[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 145 KB, 1200x900, death-of-socrates.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17807204 No.17807204 [Reply] [Original]

So let me get this straight, he was so annoying that everyone voted to kill him?

>> No.17807212

”straight”

>> No.17807247
File: 581 KB, 1110x1600, Christ_Pantocrator.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17807247

So let me get this straight, he was so annoying that everyone voted to kill him?

>> No.17807279

>>17807204
he thought he was being a genius by refusing to accept their generous offer so they had no choice but to kil him, he basically commited suicide.

>> No.17807286
File: 286 KB, 1113x888, David_Foster_Wallace.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17807286

So let me get this straight, everyone was so annoying that he voted to kill himself?

>> No.17807288

>>17807247
his knowledge of the scriptures and pil pul ability was too powerful, even the most powerful jews couldn't out debate him

>> No.17807302

>>17807286
>everyone
you mean "he"
living away from others is easy, he was effectively already doing so. living away from oneself, not so easy. you remember his attempts at meditation.

>> No.17807303

>>17807279
>renounce your principles and you'll live
What will you have left to live for after accepting their offer?
War needs to start soon so spineless NPC's like you can die off already.

>> No.17807316

>>17807204
yes

>> No.17807321

>>17807303
>I DEMAND YOU KILL ME

"hehe you fools, this truly shows the injustice of the system, killing an innocent man like me!"

>> No.17807324
File: 672 KB, 784x1100, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17807324

>>17807204
>YOUR SUPERIOR DEBATE SKILLS ARE UNDERMINING OUR TRADITIONAL VALUES AND HUMILIATING THEIR DEFENDERS SO YOU MUST DIE!

>> No.17807327

>>17807302
Yet his whole writing career focused on undoing the mind-numbing pattern we are stuck in. He couldn't get people out of his mind to the point his rejection of it all defined him, anon.

>> No.17807334

>>17807324
>but why?

truly a genus

>> No.17807335

>>17807321
Was he wrong?
No need to seethe because you cannot understand the idea of living with a purpose.

>> No.17807352

>>17807204
>>17807247
It wasn't annoyance. Both of them made enemies out of very powerful people, Socrates by making them look foolish and exposing them as ignorant and Christ by challenging the power of the corrupt religious chiefs as well as the king from Israel and Judea.

>> No.17807356

Based annoyer causing the hylics to seethe in such rage they bust a total nut.

>> No.17807372

>>17807334
Socrates doesn't ask "why", he asks you a couple of basic questions you're likely to agree with, then asks you a question that leads to an absurd conclusion, but which you cannot dismiss without also dismissing your previous beliefs. Then he helps you get closer to the truth.

>> No.17807385

>>17807204
he was a fly, he got swatted, simple as.

>> No.17807399

>>17807356
The Ancient Greeks weren't Hylics

>> No.17807411

>>17807399
They are now

>> No.17807416

He was friends with some of the 30 tyrants

>> No.17807428

Can he deny the charge if corrupting the youth when two members of his think harem grew up to be Alcibiades and Critias? You couldn't name more infamous as these in Athens at the time.

>> No.17807437

>>17807416
he was a protofascist, basically a nazi.

>> No.17807445

>>17807416
Socrates hated the tyranny and in Athens you literally could not be charged for anything to with the tyranny because of an amnesty, prohibiting anyone from being charged with crimes relating to it, implemented after revolution.

>> No.17807474

>>17807212
sodomy pilled

>> No.17807575

>>17807445
He refused to arrest someone for them. I doubt he hated Plato's uncle Critias or Alcibiades, who Xenophon wrote of favorably. He also was charged with corrupting the youth and inventing novel gods, not anything related to the 30 tyrants.

>> No.17807627

>>17807204
You want to really know why he was killed? It's blatantly in front of everyone and few people ever talk about it because it's not as romantic: he pissed off the business interests of the sophists. You have the sophists making a business out of knowledge, big business, and you have people paying money, big money, to learn it. Over time this is building a little elite club. You then have Socrates advocating giving the product away for free.

