[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 47 KB, 304x315, Top_lel.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5801843 No.5801843[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

What is /lit/'s opinion about /pol/?

>> No.5801855

Everyone here hates you

>> No.5801865

>>5801843
People speak ignorantly and don't shut up when wrong or proved ignorant, which they do by opening their mouth

>> No.5801882

Everything wrong with "SJW" culture can be found in equal measure on /pol/: intellectual dishonesty, ressentiment, refusal to engage with facts, ideology masquerading as compassion, etc.

That said, there's an appeal to reading the board every once in a while in the same way there's an appeal to skimming through Weekly World News while waiting in line at the grocery store. It's an entertaining relief valve to what is, for the most part, completely justified frustration.

>> No.5801885

>>5801843
/pol/ is only relevant if they can back up their claims and in most cases they can.

/lit/ gets assblasted because the majority our the posters go to liberal schools who have already been indoctrinated into accepting a multicultural society.

If you notice /lit/ doesn't do well when arguing with /pol/. Their users resort to attacking the person rather than the argument. And with a flurry of buzzworded insults they fall from using logic to using emotion as their main source of inspiration.

>>5801865
This child right here is a perfect example. Whenever someone tries to prove /pol/ to be ignorant in their claims they always have a multitude of data and sources.

/lit/ on the other hand just has the words of their liberal professors and interactions with other races in a safe setting at their campus.