[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/lit/ - Literature

View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 86 KB, 1200x900, 0E10B943-B390-442B-BF6D-BC2AD47A8503.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
17867798 No.17867798 [Reply] [Original]

What would you say are the 5 most essential books on economics?
Also I’d appreciate it if any anons with an econ degree shared their experiences and prospects etc, as I’m in my first year and kinda wishing I had instead chosen political science.

>> No.17867951

1) the wealth of nation's
2) principles of political economy by David Ricardo
3) Das Kapital
4)The general theory of employment, interest, and money
5) a monetary history of the United States by Milton Friedman
6) Capital by Thomas Piketty

There, that's all the major books that all disagree with each other. Read them all and pick which one seems sorta right

>> No.17867967

Nothing after that because it ended economics

>> No.17868007

Thanks anon

>> No.17868078
File: 38 KB, 400x600, A50iBxwt7qMC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.17868079


>> No.17868082

This is on my list, is it worth it?

>> No.17868097
File: 83 KB, 688x867, 30163719555.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.17868108

Not really. The author is a "heterodox" thinker, which just means his ideas are considered outside the traditional economic school of thought. Treating his book as an introduction, which it insists it is, is going to give a skewed picture of the subject as a whole. Best not read until far later in learning about the field

>> No.17868132

Thomas Piketty is a pseud but you probably meant Marx who, by my estimation, is an actual intellectual but is still just a midwit.
Both contributed nothing that should be taken seriously in the field of economics.
OP should still read these faggots though, purely because their influence is becoming greater by the day (unfortunately).

>> No.17868142

Ahh I understand. I’ve studied econ in high school so I do know a little bit about the different schools of thought eg Keynes, the Austrian school, and neoclassical school. I was planning on just reading Keynes, Hayek, and Friedman in that order

>> No.17868152

The Road to Serfdom will break your delusions about socialism.

>> No.17868180

Praxeology is pseudo science

>> No.17868190


>> No.17868262

all of economics is pseudoscience

>> No.17868276

dont read this. its a meme.

>> No.17868311
File: 966 KB, 2000x2484, Dat Kapital.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.17868393


>> No.17868738

What’s so funny you dumb commy

>> No.17868751

>People control economy
Omg literally slavery
>A dozen corporations control economy and use state power to enforce their rule

>> No.17868765


>> No.17868792

Anyone who's a libertarian denounces crony capitalism and even corporatism for the most part.

>> No.17868809

Crony capitalism is just capitalism. Monopolization is inevitable under capitalism and a state will always be formed to protect their class interests.

>> No.17868854

The state is a monopoly in a socialist country, and a very inefficient one at that

>> No.17868890

Progress and Poverty will change your life.

>> No.17868903

"If being the biggest company was a guarantee of success, we'd all be using IBM computers and driving GM cars."

>> No.17868908

exact opposite actually, sowell proved it, monopolies don't last in a free market, they can only form due to government regulation (and often regulatory capture leads to government agencies meant to prevent monopolies aiding them) and cartels. But cartels fall apart quickly because each member of the cartel has incentive to cheat the other members, can only be sustained if they all have perfect information or close to it.

>> No.17868972

The state exists prior to the economy.
The state controls the economy, not the other way 'round.
Class divisions exists due to conditions originating from the state primarily, not the economy.
>Monopolization is inevitable under capitalism and a state will always be formed to protect their class interests.
makes no sense. The state already existed before capitalism was implemented (or arose, what have you). If it was sanctioned by the state, it was for the state's benefit, not those who participate in the economy, let alone those who supposedly reap the most benefit from these particular configurations.

>> No.17869010

Satoshi white paper /thread.

all other economists are BTFO after that.
not only did satoshi write the white paper
then he transubstantiated his economics into code and actually built it and deployed it globally.

That's it.

