
>>17263288
>>17262888
I wouldn’t take it too far. A casual unconscious namedrop and sooner or later you may actually become Pugliesi. The incarnation of IOIOIQ. Damn what a fine book title that would be

[Anonymous No.17263411]

>hasn’t read a single Knut Bakker book
> hasn’t even read Aino Koskinen’s (PBUH) Sociology & Philosophy of Biological Civilization and
Consciousness
>thinks he can talk about the civilizational implications the conditions of modern life through the lens of the Helsinki School

[Anonymous No.17263417]

>>17263366
Yeah I wouldn't do it too often otehrwise the meme would be ruined. I might not do it all, maybe we should make a thread liek this again, we'll see.

[Anonymous No.17263441]

>>17263366
Yeah I wouldn't do it too often otherwise the meme would be ruined. I might not do it all, maybe we should make a thread like this again, we'll see.

[Anonymous No.17263471]

Weissman believes that for human civilization to function optimally, monogamy and one man-one wife must be strictly enforced. Man is driven by his sexual energy, virility, and companionship. All human achievement is driven by the desire to provide for a family or impress a mate. If man cannot fulfill his sexual urges or desire for companionship, he will stagnate and fall into despair. We cannot be alone if we truly wish to find motivation or drive innovation as a society, so it is our collective responsibility to ensure no man is left alone.

In order to improve society and allow people to reach their full potential, we must assign each single man a woman selected by the state through a sophisticated, rigorous scientific process taking into account personality traits, socioeconomic status, career, interests, appearance, and other variables. The selection is determined through a compatibility test that ensures maximum harmony for each couple, thus leading to bigger families, happier people, and more productivity as a whole. If we do this, then the underlying issues of society will dissipate and we will be closer towards utopia.

[Anonymous No.17263489]

>>17263471
dr. weissman needs to get his dick wet lmao

[Anonymous No.17263503]

>>17263489
The man taught evolutionary psychology at Harvard and is married to a Polish supermodel. He just knows the truth.

[Anonymous No.17263540]

>>17263471
>Weissman
>thinking exponential monogamy is viable
You should read Schwartzmann; he pretty much annihilates Weissman's entire project. Where Weissman seeks to Oedipalize desire into monopatterned reproduction, Schwartzmann sees an untenable concentration of excessive hereditization. The problem doesn't lie in the compatibility test; if anything he goes further than Weissman in his proposal that not only should spouses be prescreened, but that adult children should be metricized through exit interviews in order to provide feedback to the state-administered matrimonial cybernetics program. For Schwartzmann, the issue is a matter of quantity. If the state gurantees exponential monogamy as a civil right, it will effectively overproduce the variable inputs of exponential monogamy. Matrimonial cybernetics will outrun its selective capacity, by his calculations, within a mere six generations, and the screening process would become worse than random, as potential pairings become too numerous for assignment. Working spatio-alphabetically, an overburdened sorting system would fall back upon meaningless criteria in order to patch itself and continue operating. Does anyone really think John and Johanna would make ideal spouses? According to Schwartzmann, unless Weissman allows for polygynous libidinalities in his system, it will reduce us to nomenclaturized incest.

[Anonymous No.17263547]

>>17263471
>Weissman
Antonio Lounliano far surpasses him in terms of ability when it comes to dissecting human civilization. Lounliano believes that evolutionary pressure does not need to be natural in order to benefit us, and that if we are to reach close to a “utopia” as Weissman idealistically theorizes of, Lounliano’s model of artificial evolution, artificial environments for the alteration of consciousness and his general work within the New Darwinists movement, is generally far preferable. Lounliano completely destroyed Weissman’s idea of the necessity of a well developed companionship such as the modern monogamous relationship. He states that by shifting the environment, we can shift human consciousness, if we are to create an artificial environment wherein consciousness lives instinctually and in the present moment, like we did during Paleolithic times, the necessity for overcomplicated monogamous relationships would be obsolete, as the fully mutual instinctual process, as Lounliano has said, is a process that works infallibly and in perfect coordination (in a group without mutants), and that while in the past mutants were able to be an outlier in the mutual instinct process, but now mutants are no longer an incurable problem.

[Anonymous No.17263642]

>>17263411
I just can't take him seriously after reading his letters to Marstoné. He wrote twelve fucking pages, in perfect copperplate, attempting to refute the Skin Necessity Principle using Homer's lost work as a cypher. Made it abundantly clear to me that he never actually read E.K Szabó in the original Hungarian.

[Anonymous No.17263672]

>>17262205
Probably stems from his background in stand up comedy. Keep in mind, he only started his work on Committal Bio-Sociogenics after he ran the Kingston circuit with Brenner. What he says about shelf-stable pudding is not only fundamental to understand his concept of space-frivolity, but it is also a wonderfully humourous non-sequitur.

[Anonymous No.17263702]

>>17263547
I agree. The idea of monogamous relationships being the optimal human condition is rooted in religious morality. The notion of utopia and veneration of the nuclear family, Western traditionalism, etc. in Weissman's work is simplistic compared to the scientifically driven principles of Lounliano.

