How women use literature to filter dates

[Anonymous No.20101728]

Does your taste pass the test?

[Anonymous No.20101737]

I don't care

[Anonymous No.20101743]

id love to see what they look like

[Anonymous No.20101745]

i only care if they're attractive and not black

[Anonymous No.20101746]

>>20101743

[Anonymous No.20101749]

>>20101743
https://www.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/comments/fuavah/heres_a_greatand_fun_way_to_out_filter_men_that/

[Anonymous No.20101750]

>>20101728
>Neurotic paranoiacs from basically the red pill with a pussy and daddy issues
>only knows the most surface-level writers
>only has the most one-dimensional understanding of them and their ideas
>only associates themselves with equally as one-dimensional and shallow characters
>wall of text only to advertise to the world you're a retarded mental teenager

[Anonymous No.20101753]

>>20101746
Holy kek

[Anonymous No.20101761]

>>20101743
Same ser

[Anonymous No.20101764]

[Anonymous No.20101769]

>>20101728
Among Atwood, Morrison, Franzen, Palahniuk, Chabon, Vonnegut, and Dickens I've read 3 books and won't be reading more.

[Anonymous No.20101774]

>>20101728
That entire subreddit is just 4chan men trolling people. It's literally impossible for this not to be the case.
There is absolutely 0 chance a woman wrote that post. That might as well just be OP sharing his epic reddit gold star post.

But even if the post was real, she wouldn't have passed my test. She only named the most mainstream stuff possible and the Dostoevsky paragraph was the cringiest shit I've ever seen. Whatever man wrote this shit should feel bad even if he did it as a joke.

[Anonymous No.20101780]

>>20101774
Check the user history, its some roastie

[Anonymous No.20101898]

>>20101728
Basically whores pretending to filter right wing men...

As if they ever filter anyone

[Anonymous No.20101912]

>>20101728
>Kant and Hegel is generally okay
Huge red flag on her run away and stay away https://youtu.be/mSCsfCNiGDQ

[Anonymous No.20101927]

>>20101761
>religious catholic feminist
ie not a Catholic
>the best human being I have never known
oops

[Anonymous No.20101958]

>>20101728
my favorite book is Don Quixote, what about me?

[Anonymous No.20102404]

>>20101728
I love retarded psycho women

[Anonymous No.20102413]

>>20101728
I chose to be forever alone back in high school after seeing the absolute state of women.

[Anonymous No.20102416]

>caring what a high school aged pupa thinks
Stay in the cocoon, little guy!

[Anonymous No.20102533]

>>20101746
lmao

[Anonymous No.20102539]

>The Restaurant at the End of the Universe
I passed, I think

[Anonymous No.20102552]

[Anonymous No.20102574]

I have seen this before and can proudly say that I will always choose the glory that was Rome over the touch of a woman.

[Anonymous No.20102588]

>>20101912
>Bishop Williamson
Absolutely based. Never expected to see him mentioned here.

[Anonymous No.20102591]

>>20101728
I asked tinder matches what the last book they read was and it was always smut romance novels

[Anonymous No.20102987]

>>20102552
>that's on him for being lied to

[Anonymous No.20103002]

>>20102552
>that is on him for being lied to

this is how the female brain works. The faster you realize, the better.

[Anonymous No.20103015]

>>20101746
Hah

[Anonymous No.20103018]

>>20101728
Dickenbros... we keep winning

[Anonymous No.20103028]

No woman read Mishima so that post was clearly written by a man pretending to be a woman.

[Anonymous No.20103030]

>>20101746
who could've guessed

[Anonymous No.20103046]

>>20102413
>chose

[Anonymous No.20103051]

>>20103002
>>20102987

[Anonymous No.20103053]

>>20103051

[Anonymous No.20103055]

>>20101728
Interesting tacit admission that female authors can't write books of universal appeal.

[Anonymous No.20103067]

>>20101728
I just say it's Twilight.