>> No.17869178

monopolies were much more common with monarchs that sold monopooly rights to various things to raise money

>> No.17869243
File: 70 KB, 622x621, SternCat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Dude, Hayek literally predicted something pretty similar to a stable(bit)coin in his "The Denationalization of Money"; It was ideas like his that directly influenced the cypherpunk movement and cryptocurrencies in general.
Anyway, Satoshi wrote his whitepaper not so much on monetary theory but more on a specific technical problem in the technology which he solved brilliantly. He wasn't the first to do research on crypto though.
Cryptocurrencies existed theoretically since the '80s with David Chaum's 1982 dissertation "Computer Systems Established, Maintained, and Trusted by Mutually Suspicious Groups", being the first known conception of a blockchain protocol.
In short, economic theory was in no way central to Satoshi's whitepaper and it's weird to say that his whitepaper ended even the theoretical field of cryptocurrency which pretty much just started. Seriously, the field is so young that it's conceivable that one of (You) autistic faggots could contribute to it if you tried hard enough.

>> No.17869253

>Hayek literally predicted something pretty similar to a stable(bit)coin

predicting and inventing a time machine very different thing

also the first crypto.

Also, btc is stable, if its the denominator

you're just used to <inster your fiat> as the denominator as your overlords teach you

>> No.17869316

>btc is stable, if its the denominator

>> No.17869368

Thats literally the same as every commie denouncing Stalin for muhnotrealsocialism. Crony capitalism is just capitalism in practice.

>> No.17869479
File: 102 KB, 820x845, Seriously.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>predicting and inventing a time machine very different thing
You're joking right?
Nigga, do you actually read?
We are talking about economic theory, if you can't appreciate theory as well as application then you are at most a mid.

>> No.17869495

>Thats literally the same as every commie denouncing Stalin for muhnotrealsocialism.
Vanguardism is literally not Marxism. Dialectical Materialism says everything proceeds naturally without intervention and made no allowance for a class above and beyond but allied with the proletariat. If anything, "Marxists" are obligated to denounce the Soviet Union from inception (which by the way was founded with the crucial help of capitalists / the bourgeoisie) to its demise.
>Crony capitalism is just capitalism in practice.
That is a retarded commie take with not only no nuance but no rationality. As is mentioned before, it is state regulation of the economy which leads to the excesses of "capitalism" by creating conditions wherein competition in the free market by little guys against big fish becomes increasingly impossible.

>> No.17869509

wait a second, does anybody actually read das kapital? like, if you had no interest in "primary sources" and just wanted to know what marx thought and why it was important, would really read das kapital or would you read some distilled secondary source?

>> No.17869535

I had a classmate in college who was / is a socialist (also an organizer) and decided to read Das Kapital over his summer break, and during Paideia taught a class on it as an overview of its key points.

>> No.17869536

Small is Beautiful

It's boomerish but charming nonetheless

>> No.17869559

Grants of exclusive right in general are anti-free market.

>> No.17869584

The cambridge capital debate is probably the most important.

>> No.17869585

I've had that on my reading list for a while.

>> No.17869662
File: 79 KB, 1125x624, E186A2D9-CC8E-47DE-909C-2834DBF6C291.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

No one’s said Capitalism Socialism and Democracy yet ?

>> No.17870154

It's really not that bad. Sure it has its larpers, but if you've read anything technical/lengthy before it's pretty breezy. He wrote it to be understood by "the common man"

>> No.17870288

>The state exists prior to the economy.

yes, if we start a small civilization, the first priority is to elect bureaucrats, so that they can make rules about how we can proceed to make trade among ourselves

>> No.17870312

>Also, btc is stable, if its the denominator

even if all fiat were to be extinct and everything was priced in bitcoin, the demand would keep rising, and with the limited supple, it would be deflationary

dumbass nigger

>> No.17870324

make your way around Austrian economy, everything else is horse shit vomited by economagicians

>> No.17870379

Advanced micro
Advanced macro
Game theory

gods you are so retarded some times /lit/. do you think you go to study physics by reading Kepler?

>> No.17870562

>Capitalism Socialism and Democracy
Based Schumpy Chad

>> No.17870722
File: 46 KB, 700x641, Frosch.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>Advanced micro
>Advanced macro
>Game theory
Misapplied half the time.
Misused 95% of the time.
From the top of my head, the only people who seem to have convincingly used math in economics were Walrus, Pareto, and von Neumann.
Statistics is also retarded.
>do you think you go to study physics by reading Kepler?
>Implying Economics has meaningfully advanced in a way comparable to an actual science like physics.
Bruh, Economist can't even agree whether any real math is even necessary in their field or if they're just bullshitting themselves...

Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.