/lit/ - Literature

>>5025323
they, the murders, didn't have to happen but it gives the incessantly nonsensical diatribe depth as opposed to something that is blatantly trying to not be literal.

>i'm drunk, if this doesn't make sense try to get the gist of what you think i was trying to say.

/pol/: a novel

>it was the jews, niggers and mudslimes were involved

The Green in our Johns

>Gumby is miniaturized and gets lost in the hamper of the universe's most evil blockhead.

Putting Out The Fireflies

>An American fighter pilot, during the second world war, follows around a brother and sister duo across Japan, destroying every city they visit, until radiation eventually kill the sister.

>>4991728
i disagree, Bukowski sounds exacly like a drunken friend describing his exploits in the most simplistic way.

>>4991643
people talk with a style to the language. same with writing.

>>4989705
>singling me out

I say, i do think someone has grown fond of me. I always did have a thing for acne-addled hambeasts.

i think he's quite dashing

doesn't make me like him any more

>>4989595
>taking the bait
>i'll bite

men are busy being students of life and and generally doing things that can support one. that's why the best writers have careers outside of writing. they have experienced something of the world and use it.

>>4972862
okay, fuck it, last one...

>context
nigga, do you know this?

also,
>>/r9k/

>>4972871
so, you would have preferred i said "to be ostentatious"
lrn2context, you autistic faggot.

let's try the autist test: i'm out, my work day is done and i'm off to the bar, i am telling you that i will not read your response. if you respond, you are autistic, if you need an explanation as to why that is, you are autistic.

let /lit/ see the autism flow through you, i'm out

>>4972822
oh god, you're serious...

ostentatious is the definition of pretension, which is why i used it when defining these terms for you.

why am i feeding this autistic fuck?

unless you've something of substance to say, i will no longer respond.

i think you'll do better here, mate /r9k/

this thread
>dead/dying

other thread
>shit

>>4972778
so close

>>4972774
>precocious - adj
>pretension - n
pray tell

>>4972781
>not understanding a hyperbolic insult
>not realizing it to mean one's pretension to have been developed from an early age

please be trolling, anon; i refuse to believe people are this dumb

>>4972476
*samuel delaney

>>4972728
>having developed early
>ostentatious
pray tell

>>4972681
it was asked rhetorically but thanks for the confirmation.

places like /lit/ need to stop promoting mediocre shit. the hollywood empire does enough of that.

>>4972695
>>4972703
can't tell if precocious pretension or too ignorant to spot a joke.

>>4971540
no, just the mind of aterrible writer

>>4971546
>>4971552
is there no justice for tradition and respect for our written language?

>>4971553
>>4971565
nothing wrong with lace panties.

>>4971568
>>4971583
so, you wanted a bullshit justification for horrible writing?

>>4972115
haha what? now, i must re-read it in TC voice.

>>4972537
kind of

>>4972549
eschew magniloquent obfuscation, faggot

>>4965490
*refrain

>fixed

>>4965483
why? that i cannot answer.

because it sells, i guess.

>>4962109
back

>>4962226
he was a loathsome degenerate but which one of us isn't?

>>4962357
>>4962359
>>4962362
>>4962363
samefag

>>4964054
everything is worth a read, even if it isn't very good.

>>4964089
ever read the books?

>>4964179
is a superiority-complex needed to dislike a novel with a story even more simplistic than the writing?

>devoid of actual criticism and commentary
how about this:
>he did not live, he drank
>he did not love, he whored
>he did not write, he noted

we, as a literary society (retain from laughter) must at least pretend to promote literature and need to stop praising mediocrity

a friend of mine translates classics (mostly public domain stuff, but also some contemporary stuff) into klingon, prints and binds them, (mostly fine binding but at times, if requested, hard cover) and sells them at star trek conventions.

>>4965369
i am not saying it is right that they are spying. however, there is no alternative in the digital age. records exist, deletion is not permanent, anyone (L337 H4x0rs) can view this info.

also, none of this cyberspace shit is necessary, people use the web for its ease. how about we use it less and less, diminishing their profits, to force them into figure out a true user-friendly platform.until then, you know you're being watched, use at your own risk. again, it isn't right but that's how it is

>>4965400
perfection cannot exist objectively. the question was one's own ideal of a utopia to which i answered. in my utopia i am, at the very least, not with naught but with something.

>>4965370
have you anything worthwhile to contribute, anything with substance?

>>4965334
>*trout
fixed