Weissman is a sort of neoconservative type who thinks he can use the state apparatus to bring to life the whole 1950s American suburbia dream for everyone and that all of civilization's principles lie primarily in culture, so they should use the state apparatus to push a family values culture, use big tech to promote this,etc. It lacks in understanding of innate human behavior. He is a former Trotskyist turned religious conservative which muddles his thinking with ideology. Lounliano is not striving for a strict moralism but rather the facts. Lounliano wants to shape biological and environmental factors instead of denying them.

Weissman naively believes that everyone should have a partner, failing to take into account overpopulation, proliferation of genetic disorders, poverty, and other factors. Lounliano's theory would be more effective in creating the desired conditions, although there are some criticisms from the Weissman camp that this is akin to eugenics and could backfire due to man altering with nature. Weissman has this desire for a just world and religious morality guiding him that blinds him to inconvenient truths, which gets in the way of his work. Human consciousness is actively shaped by environment and material conditions, which Lounliano takes into account more than Weissman's regressive idealism.

>>17263540
A valid criticism. Perhaps the system would be able to sustain itself if there was a sort of population control or shared spouses rather than pure monogamy, which is rooted in the social conservatism of the writer's thought. Restricting women to a single partner while allowing for men to have multiple wives could help control output. There is also the question of who determines the criteria for the inputs and how much can these be manipulated or rendered ineffective for achieving Weissman's utopian goal due to human error. Biological and anthropological evidence suggests that our ancestors were mildly polygynous, i.e., that men fathered children with more than one woman

[Anonymous No.17263704]

>>17263642
To be fair, Marstoné drove more men mad, not just Bakker.

[Anonymous No.17263753]

>>17263702
You've pretty much got it; that mild and atavistic polygyny, rather than ultra-conservative Weissmanist monogamy is exactly what Schartzmann is trying to do, build noise into the matrimonial cybernetics that is otherwise removed by the hypersterility of sentimenalism. Lounliano's callbacks to the paleolithic are instructive, and though we certainly do not wish to retard society through the misapplication of premnemohistorical mating algorithms, they do approximate what hominids would incline to in the absence of certain contemporary stressors, which we do seek to modify for the sake of a less self-destructive bioprocess.

[Anonymous No.17263759]

>>17261730
>Mao Mau Mao Mau Uprising
I kek

[Anonymous No.17263764]

i love this thread so much.

[Anonymous No.17263775]

Is this an accelerationist thread?

[Anonymous No.17263795]

>>17263775
Landian Accelerationism is dead, start with the Emiratis.

[Anonymous No.17263842]

>>17263795
The Emiratis are clearly reading Seaman's work on the immanence of fealty. Feudalism always assembles itself from its subjects in order to territorialize sovereignty. In this particular case petrocapital smears against South Asian biolabor to accelerate the divine right of rotational Islamic monarchism. But even in the UAE we see a process which has not fully arrived. For feudalism to truly become petrogothic singularity it would necessitate the other Gulf monarchies be subsumed under one transcendent theopolitics.
>>17259678

[Anonymous No.17263855]

>>17258375
Zizekian Techno-Fascistry

Discuss.

[Anonymous No.17263862]

>Foggle disproved aesthetic smells

He really believes this

[Anonymous No.17263872]

>>17258909
read Freceum

[Anonymous No.17263876]

>>17263855
What's next? Robot zombies?

[Anonymous No.17263879]

>>17263842
>he hasnt read Lacey's work on the middle-eastern collective psychopolitic
absolute brainlet

[Anonymous No.17263881]

>>17263795
(c.f. Dinghy's work on modern Emirati dietetics)

[Anonymous No.17263887]

>>17263842
t. anon who hasnt read the emiratis or seaman

[Anonymous No.17263899]

>>17263704
I'll never forgive him for what he did to Bakker. He could have been one of the soundest minds of his generation. He practically founded Socio-Biological Civics, he singlehandedly refuted the Gavgow school; and then he met Marstoné. I genuinely believe that The Epistemological Argument Against Epistemologists is one of the most harmful monographs ever composed. Everything that Bakker wrote after the Helsinki Convention was utter nonsense, and I believe that Marstoné was directly responsible for what happened to Stausser.

[Anonymous No.17263913]

>>17263862
Kek, Foggle is unironically the greatest thinker of the 20th century, have you actually read any of his work or are you just another Mizekian shitposter?

[Anonymous No.17263920]

>>17263855
No matter how much academics try to make Zizek relevant again, he’s done for. Land already refuted him, Zizek got BTFO’d by Seaman and eviscerated in that last book Fukuyama wrote. I mean who even writes about Hegel or Lacan anymore?

[Anonymous No.17263941]

Yall need to get woke. Where's the diversity?

Anna Zimmer-Cohen advocates for a synthesis of Marxist-Leninist-Maoist thought with fourth wave feminism. She seeks to create a state where women are the ruling class and are not bound to the whims of men or their ideals. Her justification is that men are unfit to rule due to innate aggression and violence, while women are natural diplomatic peacemakers, so women led states would lead to a more peaceful, just world. Men had their time running the planet and have led it to ruin, so women should have a turn. She also states that as birthgivers, they are entitled to rule over their creations. She sees the womens lib struggle first and foremost as being of greater importance than class, race, or any other factor. The laws and social structures of the new women's state must be created by and for women and reflect progressive social change. Laws take more influence fro Men are educated in feminism and how to treat women respectfully. They are disciplined if they engage in toxic masculine behavior.

