/lit/ - Literature

>>6536302

>Capitalism is the best system though.

>>6536288
>>6536278

It has a goal though, and it's a pretty obvious goal. Oil, guns, and cash forever. There's plenty of ideological bullshit to back the geopolitical maneuvering that's been going on for quite a while to destabilize the entire region and using Israel as the proxy in the region, since the countries around Israel that are the target of said ideological judgement hate Israel for historical reasons.

It all just feeds itself and 9/11 was the boiling point and the excuse to establish a PERMANENT military presence there, to support the Post-Cold-War weapons manufacturing industry.

The occupation isn't there for "no reason", it's there because it's immensely profitable and strategic for them to stay, you can defend it pretty well too. It's pretty much Capitalism all the way down.

>>6523884

Damn at least try better at not sounding pretentious when you're accusing something of being pretentious.

Fuck Modernism and fuck the economy suck my dick

>>6519091

I give you points for trying but it lacks the confidence. I can tell you put some thought into it, instead of naturally allowing it to flow out your ass.

>>6519089

you're making Alan Jackson sweat

>>6519079

I got you even better fam

Boots and Cats
Boots and Cats

>>6519079

>>6519065

Right now, type a lyric you think can surpass Riff. Let's hear it. I'm waiting. Clock's ticking.

>>6519050

I'm inclined to agree.

>>6517434

>no. I mean you defend the baltimore riots saying things like all policemen should be shot

I apologize for not being a liberal. Tell me, what else would you like?

Muffins?

>>6517442

So? Your answer is to make it even worse? Congratulations on achieving your goal.

>>6517396

>tumbllr-tier

You mean someone was skeptical of your claims for once.

>>6517397

Because it's irritating and it's worse post quality than you think I could ever deliver.

>>6517385

>All it proves

Prove it's me.

>>6517368

Is pepe a chinless man?

>>6517370

Prove it's me.

>>6517371

I irritated white nationalists and now they're accusing me of chin theft.

>>6517359

Alright. Now what?

>>6517352

Then if you "know it's me" what have you proven? Let's say I made a twitter account to "save face" on 4chan of all places.

So...? What? What would be your next course of action? What you're trying to do here doesn't have a lot of elegance or strategy.

>>6517325

Let me introduce you to Christian Torres.

He has long since left Soundcloud and sm3na, but he had an account on both you can look at cached. Both accounts went by the name TheAntlers.

So, adding it all up, I can assume you post on /mu/, saw a black person post their photo who enjoys The Antlers, and assumed it was me.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Xav7m3FebAMJ:sm3na.is/artist/theantler+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Not only that, but here's his fucking twitter.

https://twitter.com/Christopher_01_

He's an aspiring Music Producer. And almost nothing he posts is philosophically similar to me, especially in regards to civil rights.

And here's his bandcamp!

https://cptkiddo.bandcamp.com/

He lives in Pennsylvania!

Not San Diego.

>>6517285

You know you have too much time on your hands when you think I made an elaborate conspiracy to prove that I'm not the person you stalked so I can make you look embarrassing.

Maybe you just post the same photo over and over again in an attempt for it to sick as memeology

>>6517291

>Most people who have opinions on 4chan have opinions you would expect from its audience IE anyone can post and anyone can have an opinion. Including people you generally wouldn't want to be around.

If you're someone anyone would want to be around, you don't have to worry, or be offended for them.

>>6517265

Most people who have opinions on 4chan have opinions you would expect from its audience IE anyone can post and anyone can have an opinion. Including people you generally wouldn't want to be around.

>>6517235

Moral directly follows with Morale though. You can't have a productive force without dealing with ethics.

Are you saying ethics are an avoidable subject?

>>6517237

Ah yes. Such contributors to liberationist thought like Anita, and such contributors to any thought as the people who obsess over every liberal statement she makes.

>>6517227

It's been consensus among Marxists for over a century.

It comes to the point of certain "resistances" being in place to grant bare minimum needs or needs of the privileged classes. Basically, first world white feminism is totally isolated from direct material problem and it shows.

>>6517200

"The cry for an equality of wages rests, therefore, upon a mistake, is an inane wish never to be fulfilled. It is an offspring of that false and superficial radicalism that accepts premises and tries to evade conclusions. Upon the basis of the wages system the value of labouring power is settled like that of every other commodity; and as different kinds of labouring power have different values, or require different quantities of labour for their production, they must fetch different prices in the labour market. To clamour for equal or even equitable retribution on the basis of the wages system is the same as to clamour for freedom on the basis of the slavery system. What you think just or equitable is out of the question. The question is: What is necessary and unavoidable with a given system of production?"