[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 21 KB, 250x192, 1278796579963.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR] No.896633 [Reply] [Original]

You authors will never reach /sci/'s intellectual capacity. Enjoy being the board with the 2nd highest intelligence.

>> No.896641

Joey Wheelah

>> No.896645

In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is King.

>> No.896651

maths too boring.

>>896645
that's deep brah

>> No.896657

I'm not a big /lit/ poster but I have been unimpressed by /sci/'s content. For example, I just clicked on the board and the first topic was "what is the deal with flat-chested girls?"

>> No.896668

>Implying humans can fathom intellectual measurement

>> No.896671

>go to /sci/
>First five threads:
What's the deal with flat-chested girls?
What do the high school youngsters think of religion and atheism?
Religion vs. Atheism
Hey /sci/, will this fly? (w/ troll OP image)
I'm looking for a good /sci/-fi movie.

A regular Oxford love fest you lot are.

>> No.896672

Once all scientific projects have been adequately completed, come and see us. We are working on other things.

>> No.896674

/sci/ are silly bitches.

>> No.896678

-0/10

>> No.896684
File: 129 KB, 884x516, tartuffery.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

Typical threads on /sci/

>> No.896685

wow, you think just because you visit /sci/ your IQ immediately raises?

we don't brag about our intellectual capacity, because it is shown in the threads you post, and this thread is retarded

>> No.896683

>>896629
wWw.ＡnOＬOＬtAＬＫ.ｓＥ reｐｌａCＥ ｌＯL_ｗItＨ_ｎ
voufqbphggvztq rlnwjsj mvei hoeoasw wmbuqhm

>> No.896682

What does literature have? THE BIBLE?

Science has THE FACTS.

>> No.896687
File: 12 KB, 400x400, 1278775162079.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>896682

>> No.896688

>>896682
troll detected

>> No.896699
File: 15 KB, 251x242, 1278542198951.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>Implying higher IQ = Smarter
>Implying being smart in sciences and math is the same thing as being smart in literature
>Implying I didn't just get doubles

>> No.896700

>>896682
0/10
Even idiots on /sci/ know that Carl Sagan, their hero, wrote several books.

>> No.896707

>>896699
>6699?

listen to this man for he is a messiah

>> No.896758 [DELETED] 

>>896755

>> No.896757

>>896707
he got doubles

>> No.896755

>>896699
>>implying competence doesn't depend on interest in the subject + natural intelligence

>> No.896759

>>896755

>implying there's such a thing as natural intelligence

>> No.896760

>>896755
>natural intelligence
nope.mp4

>> No.896771 [DELETED] 

I've browsed both /lit/ and /sci/, and found the former to be utter shit. Nothing but trolls, and would-be scientist college-age idiots that couldn't solve a basic electrostatics problem if their life depended on it. I love how they feel qualified to talk about advanced subjects like dark matter and string theory.

>> No.896781 [DELETED] 

I've browsed both /lit/ and /sci/, and found the former to be utter shit. Nothing but trolls, /b/tards, and would-be scientist college-age idiots that couldn't solve a basic electrostatics problem if their life depended on it. I love how they feel qualified to talk about advanced subjects like dark matter and string theory.

>> No.896779

silly troll, everyone knows /b/ has the highest intelligence

>> No.896780

>>896771
i totally agree. lit can't solve a differential equation if their lives depend on it.

>> No.896783

obvious troll is obvious.

>> No.896785

>>896781
not sure if troll....

>> No.896787

>>896781
>former
>latter

>> No.896788 [DELETED] 

>>896781
Cool story, butthurt /sci/fag.

>> No.896791

I've browsed both /lit/ and /sci/, and found the latter to be utter shit. Nothing but trolls, /b/tards, and would-be scientist college-age idiots that couldn't solve a basic electrostatics problem if their life depended on it. I love how they feel qualified to talk about advanced subjects like dark matter and string theory.

>>896780
>implying differential equations isn't entry-level stuff for an aspiring scientist

>> No.896801

>>896791
nah, never implied that.

>> No.896836

>>896759
>>896760
What is this, the 19th century? I suppose you believe in free will too?

>> No.897220
File: 17 KB, 251x242, 1278772467856.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>896836

>> No.897227

IMPLYING SCIENCE HAS FACTS TO DISPROVE THE EXISTENCE OF A DEITY.

>> No.897268

all you are doing is glossing over theories that have already been created by minds more competent than your own....

guess what! It doesn't take a genius to repeat something someone else has said

>> No.897319

sage for trollbgone