The key goal is giving women equal power and not having them in a subordinate role to men. She sees gender roles as a social construct and an instrument used to keep women as domestic slaves historically. She sees women as intellectually equal (if not superior) but due to physical strength differences men used brutality, violence, and force to seize power and create systems that benefit them, but due to technological/social advancements women are able to finally rise up in order to free themselves. She believes that women constitute a proletariat in contrast to the male bourgeoise who use the labor of women to advance their own gains and exploit for their own ends due to embedded power structures. The only way to shift this paradigm in her view is through revolution, a vanguard party representing women, abolition of gender roles, abolition of hegemonical patriarchal systems like the family, allowing women to work in any field, and redistributing economic resources and political power to women that was historically denied to them. Men lived off the surplus value and slave labor of women, so women are due reparations and a say in the government. The contradictions of the patriarchy will result in uprising. Her goal is to create a paradigm shift in human behavior by establishing a state ruled by women that allows them full opportunity which will then lead to a worldwide revolution.

The battle cry: Women of the world, unite. Hear us roar.

[Anonymous No.17263955]

>>17263913
His theory of smells, "In all good scents", was a little on the nose, but otherwise I enjoyed "Aroma of one's own".

[Anonymous No.17263976]

>>17263899
Definitely. Marstoné and his entire circle is practically an infohazard factory (which if not morally egregious, should also be legally questionable). Stausser can also be connected to his as well, no doubt.
Marstoné’s clique was known to frequent Stausser’s lectures, and David Zare was a close friend of Stausser and became a fanatical follower of Marstoné. I think this already links up too closely for the surge in popularity of Marstoné’s writings and Stausser’s infamous turn to just be a coincidence

[Anonymous No.17263981]

>>17263887
If you're talking about Al-Muyyid then no I wouldn't waste your time on him. He clearly did not understand Seaman or the implications of the petrogothic among the later works of Young Faroukis.

[Anonymous No.17264012]

>>17263941
bourgeoise liberal, total revisionist and performative "marxist" at most

[Anonymous No.17264019]

>>17263955
He wrote 'In all good scents' when he was still with the Nostrillimus Collective, his work significantly improved when they splintered into two.

[Anonymous No.17264020]

>>17264012
You're not ready to face your male privilege, brocialist. We cannot achieve class liberation without women's liberation first. To be anti capitalist is to be feminist. If gender roles continue to exist, then we have not achieved liberation!

[Anonymous No.17264032]

>>17264020
This thread’s about ideologies that don’t exist, anon.

[Anonymous No.17264373]

>>17263941
id finger her
>>17263913
Foggle is a joke. He's a loon who denies reality

[Anonymous No.17264474]

>starting with anything other than the Sumerians
Lugal and Amnanu together single-handedly BTFO everyone mentioned in this thread despite being born thousands of years before them.
Trinity theory, winged serpent theory and Mesopotamian dreams alone have shaped cultures more than the Alarian religions.

[Anonymous No.17264485]

post deleuzian technocapitalism

[Anonymous No.17264508]

>>17258437
>bosch
>MUH HERMETIC DIALECTICALITY
Dude needs to stop assuming every interaction is just autists talking to each other in computer code.

The memes all say that you need to read Ernst Braugman before doing Bosch, but all that did was make me appreciate Braugman more while realizing that Bosch placed an inordinate amount of importance on a few minor hypotheticals Braugman pondered right at the end of his life. How Bosch could've read all of Der Zusammensetzung and get so caught up on the Pre-Transitive bs in particular while missing out on the bigger picture is beyond me.

[Anonymous No.17264627]

>>17258375
This thread proves that /lit/ would rather bullshit than actually read books. The only difference is this time we know theyre being frauds

[Anonymous No.17264632]

A translated excerpt from Thierry Dugrand's controversial text "Enchaînement de L'érotique" states that

>"The religious obsession with purity and repression of sex is silly in my view. If we presuppose the truth of the Abrahamic faith...then surely a womans breast size/man's dick size correlates with their blessing by God. The genitalia is a signifier of being amongst the chosen by the Creator Himself. Our lives are centered around the genitalia, it is how we are made, fed, born, reborn, and live. Big breasts are a sign of great health, big penis is a sign of high testosterone. People are aroused and impressed by these traits, because they are admirable. Would it then not make sense that the Lord would reward his most loyal, devout, and chosen subjects with the most coveted of assets? Assets of the utmost importance? Perhaps we could consider a Spirit possessing the prick and tit of impressive width, for it is truly a sublime phenomenon to witness in the person. The awe inspiring presence overwhelms the being. This is because it is our lifes center and you witnessed the grand scale of life in its glory. Let us no longer be afraid of chaining our desires or our life center!

>The greater in size of the breasts and penis, the greater the potential of the being, the greater the spirit, energy, piousness, and intelligence needed to drive humanity forward. Tis a sign from the Lord that this individual is preordained for greatness. God punishes the descendants of the wicked by cursing them with small genitalia, while rewarding the pious and good with the greatest of rewards. Large genitalia represents strength, power, vitality. It represents life itself. I propose that we organize society based on a hierarchy of genitalia size, where men with the largest penises and women with the largest breasts hold power over the less endowed. For then we can truly reward the finest of the species and ensure fulfillment of their destiny."

