/lit/ - Literature

>>21575313


THAT IS PREEXILE L C SENECA.

>>20370964


NEVER DEBATE IDIOTS; YOU MISSED THE MORE IMPORTANT, IMPLICIT ARGUMENT.

ALL THE ONES THAT I LIKE.

>>20328117


1. YOU MEAN: «IDEA», NOT: «CONCEPT».

2. STEALING, AND LYING, ARE SINS, BUT THEY ARE NOT THE ONLY ONES.

3. «WALKING BRUTALLY OVER THE LIFE OF ANOTHER», WHILST OBLIVIOUS, IS A LESSER SIN IN COMPARISON TO LYING, OR TO STEALING, SINCE THESE LATTER ENTAIL CONSCIOUSNESS OF THE ACT, AND CONSENT TO ITS ENACTMENT, WHILST THE FORMER, AS IT IS SPECIFIED, IS DONE WHILST NOT BEING CONSCIOUS OF THE ACT: THE FORMER WOULD BE VENIAL; THE LATTER: MORTAL, IF THE DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE STEALING, OR THE LYING, IS PARTICULARLY GRAVE.

>SURNAME IS: «BROWN».

>FECAL MATTER IS BROWN.

>HAS PUBLISHED FOUR BOOKS.

>BOOKS ARE PRINTED ON PAPER.

>ONE USES ROLLS MADE OF PAPER TO WIPE ONE'S INTERGLUTEAL CLEFT.


IT IS AKIN TO POESY...

>>19712512


STARE BACK UNTIL SHE BREAKS EYE CONTACT; SAY NOTHING, DO NOT MOVE FROM MY PLACE; SHE SHOULD BE THE ONE TO OPEN; MY TASK IS CLOSURE.

>>19703151


INSERT YOUR SUPPOSITORY.

PHŒNICIANS WERE MERCHANTS, AND RAIDERS, NOT POETS.

I REWARD MYSELF WITH ONE PAGE FOR EVERY TWELVE HOURS OF BROWSEPOSTING; SOMETIMES I REDEEM THEM SOONER, AND READ HALF A PAGE.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS: «MAGICAL REALISM».

WHY READ OTHERS' JEWISH HOLOCAUST STORIES WHEN YOU COULD WRITE YOUR OWN?

BRIEF, TO AN IMPORTANT PERSON, MAYBE FUNNY.

>>19697653
>Would it be bad if an artist's muse was a child?

1. WHY WOULD IT BE BAD?

2. DEFINE: «BAD».


>Are child muses even allowed?

I WAS NOT AWARE THAT THERE IS A «MUSE COMMITTEE».

ESTUDIA, Y LEE,

MIENTRAS QUE COME, Y BEBE,

QUIEN NECIO Y CERDO.


« 零 »

>>19696732


1. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS: «WESTERN ART MUSIC» [SIC].

2. THE ILLUSTRISTIC EPOCH COMPREHENDS FROM THE LATTER THIRD OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY TO THE FIRST QUARTER OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY; «CLASSICAL» IS A MISNOMER.

>>19696711
>... no one will ever give a shit [...] and still call only us America[...][.] [SIC]


THAT MAY BE SO, BECAUSE MOST INDIVIDUALS ON EARTH ARE IDIOTIC, BUT THAT DOES NOT MAKE IT CORRECT, APT, OR FACTUAL.

>>19696583

>>19696644
>... we all know what he meant[.]


I KNOW WHAT HE MEANT, WHICH IS WHY I CORRECTED HIM.

>>19695870


JOHANN SEBASTIAN BACH IS BAROQUE, NOT «CLASSICAL» (ILLUSTRIST).

>SURNAME IS: «BROWN».

>FECAL MATTER IS BROWN.

>HAS PUBLISHED FOUR BOOKS.

>BOOKS ARE PRINTED ON PAPER.

>ONE USES ROLLS MADE OF PAPER TO WIPE ONE'S INTERGLUTEAL CLEFT.


IT IS AKIN TO POESY...

>>19695402


BECAUSE YOU ARE IGNORANT.

THERE IS NO GREATNESS ANYMORE.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS «ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE».

>>19690952