/lit/ - Literature

>>13012738

ENDING AN ORIGINAL POST WITH A SACRILEGIOUS CITATION BY A LITERARILY OVERRATED, ATHEISTIC, JEW, IS AN ATROCIOUS WAY OF STARTING A THREAD.

«NOS, EL LIBRO DE LA RESURRECCIÓN» ES SU MAGNVM OPVS.

>>13011665

THAT IS SOMETHING THAT VIRTUALLY EVERYONE DOES, NOT ONLY DANIEL DEFOE IN «ROBINSON CRUSOE»; IT IS ONE OF THOSE IDIOMATIC FIGURES THAT MOST INDIVIDUALS USE ROTELY.

IF THAT ONLINE ENTERTAINMENT SERVICE COMPANY WERE INTEGRALLY JUST, ITS NAME WOULD NOT BE «NETFLIX», BUT, RATHER, «CINEWEB».

>>13010005

SAULINE DOCTRINE IS A JUDAIZED PERVERSION OF JESUS' DOCTRINE; JUDEOCHRISTIANITY IS A JEWIFIED CORRUPTION OF CHRISTIANITY.

>>13009926

EXCELLENT POST; IMPROVE YOUR SYNTAX THOUGH.

DEISM IS INTELLECTUALIZED DEMIOURGISM.

>>13009647

RESEARCH: MICROCHIMERIZATION.

READ: «THEOZOOLOGY» BY JÖRG LANZ VON LIEBENFELS.

>«Every man should avoid marrying a woman who has whored around a lot if he wants to generate descendents [SIC]. The male semen has an effect on the woman such that the child, even when it comes from a legitimate father, still inherits characteristics from all those men with whom the wife has had premarital or extramarital intercourse. It is for this reason that the old laws favor marriage with virgins, the privilege of the first-born and draw a sharp distinction between the sexual rights of women and men. ... The old custom of law which allowed the lord of the manor to sleep with every virgin first proves that the ancients knew that it is the man who is responsible for breeding the race upward.»

— JORG LANZ VON LIEBENFELS, «THEOZOOLOGY».


ADDENDVM: I SHOULD NOTE THAT MICROCHIMERIZATION OCCURS IN BOTH SEXES, IN ALL SPECIES, NOT ONLY IN HUMAN FEMALES.

>>13008943
>Okay but how does one subjugate those urges to virtuous affect

BY DISCERNING, VIA REASON, THE ESSENCE OF THE URGE: WHETHER IT IS SUBLIME, OR VILE.

AFTER DISCERNMENT IT IS ONLY A PROBLEM OF ETHICAL VOLITION TO REJECT, AND SUBDUE, VILE URGES, NOT WITH REPRESSION, BUT WITH SUPPRESSION, FOR SUBLATION, AND SUBLIMATION.

SOME INDIVIDUALS ARE CAPABLE OF DOING THIS IN INTUITIVE MANNER, WITH NO METHODICAL PRACTICE, OR EVEN WITH NO RATIONAL MEDIATION, BUT, I PRESUME THAT YOU ARE NOT ONE OF THOSE INDIVIDUALS, THEREFORE, I RECOMMEND TO YOU: «SPIRITUAL EXERCISES» BY SAN IGNACIO DE LOYOLA.

>>13008907

DEFINE: «COMING BACK».

>>13008475

BOOKS ARE UNNECESSARY TO SUBJUGATE BIOPHYSICAL URGES TO JUST REASON, AND TO VIRTUOUS AFFECT.

ARE WE HUMAN, OR ARE WE DANCER?

>>13001845

THE POSTER ABOVE THE REPLY TO WHICH I AM REPLYING MAY BE PARTIALLY CORRECT; IT IS PROBABLE THAT YOUR THYROID GLAND IS HYPOACTIVE, BUT DO NOT INGEST SO MUCH ORANGE, ESPECIALLY EVERY DAY, ESPECIALLY WHEN IT IS ONLY A REMEDY, NOT A SOLUTION; THE SOLUTION TO HYPOTHYROIDISM IS AN IODINE ONE: DAILY INGEST ONE TO TWO DROPS OF IDONIDE SOLUTION AT TWO PERCENT CONCENTRATION, DISSOLVED IN A LITER OF WATER.

YOU ARE PROBABLY MALNOURISHED.

YOU ARE FEELING THE BLEAKNESS OF THE BEACH OF EXCELLENCE, BUT A MERE BREEZE, SINCE OCEANIC TERMINVS STILL CLAMOURS AND WAVES FOR THE HERO.

>>13001112

YOU IGNORE WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY.

>>13001083

BECAUSE: (1) «DARK MATTER» IS A SPURIOUS CONCEPT FABRICATED BY PSEUDOSCIENTISTS, AND (2) «DARK MATTER» IS A CONCEPT THAT PERTAINS TO SCIENTISM, AND TO SOPHISTRY, NOT TO SCIENCE, AND NOR TO PHILOSOPHY.

>>13000682

«THE WHERE»: MEDIUM IS PRESUMED, LOCATION IS OBVIATED, BEING REDUCED TO PARTICULAR, VAGUE, PLACES —EXEMPLI GRATIA: «THE PARK», «THE OFFICE», «HOME», ET CETERA.

«THE FROM WHERE»: FROM BED, FROM THE KITCHEN, FROM SCHOOL, FROM THE TOILET, FROM WHAT CITY, FROM WHAT STATE, FROM WHAT COUNTRY, FROM WHAT CONTINENT, ET CETERA.

«THE HOW»: VIA MOBILE DEVICE, VIA STATIONARY DEVICE, VIA SOCIAL NETWORK, VIA PAPER, ET CETERA.

IN THE TWENTYFIRST CENTURY, WHAT IS RELEVANT IS NOT «THE WHERE», BUT, RATHER, «THE FROM WHERE», AND «THE HOW».

>>13000593

1. YOU MEAN «UNITEDSTATES», NOT «AMERICA» —QVOD VIDE: IMAGE ATTACHED TO THIS POST.

2. THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF QUAINT TOWNS IN UNITEDSTATES.

>>13000478

>[S · O · Y] MEXICANO, COMPAÑERO.

>>13000472

ONIONS MEXICANO, COMPAÑERO.

>>13000227
>Sex is not evil.

THE CAUSE FOR THAT IS THAT NONENTITIES CANNOT BE GOOD, OR EVIL; SEX IS NOT AN ENTITY, BUT AN ACT.

SEX IS MALIGN, BECAUSE IT IS THE SOULEXHAUSTING, SPIRITDISSIPATING, URGE IMPLANTED ON HUMANS BY THE DEMIOURGOS, WITH THE INTENTION OF IMPAIRING THE TRANSCENDENT POWER OF THE SOUL, AND WITH THE PURPOSE OF INDUCING THE REPRODUCTION OF FLESHVESSELS.

>The consummation of a marriage is sex, it is the logical conclusion of it.

THE CONSUMMATION OF MARRIAGE IS METAPHYSICAL, NOT PHYSICAL; IT CONSISTS IN MAKING ONE'S PARTNER LIKE ONE, AND ONE LIKE ONE'S PARTNER, SO THAT THE TWO CAN BE ONE.

COITUS SEPARATES; MARRIAGE INTEGRATES.

>Sure sex isn't a sacrament, but it's the reason people get married, to have sex and have children.

THE KIND OF PEOPLE TO WHICH YOU REFER CONSISTS OF DEMIOURGIC AUTOMATA, BUT, FORTUNATELY, NOT ALL HUMANS ARE SOULLESS FLESHVESSELS.