[Anonymous No.17264741]

>implying anything written here hasn't been retroactively refuted by Al Qabatr

[Anonymous No.17264758]

>>17264632
didnt he go to prison for some weird sex shit?

[Anonymous No.17264767]

>>17263411
Sounds based

[Anonymous No.17264799]

>>17264632

Cringe

[Anonymous No.17264807]

Pic related is was was philosopher named "0x0.0000000001."
Let me sum up his thesis with greentext:

>" "

How the fuck anyone can can refute this?
Every post-0x0.0000000001 scholar is a careerist
hack larper who don't even understand his analysis. Ignore these filthy fucking academics whenever you see them.

I have heard from some theorist cyberwizards that "Geomoths" is a secrete society of coal mining autodidact philosophers who live Northern Afghanistan. Long time ago they lost their sense of experience and fiction while they were trying to interpret 0x0.0000000001's nonexistent wisdom. They believe that The Great 0x0.0000000001 was actually a radiation from Earth core which left a locked taste on their tongues. This group rejects every philosophy based on Earth's Crust. They say that Crustiods have ruined philosophy by only caring about noise clusters which exist in humanoid bodies when those noise clusters are nothing but offsets of The Noise Cluster. They also believe that one can gain access to The Non-existent wisdom if anyone could throw himself directly into The Core. Now after their daily mining work Geomoths dig the Earth like madmen so they can gain access to the locked taste on their tongues.

Yamoor-al-Xssark and his followers see Geomoths as Radical Annihilationist performance artists and Post-Annihilationist philosophers. If anyone want to read in depth art analysis of Geomoths by Xssark then checkout "Embroidery of Thermal Emancipation."

Kek'ing @ Pugliesifags, who have been "warning" people about this so called "Cult of Smoke". Pugies are bunch of limp-wristed faggots hiding behind walls of academia.

[Anonymous No.17264830]

>>17264632
>Frenchman
>writes about sex

how original

[Anonymous No.17265156]

>>17264807
Meaning is inherently anthropocentric, you Xssarkfags were unironically refuted by Gorgias and Protagoras. Read Joseph Amirault's A Geography of Deeds, of the three philophers that founded the Tauredian school I prefer Pugliesi but A Geography of Deeds refutes all mathematical and vulgar deterministic philosophy.

[Anonymous No.17265163]

>>17263764
fag

[Anonymous No.17265788]

>>17264807
technology will liberate us

[Anonymous No.17266433]

bump

[Anonymous No.17266507]

>talking to my cousin about the principles of Adraxian sphinxospheres
>he thinks that the Green Helix Theory refutes Karuzawa's Theory of Infinite String Hyperstructures

I can't believe there are people out there that think like this

[Anonymous No.17266642]

>>17266507
>Karuzawa
READ YURI ZILBER
"What Dr. Green does not consider is the possibility that the theoretical acceleration of strings within the void can put too much strain on the acceleration mechanism. I'm of the opinion that certain instabilities like the resonant nil perversion should be a very subtle phenomenon in theory, with no real obvious indicators."
"Adraxian sphinxospheres can be found in Heronian sphexospheres. The principle to look for is the quantity of different structure lines present in a spherically shaped spheroid. Green Helix Theory does not state that two lines of a spherically shaped spheroid cannot be continuous, or that two lines of a spherically shaped spheroid cannot be directly connected."
Zilberian theory shows us, for example. There are many kinds of strings, and with Zilberian Theory there are always two kinds of strings--exact strings and approximate strings. The specification of an exact string, or a string that is exactly full of points, is impossible, and the specification of an approximate string is impossible in the least.

[Anonymous No.17266644]

>>17258437
Salter is a fucking spook, he only makes sense if you HAVEN'T read him. It's nice getting his ideas out of context, that's when they're at their best. But when his diatribes on Divine Odontology directly follows the ranting about Subjective Granulation, you realise that he's making all this shit up as he goes along.

[Anonymous No.17266689]

>>17266642
>The specification of an exact string, or a string that is exactly full of points, is impossible, and the specification of an approximate string is impossible in the least.
Try to keep up to date with sphinxospherics at least if you insist on posting. Yogesh effectively refutes Zilber, who overly relies on the neo-Newtonian physics which seems to be increasingly popular in Western academic circles. Yes, clearly we cannot arrive at specification of string genera without the instrumentality requisite for projecting them into an acoustic plane. But by measuring the implicit volume between two sphinxospheres we can determine the relative position of their strings, and from there it is a simple operation to deduce the approximate string.

[Anonymous No.17266697]

>>17265156
How can one man be so based bros? Amirault is light years ahead of the curve.

[Anonymous No.17266708]

>>17263976
At least Zare remained respectable thanks to his architectural works. I don't even want to know what Gatineau would look like without him. Hell, even late-era Bakker has his adherents, but Stausser just destroyed himself. He was to desperate to fill the void Marstoné left after his disappearance that he turned into nothing more than self-parody. I guess you could give him some credit for bringing Schizotypicalism into the mainstream, though.

