[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 43 KB, 749x946, question-mark1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
446886 No.446886 [Reply] [Original]

X knows that p IFF
(i) X believes that p;
(ii) it is true that p ; and
(iii) X is justified in believing that p (if X does)

X believes that p IFF
X thinks that p is true.

>> No.446894

that's logic, not philosophy

>> No.446896

Hmmm.... you might try /sci/. I haven't touched logic in a year.

>> No.446898

And?

>> No.446900

not doing your homework for you

>> No.446902

justified and true belief, but where are you going with it?

>> No.446904

>>446894
Erm logic is philosophy

>> No.446906

>>446886

The only thing I know about this is it ain't true. Russell's counterexamples, or something.

>> No.446919

>>446894
That's why it comes straight out of a Philosophy 101 text book that specifically says that it doesn't cover the idea of logic because it's an entirely different course.

>> No.446921

>>446902
Just wanted to write it out and see what people came up out of it

>> No.446928

>>446921
epistemology is really boring and dry, not to mention pretty terrible philosophy.

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-analysis/#JTB

away you go

>> No.446934

>>446928
Danke