People are the same as they've always been and when you don't go along with the new order, your ass is history. You can say and advocate for almost anything, but the moment you start threatening the economic machine it becomes an incredibly lucrative prospect to take you out. Socrates made it good business to kill him as did a lot of other people throughout history. No one pulls the trigger until you start costing them money.

>> No.17808511

>>17807204
the way it worked was that first they voted on finding him being guilty/innocent and then on what was the most appropriate punishment. From the ancient sources we know that more people decided to punish him with death that previously found him guilty. That means that between those two votings he must have said something that made them change their minds so radically as to want him dead. He probably mocked the whole affair and laughed and the ones who accused him. Read Plato and Diogenes Laertios for that, also The Trial of Socrates by I. F. Stone.

>> No.17808880

>>17807279
He was old as fuck and probably soon to die anyway. Living in exile sounds cringe; I'd drink the hemlock in that situation too.

>> No.17808897

>>17808880
Dude, its a fucken rage quit, admit it.
Socrates was a shitcunt troll.
When reported he ban evaded.
So they rangebanned him but before it came into effect he rage quit.

>> No.17809384

>>17807204


NO BETTER EXAMPLE OF DEMOCRACY IN ACTION: DEMOCRACY KILLS THE BEST, AND PERPETUATES THE WORST, WHILST THE MEDIOCRE RULE.

>> No.17809390

>>17807204
Yes

>> No.17810251

>>17809384
Based.

>> No.17810288

>>17808897
socrates: the original rage quitter.

>> No.17810353

>>17809384
You need to replace the "U"s with "V"s to improve the larp. Otherwise based

>> No.17811428

>>17808897
And that's what made him based.

>> No.17811692
File: 81 KB, 564x721, E2D521CC-A445-47FA-9557-40A610E6E3B4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17811692

>>17807204
yes
>>17807324
he was still kind of a tool and smartass. Dont get me wrong, i respect him, but the consequences for his actions were equally as reasonable.

Is there a term for both understanding a position and understanding the consequences of that position? Like from the jury’s position they gave him a number of outs and benifits of the doubt, but he refused to question his own questioning which should be the ultimate conclusion to the line of socratic thought.

Its like standing up in the middle of a lecture hall and proclaiming the institution forfit, or proclaiming you dont have to go the the lecture hall. Yah, you might be conceptually correct if you follow from a purely logic pov, but that way you can deconstruct everything, and what do you expect the institution to do “yah you are right, lets pack up our bags and create a semi autonomous commune teaching organization rather than a traditional learning structure because anonrightly said it does not strictly logically follow with how we are doing this things”

No, people dont just ficking flip their structure overnight. Its one thing to move towards a goal in a practical sense, and its another thing to argue theory and admonishing that practice is not exactly 1 to 1 with your conception ASAP.

“Ow, I guess you are right socratese, I guess this council will just create YOUR perfect conceptualization of things this very instant.”

I understand sticking to a theory for theories sake and facing the practical consequences of it. But getting upity that theory does not reflect current practice immediately is just fart sniffing.I respect the socratic stance, but I also understand the consequences of it when being so myopic about it.

>> No.17811708

>>17811428
It took this long for a poster to recognise that.

>> No.17812651

I have read only parts but I feel the dialogues are filled with very lax use of extremely wide and vague terms that Socrates uses to jump to his predetermined conclusion and epicpawn everybody.

>> No.17812711

>>17812651>>17807279
>>17807335
>>17807356
>>17807372
>>17807445

>>17807204
Yeah Socrates is peak rationalist midwitism. The guy just roams the city, going to artisans like a shoemaker and saying >HEY BRO WHAT"S THE DEFINITION OF A SHOE? HUH What's that? UH? HU ? WHAT that's? YOU DON"T KNOW?! YOU DONT"EVEN KNOW THE DEFINITION OF A SHOE. LMAO AT YOU FUCKING CAVE PLEB.

Socrates was r8ddit all along. No wonder all the atheists in academia praise him today.

>> No.17812734
File: 79 KB, 1125x624, DE794969-CB56-4459-85AF-8A423B2B1AE1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17812734

Where to start with Socrates?

>> No.17812739

>>17812711
haha