/lit/ - Literature

>>6022535
the federal reserve will just print more money, duh

>>6022530
no
u
checkem

>>6022514
>>6022518
the word as no meaning

individual
the sole unit, sole being
no false collective

>>5997601
IRA training. He fights for God and Country.

>tfw no Paradise to check my dubs

>>5997520
no
u

>>5997512
/pol/ friendly info graph?

>>5997504
rollin wit dat OC

>>5997484
reroll
memes to the dub gods

>>5997477
>>5997477
nice dubs
rollin

>>5997461
I like you. Let's be friends.

>>5997382
>You seem to be arguing that the existence of subjectivity means that every person's desires are completely random, with no relation to reason or reality.
Not at all, I am arguing that equality is categorically impossible because of subjective value and desire.
>Essentially everyone wants to be able to live without worrying about basic necessities of survival and be fairly rewarded for the work they do.
How would you know?
>The fact that not everyone seeks vast wealth does not make it just for the few who have it to wield inordinate power over most of society.
Why?

You seem to be clinging to self defeating dogma in an attempt to place a band aid on the existential crisis.

>>5997330
What if one doesn't want your 'initial material conditions' (whatever the fuck that means), but wants more? Or less? Or something entirely different?

And how could equality exist if you are Caesar and I am a hobo?

>>5997320
Perhaps one has no need, or little need for money. He lives a moderate a lifestyle subsisting off game and crops he plants; but another man desires a Ferrari, real estate, and Filet Mignon for every meal. They both have different value and have different means of obtaining their desires. Would the latter man be oppressing the former? Would this relationship be unfair?

>>5997315
>>5997304
>Objective value
Utilize my ballsack faggot. Suckling those tender testicles would bring us both pleasure and therefore increase net utility.

>>5997302
I will never be equal to you, I am not you. Inequality is non-quantifiable, how could you possibly 'reduce' it? Maybe one wants to be Caesar, and another Diogenes, and another Jesus. How could you possibly reconcile these men into equals?

>>5997283

Egalitarianism is an impossibility. Two separate and distinct units cannot be equal to each other.

There is no such thing as fair. What is fair to me might not be fair to you. Hence subjective value.

One man's caviar is another man's pizza is another man's rice and cabbage. Idiot.

"Women are good for one thing, cooking, cleaning, and vagina."

Shopenhair

>>5912891
>>5912731
whoops. forgot trip.

How is your holiday going, kitty?

>>5912442
The scene where he demonstrates the light bulb to the scholars. I found it amusing.

judeo-christian morality reductio ad absurdum

>>5912256
>he says, while posting in a meta thread

>>5912395
Fountainhead was enjoyable enough