[Anonymous No.20103069]

>>20103002

[Anonymous No.20103082]

>>20101728
>For the love of Zeus this is why they shouldn't go to school.

[Anonymous No.20103087]

>>20103053
Yes. Not only they can, but they prefer that kind of man too.

[Anonymous No.20103090]

>>20101728
Filter for what? Women don't care about what books you read unless this is a date to marry kind of relationship, in which case there are more efficient filters. If she and her friend have used it to filter with success, then it sure sounds like they are still single and it hasn't actually accomplished anything.

[Anonymous No.20103092]

>>20101746
D E S T R O Y E D

[Anonymous No.20103102]

>>20101728
I-Is this r-real?
like is anyone really this stupid to use this in real life

why not just ask WHY someone likes a book
or ask about the last 3 books they've read
or about favorite authors
about favorites eras, genres, subjects, philosophies
There are so many things to ask and she decided instead of at least pretending to be interested to just assume random stuff based on a single book title named???

I refuse to believe that this is real

[Anonymous No.20103109]

>>20101728
>as for philosophy avoid anyone into Aristotle
Femoids can't handle my substance.

[Anonymous No.20103154]

>>20101728
As for philosophers, I think most german ones are red flags, except for Hegel and MAYBE some of the lefties. It's good to be careful with guys who read left wing or feminist theory though, since they might be lying about it.
Generally she's right though.

[Anonymous No.20103158]

>>20102552
Shit bait thread but this is literally why I stopped dating years ago and I'll likely never get in a relationship again.
They just lie and then tell you the truth a few months to a year in because they think at that point they're past some sort of "commitment threshold" where you'll just swallow it in the name of love, but then I instantly lose all attraction and affection for them and consider them like filth and THEY seethe at ME and we break up. This is because I am soft and accommodating on trivial matters like who gets to pick the movie for the night and other similar shit, so they get the impression I have no truly hard boundaries and they just start slipping this shit in. So not only I'm fucking upset because I wasted time on a public cocksleeve and a liar, I also have to endure this gratifying idea that because I love them and I take commitment seriously I'm some kind of doormat who will accept being lied to by a whore.
I imagine that if someone acts more strict and domineering overall he'll simply never know, but if you give the impression you have no guard up, this shit just starts pouring in. You can see the gears turning in her shitty whore head when they figure out that they made a bad calculation and they get mad because YOU gave them the impression that you'd let it pass. It fucking boggles my mind. Women are fucking subhuman.

[Anonymous No.20103165]

>>20103158
I didn't ask for poetry about how ugly you are.

[Anonymous No.20103166]

>>20101746
Positively wrecked

[Anonymous No.20103170]

>20103165
dilate your face with a shotgun

[Anonymous No.20103173]

>>20103090
Women generally don’t care about books period, and if she does and she likes you she will like whatever you’re into. Same reason why women get into bands, videogames, etc because of their boyfriends.
That bitch in OP is just LARPing. Remember nothing women say has any real weight to it and they will become much simpler to understand.

[Anonymous No.20103182]

>>20103158
Same. The dating market has considerably worsened in the last half decade. I don't really care how many guys a woman has slept with, but it will dictate how seriously I take the relationship. I'm not wifing or seriously dating a tramp.

[Anonymous No.20103184]

>>20103173
This. It's clearly just some thing she wrote for shits and giggles, probably didn't even expect it to be believed.

Women do like it if you read books (raises your status, shows that you're a sophisticated adult), but they don't care much *what* books you read.

[Anonymous No.20103191]

>>20101728
I think this is a man. If it’s a woman, I like her; she’s a great troll

[Anonymous No.20103204]

>>20103158
>>20103182
Beggars can't be choosers ;)

[Anonymous No.20103210]

>>20101728
People in this thread are debating whether or not this is an effective filter do not understand the MO for women.

This is not a genuine attempt to help other women, it is an attempt to keep them down. Women, far more than men, are actively jealous of other women. Instead of bettering themselves, they do everything in their power to drag down others. That's why you see so many washed up, overweight, feminist sycophants insisting on younger women sleeping around and putting of marriage despite the fact it has so clearly failed for them. The female mind is based in resentment and jealousy.

[Anonymous No.20103213]

>>20103204
ywnbaw

[Anonymous No.20103221]

>>20103213
You will never be loved by a woman

[Anonymous No.20103228]

>>20103213
I'm non binary btw

[Anonymous No.20103232]

>>20101728
>Praise Durant for giving "nuanced protrayal of history and always mentions the status of women of every civilization they discuss"
>No mention of Duby & Perrot
Why do Durantfags do this to themselves?

[Anonymous No.20103235]

>>20103221
that's for sure, women are incapable of it

[Anonymous No.20103241]

>>20101746
Oh my god that really puts things into perspective. Holy kek.

[Anonymous No.20103260]

>>20103235
women are incapable of loving you, just like your mom was

[Anonymous No.20103266]

>>20101746
>it's real

[Anonymous No.20103270]

>>20101761
>admits to being low value and unwilling to better themselves
>demands high value man
lmaooo the state of roasties

[Anonymous No.20103275]

>>20103184
>Women do like it if you read books (raises your status, shows that you're a sophisticated adult)
They really don’t. Reading books is seen as a non-social, loner activity, much like videogames. Unless you got some clout related to literature, i.e you are a semi-known author in some circle or at least a leading figure in a book club, they don’t care.
If a girl ever did say to you she likes that you read, she already liked you. Maybe it makes a good impression in a first date but nothing beyond that.

[Anonymous No.20103286]

>>20103260
You think you are clever.

[Anonymous No.20103290]

>>20103275
You're going off gay incel memes. Yes, women want you to have 'status, but their idea of status can be very broad. Being a respectable adult and having actual interests counts towards this, it's not just about social media clout.

[Anonymous No.20103297]

>>20101728
i fucking love redd*t

[Anonymous No.20103302]

>hegel is ok

[Anonymous No.20103317]

>>20103290
Not from memes, but from personal experience. I assure you just reading books adds zero to your status. It is literally irrelevant for them.

[Anonymous No.20103324]

>>20103275
I know several women who actually read. My mom was a big fan of Paul Auster and a few local Canadian authors. This list is bullshit, for instance:
>Pynchon
Why? Because he is controversial or because he attracts a certain type of man? He is extremely socially liberal and his followers that I've met are actually fairly nice.
>Chabon
I don't even get this at all.
>Vonnegut
Confuses me completely.

[Anonymous No.20103348]

>>20101746
Bruhhh

[Anonymous No.20103356]

>>20103275
What's your body count? If it's less than 5 please do not provide an opinion on what woman want.

[Anonymous No.20103357]

>>20103317
Assure all you want, faggot. I've actually been outside before.

[Anonymous No.20103366]

>>20101728
This ho mad because Foucault knew the truth.

[Anonymous No.20103375]

>>20101746
>botchedsurgeries

[Anonymous No.20103389]

>>20101728
>Favorite book is a tie between Moby-Dick and Paradise Lost
I'm guessing I passed?

[Anonymous No.20103394]

>>20103375
It's women making fun of other women who got lip and boobjobs. Very nasty stuff.

[Anonymous No.20103405]

>>20101728
Based Will and Ariel Durant enjoyer. I think these seem like pretty reasonable rules of thumb. Nothing I’ve really actively been reading is mentioned here. I think if someone asked me about my favorite book on a date I’d probably just say EO Wilson’s Social Conquest of Earth.

[Anonymous No.20103469]

>>20103405
I think EO Wilson is a bad guy now, he might have said something about race once

[Anonymous No.20103548]

>>20103469
Probably. Most normies don’t know who he is or care, though. I’ve brought it up in the past when asked about books on dates, and it usually opens the door for some inane Joe Rogan-type conversation about how we fucking love science or how evolution and sociobiology are le crazy. Most normies have some thoughts about this stuff they don’t often get an opportunity to share. One thing I’ve learned is that when people ask about your interests, they’re really looking for an opportunity to talk about their own.

[Anonymous No.20103565]

my asian girlfriend doesn't read books, she just plays video games and takes baths.

[Anonymous No.20103567]

>>20101728
>if his favourite book is the great Gatsby he probably hasn’t read since highschool
Kek this is true and I use this exact criteria on girls when I ask them what their favourite books are
>do you pass the test
Yes and most of these criteria are good, especially being wary of people too into scifi and fantasy and seeing HP faggots as immature. Unfortunately my favourite book being Moby-Dick might out the fact that I’m bisexual.
I like Aristotle and Nietzsche but they aren’t my favourite philosophers let alone the writers of my favourite books so it wouldn’t come up.

[Anonymous No.20103570]

>>20103394
>women

[Anonymous No.20103573]

>>20102413
You're not fooling anyone.

[Anonymous No.20103583]

>>20103567
>Unfortunately my favourite book being Moby-Dick might out the fact that I’m bisexual.
>haha Moby Dick is le gay xD

what’s up with this trend of coomers and women projecting homoeroticism into every depiction of male companionship?

[Anonymous No.20103615]

>>20103583
They read as far as the title.

[Anonymous No.20103621]

>>20101774
FDS is mostly old and/or black women

[Anonymous No.20103678]

>>20103109
What's so cool about Aristotle? I myself prefer Plato, and i have read the complete works of both

[Anonymous No.20103693]

>>20101728
Extremely based, love grils, seethe retards

[Anonymous No.20103697]

>>20101774
My personal favorite was this (alleged) woman claiming she never puts out, never 'goes steady' (she dates multiple men at a time), and obviously never picks up the check. "She" claimed that this works and all these 'high value males' desperately simp for her out of the hope of one day marrying her, after which point she will give them the puss-puss.

[Anonymous No.20103698]

>>20103260
>claiming to speak for all people of your gender (a massive portion of the world population)
I am not him, but you are behaving stupidly. Stop saying such things.

[Anonymous No.20103710]

>>20103698
No

[Anonymous No.20103711]

>>20101728
>(unless you're into Harry Potter yourself, then I'm sorry)

[Anonymous No.20103714]

>>20101746
Oh no no no no femcel sisters, not like this

[Anonymous No.20103718]

>>20101764
>les elites want fewer people!!!!
curious how "they" let the world arrive at 7 billion to begin with, how they entrenched reproductive rights as human rights and how it's easier and safer than it has ever been to keep your progeny alive from disease and hunger.

[Anonymous No.20103722]

>>20101912
I doubt women are looking for the kind of trad cath larper that watch and agree with this shit

[Anonymous No.20103725]

>>20103718
>how they entrenched reproductive rights as human rights
holy shit you're retarded

[Anonymous No.20103734]

>>20103165
You are a woman

[Anonymous No.20103737]

>>20103583
>haha Moby Dick is le gay xD
Yes, it is. Queequeg and Ishmael’s relationship is purely a strong friendship and not homoerotic but A Squeeze Of The Hand is the gayest/most homoerotic thing ive ever read.
> Squeeze! squeeze! squeeze! all the morning long; I squeezed that sperm till I myself almost melted into it; I squeezed that sperm till a strange sort of insanity came over me; and I found myself unwittingly squeezing my co-laborers’ hands in it, mistaking their hands for the gentle globules. Such an abounding, affectionate, friendly, loving feeling did this avocation beget; that at last I was continually squeezing their hands, and looking up into their eyes sentimentally; as much as to say,- Oh! my dear fellow beings, why should we longer cherish any social acerbities, or know the slightest ill-humor or envy! Come; let us squeeze hands all round; nay, let us all squeeze ourselves into each other; let us squeeze ourselves universally into the very milk and sperm of kindness.
>Would that I could keep squeezing that sperm for ever! For now, since by many prolonged, repeated experiences, I have perceived that in all cases man must eventually lower, or at least shift, his conceit of attainable felicity; not placing it anywhere in the intellect or the fancy; but in the wife, the heart, the bed, the table, the saddle, the fire-side; the country; now that I have perceived all this, I am ready to squeeze case eternally. In thoughts of the visions of the night, I saw long rows of angels in paradise, each with his hands in a jar of spermaceti.

[Anonymous No.20103739]

>>20103734
I take offense to that

[Anonymous No.20103744]

>>20103725
Can you forcibly sterilize people, you mong?

[Anonymous No.20103761]

>>20103744
"Reproductive rights" means abortion, they support the right to kill unborn children. Eugenics has never been a serious discussion either way, it's plain retarded to suggest that it's because of globohomo that you aren't allowed to go around forcefully sterilizing people. Government-mandated sterilization has only ever been practiced in a local and experimental capacity and stopped because regular people legitimately don't support it.

[Anonymous No.20103764]

>>20101746
>survivinginfidelity
>botchedsurgeries
>childfree
>instagramreality
>raisedbynarcissists
>deadbedrooms
>breakups
There is a god, and he has a damn fine sense of humor

[Anonymous No.20103768]

>>20101769
I've only read fight club and a christmas carol. I liked them both. I started tale of two cities, and I liked it, but I never got through it.

[Anonymous No.20103785]

>>20103737
>Queequeg and Ishmael’s relationship is purely a strong friendship and not homoerotic

I don't get how you understand this and still think its le epicly gay. This wouldn't have struck Melville or any of his contemporary readers as gay, so I don't see why coomer postmodern interpreters of Moby Dick feel justified in projecting their gay fantasies into the text.

[Anonymous No.20103789]

can you imagine fucking a girl for free. literally making her cum and not even wanting to be paid for it.
Can you imagine literally spending your own money to accommodate a woman and making her feel at home, having a lavish life full of sex and pleasures.

I wonder what would happen to society if men stopped putting women on a pedestal

Girls are NPC because men around them keep telling them they are smart and perfect, men solve their daily problems free of charge and the grils keep thinking they are awesome since they do have an easy life, but girls dont see that this easy life is given to them by their orbiters.

[Anonymous No.20103816]

>>20101774
I had the same theory. It had to be some incel trolls keeping that sub alive and perhaps that is the case to an extent but it's also full of jaded women over 30 so who knows what's real and what it isn't

[Anonymous No.20103817]

>>20103785
>>20103737
>why should we longer cherish any social acerbities, or know the slightest ill-humor or envy! Come; let us squeeze hands all round; nay, let us all squeeze ourselves into each other; let us squeeze ourselves universally into the very milk and sperm of kindness.

It's also a sad post-sexual revolution development that a line like this is now considered to suggest erotic desire. I can't help but feel that the social relationships between heterosexual men have been to some degree impoverished by coomers relentlessly sexualizing their expressions of platonic affection.

[Anonymous No.20103959]

>>20103817
He’s making a point about human community rather than a point about human sexuality but that doesn’t change that the way he is doing it is certainly homoerotic
>>20103785
I don’t think “the whole novel is gay” or whatever but to claim that “a squeeze of the hand” lacks any kind any kind of homoeroticism is delusional. Queequeg and Ishmaels relationship doesn’t seem homoerotic to me because there is no aspect of it that is homoerotic, there isn’t a line in those chapters about how sexy queequeg is or something in the way that in a squeeze of the hand Melville describes squeezing “white globules” of “sperm” with his fellow men, I don’t think there are any gay relationships between characters in the book but that doesn’t preclude homoeroticism if there is something as blatant as squeeze of the hand. Queequeg and Ishmael share a common humanity despite their external differences, I’m not shipping characters like a teenage girl, I’m pointing out some obviously erotic prose.
Melville knew why spermaceti was called spermaceti and he wasn’t retarded enough to see absolutely nothing suspect about “squeezing white globules of sperm”. His overall point wasn’t about anything sexual but he expressed it in a sexual way.

[Anonymous No.20104121]

>>20101746
Sometimes this website gives a few whitepills

[Anonymous No.20104130]

>>20101745
ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
so fucking true

[Anonymous No.20104141]

>>20103959
according to postmodernism anything can be gay
it's just tedious nonsense
there's plenty of gay lit just go read it

[Anonymous No.20104183]

>>20103051

[Anonymous No.20104197]

while it's vaguely relevant, what's the best english translation of brothers karamazov? warosu is the worst archive and doesn't even allow search by term anymore

[Anonymous No.20104212]

>>20104183
Why do they call it oven when you of in the cold food of out hot eat the food?

[Anonymous No.20104218]

>>20101912
>>20102588
Here is the timestamp btw for kant and hegel https://youtu.be/mSCsfCNiGDQ?t=470
>>20103722
not larping brother but we don't want those abominable women in our lives lol, you seculars can keep your 105 body count std ridden sluts >>20102552 keep them away from us and good riddance :^)

[Anonymous No.20104241]

>>20101774
NOOOOOO women couldnt possibly be retarded

[Anonymous No.20104264]

>>20104241
They aren't creative or lucid enough to come up with these, giving them credit is overestimating them.

[Anonymous No.20104271]

>>20103158
If you act more strict and domineering, you might attract trad women who aren't sluts.

[Anonymous No.20104277]

>>20104197
then use a different archive, genius

[Anonymous No.20104288]

>>20101728
I love how she didn't even bother to give the slighest reason why you should ditch people who like certain authors .

[Anonymous No.20104293]

>>20103286
well he's not wrong

[Anonymous No.20104299]

>>20101728
>implying women read anything other than Buzzfeed

[Anonymous No.20104300]

>>20101958
You are a funny guy

[Anonymous No.20104305]

>>20101728
My favorite book is Eternal Champion.
What am I?

[Anonymous No.20104321]

>>20101728
>>20101746
Why do they do it to themselves? It's moronically easy for women to get a man but they do everything in their power to become lonely and miserable

[Anonymous No.20104334]

god i hate humans

[Anonymous No.20104335]

>>20104321
it's true i'll go fo any woman between the ages of 22 thru 86 fat skinny or ugly

[Anonymous No.20104340]

>>20103768
Dickens is probably good, one of the best, I just can't make myself be interested. Atwood is probably OK too. I read the Penelopiad by Atwood, SH-5 by Vonnegut, and Invisible Monsters by Palahnuk.

[Anonymous No.20104351]

>>20103324
>Because he is controversial
Why is he controversial?
I'm also curious on why they choose him when it's probably one of the most "intellectual" authors a guy could choose. So that's a good thing, right?

[Anonymous No.20104361]

>>20104321
Women are taught during the entire lives that they all deserve a tall, handsome smart guy with a six figure salary just by existing.

[Anonymous No.20104363]

>>20101746
Kek brilliant.
The incel ones usually just have a load of anime/game sub overlap so at least those guys have an escape and aren't just constantly torturing themselves.

[Anonymous No.20104370]

>>20103959
He’s dwelling on the physical dimension and ecstasy of platonic affection, and you’re equating this with homoeroticism. Homoeroticism refers specifically to erotic desire, which you agree isn’t present here. Not everything related to the body or corporeal sensation is inherently sexual.

[Anonymous No.20104397]

>>20101728
If my wife and I followed this advice we'd never have made it. She read every kind of fiction, but dislikes the Western Canon and especially melville. She reads lots of true murder, romance, and contemporary crap. She like's regional authors, scottish, german, etc.

I read everything historical 19th century, and mostly avoid 20th century, the pedos of history, and have read more on Nazis, philosophy and such that this person couldn't stand it.

Wife and i are almost at 2 decades together with 2.7 kids.
'
Sometimes it's nice to have different interests.

[Anonymous No.20104404]

>>20101728
Who cares

[Anonymous No.20104563]

>>20101746
destroyed

[Anonymous No.20104570]

>>20103761
>"Reproductive rights" means abortion
ok, so you're just ignorant.

[Anonymous No.20104574]

>>20104397
You are both low IQ plebs

[Anonymous No.20104578]

>>20101728
No it doesn't

[Anonymous No.20104580]

>>20104321
Because just like male incels, femcels don't want a regular guy who love them, they want a popular Chad.

[Anonymous No.20104585]

>>20104570
No he's right

[Anonymous No.20104591]

>>20103051
I disagree. Sex should always be transactional, and consent should lie with the man

[Anonymous No.20104616]

>>20101746
> surviving infidelity
> dating over 30/40
> botched surgeries
I had a feeling feminists were basically female incels. It brings me no joy, though. It's just more damaged, alienated people bitter about life's treatment of them.

[Anonymous No.20104631]

>>20104397
>2.7 kids
you wanted us to ask about this

[Anonymous No.20104653]

>>20104321
It really isn't if you're an old, ugly and bitter woman.

[Anonymous No.20104657]

If the members of /r/femaledatingstrategy and 4chan all just lowered their standards, they could all pair up and everyone would finally be happy and feel loved :)

[Anonymous No.20104667]

Why do people who are unsuccessful at dating always make these elaborate filters for imaginary suitors?

[Anonymous No.20104712]

this is all a joke.
ever since Female Dating Strategy got exposed on 4chan I can no longer believe in any geniune sincereity or authenticity coming out of any of these posts.
the probabililty that they are a troon, a troll, or a cunt looking for meme points seems much more likely now that r/female dating strategy is a thing.
if it is sincere its some cunt engligh lit major who inherently is feminist becuase that who she wants to read, but not only does she wasnt to read female authors, she wants to read GOOD female authors and she is angry about it, and refuses to date anyone until she finds a female author actually worth reading.


this person sounds more like a conservitard boomer veteran trying to shitpost on female dating strategy in hopes that his daughter doen't grow up fucking hippie dudes while in college.

[Anonymous No.20104723]

>>20104271
I act the way I act you nochin fuckface, God I fucking hate armchair PUAs here who read a couple faggot books and think they got life figured out. There are are no submissive virgin trad women outside of your stupid alpha-omega anime idea of the world, people in the end just cope with marrying a whore because that's what society shapes them to be in the West in the current fucking year. This is the reality you acknowledge when you have to do with married people, successful people with normal personalities and good jobs and a good standing in society, who are more assertive than stupid fucks like you, who are more intelligent and skilled than retarded armchair mongrels who LARP on 4chan. People just cope. They coped decades ago, and now you have to swallow so much of this bitter shit it simply isn't worth it. One day one of you fucks will quip at me like this and I swear I'll fucking bend you over and fuck you in the ass.

[Anonymous No.20104751]

>>20103204
Just get rid of consent and beggars CAN be choosers

[Anonymous No.20104763]

>>20103621
>or black women
Fr they basically caused inkwells to exist

[Anonymous No.20104766]

>>20104667
It's fairly simple really - so as to deflect the blame for their lack of success onto their 'inadequate' partners and away from themselves.

[Anonymous No.20104771]

>>20104667
I dunno I just want cuteness and loyalty. A little intelligence couldn't hurt either. That's basically it and all I attract is whores

[Anonymous No.20104797]

I love Pynchon

[Anonymous No.20104909]

>>20104585
I assume you don't have a law degree. I do. I know more about rights than you can comprehend in your little lay mind.

[Anonymous No.20104933]

>>20104570
In the way that everyone uses them, that is exactly what it means. Apart your your retarded post, it is never used to mean "the right to not be forcefully sterilized"

[Anonymous No.20104940]

>>20104909
I have two law degrees, one from Harvard and one from Yale.

[Anonymous No.20104943]

>>20101728
>pessimistic misanthrope
I love Tolstoy, and I suppose I do have misanthropic tendencies, but these two things aren't related.

[Anonymous No.20104948]

>>20104723
Legendary level of cope and seethe going on here. He was just telling you to be more dominant, simple and good advice.