[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.3223959 [View]

>>3223958
>Magazine's.
I'm so sorry for that.

>> No.3223958 [View]

>>3222797
What field?
What bothers you most about popular science?
For me it's that most of their articles are about things which have not happened yet and are pure speculation.
I prefer to read magazine's like Wired which have interesting, well researched in-depth articles about current events.

>> No.3223940 [View]

>>3223910
I'm answering based on things people might reply with.
It's not specifically meant for you.
By the way, would you have said those things if I hadn't preemptively responded to them?

>> No.3223869 [View]

>>3223836
Why are they making those changes?
>Because they are self aware.
So they would act differently if not self aware?
>Yes.
It's not free will then.
It's just another form of stimulus.
>But it comes from the person making the decisions.
It still can't be controlled by them,
you can't really control what you think,
just how you interpret it.

>> No.3223825 [View]

>>3223815
>Discussions
Decisions

>> No.3223823 [View]

Bradbury's short stories are always good.

>> No.3223815 [View]

No, your discussions are made based on stimuli, therefore stimuli controls you.

Yes, I don't like them.

>> No.3212198 [View]
File: 982 KB, 1920x2560, III.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3212198

>>3212110
I can help with cummings.

>> No.3204406 [View]

>>3203111
His short stories, in a twilight zone type format.
Specifically "Bang you're dead" and "The smiling people"

>> No.3196467 [View]

Bu)(Mp

>> No.3194489 [View]
File: 1.21 MB, 2560x1920, II.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3194489

e.e. cummi ngs.

>> No.3190115 [View]

>>3190104
All agree with you there.
Because i just don't like it, but I have no complaints other than that.
Thank you for being the first one to present an argument that wasn't merely
I'm right and you're wrong.

>> No.3190094 [View]

>>3190082
>Avatar
>Writing
>Depth

>Ghost in the Shell,
>Flashy visual with no depth.

>> No.3190086 [View]

>>3190070
Prometheus Bound IS the backstory.
It's part of a trilogy.

>Shelly (the modern Prometheus)
>Nope, it's pretty vague and skips over stuff all the times.
Imagine how vague it would be if everything was
>Implied.

>> No.3190072 [View]

>>3190053
>Keep calm and blank.
Mind the gap.

>>3190054
Thats why I put "Anime" in "Quotation marks",
>Implying I was saying it sarcastically.
The american part of it is the worst one.
>It's all american.
I know.

>> No.3190059 [View]

>>3190046
>Aeschylus (Prometheus Bound)
>Bradbury (sometimes in his short stories, but at least he doesn't hint at it and nothing else like a kid yelling "I'M NOT TOUCHING YOU")
>Shelly (the modern Prometheus)
>Camus (The Plague)

>> No.3190047 [View]
File: 61 KB, 500x281, 4468410190_09b3ef8664.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3190047

>>3190024
No, I didn't miss it.
I'm very well aware of that "Anime" and it's sequel.
Grow up and watch something decent.

>> No.3190042 [View]

>>3190011
What I read?
Alright, I'll go there.
But that means you have to bring what you read into the argument,
agreed?
>Aeschylus
>Bradbury (most of his short stories)
>Shelly
>Camus (Plague>the stranger)
>Alberts (molecular biology of the cell, 5th edition)
>Cummings.

Thats my list of recent authors.
Now you.
>If it was for school, it doesn't count.

>> No.3190005 [View]

>>3189990
Cartoon's aren't seen as mature because they aren't.
They were mature, but now they're more immature than ever.

>> No.3189994 [View]

>>3189978
>Wacky and mature.
Not at all angst filler and socially awkward, as if it was made to appeal to a certain group of people.

>> No.3189979 [View]

>>3189974
Now you know what it's like to argue with one of your kind.

>> No.3189976 [View]

>>3189935
You're so right about that!
Characters should never have any concrete details.
>And when everything is implied, but it still understand it, I feel smart.

>> No.3189965 [View]

>>3189932
You're right. I've just been some ignorant old man, while you young adults are the future of the world, which will never change until people like me learn to not judge things so much.
I was so wrong to think Adventure Time was immature, I was clearly wrong about it being a show spawned from reddit and designed to systematically produce memes.

>> No.3189945 [View]

>>3189910
>Ah, I've wounded you! I will relent.
Wow, you're so talented at literature, you can talk just like shakespeare. I'll bet you can quote hamlet from memory.

I really was wrong, you gave an example that is an entire episode long. Those Adventure Time writers sure must be invested in their characters, to make a whole episode that does nothing but imply things through a photograph and a vague letter. I don't know what they were implying, but that's because it's just so deep. I'm sure you understand it, because you're just naturally smart.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]