[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 58 KB, 451x680, 7C765222-31A4-4379-A032-A8015FBD9E6B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22010983 No.22010983 [Reply] [Original]

Long shot, but does anyone here unironically read feminist theory? If you do, recommend works you've enjoyed lately. I'll post some of mine

>> No.22010999
File: 25 KB, 322x500, 6B1C59D4-FCE4-4CB4-A73B-85853AA97724.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22010999

Read pic related in high school but I got filtered hard by her fiction

>> No.22011000

>>22010983
ahh!! boobies

>> No.22011010
File: 31 KB, 453x677, 6109D50C-3110-4468-8291-574FE789A016.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22011010

>> No.22011013

>>22010999
my favourite bit of this was where she went to the cool boys college and had a fucking nice meal with good wine and then they had a cool chat, then she went to the shitty women's college and had a less good meal and was like "how are women meant to write as well as men without good sauternes??"
i think about it every time i drink sauternes

>> No.22011029
File: 34 KB, 486x631, B142F08B-E06F-4B84-BF72-D0D2CD5390C0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22011029

banger desu

>> No.22011529

I have no problem with feminism, but I think the general focus on “bodies” in anthropology and the humanities is really pathetic. Every article I’ve read with a focus on “bodies” is just poorly researched and anachronistic diatribe about modern sexism. So nah, I’m gonna pass on this one, sorry

>> No.22011855

Does Ayn Rand count?

>> No.22012108

Sorry, formalism/new criticism only for me, no problem with feminist theory though

>> No.22012309
File: 24 KB, 600x576, booba.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22012309

>>22010983

>> No.22012421

The Second Sex is good, everything else is not so interesting