[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 75 KB, 663x663, 1613940508872_edit_50239741029312.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18390960 No.18390960[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

What is the difference between objectivity and intersubjectivity?

>> No.18390967

>>18390960
I don't know

>> No.18390972
File: 75 KB, 770x600, E0B66EBF-EBEF-493F-8B21-E3A48DAAA7E9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18390972

>>18390960
It's all a matter of perpsective anon

>> No.18390975

>>18390960
It's exactly as it sounds I imagine. If all the humans could align their thoughts with each other's and interpret reality that way it would be intersubjectivity.
An alternative is berkeley saying God's subjectivity is what ours borrows from

>> No.18390995

>>18390975
Is reality objective or intersubjective?

>> No.18391224

>>18390960
Objective: true from a third party perspective
Intersubjective: true as a result of consensus

>> No.18391227

>>18390960

Objectivity - Exists independent of subjects

Intersubjectivity - Exists in the collective consciousness of the subjects (See: states, money, companies. None of these truly exist, it exists only in our collective imagination).

>> No.18391252

>>18390960
There is no difference fundamentally. Practically you can just rely on the word denotations for separation.

>> No.18391485

>>18391224
This is the stupidest thing I've ever read in my life. What is consensus if not an agreement of third parties? Your definitions collapse into each other.

>> No.18391490

>>18390960
If its objective it would be true even if you deleted all the humans (^: