[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 521 KB, 1071x576, 1608945302798.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17940364 No.17940364 [Reply] [Original]

Who wins?

>> No.17940368

Nobody thinks of Joe Rogan as a "public intellectual", nice strawman

>> No.17940383

>>17940364
Chomp
Fowlcult
Derisive
Joe Rogaine
Russell tussle

>> No.17940393

>>17940364
Foucault vs Peterson would just be fucking embarrassing, from every point of view imaginable. A complete disgrace to discourse, philosophy and rationality.
And then 40 years later you'd learn Foucault invited Pete to go diddle some black kid afterwards and Pete now feels really regretful about not coming forth sooner...

>> No.17940399

>>17940364
Everybody on this chart is a midwit pseud

(with the exception of Foucault when he limits himself to the history of sociology and Peterson when he limits himself to personality psychology)

>> No.17940427

Chomsky
Foucault
Derrida
Rogan
Russell

>> No.17940439
File: 17 KB, 500x241, 195F520C-BE59-468F-A302-E1490693DD14.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17940439

>unpictured

>> No.17940441

*sniffs*

>> No.17940462

>>17940368
His status as a gatekeeper puts him on the same level.

>> No.17940478
File: 14 KB, 255x247, 1615447685566.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17940478

>Buckley is the only one who actually loses to his modern day counterpart

Kek

>> No.17940489

>>17940393
Agree, the Foucault worship is extremely embarrassing

>> No.17940499

>>17940364
Derrida is a fucking fraud

>> No.17940505

>>17940368
Even a stoned comedian beats the war mongering soulless capitalist that is Buckley

>> No.17940513

>>17940499
Still beats Harris

>> No.17940517

>>17940513
True.

>> No.17940539
File: 201 KB, 421x519, 1617406387639.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17940539

>>17940364
Joe chimps out and murders them all in an animalistic rage.

>> No.17940850

>>17940478
What the fuck would Rogan and Buckley even debate about?

>> No.17941938

>>17940364
Bertrand Russell would destroy them all

>> No.17941948

>>17940364
Chomsky
Foucalt (only because he would become more honest in contemporary discourse where his fame is immovable)
Derrida
Buckley
Zizek

>> No.17941957

>>17940364
All of the public intellectuals then would beat the public intellectuals now, the only exception is Sam Harris who would beat Derrida. However, this has less to do with any intellectual rigor Harri has and more to do with Derrida being a charlatan

>> No.17942113

>>17940364
The debate should be a set of debates matching all pairings possible made from Russell, Chomsky, Foucault, and Derrida, with a final debate with the four of them. Nobody else should be invited, but maybe Zizek can be moderator.

>> No.17942227

Pinker beats Chomsky
Foucault and Peterson talk past each other
Harris doesn't attend the debate becaus he burned himself on a hot stove
Rogan beats Buckley because their only serious point of debate would be weed
Zizek and Russell talk past each other

>> No.17942255

>>17940850
I thought this was fighting. Rogan would just headkick Buckley.

>> No.17942408

>>17942227
Sounds about right