[Anonymous No.17266772]

>they still haven't embraced Solar psycho-substitution

[Anonymous No.17266791]

>>17266772
Eastern Evolian Dialectics is for plebs, it’s all about Vedic Dialectics and Eastern Spinozism

[Anonymous No.17266840]

>>17266791
>Implying

[Anonymous No.17266880]

>>17266697
Imo Petra Visconti and Adriano Pugliesi are better but I do think that Amirault's background as a mathematician makes him interesting as the other two aren't really STEMfags. However, Einar Gunnarsson (the most prominent student of Pugliesi) is also a Tauredian philosopher that has a STEM background and his criticism of Amirault's criticism of teleology is pretty good. You really have to read On the Anti-Form for a proper Tauredian critique of teleological reasoning, as I think Amirault is too quick to discount teleology in it's entirety.

[Anonymous No.17266954]

>>17260366
keked and checked

[Anonymous No.17266983]

>>17266772
> Doesn’t know about Eastern Evolian Dialectics of Solar and Lunar Psycho-Substitution

[Anonymous No.17267059]

>>17263335
I thought your Najderposts were pretty fucking based.

[Anonymous No.17267083]

>>17266983
>going anywhere near the debasing Lunar practices

You weirdos always try but always fail and succumb to your own frailty.

[Anonymous No.17267140]

>>17267083
You just haven’t read enough Eastern Evolian Dialectics. Classical Evelina dialectics makes the mistake of reserving lunarity as the feminine psycho-spiritual form and solarity as the masculine psycho-spiritual form, but Eastern Evelina dialectics takes into account the Animus and the Anima, and is more nuanced, in that it seeks to work through a synthesis of the forms, which truly corresponds to peoples’ individual psycho-spiritual forms (btw the idea of there being one perfect form for both male and female refuted by Robert Breton, who explained the multiplicity and subjective-objective forms of all).

[Anonymous No.17267160]

>>17267140
(For the brainlets, in the the east they are referred to as Evelina, not Evolian)

[Anonymous No.17267232]

>he fell for the post-paralelist colour theory meme
oh nonono

[Anonymous No.17267257]

>>17266689
Measuring the implicit volume between two sphinxospheres does not always determine the relative position of their strings, as known in neo-Newtonian physics, it only tells us what the projection angles were. The semi-empirical and non-euclidian approach may be useful to determine the relative position of the projection points of the strings.
To place the sphinxospheres accurately, one needs to determine the orientation of the multiple axes of the mirror-image sphinxospheres, and orient the mirrors accordingly.
The mirror-image sphinxospheres are centered on the center of the top and bottom rhombiid spheres, and their individual faces each point toward an internal dimension.
This has been studied empirically by Göran Ekström.
The Non-Euclidian approach shows that the projections of two opposing sphinxes can be described using straight lines whose shortest segments are the shortest links of the strings. In this way we get a set of orthogonal projection points with as average distance between them, as in a grid.
As we know, the length of strings depends on the number of consecutive strati connected.

[Anonymous No.17267262]

>>17267140
>word words words
>reading

The only thing neccessary is to commit the ultimate violence, to sever in totality ones binds to the telluric sense-stream; abjure all ideations, concepts and desires, ans gaze only into that all-pervsding NEGATION which shrivels the body, grinds the bones, and shines like the enternal SUN.

What power is greater than this? All your wandering through these winding tunnels of words of the waylaid children of ages has brought you nothing but the desolation you have so ardently fought against.

Shall you continue to struggle in darkness, strangling on the the vines of your own false mentation? Or will you assume your role as KING, embrace the SUN, and bring the Samsaric cognitive cage to heel? The choice is yours.

[Anonymous No.17267289]

Why do people hate Beckheimer? Sure, he murdered Conrad with an axe during a debate to prove his philosophy of infinitism, but does that act not vindicate his words?

[Anonymous No.17267294]

>>17267257
>Ekström
I'll have to check that out, thank you good sir

[Anonymous No.17267296]

>>17267289
>nrad with an axe during a debate to prove his philosophy of infinitism, but does that act not vindicate his words?
I’ll forgive Althusser, but Beckheimer was just too barbaric to spill blood like that.

[Anonymous No.17267301]

>>17267262
>he hasn't read the Prajñavidyabhumivatara

[Anonymous No.17267306]

>>17260261
Ah yes, a pungent analyst

[Anonymous No.17267314]

>he keeps all 13 volumes of Katrina Star's The Kleptocracy on his shelf
ywnbaw

[Anonymous No.17267319]

>>17260261
If Fartman was any more of a hack, he’d be executed for cybercrimes against humanity.

[Anonymous No.17267324]

>>17267301
Yeah, I don't read Filipino supremacist literature. Marl Karx is basically a Flip Hitler.

[Anonymous No.17267360]

>>17267301
Swami M's teachings are derivative of Viseluvius's Vision of the Cosmic Dominion (which he attained from the Library of Yohokanta); he only cherrypicked from the documents and did not attain the full insight, content to remain swirling about in sub-luminous spiritual contraction.

[Anonymous No.17267394]

>>17267324
Yet here you are on a Filipino flipbook forum. Start with the Austronesians

[Anonymous No.17267421]

what the fuck happened to hyperborean philosophy in the last 60,000 years of its existence?

[Anonymous No.17267434]

>>17267262
>reads Boltein's Bardo
>shills the king role and embracment of the sun and forth the Samsaric Cognition Cage
>doesn't read False Paradiso by Adrian
>mfw finding out brainlet would sever the Telluric sense-stream instead of manipulating it

[Anonymous No.17267443]

>>17267421
The southern cults spreads too far and wide, since our current earth conditions tend towards a negative verticality, toward inertia. Only the most noble and strengthened souls will be able to make the return trip to the invisible northern kingdoms.

[Anonymous No.17267494]

>>17267434
>>mfw finding out brainlet would sever the Telluric sense-stream instead of manipulating it

You cannot manipulate something you yet remain inextricably a part of. The sorcerers make that mistake time and time again, then are inevitable swamped under the waves of cosmic reflexivity. Only once have been fully severed, or rather circumcised, will be permitted into the ranks of the Journeymen.

[Anonymous No.17267558]

Anyone read this?

[Anonymous No.17267570]

>>17258375
>instead of reading real books, let's jerk each other's cocks and stop trying having actual conversations

[Anonymous No.17267592]

>>17267570
Seems like you need to read Nicholas Ravencrow's Philosophy of Fun

[Anonymous No.17267603]

>>17267570
READ
RAVENCROW

[Anonymous No.17267606]

>>17267570
>reading books
>not telepathically intercepting the pre-manifested form from the low-density cognitive spheres

[Anonymous No.17267618]

>>17267421
unironically <<<raugonians>>>
>inb4 bekmefag starts sperging out again

[Anonymous No.17267644]

>>17267618
>M-MUH BEKMEFAG BOOGEYMAN
take your meds schizo
why can't aryoids admit that they're too dumb to post-conceptual thought?

[Anonymous No.17267650]

What is the conclusion of this bros?
Not single new meme framework came out of this shitshow.

Thanks for the keks though.

[Anonymous No.17267656]

>>17267360
>sub-luminous spiritual contraction
Yes, this is necessary in progression for realizing the ninety-seven stages of hypersolarity. You mistake contentment for the termination of exoteric learning. Beyond that point in his PVBV, the practitioner is pretty clearly advised to contemplate the Yohokantan visualizations.

[Anonymous No.17267658]

>>17267650
The cycle must continue.

I'd unironically read a whole magazine full of bullshit like this

[Anonymous No.17267666]

>>17267644
>t. bekmefag

[Anonymous No.17267680]

>>17267570
>/hyperlit/
>capable of differánce from /lit/
Come back after you've read Bakker

[Anonymous No.17267695]

>>17267650
It's all a mimicking of /lit/'s preferred type of intellectual discourse, and a very convincing one at that. This thread is further proof that /lit/ is about soundbites and arrogance, not content.

[Anonymous No.17267715]

>>17267695
>read thread
>come away frustrated and confused and don't even pick up any recs
It's not mimicry. What real is there to copy?

[Anonymous No.17267716]

>>17267658
Someone get in touch with the fags at &amp lol, a /hyperlit/ section would be kino.

[Anonymous No.17267724]

>>17267715
I think this board is pretty good for recommending books but less so for discussing content. That's the best reason to come here imo.

[Anonymous No.17267769]

>>17267658
>>17267695
desu, I see this thread as the good old /b/tard autistic shitposting of "just doing it for lolz"
there is nothing wrong with this. what else anyone can expect from disenfranchised youth on the fringes of normalfag internet?
philosophy has been stuck in a slump from quite sometimes. And nick land's meme influence itt thread is pretty apparent. all of the philosophical enthusiast discussion on internet are based on memes and shit.

[Anonymous No.17267777]

>>17267658
Add this thread to the &amp magazine

[Anonymous No.17267784]

>>17267777
quads have spoken

[Anonymous No.17267785]

>>17267724
Just wait until someone makes a /hyperlit/ chart. Then you'll know recommendations have arrived from the future.

[Anonymous No.17267786]

>>17267785
>Just wait until someone makes a /hyperlit/ chart.
It already exists

[Anonymous No.17267792]

>>17267777
Blessed thread

[Anonymous No.17267796]

>>17267777
based and checked

[Anonymous No.17267820]

>>17267658
Someone has to compile discussions within a proper structure or at least some in some thread which makes little sense

[Anonymous No.17267877]

>>17267820
A potential direction for /hyperlit/ is to discuss 'original' ideas under the guise of artificial co-authorship. In other words, attributing one's ideas to a hyperreal author that you have no personal control over, who others may also use, as if writing scripture or sutras.

[Anonymous No.17267891]

>>17267786
Ah yes of course how could I forget

[Anonymous No.17267899]

Does anyone have the Esoteric Retardism reading list? I know you're supposed to start with Cass' Essay on Drooling, but I don't know where to go from there.

[Anonymous No.17267906]

>>17267877
While I think this might be interesting, making hyperreal authors up just to create nonsense that sounds interesting is also fun. Both can coexist if people stick to the bit.

[Anonymous No.17267921]

>>17267877
the French group of mathematicians "Nicolas Bourbaki" already did this

[Anonymous No.17267964]

>>17267906
There being no reliable way to tell them apart adds to the experience.
>>17267921
Like so; I have no idea if this is real in context to /hyperlit/ because real literature is discarded as a valuable criterion

[Anonymous No.17267981]

>>17267899
I'll have to check my folders, but a good starting point in general is Felix Grougnard's Course on Saussurean Simianotics.

[Anonymous No.17267982]

>>17267964
what about this >>17258401?

[Anonymous No.17267994]

>>17267981
what is pong phenomena?

[Anonymous No.17268020]

>>17267899
Well, Bermudes' "Towards a New Form of Retardism" and Bosin's "Being (a Moron) in the World: Heidegger and IQ" will give you a basic understanding of the theory, and >>17267981 too.
Then you have the two main schools, Mongoloids and Pinheads. I don´t know much about Mongoloids, myself belonging to the latter school, but Pinheads focus more on the gnoseological relationship between sub-intelligence and ignorance theory. If this sounds interesting, read ALL that Newsted wrote (it's worth it)
Also, there's Scharping, but he's kind of a meme.

[Anonymous No.17268023]

>>17267982
Well I did have to look up Bourbaki; knew what Ccru was. I guess we are returning to tradition after all!

[Anonymous No.17268043]

>>17267994
In the Borneo school it refers to the absence of neurotactile canalization among the retarded, when presented with a reflection.

[Anonymous No.17268061]

>>17268023
following the tradition is totally boring without adding any new chan flavour.

[Anonymous No.17268093]

>>17258375
Did anyone read that posthumous book The Evil Heat, from Marçin Levy? First boom I’ve read that came with a warning label. Most fucked up thing I’ve read in my life, absolute kino. Why did he only publish his YA garbage? I was ready to dismiss this book because of his awful YA history, but the reviews convinced me it was something truly different. I’m pretty sure he’s already surpassed Francis Mikke (the undisputed master of Neo-Burgerpunk Hyperrealism) in terms of greatest writers of the 21st century.

[Anonymous No.17268128]

ITT: We discuss Isaac Gorkoniker, prominent Russian philosopher, Jewish theologian and amateur Ornithologist.

Influences:
Ralph Waldo Emerson
Henry David Thoreau
Karl Marx
Hermann Cohen
Ivan Turgenev
Lev Tolstoy
John Muir
Walter Benjamin
Arne Naess
Cervellissimo
Rudolph Najder

Schools of Thought:
Banticism
Neo-Babelics
Transcendentalism Revival

Notable Works:
Птицы и дepeвья Иpкyтcкoй oблacти (untranslated) (2037)
The Moon Over Angarsk (2038)
Bantic Discourses (2040)
Translations of the Complete Works of Mikhail Lermontov (2045)
Beneath Solomon’s Axe (2052)
Self-Immanence & Self-Transcendence (2058)
Birds of the White Tops (unfinished)

Personal History:
Isaac Gorkoniker was born in Moscow, January 30, 2002 to Warren and Fae Gorkoniker
He was drafted in November 2029 for the Third World War and was sent to fight in the Irkutsk invasion in 2030.
He lost his leg in a mortar explosion while carrying wounded soldiers to safety during the Siege of Angarsk (2032), he received the Order of Courage.
He lived in Angasrk until the end of the war, and for two years after, during which he wrote his war memoir, published in 2038.
He emigrated to the U.S. in 2038 with the money he made off of his book.
He spent five years in Brooklyn where he wrote and worked at Fordham University. During this time he met and worked closely with Rudolph Najder developing Neo-Babelics.
During this time he also met and married Kassidy Cohen.
They moved to Danville, VT in 2043 when he was 41 and stayed there until his passing in 2091.
During the ‘Vermont Years’ he became invested in the works of Thoreau and Emerson and pioneered the Transcendentalism Revival, his most famous work of this era being the sister-works ‘Self-Immanence & Self-Transcendence’ which approach traditional Transcendental ideas from Jewish and Pantheistic perspectives.
In 2077 when he was 75 years old, he went on a foot-journey backpacking across the White Mountains cataloging the various species of birds. On his return he caught a bad cold which developed into pneumonia which eventually caused him to lose his already damaged hearing completely.
On October 1, 2091 he passed away in his sleep. His coffin was quickly transported to Moscow where the next day he was buried.
He is survived by his children: Mark, Jack and Fae.

Picture is Gorkoniker reading to his grandchild in ~2084.

[Anonymous No.17268193]

All fiddelopolists deserve the sword, I swear to christ it's like they havent even read Greg Glock!

[Anonymous No.17268211]

>>17258647
You absolute imbecile. The thinking or figurate conception which has before it only a specific, determinate being must be referred back to the beginning of the science made by Bosch who purified and elevated his own figurate conception, to pure thought, to being as such and thereby created the element of the science. This is the crucial point of the Bijectivity: precisely this undermining of this initial diadic structure which you have, so ignorantly, fallen for. What is the first in the science had to show itself historically as the first. And we must regard the Eleatic One or being as the first step in the knowledge of thought. Brainlets like you should stop reading eliminivist critiques and get to the original matterial.

[Anonymous No.17268280]

>>17268128
>Jewish theologian
Stopped reading, Judaism was refuted by Jean Hamann, the great Neo-Guenonian Savant.
How about ITT: We discuss Giovanni Pravda, philosopher and founder of the Sicilian school, which focused on object oriented psycho-ontology, Post-Heideggerian psychoanalysis of unconscious anthropometrics, Generative Cognitive Jungian Memetics and Girardian Studies.
His magnum opus "Psychophilosophy and the reality bias", also put himself forth as a reviver or resuscitator of the ancient tradition of Sicilian wisdom literature, which was thought to be lost, but rediscovered in oral tradition and recent archeological findings.

[Anonymous No.17268319]

>>17268193
Greg Glock is pure midwit filth.

[Anonymous No.17268342]

>>17268319
>Greg Glock is pure midwit filter
fify

[Anonymous No.17268412]

>>17268193
Glock is a fraud and got retroactively BFTO by Baunucco but I agree on the fiddelopolists. Shit ideology for teenagers

[Anonymous No.17268424]

Where are the marxshits Beterson!?

[Anonymous No.17268458]

>>17268424
>hasn’t read the 5000 page posthumous JBP document on Solzhenitsyn’s Two Hundred Years Together

[Anonymous No.17268597]

>>17267899
Esoteric Retardism has deep roots in Postintellectualist ontology, so go read Foranoglu and Kvartov to get a better grasp

[Anonymous No.17268618]

>>17268412
Baunucco is pure nonsense, Glock was actually brutally refuted by Koporyanoshian (who also incidentally proved Baunucco wrong)

[Anonymous No.17268713]

>>17268020
You can't forget the research of Professor Eugene "Genie" Hastings at John Hopkins in the 70's. Were it not for his experiments with having "invalids and idiots" write essays, monographs, and papers on topics like Subjective Morality, Sexuality, and the Meaning of Life, we would never have gotten Joeseph "Plato" Platt's 15,000 page book, Life (one of the only words Platt knew, since he was illiterate and otherwise wrote in his own, nearly-unintelligible language). If it weren't for that, the entire field would probably have died with Conrad Nero. To be able to study works written by actual retards (I'm convinced Newstead was pretending) was a breakthrough.

[Anonymous No.17268732]

>>17268618
How do? I’ve read some of Koporyanoshian’s works and I haven’t found such brutal destruction of Glock’s works. Keep in mind, I also disagree with Glock and his acolytes.

[Anonymous No.17268828]

>>17268319
>>17268412
>>17268618
>>17268732
Say what you will about Glock, he's a fucking champ when he wants to! Sure, some of his ideas regarding Garlinian metacycles are retarded, but "Refutations Of The Fiddeler" is some of the deepest shit you'll ever read!

[Anonymous No.17268937]

>>17258375
Just finished Jochim Scholz's Crisis of the Absent Subject. How have people been missing this?

>inb4 unart btfo scholz

[Anonymous No.17268944]

>>17268937
Give me the run down on it anon, I've been meaning to read it.

[Anonymous No.17268949]

>>17268937
fuck off retard. no one cares about scholz. dead faggot who never read marx.

[Anonymous No.17269018]

>>17268944
the basic run down is that modern western society has lost its framework for operation and continued existence, and is only preserved by a plethora of religious and economic institutions institutions backed by a despotic state, which form a function which Baunucco called the mechanic subject (as opposed to the organic subject, ie society operating healthily). Scholz's point is that this function is now also breaking down, and we are entering a period of the absent subject, set adrift, just like Frumaier's hexamodern age decaying into the cultural vacuum. It's more of a sequel to Scholz's hauntology in The Bygone Future, so I'd recommend reading that before absent subject.

[Anonymous No.17269051]

>>17269018
A few things that come to mind, firstly history is the only subject as we are all objects, secondly,
>organic subject
See this post >>17265156 on the subject of the organic-synthetic distinction.

[Anonymous No.17269086]

>>17268713
>I'm convinced Newstead was pretending
This meme again. Research has debunked this, read Ingall´s critical biography of Newstead, it's on libgen

[Anonymous No.17269120]

>>17269051
>actually accepting teleological Tauredian historicism

Kek. Scholz refutes this. Hell, his phd dissertation at the University of Vlatava was on the various mistakes of accepting history as a subject-process. Read picrel if you dont have the time to go through the older works.

[Anonymous No.17269140]

>>17268732
Well, I suggest you to take a look at his secondary works, like his letters to Kramsern. Very interesting stuff, deserves more attention.

[Anonymous No.17269170]

>>17268937

>unironically caring about Scholz

[Anonymous No.17269197]

>>17269120
I'll read it and it better be good or else faggot.

[Anonymous No.17269204]

>>17269120
Oh and not all of the Tauredians accepted teleological reasoning, read Joseph Amirault.

[Anonymous No.17269323]

>>17269086
While Ingall makes some good points, I agree with Dördall's theory that Newstead only drooled because of a hairlip that he covered with his moustache, which would also explain his speech impediment. Keep in mind, there is very little information regarding Newstead before the publication of his dissertation on Pinhead Physiognomy, and by that time, he already had his moustache.
I'll concede that he might have had high-functioning autism, but that's not even considered a form of retardation by either Pinheads or Mongoloids.

[Anonymous No.17269364]

>>17269323
>Pinhead/Mongoloid orthodoxy
Kiddo I'm about to hit you with some Nitwit mysticism, read Of Flowers and Burnt Fingers. All is all or something.

[Anonymous No.17269594]

>>17269364
Holy shit, this thing is in 15 volumes. Why does it warn you not to read if you know French?

[Anonymous No.17269594,1]

>>17269594